Gettin' tired of this "Anniversary" mentality...
I think the anniversary mentality has partly come about because PR departments are there to think of ways to market things. Anniversaries are just the easiest way to work with catalogue titles for them, I think. I think it might also help them wrap their heads around how to release a catalogue of several decades worth of great and worthwhile movies.
It sucks so bad, though.
The ten year anniversary of The Thin Red Line was last year.
Citizen Kane has a big one in 2011, and the morons at studio PR have said they're releasing it in that year, for that reason.
And your Lawrence and Kwai examples are banes of my existence. Lawrence is my favourite widescreen film, my favourite colour film, my favourite epic film.
Releaselists.com has Lawrence (marked "tentative") in the US section for Dec 2009, but this may be out of date now.
Edited by Ben Cheshire - 9/21/09 at 3:58am
P.S Tarantino has finally bested Pulp Fiction.
But otherwise, I agree with the OP's sentiment.

On the other hand, I see lots of posts from fans saying that the studios need to release a Blu-ray to commemorate everything from the 30th anniversary of Apocalypse Now to the 25th anniversary of C.H.U.D. to the 5th anniversary of Ocean's Twelve. And even if a Blu-ray does come out in sync with an anniversary, it seems more like a coincidence than anything else.
There's Jessie the yodeling cowgirl. Bullseye, he's Woody's horse. Pete the old prospector. And, Woody, the man himself. Of course, it's time for Woody's RoundUp. He's the very best! He's the rootinest, tootinest cowboy in the wild, wild west!
Top Ten Ways to Find Good Deals on DVDs and Blu-ray...
Matrix: 10th Anniversary Edition
Braveheart: 25th Anniversary Edition (its subtitle in region B territories)
Reservoir Dogs: 10th Anniversary Edition
I think every catalogue title I own is an anniversary one except for the boutique label ones. :p
I'm waiting for Spiderman 3: 2 Year Anniversary Edition. Can you guys IMAGINE the reunion? Oh, wait, that's just Spiderman 4...
P.S Tarantino has finally bested Pulp Fiction.

. . . I fear that Sony is going to wait until 2012 to release these to take advantage of LAWRENCE's 50th anniversary and BRIDGE's 55th.
So, in other words, the premise of this thread is "fear". Not information about these titles, not direct experience in how marketing decisions are made, just . . . fear.
Studios release titles when they think they can best sell them. I've seen no evidence that anniversary dates have anything to do with it. Those are just monickers to stick on the cover and use as an advertising hook (like "new and improved"). It's much more likely that Sony is waiting for the installed base of Blu-ray players to hit a certain level.
Indeed, none of us has unlimited time. When each of us passes, there will be technological developments that we didn't get the opportunity to take advantage of, because they weren't yet available to the public. Such is life.
Ativan calms me when I see the bills.
These are a few of my favorite pills.
(Next to Normal) HTF Rules & Regs My 2009 Film List
Win cool stuff: www.hometheaterforum.com/contest for details!
--Michael Scott, The Office
"When I get sad I just stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story."
--Barney Stinson, How I Met Your Mother
You said it yourself, Michael: "studios release titles when they can best sell them."
I'd also suggest that a forum isn't just a place for press releases and inside info. You're right to point out that so far this is a thread about personal perspectives of movie buffs getting frustrated, not a press release about a probable upcoming release of whatever. But I'm sure we all knew that already.
Perhaps members like Dick and me sometimes make "I" statements here like "i wish I didn't have to wait till 2011 for Citizen Kane on Blu Ray" in hopes some insider might come along and say... Well, its funny you should say that, I was just chatting with Beatrice Welles last night, and she said she didn't believe in anniversaries had any effect on sales at all, and therefore had advised the studio to release the film on the 48th year after its theatrical release... Just for fun.
P.S Tarantino has finally bested Pulp Fiction.
I never "pointed out" any such thing.

Perhaps members like Dick and me sometimes make "I" statements here like "i wish I didn't have to wait till 2011 for Citizen Kane on Blu Ray" in hopes some insider might come along and say... Well, its funny you should say that, I was just chatting with Beatrice Welles last night, and she said she didn't believe in anniversaries had any effect on sales at all, and therefore had advised the studio to release the film on the 48th year after its theatrical release... Just for fun.
No one can stop you from hoping, but when you've been here longer than five minutes, you'll know that this scenario doesn't happen. When announcements get made, they're vetted and officially approved. Otherwise, no one says a word, because no one wants to lose their job.
Ativan calms me when I see the bills.
These are a few of my favorite pills.
(Next to Normal) HTF Rules & Regs My 2009 Film List
Win cool stuff: www.hometheaterforum.com/contest for details!
Fair point. Things are always different the fiftieth time you've been through it. However, as an at least ten year veteran of several other film forums, I, like you, have seen this kind of thing before, and I can relate to the feeling: I watch Lawrence of Arabia on SD and think "man this is good," then I think... "I wonder if any news has come about it on blu ray yet!" So we google around and, of course, nothing. (However, does anyone know why releaselists.com has this as tentative for Decemeber on its US page?) And aside from this kind of vague glimmer of hope, there's nothing, so we then do the next best thing: find threads where other people are just as looking forward to the release as us. And then we don't cry so much in our pillows at night till... God forbid... 2012...
P.S Tarantino has finally bested Pulp Fiction.
Warner might appear to be the only studio to care about such anniversaries, but studios like Fox and Disney have gone down that road too like the upcoming "Say Anything" 20th Anniversary or the released "Sleeping Beauty" 50th Anniversary BR releases. Even Universal and Lionsgate have released such Anniversary editions.
IMO, it's like Michael stated, it's a marketing tool, but studios are releasing their titles based on whether they can maximize sold units not some package marketing tool.
Crawdaddy
On the plus side: a film that's the studio's not willing to release may get a release if an important anniversary is coming, sometimes that will get a studio to greenlight a video release
LOL
I didnt play Dungeons and Dragons all those years and not learn something about courage.
--Bernie Faulkner
My DVD List at DVD Aficionado
I think you meant, "Such is Death."

Hehe... well that's one of those, "It's nice that people are different," things. I grant that there are a lot of people who like this "anniversary" stuff, and so they provide more than enough demand for the studios to provide it, but that doesn't mean I like all this emphasis on what I consider nothing more than a bunch of "old stuff". I take solace in the fact that putting together "old stuff" probably doesn't take that much, and surely doesn't take up the same resources that would otherwise be directed towards putting together "new stuff", such as remakes, reboots, and such. I'd far prefer to see someone take a new stab at a concept or a story than rewatch someone's old stab at it.
I agree, those anniversaries are getting annoying, especially when these editions don't contain any new special features or content.
Hi, everyone, I decided to sign up to this forum and post my first.
Hey Mike, thanks for the laughs!
cheers!
David
P.S Tarantino has finally bested Pulp Fiction.

Warner might appear to be the only studio to care about such anniversaries, but studios like Fox and Disney have gone down that road too like the upcoming "Say Anything" 20th Anniversary or the released "Sleeping Beauty" 50th Anniversary BR releases. Even Universal and Lionsgate have released such Anniversary editions.
IMO, it's like Michael stated, it's a marketing tool, but studios are releasing their titles based on whether they can maximize sold units not some package marketing tool.
Crawdaddy
The weird thing about Disney is that both Sleeping Beauty's and Lady and the Tramp's 50th anniversary editions were released when the movies weren't fifty years old. Which makes the entire point of an anniversary edition completely useless.
I also don't like why they're doing it. If it can be released, just release it. I can understand they want to build up expectations but it's getting out of hand.
Never go out with anyone who thinks Fellini is a type of cheese
My Blu-Ray/DVD Collection
It's great to be back.
I definitely agree on the preperation alot of the times. ALTHOUGH misfired Anniversary Editions were both Poltergeist and Beetlejuice in my own crazy opinion. I mean if you have an Anniversary Edition, it's far better to load it with extras relating to the film in question.
If I were a DVD producer, you bet I'd know which extras I'd make and damn great ones too.
It's great to be back.
In the case of Lawrence, the silence has been deafening. First it is previewed among the early Blu-ray release titles, then nothing. I have queried Mr. Harris about it in his Insider Forum but have not seen a response from him. Maybe he doesn't know anything about it, but I thought he might be one of the first to learn any news of it from Sony.
If Sony is doing a brand new transfer from an 8k scan then the wait will (should!) be well worth it. Hopefully that's the case here.

I definitely agree on the preperation alot of the times. ALTHOUGH misfired Anniversary Editions were both Poltergeist and Beetlejuice in my own crazy opinion. I mean if you have an Anniversary Edition, it's far better to load it with extras relating to the film in question.
If I were a DVD producer, you bet I'd know which extras I'd make and damn great ones too.
I believe the problem with Poltergeist is that when the film changed hands, MGM to Warner, the rights to most of the behind the scenes footage didn't go with the film. Of course they could do an all talking head making of, but that would be kinda boring.
Doug
Bob Hope in The Ghostbreakers




