Quote:
So, for me I guess there are two aspects to movie collecting that appeal to me. First the solitary nature of collecting which is made up of research, databases, etc. Second, the social nature of sharing the film experience with others.
As for the first, I used to have a spreadsheet with all my DVDs and the prices I paid for them to calculate my contribution to Reel.com's demise, but lost interest in that. The second reason is what has really survived. Having a nice collection is great for when you have friends or family over, you usually have instant access to something good they haven't seen that also fits the mood.
Quote:the next one I buy may be the next one I watch - it's not like there's an orderly date-stamped queue. There's a pleasure I get from the choices I have, even if I don't ever expect to choose them all.
Exactly! I use my collection to have many choices of movies I know are good spur of the moment entertainment. Adding titles keeps that selection fresh and varied, but also contributes to that perceived need to get titles on the shelf at increasing rates.
The number of Blu-rays I purchase has been cut in half because of high prices of many titles or the inability to get them outside of a box set or expensive collector's edition. I am usually a bit outspoken, including now, about how some studios have started raking consumers over the coals with these practices, but it has gotten me to take a look at why I
really collect and what I
really need to have in my collection to satisfy those reasons. I have found I can cut back quite a bit without any perceived loss in the collection's ability to serve its purpose.