*** Official TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN Discussion Thread
When I saw Dead Man's Chest a few years ago, I was sure it would drop off the following weekend and sink like a stone, but it persevered.
I have a feeling this will continue too, but I hope I'm wrong.
Universal, please release Streets of Fire on Blu-ray.
I read an article the other day that said in a poll 95% of people leaving the movie said it was as good or better than the first. It's going to make money, get over it and calm down.

Well I'm sure it will drop somewhat, but I doubt it will be enough to satisfy the need of so many on this forum. Seems many of you are way to invested in a film you don't like.
I read an article the other day that said in a poll 95% of people leaving the movie said it was as good or better than the first. It's going to make money, get over it and calm down.
Yep. I hated it but I don't care if it makes $700 million or it never makes another dime. That being said, it's going to be the or one of the biggest hits of the year no matter what I think.
i just saw this and thought the same thing. both Transformers and PotC are way too long and have over-complicated stories with "plot developments" that take place waaay past the point where the audience cares. it's like the writers are confusing quality with quantity. yet i still have to hand it to the writers. there are crap stories that bomb and there are crap stories that make bucks, and they wrote a crap story that made bucks.
i don't understand why they couldn't just make it a simple machine monster story. something along the line of Aliens or Jurassic Park, where the main story is just 'get the hell out of there' and have simple minor plot developments along the way that might hinder/help them. there's still a lot of action that could spring from that.
"now, if that's a fact, tell me... am i lying?"

Well I'm sure it will drop somewhat, but I doubt it will be enough to satisfy the need of so many on this forum. Seems many of you are way to invested in a film you don't like.
I read an article the other day that said in a poll 95% of people leaving the movie said it was as good or better than the first. It's going to make money, get over it and calm down.
I'm calm. Just bummed that such a giant turd can rake it in. That's all.
Universal, please release Streets of Fire on Blu-ray.
Submit
First, this isn't directed (maybe it is, but shoudn't be) at kids. This is derived from a cartoon that came out 25 years ago. It's directed at 30-somethings. Don't like the dialogue? Good, the adults in the crowd don't want your kids there any more than you want them to hear it.
Second, this is a movie designed to be fun and relatively mindless. Anyone expecting anything else needs to read the title of the movies they stumble into.
Third, the "racism" thing is old. Really, really old. Anyone that thinks that some people don't talk like the robot brothers is either a super-lib, or is firmly ensconced in the milktoast suburbs where they aren't typically exposed to anyone other than white folks.
Done. Everyone relax and try to enjoy the movie.

A few things about this movie.
First, this isn't directed (maybe it is, but shouldn't be) at kids. This is derived from a cartoon that came out 25 years ago. It's directed at 30-somethings. Don't like the dialog? Good, the adults in the crowd don't want your kids there any more than you want them to hear it.
If you think this movie is directed at 30 year olds, I implore you to take a walk down the toy aisle in any department store. You'll see Transformers figures, masks, bed spreads, towels, backpacks and lunchboxes.
I don't know how many 30 year olds are too keen on having any of that stuff.
Also, to your point about a movie that is supposed to fun and relatively mindless - that does not excuse BAD filmmaking. The lack of story, non-existent character arcs and a dreadful length are just some of the things wrong here. Something like last summer's Iron Man was light and, for the most part, mindless. But it was a good film with a tight script and solid acting. There's a difference. The whole "it's a popcorn movie" argument is often thrown around to excuse a movie's flaws, but there's just too much wrong with Revenge of the Fallen to even begin.
Universal, please release Streets of Fire on Blu-ray.
First, this isn't directed (maybe it is, but shoudn't be) at kids
Im sure Hasbro would disagree! This should be the primary audience for the film. I am all for making it enjoyable for adults too but the main market for this should surely be the 5 year old-11 year olds.
Michael Bay knows how to make mindless fun action movies - he has done so before. But not here!
My DVD collectionhttp://www.intervocative.com/dvdcoll....aspx/simassey
When you walk through a storm, hold your head up high, And don't be afraid of the dark.
At the end of a storm, there's a golden cloud, and the sweet silver song of a lark,
Walk on through the wind, Walk on through the rain,...

Third, the "racism" thing is old. Really, really old. Anyone that thinks that some people don't talk like the robot brothers is either a super-lib, or is firmly ensconced in the milktoast suburbs where they aren't typically exposed to anyone other than white folks.
You're right, it's not racism- it's a stereotype. I've managed to be exposed to more than just white people so I know there's many people that act exactly like that. That doesn't mean that the movie should perpetuate that stereotype though.

If you think this movie is directed at 30 year olds, I implore you to take a walk down the toy aisle in any department store. You'll see Transformers figures, masks, bed spreads, towels, backpacks and lunchboxes.
I don't know how many 30 year olds are too keen on having any of that stuff.
Also, to your point about a movie that is supposed to fun and relatively mindless - that does not excuse BAD filmmaking. The lack of story, non-existent character arcs and a dreadful length are just some of the things wrong here. Something like last summer's Iron Man was light and, for the most part, mindless. But it was a good film with a tight script and solid acting. There's a difference. The whole "it's a popcorn movie" argument is often thrown around to excuse a movie's flaws, but there's just too much wrong with Revenge of the Fallen to even begin.
(How the heck do you quote only part of a post now?)
Re: the part about the toys etc, there's a whole group pf people out there that want those things, they're called nerds and i'm proudly one of them.

I know, I'm the same way with the G.I. Joe re-issues.

Universal, please release Streets of Fire on Blu-ray.
The toy department might not but I can guarentee you that the toy company does. It would be a fool to market only to children when it should know that in this day and age those figures are highly loved by young and old.
I've never seen toy commercials in a non-kids show, and I've never seen 30 year olds wandering around the toy dept. (unless, of course, they were parents).

Seriously, there's a whole market that gears action figures and toys towards 20 and 30 somethings, companies like Sideshow, Gentle Giant, McFarlane Toys and NECA are just some examples and to a lesser extent Hasbro.
Look at how toys and figures have evolved over the years from simple twists in the original generation 1 toys to very complex transformations of the new designs (shit, you need a degree in engeneering to transform the Ultimate Bumblebee figure!), that's for us, the detail oriented individuals who want as close of a replica of the character that we can possibly get in plastic form.
Children certaintly don't really care that a toy looks exactly like the one in the film, they just want something cool to play with from the movie, that extra level of detail is for a mature buyer who does desire that and this case we get the best of both worlds, we get cool toys for kids to play with and we also get the level of detail to satisfy the older collectors.
That's where we come in so yes I do believe that this stuff is geared towards older people as well, the commercials may not out right say it but it's obvious to me anyway.
Edited by Inspector Hammer! - 7/6/2009 at 10:46 pm GMT
Edited by Inspector Hammer! - 7/6/2009 at 10:48 pm GMT
It's not really any different from plastic model kits.
Besides, Hasbro'd be dumb not to at least partially target the people who grew up on Transformers in the 1980sThey have a nostalgia for the toyline but want something more complex.
i am quite sure that the market share for that demographic is quite small given the entire scope of what a toy company like hasbro has projected in toy sales.
the types of toys that many of you are referring to are a niche market at best. kind of like the equipment that many of us run is niche and a very small part of the overall ht market.
this movie failed to be kid friendly. although i am quite sure that hasbro had every intent to sell as many toys as possible to the kids that did endure this movie. but lets not be ridiculous and think that hasbro or mcfarlane toys is banking on millions of adults to buy complex niche market toys in order to pad their bottom line. in this country, generally speaking, toys and comics are for kids. if this were japan i might give someone a little more leeway in that argument.
and this is coming from someone who still reads comics and manga.
listen with your own ears...
watch with your own eyes...
make your own decision.
_______________________________________
Not to go too off topic, I agree that the perception of comic books is that they're for kids but I think the reality is that comics priced kids out of the market 15 years ago. Now with all the entertainment choices and $3 to $4 price tags, you're never going to get kids to return to comics. Whenever I go to the comic book store, a kid's about as likely as a girl- you'll see one every now and then but it's a rarity.

My DVD collectionhttp://www.intervocative.com/dvdcoll....aspx/simassey
When you walk through a storm, hold your head up high, And don't be afraid of the dark.
At the end of a storm, there's a golden cloud, and the sweet silver song of a lark,
Walk on through the wind, Walk on through the rain,...
I don't know where he is coming from but I think most of the stuff that someone would find inappropriate for a kid would fly right past them (is a kid really going to get a robot testicles 'joke'?). I'm certainly not telling anyone what is and isn't appropriate for their children but I don't think there's much difference between the two movies so if he's seen the first one, he might as well be allowed to see the second one as well.

I don't know where he is coming from but I think most of the stuff that someone would find inappropriate for a kid would fly right past them (is a kid really going to get a robot testicles 'joke'?). I'm certainly not telling anyone what is and isn't appropriate for their children but I don't think there's much difference between the two movies so if he's seen the first one, he might as well be allowed to see the second one as well.
I let both my kids see the first and they both saw the second one. I liked them both but I think the second one had a lot more profanity. There are many people I know that would not be comfortable letting their 5 -10 year old kids watch this movie. I know, I know. "It says it is PG-13" -- I call bullshit on that because this is aimed at children. Don't believe me? Watch Spongebob and see how many commercials you see for it.
The Legend is better than reality!
My DVD collectionhttp://www.intervocative.com/dvdcoll....aspx/simassey
When you walk through a storm, hold your head up high, And don't be afraid of the dark.
At the end of a storm, there's a golden cloud, and the sweet silver song of a lark,
Walk on through the wind, Walk on through the rain,...
The Legend is better than reality!
It was the obscenely long final battle that made the film drag out. They could have eliminated the whole Constructicon portion of the battle and a couple of the robots-punching-robots shots and it would have been just about right.
I'm not sure its fair to equate a toy line with the movie itself. There has always been ancillary merchandise available for younger audiences than the primary product has been targeted for, long before any Transformers movies.
I agree the final battle did go on a bit but it made up for the fact there wasn't that much action in the rest of the film, considering it's Michael Bay and 150mins long, so I can't really complain about it.
The Chinese have gone nuts over the film, it's beaten Titanic as the highest grossing film ever -
"Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" surpassed the 11-year-old record of 360 million yuan set by "Titanic," spokesman Weng Li at the China Film Group, one of the country's two film importers, told The Associated Press. "Titanic" made about $43 million based on exchange rates in 1998, the year it was released.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090717/ap_en_mo/as_china_transformers2_7
And the film has so far grossed $727m in 22 days, according to Box Office Mojo.
- Joined: August 2000
- Location: BritCol. North of a Black Hole and West of The Centre of the...
- Post Count: 3,850
The big fight scene was long, but I didn't mind it so much because I felt like I needed some sort of pay off for having to endure Bay's infantile sense of humour. The fight at the end at least delivered in that respect.
When you have to shoot...shoot. Don't talk!


