Quote:
Originally Posted by
Traveling Matt 
A licensing situation shouldn't cloud the trail. The end result is that edited episodes stand in place of full episodes, which is unacceptable with or without licensees.
It may be that simple or not. Unfortunately, they rarely let the consumer know what is going on. Too bad DVD's don't fall under the same scrutiny for labeling as some other products. As such, I can sort of understand their reluctance to acknowledge such issues if they don't have to for fear of scaring away potential sales for something the average consumer might not notice. However, full disclosure in a forum such as this couldn't hurt if the results had some justification. At least it would remove any inaccurate speculation.
Anyone that has seen the latest Star Trek TOS and watched the extra on the remastering process knows what can be done if the potential revenue is high enough. Now not many vintage shows fall into that category (luckily some don't need the same level of restoration).
So when we end up with results that are less then expected, one has to wonder if someone unnecessarily dropped the ball, someone was being too cheap, or if what we got was justified based on what was available and the expected revenue to make it worth even attempting.
In this case, the prints seem acceptable and no known music replacements (that I know of), but some cut episodes included. If there was a reasonable reason for cut episodes, such as the originals have been lost or were in such bad shape as to be unpresentable or too costly to restore then it would circumvent a lot of bad press if they would just come clean from the get go, and may even garner some respect for what was received.
While I think they do just screw up sometimes, I also think they may be justified in others. Of course they rarely seem to open up about anything of this nature so it's always hard to know which it is. So the speculation continues.