Home Theater Forum  ›  Forums  ›  Hi-Definition  ›  HT Software - High Definition  ›  High Def Disc Review Archives  ›  HTF BD REVIEW: The Robe - Special Edition

HTF BD REVIEW: The Robe - Special Edition

#1
Rating: 0


Blu-ray Disc Review





ronsreviews_covers_14433680.jpg

THE ROBE
SPECIAL EDITION


Distributed by: 20th Century Fox
Film Year: 1953
Film Length: 134 minutes
Genre: Drama

Aspect Ratio: 2.55:1
Colour/B&W: Colour

BD Specifications:
Resolution: 1080/24p
Video Codec: AVC @ 21MBPS
Disc Size: BD-50

Audio:
  • English DTS 5.1 HD Master Audio
  • English Dolby Digital 4.0 Surround
  • French Dolby Digital 1.0 Mono
  • Portuguese Dolby Digital 1.0 Mono

    Subtitles: English SDH, Spanish, Portuguese, Thai, Cantonese, Mandarin, Korean
    Film Rating: Unrated







Release Date: March 17, 2009.


Rating: /

Starring: Richard Burton (Marcellus Gallio), Jean Simmons (Diana), Victor Mature (Demetrius)

Screenplay by: Albert Maltz & Philip Dunne
Directed by: Henry Koster



The Robe is a fictional story about a Roman Centurion whose life changed after he crucified Christ and won his robe in a gambling game at the foot of the cross. His guilt overcomes him as he is sent on a mission to investigate Christ’s followers as a merchant and search for to destroy the robe that cursed him. In his journey he learns about peace and forgiveness that contradict the views of the Roman Empire and the evil Emperor Caligula. Many people to this day wonder what happened to the robe Christ wore when he died. This film is based on the novel of what the author thought of could be a good story as to what happened to the robe.

The film was nominated for five Academy Awards including Best Picture, Actor, Costume Design in colour, Art Direction in colour) and won the last two.


VIDEO QUALITY: 3.5/5

Much effort has been placed in the restoration of The Robe. Past editions of the film have not looked too good, and now that good restoration tools are available, The Robe received the treatment it needed. The result is an image that is respectable. The conditions of elements vary and the very good surviving pieces tend to show the known technical limitations of the anamorphic lens used for this film. Based on the featurettes on this BD, The Robe didn’t get one of the sharpest anamorphic lenses. While resolution is good, it wasn’t as sharp as the second Cinemascope feature How to Marry a Millionaire. Image contrast and colour check out ok with these elements but dupes appear dimmer and not as naturally saturated. What is also noticeable about the lens is the distortion at the far edges and in the middle; the image gets skinny to the sides and fatter in the middle. When viewing the 4:3 full screen version as a comparison, one can see that Richard Burton’s face is probably more accurate, but of course you lose the scope of the widescreen presentation (the 4:3 version with mono audio can only be viewed in the smaller BonusView window and not separately). Note that this is the original photography for the film, and a great amount of effort has been placed in restoring The Robe and one will appreciate the work completed here.


AUDIO QUALITY: 3/5

At one time the sound has been repurposed for 5.1. My guess is that this had to have been a 6-channel recording in its day: five channels across the front, one in the rear. Dialogue is very directional and is placed with the actors on screen. The effect works wonders for those with large screens and a wide speaker spread, or even better – with speakers behind the screen (in my opinion too much video resolution is lost with the latter because of perforation). I like this technique because it’s much better than restricting dialogue to the center channel only. The directional dialogue of The Robe, it’s not always stable; every now and then dialogue wavers back and forth in a floating space, say, between center and 75% left. Its movement doesn’t always correspond with movement on screen. It sort of takes me out of the moment. At other times imaging is good, although my center speaker is placed below the tweeters of my mains, the phantom image was shifted down slightly.

Another strange effect is how dialogue at 100% left and 100% right isn’t always exactly “hard” left and right. Its phase is different…rather than coming from the precise speaker location, the voice seems to float in front of me on that axis, exactly half the distance between the speaker and I (about 5 feet from me). It’s like a third dimension in sound but rather being placed far back into the soundstage, it’s forward and almost in my face. The music and sound effects don’t appear to be affected by this oddity.

The original sound design sounds fairly good in terms of design, but the soundtrack does not have the warm, thick sound we hear more and more as soundtracks continue to evolve. Lacking a nice round bottom end makes The Robe feel thin, weak, and in need of a little fattening. Listening to The Robe can be a bit sibilant at high volumes. Alfred Newman’s score has some directionality with channels, but I found it based too much in the center channel. If my center speaker was placed behind the screen, it may have been a bit better, but I prefer music from left and right channels only with 100% phantom imaging.

TACTILE FUN!!: 0/5 ZERO

TRANSDUCER ON/OFF?: OFF

I didn’t notice anything in the LFE channel. If there was it was too subtle. Use of a bass shaker is unnecessary.


SPECIAL FEATURES: 4/5


Many of the features here are about Fox’s use of Cinemascope for this film. Since it was the first Cinemascope film, devoting time to this topic is not a mistake. I found the features well organized and very informing and worth the watch. It was sometimes tough to skip through these educational spots. My only complaint is the menu to navigate these features; it’s hard to read on the film when overlaid. I also found using the left and right arrows a bit bothersome when going into submenus, I sometimes hit the wrong arrow key repeatedly based on how I thought the key should have functioned.

  • Introduction by Martin Scorsese - about the use of Cinemascope
  • Commentary with film composer David Newman and Film Historian Jon Burlingame, Julie Kirgo and Nick Redman
  • Isolated Score: The Music of the Robe – Alfred Newman’s Score in 5.1 (most music, some absent)
  • The Making of the Robe featurette (HD, 31:23)
  • The Cinemascope Story featurette (HD, 18:39)
  • From Scripture to Script: The Bible and Hollywood featurette (HD, 24:39)
  • Audio Interview with Screenwriter Philip Dunne (1969) (audio only, 22:33)

  • BONUSView Picture in Picture - a comparison of widescreen and standard version. It is introduced as a different version of the film, with different takes and different lines, and I caught this while watching it before even knowing the full frame version was a different version. For example in Chapter 15, 1:37:37 face Marcipor is seen less and the folds on Diana’s dress are different. A little more image can be seen on the top and bottom of frame too.

  • BONUSView Picture in Picture - A Seamless Faith: The Real-Life Search for The Robe interactive featurette (SD 1.78:1, 38:08) – the ten segments of this feature can be played through the film or independently. With various historians, scholars, and linguists, they discuss the real life search of the robe and who claims to have it today.

  • Advertising the Robe includes vintage celebrity introductions (SD 4:3 1m35), five Fox Movietonewes spots (SD 4:3), Trailers and TV spots (SD widescreen), interactive press book, poster gallery, lobby cards, publicity stills (all in HD).


    IN THE END...

    The Robe is not one of my favourite films in the history of cinema, but it is a pivotal success for Fox’s continued success, the fight against television, and the continuation of widescreen films in the years to come. Fox’s work on this film is good and the result is a large step above what was available in the past. The film did have its technical limitations at the time and inconsistencies can be seen on this disc, but the final result is a good job that is a pleasure to view.

    Michael Osadciw
    March 30, 2009.

    Review System

Warner Bros. Blu-ray Reviewer
Anchor Bay/Starz Entertainment Blu-ray Reviewer

THX/ISF Professional Video Calibrator
HIGHEST FIDELITY CALIBRATIONSServing Southern Ontariothehighestfidelity@hotmail.com

Export to Wiki
#2
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BD REVIEW: The Robe - Special Edition

"How to Marry A Millionaire" was shot with the same CinemaScope lenses as "The Robe". The sharpness differences were not due to any learning curve, I'm pretty certain, since the former was shot before the latter. Possibly, the studio lights in a modern setting did the trick toward the sharpness you note. Leon Shamroy's photography on "The Robe" tended to strive toward "source" lighting for an effect that lends an authenticity to the antiquity of the story, IMO.
Export to Wiki
#3
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BD REVIEW: The Robe - Special Edition

"My guess is that this had to have been a 6-channel recording in its day: five channels across the front, one in the rear. "

I don't think The Robe was ever released in 70mm. 35mm CinemaScope was 4-channel, three across the front and one in the rear.

Roland Lataille
Cinerama web site:
http://cineramahistory.com

Export to Wiki
#4
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BD REVIEW: The Robe - Special Edition

Hence the 4.0 track included as a feature.

\"My opinion is that (a) anyone who actually works in a video store and does not understand letterboxing has given up on life, and (b) any customer who prefers to have the sides of a movie hacked off should not be licensed to operate a video player.\"-- Roger Ebert

Export to Wiki
#5
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BD REVIEW: The Robe - Special Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by RolandL
". 35mm CinemaScope was 4-channel, three across the front and one in the rear.

So it was, although you will never know it from this otherwise excellent release.Where is the 4th rear or effects track as it was called at the time? Today it is called surround. There is simply no use of this track in the "restoration".Has it been lost?
When I first saw a mag print, I clearly remember thunder rolling around the theatre during the crucifixion.Only the odd echo here. Did no one realise? Did anyone care? This film would have been a showcase for "surround"in 1953. Fox would hardly have gone to the trouble to get exhibitors to install speakers around the auditorium at considerable expense and then not use it.

It's a shame that Schawn Belston is not around now to answer these questions.
Export to Wiki
#6
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BD REVIEW: The Robe - Special Edition

I think this incarnation shows THE ROBE as I've never seen it before....more than acceptable, clear and full of interesting special features, including an especially interesting commentary track.
True, when you view the standard version "picture in picture", you can see much more vibrant color, far less muddy than the Cinemascope version.
All in all, a very successful release.
Export to Wiki
#7
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BD REVIEW: The Robe - Special Edition

This movie certainly looks odd. No actual reds in the movie. Was that intended? The Roman soldiers' capes and helmet feathers are brown.

I guess it's the best it has looked in a long time, but I could hardly watch it.
Export to Wiki
#8
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BD REVIEW: The Robe - Special Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Virgoan
"How to Marry A Millionaire" was shot with the same CinemaScope lenses as "The Robe". The sharpness differences were not due to any learning curve, I'm pretty certain, since the former was shot before the latter. Possibly, the studio lights in a modern setting did the trick toward the sharpness you note. Leon Shamroy's photography on "The Robe" tended to strive toward "source" lighting for an effect that lends an authenticity to the antiquity of the story, IMO.
According to the CinemaScope documentary on THE ROBE, this film did get a poorer lens than HOW TO MARRY A MILLIONAIRE.

Fox signed with Henri Chretien for the rights to his anamorphic process. Although they were in the public domain, Fox signed because they would have immediate access to Chretien's lenses. They were not geometrically exactly the same as the documentary pointed out. THE ROBE got the poorest one.

How can you verify that THE ROBE was shot with the very same lenses?
Export to Wiki
#9
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BD REVIEW: The Robe - Special Edition

I don't remember that distinction being made. I know that "The Robe" was intended to be the big picture of the year for Fox and that Fox intended to release it first even though "How to Marry A Millionaire" was finished first. I guess I thought it would have been insane to shoot "The Robe" with a poorer quality lens given that film's higher profile.
Export to Wiki