- Joined: January 2003
- Post Count: 4,493
Re: NBC Gives up "We'll Never be #1"
Quote:
| I guess that's one way to keep your job as boss, to say that you should expect failure and call it good. |
Assuming the quote wasn't taken out of context (which is often the case) Immediately fired!
STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!
- Joined: April 2000
- Post Count: 4,317
Re: NBC Gives up "We'll Never be #1"
I could do a better job running this network. Seriously. So could anyone on this board.
STOP THE MADNESS! STOP THE BUTCHERING AND ABANDONMENT OF TV SHOWS ON DVD!
My DVD List at DVD Aficionado, Now Featuring Blu-Ray
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: NBC Gives up "We'll Never be #1"
At this year's up-fronts NBC will reveal their new slogan: "We Try Harder"

We may have to coin a new term, "The Zucker Principle", to explain something like this. "The Peter Principle" doesn't apply, because in that case the employee is actually successful at all levels prior to finally reaching his level of incompetence, where his career stalls. I can't recall another case of "failing upwards" like this. (Outside of politics, of course.

)
Regards,
Joe
- Joined: July 1999
- Post Count: 6,450
Re: NBC Gives up "We'll Never be #1"
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Walter C
Will he still have a job when it falls below the CW?
|
Thats what irks me. Is their are some shows on the CW that are better than Kath & Kim. Yet lose to that show weekly.
Bring back John Doe! Or at least resolve the cliff-hanger with a 2hr movie or as an extra on a dvd release.
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: NBC Gives up "We'll Never be #1"
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by todd s
Thats what irks me. Is their are some shows on the CW that are better than Kath & Kim. Yet lose to that show weekly.
|
The CW is a marginal network that isn't even available in many cities and isn't carried on some cable systems. Hardly surprising that it gets trounced in the ratings by the original "big three" and Fox, all of which established themselves before the cable/satellite revolution really took off. Even the Hollywood union contracts treat the CW (as they did UPN and The WB when they were still separate networks) differently than "The Big Four". I don't remember all the details, but I know in the SAG and WGA MBAs prior to the last go-round, The WB and UPN were in either the 2nd or 3rd tier, down with first-run syndication or maybe basic cable when it came to minimums, residuals and other items.
NBC is simply available to a larger universe of eyeballs, and therefore even its crappy shows are going to be seen by more people than will see most CW shows. (OTOH, because they are available to a bigger audience, NBC shows have to draw a larger minimun audience to stay on the air, which is why the few decent shows they attempt are often cancelled. Ratings that would make a show an unqualified success on The CW - or the Food Network

- will get you dumped in a heartbeat on NBC, ABC or CBS. Even with their declining market share they still require big numbers - even more so with ad revenues down.)
Regards,
Joe
- Joined: April 2000
- Post Count: 4,317
Re: NBC Gives up "We'll Never be #1"
And what do they do if Leno fails, give the 10 PM time slot back to the affiliates?
Seriously, he must have incriminating pictures of the entire board of directors of GE. That's the only thing keeping him around.
STOP THE MADNESS! STOP THE BUTCHERING AND ABANDONMENT OF TV SHOWS ON DVD!
My DVD List at DVD Aficionado, Now Featuring Blu-Ray
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: NBC Gives up "We'll Never be #1"
Hmmm... Let's see.
1) The president seems to want to do a primetime address to the nation pretty much every week, which is pissing off viewers and disrupting schedules on all the major networks.
2) NBC has no primtime programming and no viewers.
I think I see a solution - why doesn't NBC just give the president a weekly series? He gets the airtime, they get an audience, ABC, CBS and Fox can run talent shows, dancing contests and re-enactments of
The Lord of the Flies to their hearts' content. Everybody wins!

Regards,
Joe
- Joined: April 2000
- Post Count: 4,317
Re: NBC Gives up "We'll Never be #1"
Ever since cable TV began and the internet took off, we've known that eventually there would be a point where the traditional network TV model proved unsustainable. Is this it, or is it still a ways to go? Either way, at this rate NBC will be the first domino to collapse.
STOP THE MADNESS! STOP THE BUTCHERING AND ABANDONMENT OF TV SHOWS ON DVD!
My DVD List at DVD Aficionado, Now Featuring Blu-Ray
- Joined: January 1999
- Location: The Land of Oranges, Mickey Mouse, and foreclosures
- Post Count: 6,211
Re: NBC Gives up "We'll Never be #1"
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MatthewA
Ever since cable TV began and the internet took off, we've known that eventually there would be a point where the traditional network TV model proved unsustainable. Is this it, or is it still a ways to go? Either way, at this rate NBC will be the first domino to collapse.
|
Imagine a TV version of the Mendoza Line -- you must broadcast a minimum amount of decent programming in order to sustain the traditional network model, just as you must maintain a certain level of stats in order to maintain a major league baseball career. NBC may be crap-shoveling itself into the dustbin of history.
Call it the "Zucker Line."

PS Remember also that NBC runs "Syfy." Will the unintentional comedy never cease?
"How wonderful it will be to have a leader unburdened by the twin horrors of knowledge and experience." -- Mr. Wick
- Joined: August 1999
- Post Count: 166
Re: NBC Gives up "We'll Never be #1"
I think MILF Island is still a viable property.
This is all reading like a 30 Rock episode, which is both funny and sad at the same time.