THE BAND/MUSIC FROM BIG PINK SACD - elusivedisc
Rickie Lee Jones - Pirates
RICKIE LEE JONES/PIRATES SACD - elusivedisc
Viewing: Sony KDSXBR150, Samsung 1400, DirectTV
Listening: Sony SCD777ES, Oppo980H, VPI Scoutmaster, Audio Research Electronics, Magnepan 1.6s
"Music is a magic carpet loaded with oils and other soothing potions, it's just what you need when you don't know what you need, when you've got more questions than answers." - Bob Lefsetz
|
Originally Posted by zackscott5
MoFi doesn't do surround mixes at all because it is not the original way the album was produced. I know...bummer.
|
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes time, and it annoys the pig.
|
Originally Posted by PaulDA
At this point (though I speak only for myself), I've concluded--after extensive comparisons and tweaks to ensure I could detect a reasonable difference between them--that my ears and my gear (which I will not be changing any time soon and which is not "bargain basement" stuff--Integra receiver, Marantz "universal" player and Boston Acoustics VR-M series speakers) working together cannot reliably distinguish 2 channel CD from 2 channel SACD in most cases. I've taken two copies of an RCA Living Stereo SACD, played on a CD player, the other on my SACD player and, after level matching the output, did a "partially blind" A/B (I had a friend switch the playback input while listened with my eyes closed. No audible difference that I could detect (and I was favourably biased towards finding one).
|
Viewing: Sony KDSXBR150, Samsung 1400, DirectTV
Listening: Sony SCD777ES, Oppo980H, VPI Scoutmaster, Audio Research Electronics, Magnepan 1.6s
|
Originally Posted by Lee Scoggins
I must politely differ here Paul. There are significant sonic benefits to hirez layers like Super Audio. I'm not sure why exactly you are not hearing it but it is quite noticeable on my system and several of my friends. Now it is truie that if you have a Wadia or similarly fancy CD player then the gap in sound narrows but it is still there. I'm heard it on around a half dozen systems of close friends who have SACD capability.
|
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes time, and it annoys the pig.
|
Originally Posted by PaulDA
I have reached the conclusion, for 2 CH comparisons, that the bulk of any improvement in SQ in hi-res audio owes more to the extra care the producers of some of those discs take at the mastering stage rather than any inherent superiority of the format itself.
|
|
Originally Posted by PaulDA
I did qualify my statement by saying "most cases" and "reliably distinguish". Perhaps I should have expressed my point slightly differently. I have noticed some difference, some of the time. However, the differences, with my ears and gear, are not sufficient to warrant a major difference in price. I usually budget to reflect 'biggest bang for the buck' and MCH trumps 2 CH, for me, each time. I'll gladly "upgrade" to a MCH SACD/DVD-A of something I already own in redbook, but I won't do the same for 2CH hi-res. As for buying something new in 2 CH hi-res (new in the sense of "I don't already have it"--I'm an avid used disc shopper), if the price difference is not more than 10% (happens, but not overly frequently) OR it is only available as a hybrid 2CH (RCA Living Stereo and Pentatone seem the only ones I've encountered) OR it contains extra material not found on the redbook release (also very rare) OR it has been remixed/remastered and trustworthy reviews indicate that the new mastering is better than the original redbook release (of course, this is still subject to the 10% rule or the "only available in hybrid" rule), then I'll buy it. Otherwise, to me, it's not worth the extra money.
One other note on differences--I know it is hotly debated in some circles and this is my own view with no intent to proselytize--I have reached the conclusion, for 2 CH comparisons, that the bulk of any improvement in SQ in hi-res audio owes more to the extra care the producers of some of those discs take at the mastering stage rather than any inherent superiority of the format itself. When I've compared the same mastering (as I have with RCA Living Stereo releases--about the least processed SACD releases available), redbook vs SACD in 2 CH, any difference becomes so small that the level of concentration required to notice it takes away from the joy of listening to the music. If redbook were as carefully treated across the board, rather than merely in a few cases (relatively speaking), hi-res would be largely superfluous for 2 CH and we would all be better served by the music industry at large. Sadly, that is not the case. Perhaps if my ears were sharper and my gear was better, I'd notice a more significant difference. But I'm getting older, not younger, and I have other life concerns besides my hobby (children, mostly) so my gear isn't going to get significantly better for quite some time. |
Viewing: Sony KDSXBR150, Samsung 1400, DirectTV
Listening: Sony SCD777ES, Oppo980H, VPI Scoutmaster, Audio Research Electronics, Magnepan 1.6s
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes time, and it annoys the pig.
|
Originally Posted by PaulDA
I attend the Montreal A/V show every year and I know I am only at the first steps above entry level with my gear. But my gear represents a significant leap forward over my previous gear (which was at about the same "level" when new, but was mostly around 15 years old when I upgraded five years ago--it'll be at least another ten before I do a wholesale upgrade, if not longer than that). I guess, in the end, I would rather devote the money towards more music rather than upgrade the gear to reach a level where the differences become more apparent. Still, I do feel a little envy for those with the time and money to pursue audio excellence.
|
Viewing: Sony KDSXBR150, Samsung 1400, DirectTV
Listening: Sony SCD777ES, Oppo980H, VPI Scoutmaster, Audio Research Electronics, Magnepan 1.6s