Home Theater Forum  ›  Forums  ›  Entertainment and Media  ›  Movies (Theatrical)  ›  2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

2009 Film List (Reviews, Discussion & Tracking)

#121
Rating: 0
I adored the new Christmas Carol. sure it's got some gee whiz crap in there to make the producers feel better about spending so much money, but goddamn if Zemeckis didn't fool them and make a drop dead amazing adaptation.  I hesitate to call it an instant classic, but it's really the first Christmas Movie since the Santa Clause that I think deserves that label.  Wow, the language and rhythm of dialog was just absolutely beautiful.  The performances were all excellent, and the animation was often glorious, especially in Imax 3d (this is actually the first imax3d movie I've felt was worth the money and the first 3D movie since Monster House or Up that I thought the premium was worthwhile).  Just absolutely brilliant all the way through, my only disappointment was that I saw it at a late show and missed the excellence of seeing it with an audience of families.  This is great, classic storytelling.  Loved it. 

The one caveat I would have is that the women still look fake next to the men. this was a problem with Beowulf but it's more noticeable here with Robin Wright Penn (whoever is playing Scrooge's love interest) because she's just too symmetrical and blemish-less, makes her more barbieish next to all the other animation.  Additionally the animation in wide shots is still model stiff and ineffective, and one zoom in is particularly disconcerting as the camera goes from very wide to a medium shot of a caroler and it's almost like seeing her get more processing time as the camera gets closer as it goes from appearing puppetlike to appearing life like.

Also, the dead eyes from Beowulf are completely gone, I'd go so far as to say that Jim Carrey's eyes are soulful in the film. 
top 20 films
S&S List 62...212
Export to Wiki
#122
Rating: 0
I'm really beginning to wonder what goes on in the minds of professional film critics.

A.O. Scott needs someone to explain to him the plot of The Box? Is he serious? It may not be presented in the most straightforward fashion, but it's not exactly mysterious by the end.

Scott and Michael Phillips can't figure out what Ewan McGregor is doing in The Men Who Stare at Goats? A film where he plays it absolutely deadpan while his character investigates a covert military group that routinely refers to themselves as "the Jedi"? And who early on declares that he never imagined himself as some blond kid on a faraway planet suddenly discovering that he has a destiny?? These supposed film experts can't figure out that they're watching an elaborate parody in which all of the major characters are elaborate goofs on other characters the actors have played?
Zoloft and Paxil and Buspar and Xanex, Depacon, Chronaphin, Ambien, Prozac,
Ativan calms me when I see the bills.
These are a few of my favorite pills.
(Next to Normal)              HTF Rules & Regs     My 2009 Film List
Win cool stuff: www.hometheaterforum.com/contest for details!
Export to Wiki
#123
Rating: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben View Post

I'm really beginning to wonder what goes on in the minds of professional film critics.

A.O. Scott needs someone to explain to him the plot of The Box? Is he serious? It may not be presented in the most straightforward fashion, but it's not exactly mysterious by the end.


I admit it was more 'heady' than I expected but I could follow the plot of The Box as I watched it. And no one is ever going to accuse me of being able to write film criticism so I can't believe that a man who has a job in that field can't follow it.
Export to Wiki
#124
Rating: 0
On the DVD for The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3, there was a trailer for a low-budget direct-to-DVD film called Hardwired. It looked interesting and the Redbox in the grocery store I stopped at to pick up something for dinner had it in stock, so I went for it. Occupying a space somewhere in between an old "Outer Limits" episode and one of SyFy's awful Original Movies on Saturday nights, the movie invisioned an advertising saturated future where corporations rule in the aftermath of government insolvency. The latest advance involves a chip implanted into the brain which overlays three-dimensional advertising over the implantee's day-to-day living. The advertising becomes increasingly persistent until you buy or steal the product being promoted. A two-tier system is envisioned: The rich buy their chips and, in addition to being served advertising, can use their chips to surf the web, watch television, listen to music, etc. The poor agree to be implanted in exchange for having their medical needs taken care of. In the mean time, the company is testing the technology on the uninsured coming into E.R.s with tramatic brain injuries. The special effects don't hold up with feature-quality, but they far exceeded what I expected. While the supporting roles feature so-so to horrendous acting from no-name supporting actors, the project is elevated somewhat by has-beens Cuba Gooding Jr., Michael Ironside and Val Kilmer. Lance Henriksen makes a cameo at the end as the big bad, who would presumably have a larger role in a sequel down the line. The movie's problems are obvious and run deep, starting with a hackneyed screenplay and continuing with very mediocre production values (although innovative, redressed use of the New York City exterior sets from Watchmen gives the film a far more expansive feel than it has any right to). That being said, the story was interesting and Cuba Gooding Jr. (an excellent actor who's done a really poor job picking roles) elevated the project above what it would have otherwise been. I feel like I got my dollar's worth.

Edited by Adam Lenhardt - 11/8/09 at 11:37pm
Export to Wiki
#125
Rating: 0
My most recent '09 viewings:

The House of the Devil
- a college student who has just finalized a deal for her own place needs money, so she takes a babysitting job. However, it turns out that the gentleman who hired her lied. She won't be babysitting children, but instead the man's mother... or so he says. She thinks of leaving, but is offered $400 dollars and stays. She'll wish she'd just trusted her instincts. The poster for this thing is a beauty. Truly a throwback to the older posters made for genre films in the 70's and 80's, it alone was enough to interest me in this movie. Alas, it doesn't live up to it's poster, though I guess that was often the case. Things start out well enough, but this is yet another film from the director of The Roost that takes a pretty threadbare plot and does little with it. After the initial setup, the film drags on and on as the lead feels uncomfortable with her surroundings. I'm a fan of slow build as much as the next guy, but there's a difference between that and being plain dull. Once we do get to the action, it's over almost as quickly as it began and it's nothing particularly out of the ordinary. Not really worth waiting that long while nothing happens. I also feel that the girl would have split pretty quickly, even if the house was in the middle of nowhere. On the upside, Jocelin Donahue is a solid, appealing lead. I'd love to see her in more things. The atmosphere is also pretty thick at times and the thing does feel like an older style horror film. I wanted to like this one more, but Ti West needs to do a better job with pacing in the future.

The Fourth Kind - through archive footage and reenactments, this film explores the account of several unexplained occurrences in the town of Nome, Alaska. Following her husband's murder, Dr. Abigail Tyler decides to continue his studies in Nome, which has to do with several patients being unable to sleep and witnessing a strange owl outside their bedroom windows. Suicides, disappearances and possible alien abductions are also involved. I actually thought this was quite effective. The split screens and intercutting took some getting used to at first. It's a unique way of telling a story, and I felt that it paid off. Redundant? Sure, but refreshingly ambitious at the same time. Milla Jovovich was very good here. Will Patton is an underrated actor, but he goes a bit too over the top as Nome's sheriff. Elias Koteas is just sort of there. The mood is very eerie throughout, and there were two scenes that hit me pretty hard, the first one quite unexpectedly. That one was when Jovovich plays back the recording she made in her bedroom. The whole thing sent a literal chill through me, particularly the scream. That is without doubt one of the most piercing screams I've heard. The other was briefly shown in the trailer, what the cop sees above the house. I've said before that I'm a sucker for catching brief glimpses of something unnerving, and this is a perfect example of such an instance. The film isn't without fault. The plot point with Tyler's son felt cliche and the resolution to the husband murder storyline is underwhelming, but I was pretty impressed with the film as a whole. The fact that it's all fiction didn't detract from my enjoyment.

The Box - based on Richard Matheson's story, Button, Button. A man (Frank Langella) delivers a box to a family's doorstep. In it is a "button unit", a contraption that will bring about the death of a person that no one in the family knows, but only if either the husband (James Marsden) or wife (Cameron Diaz) pushes the button. Why would they do such a thing? Because pushing the button will also see them rewarded a million dollars. Richard Kelly's latest directorial effort is quite entrancing. It's interesting that this film is titled what it is, as Kelly makes films that are very much outside the box and I hope he doesn't change. While I feel that this is the weakest of his three works, it's still full of intriguing ideas. I will say that this is Kelly's most elegant film to date. The look lends it a certain class. I loved the 70's decor and particularly the NASA sets. The atmosphere as a whole comes of as rather ethereal in feel. There's also Langella, who has an air of elegance about him even with half his face missing. The story itself has a few hiccups, perhaps due to being cut down from the director's nearly three hour original. That said, I don't think this material warrants such a lengthy running time, and what's here works well enough in spite of the flaws. Exploring themes of morality and altruism, Kelly heads off in directions that could only come from the mind of the man behind Donnie Darko and Southland Tales. The library scene especially is so Kelly-esque that I'm sure I would've guessed the director had I not known beforehand. Another thing I liked was how the film plays with your expectations at one point in reference to the 80's Twilight Zone episode that also adapted this story. And hey, Cameron Diaz wasn't as irritating as usual. That in itself is some accomplishment.
Edited by Justin_S - 11/9/09 at 5:58am
DVD Collection
Export to Wiki
#126
Rating: 0
Roland Emmerich has mastered the genre he has dominated for the last two decades: with 2012, he has achieved the pinnacle of cinematic spectacle. No other film approaches it in sheer scope, and no film will be able to surpass it without losing relatability and scale. Go any larger and you have Krypton or the Death Star exploding in 2-5 seconds. It is not a perfect movie, but it deserves four stars just for that. Not only is the devastation complete and unprecedented, Emmerich is one of the few film makers today who realizes that you derive more power from holding on your camera on shots than you do with constant intercutting. Someone of those shots will remain iconic for decades to come. The story follows characters from all around the world, and presents an idealistic vision in the face of unfathomable calamity. John Cusack is also, in my opinion, Emmerich's best protagonist yet. It's incredible that Columbia didn't try to get IMAX for this picture.
Export to Wiki
#127
Rating: 0
Oscar winner, Monique
top 20 films
S&S List 62...212
Export to Wiki
#128
Rating: 0
Paranormal Activity

I've probably watched way too many horror films in my life.  Year after year another film gets hyped up as the second coming of Christ yet most of the time these things turn out to be a complete misfire.  Well, that's what I was expecting out of this one but it turned out to be one of the most frightening that I've seen.  I really, really loved this one here.  Hopefully it will be as strong on a second viewing.

Observe and Report

Think TAXI DRIVER but as a comedy and you've pretty much got the idea of this thing.  On one hand I was disappointed because the trailer made this thing look terrific.  There are plenty of nice laughs but on the whole I think the film is just a tad bit too dark in places to really work as a comedy. 

Antichrist

Another disturbing film from von Trier.  I just got done watching this one about half an hour ago and it's still haunting my mind.  My thoughts are all over the place on what the film meant and what it was trying to say but there's no question that the performances are brilliant as is the direction.  I hope the actors will be remembered when it comes time for the Oscars but I'm sure this is the type of film they will gladly stay away from.  It's not a flat out porn like some would have you believe but it's certainly adult only in nature but we need more works like this.
IMDB Reviews
Export to Wiki