Re: *** Official FROST/NIXON (2008) Discussion Thread
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Holadem
I thought the phrase was a fun bit of creative license -- can't believe he actually said that!  But the context appears to be different: the script shift what seems the product of desperate awkwardness into a devishly destabilising hit job.
|
Maybe. Don't forget that Frost's account is just that:
Frost's. It's the victor's account 30 years after the fact. In the moment, it might well have been just what the film suggests.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Holadem
Is Oliver's Stone's treatment worth seeing?
|
I only saw the theatrical release, and none of the many director's cuts on video. I remember it being a good film, but next to it,
Frost/Nixon demonstrates the virtue of dramatic compression. If a writer finds exactly the right vantage point from which to illuminate a character, it can be done more economically, and the result is more effective.
There must be a reason why Stone kept recutting
Nixon, more than any of his other films. I suspect he felt he never quite captured the man. Morgan, Langella and Howard got him the first time.