Home Theater Forum  ›  Forums  ›  Entertainment and Media  ›  Movies (Theatrical)  ›  Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Track the Films You Watch (2009)

#871
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Evil Dead
This is another movie I always liked. It is good for both it's gory horror and to a lesser extent it's comedic presence (Comedy much more prevalent in the sequels). While I did like all three of the Evil Dead movies... this first one remains my favorite of the bunch. The majority of the gore on this movie is more in an unrealistic fun way then anything else. But for what it is... it makes for an enjoyable viewing experience. Until watching this movie today... I completely forgot it wasn't until part 2 that Ash lost his hand. For some strange reason I was thinking that happened in this movie.
Movies Watched in 2009
Export to Wiki
#872
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Allegheny Uprising
US 1939 81m bw
RKO (P.J. Wolfson)
G.B. title: The First Rebel

In pre-Revolutionary Pennsylvania, a small patriotic band's activities routing gun-runners are misconstrued as rebellious by the occupying British military forces.

Despite the unfamiliar background, this is no more than a mildly enjoyable historical actioner: palatable enough given the cast but, as the very first vintage John Wayne vehicle, not particularly exciting or rewarding.

w P.J. Wolfson novel The First Rebel by Neil H. Swanson d William A. Seiter ph Nicholas Musuraca m Anthony Collins

John Wayne, Claire Trevor, George Sanders, Brian Donlevy, Wilfrid Lawson, John F. Hamilton, Robert Barrat, Moroni Olsen, Eddie Quillan, Chill Wills, Ian Wolfe


Hot Blood
US 1956 82m Technicolor Cinemascope
Columbia (Harry Tatelman, Howard Welsch)
aka: Bad Blood

Tempestuous love between young members of a modern-day gypsy community.

It is hard to fathom what anybody concerned with this virtually indefinable farrago - one of the aberrations which Hollywood is liable to turn out from time to time - thought they were up to. Rendered even odder by garish color and widescreen, it is justly considered its director's worst film.

w Jesse Lasky Jr. d Nicholas Ray ph Ray June m Les Baxter

Cornel Wilde, Jane Russell, Luther Adler, Joseph Calleia, James H. Russell, Nina Koshetz, Helen Westcott, Mikhail Rasumny, Wally Russell, Nick Dennis


The Shepherd of the Hills
US 1941 97m Technicolor
Paramount (Jack Moss)

The arrival of an elderly stranger causes consternation in a mountain village beset by superstition due to an ancient curse.

Modest but genuinely odd and rather effective star western, interesting both for its soft early color and the agreeably mystical allusions of the plot.

w Stuart Anthony, Grover Jones novel Harold Bell Wright d Henry Hathaway ph W. Howard Greene, Charles Lang Jr. m Gerard Carbonara

John Wayne, Betty Field, Harry Carey, Beulah Bondi, James Barton, Samuel S. Hinds, Marjorie Main, Ward Bond, Marc Lawrence, John Qualen


Montana
US 1950 76m Technicolor
Warner (William Jacobs)

Sheepherders are met with severe opposition in the cattletown of Montana.

Minor but quite likable star western, all the more pleasant for its rich color.

w James R. Webb, Borden Chase, Charles O'Neal story Ernest Haycox d Ray Enright ph Karl Freund m David Buttolph

Errol Flynn, Alexis Smith, S.Z. Sakall, Douglas Kennedy, James Brown, Lester Matthews

+ Filmed in 1948; director Raoul Walsh allegedly made an uncredited contribution.


The Lusty Men
US 1952 113m bw
RKO/Wald-Krasna (Jerry Wald)

A retired rodeo legend coaches a young hopeful but friction over money and the latter's wife eventually leads to tragedy.

Arguably the cinema's best treatment of the subject, in which the requisite macho attitudes are complemented by sufficient psychological insight and appropriate dramatic emphasis brings out the underlying portentousness of the milieu.

w Horace McCoy, David Dortort novel Charles Stanush d Nicholas Ray ph Lee Garmes m Roy Webb

Robert Mitchum, Susan Hayward, Arthur Kennedy, Arthur Hunnicutt, Frank Faylen, Carol Nugent

+ Robert Parrish is reported to have replaced director Ray for a few days' shooting when the latter fell ill; Alfred Hayes and Andrew Solt allegedly also worked in an uncredited capacity on the script.


Istanbul
US 1957 84m Technicolor Cinemascope
Universal (Albert J. Cohen)

An adventurer clashes with diamond smugglers and meets up with an old flame, now married and stricken with amnesia.

Tolerable but rather indifferently made latterday star vehicle bearing faint echoes of Casablanca (though actually a remake of the 1947 film Singapore).

w Seton I. Miller, Barbara Gray, Richard Alan Simmons d Joseph Pevney ph William H. Daniels m Heinz Roemheld

Errol Flynn, Cornell Borchers (evoking Ingrid Bergman), John Bentley, Martin Benson, Werner Klemperer, Torin Thatcher, Nat King Cole (aping Dooley Wilson), Leif Erickson, Peggy Knudsen, Vladimir Sokoloff, Roland Varno


Wind Across the Everglades
US 1958 93m Technicolor
Warner/Schulberg (Stuart Schulberg)

The battle of wills between an edgy young game-warden and the fearsome leader of wildlife traders in a Miami swampland.

Interesting, vividly-set drama with a somewhat pretentious approach and an unusual conservationist viewpoint.

w Budd Schulberg d Nicholas Ray ph Joseph C. Brun m Paul Sawtell, Bert Shefter

Burl Ives, Christopher Plummer, Chana Eden, Gypsy Rose Lee, Peter Falk (debut), MacKinlay Kantor

+ Budd Schulberg took over the shooting and editorial chores when director Ray was fired.


Flying Tigers
US 1942 102m bw
Republic (Edmund Grainger)

American flyers aiding in the Chinese struggle against Japan take the matter personally following the latter's bombing of Pearl Harbor.

Well-staged and very enjoyable flagwaver in the Hawksian tradition with most of the expected ingredients and surprisingly violent highlights; all in all, an underrated star vehicle.

w Kenneth Gamet, Barry Trivers d David Miller ph Jack Marta m Victor Young

John Wayne, John Carroll, Anna Lee, Paul Kelly, Gordon Jones, Mae Clarke, Tom Neal, Addison Richards, Edmund MacDonald, Bill Shirley

AAN: Victor Young


Mara Maru
US 1952 98m bw
Warner (David Weisbart)

A salvage expert is entangled with various shady types in the quest for an undersea treasure.

The Maltese Falcon formula unsuitably refashioned by Warners for a tired-looking action star; watchable enough for the atmosphere, but eventually done in by unwarranted piousness at the climax.

w Philip Yordan, N. Richard Nash d Gordon Douglas ph Robert Burks m Max Steiner

Errol Flynn, Ruth Roman, Raymond Burr, Paul Picerni, Richard Webb, Dan Seymour, Georges Renevant

+ The exotic, albeit irrelevant, title refers to the villain's yacht.


The Fighting Seabees
US 1944 100m bw
Republic (Albert J. Cohen)

Construction workers risking their lives in the Pacific are gradually turned into a tough fighting unit.

WWII star actioner predictably posing as a salute to some specialized corps or other; romantic contrivance and corny racial archetypes merely interrupt the prevailing mood of jingoism.

w Borden Chase, Aenas MacKenzie d Edward Ludwig ph William Bradford m Wakter Scharf, Roy Webb

John Wayne, Susan Hayward, Dennis O'Keefe, William Frawley, J.M. Kerrigan, Paul Fix, Leonid Kinsey, Grant Withers, Addison Richards

AAN: Walter Scharf, Roy Webb
IMDB Reviews
Export to Wiki
#873
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario Gauci


The Shepherd of the Hills
US 1941 97m Technicolor
Paramount (Jack Moss)

The arrival of an elderly stranger causes consternation in a mountain village beset by superstition due to an ancient curse.

Modest but genuinely odd and rather effective star western, interesting both for its soft early color and the agreeably mystical allusions of the plot.

w Stuart Anthony, Grover Jones novel Harold Bell Wright d Henry Hathaway ph W. Howard Greene, Charles Lang Jr. m Gerard Carbonara

John Wayne, Betty Field, Harry Carey, Beulah Bondi, James Barton, Samuel S. Hinds, Marjorie Main, Ward Bond, Marc Lawrence, John Qualen


I've not seen the movie, but the live show/stage performance of it is definitely modest and genuinely odd. And it has ran continuously, season after season at an outdoor amphitheatre in Branson Missouri for 49 years. :-p
top 20 films
S&S List 62...212
Export to Wiki
#874
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Day of the Dead
I always liked the Romero zombie movies. And this is one of my favorites. The gore is really up there in this movie. Between the zombies tearing and and eating flesh and some of the scenes such as the doctor's experiments on the zombies and a dream sequence here and there the gore is plentiful and well done. I will say that there is some characters I dislike in this movie. But I think that is usually true of most movies. I would also say that some of the acting is a bit over the top. But if you can get past that you are in for a gory walking dead treat.
Movies Watched in 2009
Export to Wiki
#875
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Gentlemen Prefer Blondes - Obviously, the famous "Diamonds Are a Girl's Best Friend" number is spectacular, one of the best musical productions on film. And there's about 5 or 6 really really funny jokes. The rest of it is good, not great. The acting is good, the plotting and pacing is good, the songs are good (except the obnoxious opening), the gags are good, the photography is good. All good... but not great. Criticker predicted I would rate this movie a 76, and that's exactly right. It's a perfect example of a 76 -- watchable and enjoyable with no huge flaws and a few bright spots, but not the kind of thing to get excited about. Rating: 7


A Place in the Sun - I had "An American Tragedy" kicking around my book collection for several years, but never got around to reading it. I suspect it's better than this adaptation, but the film is still an engaging drama. Like Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (and in fact like a lot of other movies on the TSPDT 1000 list), I kind of liked watching it but I didn't find it that exceptional either. Some nice touches: very good cinematography and mostly good performances, and a story that's rather predictable but still worthwhile, with a few subtle nuances. In the end though, it's not much better than the average Hollywood drama... the type of thing the Academy loves to throw awards at but as time goes on, people stop caring about it. Rating: 7


Olympia 1 and Olympia 2 - Having seen Tokyo Olympiad first, comparisons are inevitable. Ichikawa's film surprised me with its ability to get me interested in a 3+ hour documentary about sports. While I found the content of Riefenstahl's work slightly less compelling, it's a masterpiece of filmmaking technique. Each part begins with a lengthy prologue, a lyrical wordless montage celebrating the human form. And the footage of the events themselves, although a bit repetitive at times, is for the most part filmed beautifully... a tribute to athleticism, often employing slo-mo and dramatic angles to capture bodies in motion. The film ends with a spectacular diving montage. There's a few shots of Hitler, one suspect racial remark in the commentary, and an extra bit of enthusiasm for the German athletes (which, as in Ichikawa's film, is quite understandable). Other than those minor details, it seems pretty difficult to interpret the film as propoganda in any way. It felt like very even-handed coverage to me. Rating: 8


I Walked With a Zombie - A bit like Curse of the Cat People in that it's very moody and ambiguous, and not really a horror movie at all. I always get a kick out of "pagan" religions, and the trek to the voodoo ritual is a delightfully creepy sequence. At a tight 68 minutes, the film wastes little time. Even the build-up that would seem superfluous in similar movies adds extra dimensions here. Rating: 8


Teorema - Pasolini pushing buttons again, but this is far better than the sledgehammer of Salo. A mysterious houseguest (Terence Stamp) arrives as a wealthy mansion and proceeds to seduce the entire family, including the maid. The experience leaves them profoundly altered. Much is left up to interpretation, and we're never certain if the stranger is a force of good or evil, but there definitely seems to be some Bunuel-esque skewering of both the upper classes and Catholicism. It's an intriguing piece that's thoughtful and funny (and with a terrific Morricone score)... maybe a little obvious at times, but still engaging. I have to wonder if this film was an influence on Miike when he made Visitor Q. It's a good thing there's so little dialogue, because the dubbing work is particularly bad here. It's especially disheartening to hear Anne Wiazemski, who was so wonderful in Au Hasard Balthazar, get saddled with such an inappropriate voice. Rating: 8


The Tree of Wooden Clogs - This is my third time trying to watch this movie. My main concerns on previous viewings were that it was "boring", and the pig slaughtering scene bothered me. That scene still bothers me (as do a couple of other instances of animal cruelty) but this time I didn't find it very boring at all. It's not as interesting to me as I Fidanzati or Il Posto, but I certainly didn't think it was dull. The movie focuses on four peasant families in a tiny turn-of-the-century village. There's no plot to speak of, just a series of minor anecdotes. It really captures the sense of time and place, depicting their struggles without asking the audience for pity, and without portraying the characters as noble salt-of-the-earth types wronged by a cruel class system (there is a bit of that at the end, but by that point it's been earned). It's all very matter-of-fact. The cast is quite good, and the photography, although not spectacular, has a pastoral grace to it. At 3 hours, it does require some patience... I'm glad I finally had enough to make it all the way through. Rating: 8


Ponyo on a Cliff - I'd had heard that this was a disappointing offering from Miyazaki. It's definitely not as sophisticated as Spirited Away or Princess Mononoke. It's more geared towards childrens, with a classic Disney feel. Kind of like My Neighbor Totoro meets Pinocchio or The Little Mermaid. But it is very, very charming and Ponyo is adorable. Miyazaki's storytelling skills are finely honed, and in this case much tighter than the often messy Howl's Moving Castle. He maintains his steadfast refusal to divide the world into good and evil; as always, the "villain" is not truly a bad guy at all. If you go in expecting some fun, escapist entertainment and not a masterpiece, you should be satisfied, and moved. Rating: 8
Export to Wiki
#876
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

I agree on OLYMPIA. It seems Riefenstahl's reputation is so ruined that people will start calling any of her films evil without seeing them. I thought the movie was 100% fair and even if it did show the German athletes more it's to be expected since it was a German film. There's nothing racist about that and I'm sure an American documentary would have paid more attention to the American athletes.


Wells Fargo Days (1944) Mack V. Wright

A stranger (Dennis Moore) arrives at a new town where he's not welcomed because people think he's yellow. In reality he's just not using his guns because the woman he's loves asked him not to but that changes after a friend is shot during a robbery. If you're a fan of Westerns then you should enjoy this 20-minute short from Warner, which benefits from a decent story and some Technicolor. The Technicolor is pretty much faded in the print shown on Turner Classic Movies but there's still enough detail to see some beautiful locations. The performances are also fairly good for this type of film with moore making a good hero and Louise Stanley fine as his love interest. The direction isn't anything too special and the "revenge" goes by way too fast but this is still worth watching if you enjoy shorts.

Penthouse (1933) W.S. Van Dyke

Warner Baxter plays a lawyer who has a reputation of getting guilty men off with murders but in reality he takes those who look guilty and proves their innocents. After getting a gangster off for murder, he gets involved with a new case where a friend of his is accused of murder and the only way to break through the case is by taking up with a gangster moll (Myrna Loy). I was really looking forward to this film, which many (including Maltin) talk up as a major gem of the decade and while I wouldn't go that far the movie is still pretty good. I think the biggest benefit here is that we get a lot of pre-code material including Baxter and Loy spending the night together, some sexual innuendo and most important is the sight of blood coming out of bullet holes, which wasn't seen in some of the major gangster films of the era. Another major plus are the performances with Baxter and Loy doing great work and really having great chemistry together. Moy easily steals the film in a very sexy performance that gives her quite a bit of range in terms of her character development. The supporting cast includes Charles Butterworth, Mae Clarke, C. Henry Gordon, Nat Pendleton, Raymond Hatton and George E. Stone. I think the film gets a little long winded in the middle but in the end this is another winning picture from the director and certainly worth watching when it pops up on Turner Classic Movies.

Skyscraper Souls (1932) Edgar Selwyn

Pre-code drama in the same vein as GRAND HOTEL, which was also produced by MGM. This time out the story centers on an entrepreneur (Warren William) who will stop at nothing to own a 100-story building that he helped create. While William tries to take over the building, he also sets his eyes on a virginal woman (Maureen O'Sullivan) who is also being looked at by a poor bank clerk (Norman Foster). This is a much talked about film because of all the pre-code nature, which includes William trying to sleep with every female in the film and other goodies such as murder and suicide. Quite a bit of bad stuff happens in this film and that certainly makes it stand apart from other movies of the decade but there's no denying a stronger story would have made the movie even better. I think the by the numbers story is the main weak link because while watching the thing you can't help but already know what's going to happen and how it's going to play out. This familiar territory is a weak point but it doesn't take away from the fun. William is devilishly good in his role and you can't help but believe his character who is evil enough to not let anyone stand in his way. O'Sullivan, right off TARZAN THE APE MAN, does a great job as well and really sells the innocence of her character. Foster, Anita Page, Gregory Ratoff and Wallace Ford also turn in nice supporting performances. Fans of this film will also want to catch EMPLOYEE'S ENTRANCE, which features Williams in the same type of role and co-stars Loretta Young and Ford.

Champagne (1928) Alfred Hitchcock

A millionaire father (Gordon Harker) is tired of his daughter Betty (Betty Balfour) not following his wishes in which men she hangs around. To teach her a lesson the father tells her that he has lost all his money and they are now broke. Soon the two move into a shack where Betty must try to keep them alive and moving on. There's some nice stuff here but overall it's another mediocre film for the young Hitchcock. What really bothered me here isn't the silly and short story but how it's handled. We watch a movie where Betty is completely out of control yet at the drop of a dime she stops this behavior and turns into a responsible person. I know that's the point of the story but after she learns that they are now poor, not once is she upset about it nor is there any transition period for her character to develop. Instead she just goes from party animal to responsible person. The movie, for the most part, is a comedy and there aren't enough laughs to keep it moving at a better pace. What does work is the performance by Harker who easily steals the show. Balfour isn't nearly as good and I'm guessing Hitch had a thing for her because her acting talent really didn't make one want to keep watching her. Hitchcock handles the material a lot better than I figured he would and we get some of his favorite early techniques like the point of view shots as well as another nice one at the end with a champagne glass.

Jewel Robbery (1932) William Dieterle

William Powell stars as a masterful jewel robber who uses not only his mind but also his charm when it comes time to pull a job. On his latest job he meets a victim (Kay Francis) and quickly becomes fixated on her but not half as much as the crush she grows on him. Soon the two are trying to come together even while the police are still looking for him. Powell remains a fairly popular star today due to many classic movies but this one here is usually forgotten about and never mentioned, which is a real shame because this is one of the better pre-code comedies out there. Not only do we have Powell being as charming as ever but we also get some very risky material, which certainly could only belong in a pre-code. For starters, we get Francis playing a bored wife, not girlfriend, who keeps trying to run off with another man. Secondly, during the robbery Powell wants to make his victims forget what they saw and go to sleep so he gives them "laughing cigarettes", which is naturally marijuana. There are several scenes where people are smoking on these joints, not knowing what they are, and then laughing with no idea of how dumb they look.. These scenes are extremely funny and at times downright hysterical considering the time frame that the movie was released. As funny as REEFER MADNESS is these scenes are even funnier. Powell is the main reason to watch this film because of his charm and wit, which are all over every scene. Francis wasn't as impressive but I think a lot of this is due to her character being rather annoying. The movie is very fast paced from start to finish and it never takes a break and these are just more reasons for catching this gem when it shows up on television.

Hell Ship Mutiny (1957) Lee Sholem, Elmo Williams

A Captain (Jon Hall) travels to a tropical island to see some friends when he learns that three bad men (led by John Carradine) are holding the natives hostage. Hall's team are able to take them over and on the boat back to the main land they escape and take Hall hostage. This here has been a film I've been meaning to watch for over fifteen years but could never locate it on video and I didnt even realize until a week ago that budget label Alpha had released it on DVD. This was a Republic film so it's doubtful the Alpha release is too official but at least it's finally out there. The movie wasn't as bad as I had heard and even though it's not that good I'd still recommend it to fans of Carradine and Peter Lorre who has a brief role at the end of the film. The production values are incredibly low and that takes away quite a bit. It appears very little thought went into anything and it's rather shocking to see Carradine and Lorre in the film. Both men certainly did low budget movies but this one here is pretty low and it was surprising that the producers got both of them. Perhaps their salaries ate away at the rest of the film? Either way, both men are a lot of fun and especially Carradine as the bad guy. Hall plays everything pretty much by the numbers but he isn't too bad. With a running time of 66-minutes there's really nothing too boring here as long as you know what you're getting into.

Easy Life (1944) Walter Hart

Lesser entry in MGM's Crime Does Not Pay series has 17-year-old Frank Davis (Bernard Thomas) dropping out of school after learning that stealing can lead to quick cash. Soon he's picked up by a mob boss and they pull off a big heist but Frank soon learns that it's not an easy or fun life. This series is perhaps my favorite of any classic short series but this here might just be the weakest one I've seen. I really enjoyed the straight punch in regards to the ending but outside of this the short is pretty bland. It's certainly not a bad one but when it comes to this series I expect a lot more. I really wasn't impressed with Thomas because I found him to be a tad bit too simple in his role. I also wasn't impressed with any of the supporting players as they really didn't add anything to the film. The director and production crew handled the material very seriously as they clearly wanted to get a message across but the story itself just wasn't strong enough to make it entertaining.

Night of the Demon (1957) Jacques Tourneur

Classic horror film has Dr. John Holden (Dana Andrews) going to a meeting in London where Satanic cults are being discussed. Dr. Holden doesn't believe anything supernatural but soon he might change his mind. Outside a few minor flaws this shocking from Tourneur is certainly one of the best films that this genre has to offer. Film dealing with cults and Satan worshippers are dime a dozen but every once in a while one works to near perfection and that's where this movie comes in. What works so well is the direction of Tourneur as well as the performance from Andrews, which gives the film a lot of credibility. Had an unknown been in the film then perhaps we wouldn't have been able to get so involved in the story but with Andrews, a respectable actor, it's quite easy to understand his character and go along for the ride just as his character is going from a non-believer to someone being stalked by the title creature. Tourneur's direction is certainly right on the mark and his use of shadow and fog will certainly remind one of his days working for Val Lewton at RKO where he created such gems as THE LEOPARD MAN and CAT PEOPLE. Those previous films and this one share a lot in common as they have the same visual style and one can't help but wish the director made more films in the genre. The one thing against the film is that it seems to try too hard to get the viewer to believe in witchcraft. I think there are a few too many speeches about it and I'm under the impression that if you're going to watch a movie like this then your mind is going to be willing to believe the subject matter just for the sake of the film. A nice performance by Peggy Cummings and a very strong one from Niall MacGinnis help push the reality factor even more. The close up shots of the monster aren't that believable but when it appears in the distance one can't help but get goose bumps. The first time the monster appears is a very effective moment in horror history.

Comedy of Terrors, The (1964) Jacques Tourneur

All-star spoof of horror movies features Vincent Price, Peter Lorre, Boris Karloff and Basil Rathbone working with a screenplay by Richard Matheson and being director by the great Tourneur. One would hope the end results were better but this is a decent little movie. Price runs a funeral home, which hasn't been getting too much busy and after the land owner (Rathbone) threatens to throw him out, he decides to make business for himself. Together with his partner (Lorre) they set out to kill a few people. Considering all the talent involved here you can't help but wish the movie had been better but what's here isn't too bad if you're in the mood for some minor entertainment. Price could always be counted on to give a good comic performance but I found him to be rather weak here. He does get off a few good one-liners and his comic tone is right on the mark but the screenplay doesn't give him too much to work with and you can see him struggling at times. Lorre is quite good in the film although he too finds himself not doing that much except for looking at Price's wife in the film played by Joyce Jameson. Karloff steals the show with each scene he's in and his comic timing is perfect even though he gets very little dialogue. Rathbone is fun as is Joe E. Brown in his one scene, which turned out to be his last. This is certainly unlike any of Tourneur's previous horror outings and I'm really not sure he ever made another one like this. The end results are quite mixed but you can't help be drawn to the film with its all-star casting.
IMDB Reviews
Export to Wiki
#877
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Hostel
The first thing I noticed about this movie is that when watching the first half an hour of the movie you can forget that you are even watching a horror movie. That first half an hour feels more like a movie about college buddies backpacking it through Europe. But then when they get to this one particular Hostel... that is where all the fun begins. Then the horror hits pretty good. This is not much of a movie for scares... it is more of a shock value type horror... with a generous amount of gore. Though I will admit that I remembered it to be a bit gorier from the first time I watched it. Over-all... while it is not the best horror movie I have seen lately. I did enjoy it quite a bit... and can see myself watching it again.
Movies Watched in 2009
Export to Wiki
#878
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Cube
I first popped in this movie for my Gore-Fest Marathon because I remembered the opening scene... which is rather gory and fits the bill. Unfortunately there was only a couple such scenes in this movie. For the most part this movie is not really that gory. At least not to the point of inclusion of such a marathon. If I would have remembered that I would have picked another movie. But with that said... this is a favorite of mine. As I said it does have some gore to it... but it has much more then that... this movie shows what people are capable of in the name of survival. And you better believe... some of it is not pretty. Another thing I really enjoyed in this movie... it was my first introduction to Nicole DeBoer... an actress I quickly became a fan of.
Movies Watched in 2009
Export to Wiki
#879
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

06/11/09

Riptide (1934) Dir: Edmund Goulding
Production: MGM

Marital strife among high society types. On a visit to New York, Lord Philip Rexford (Herbert Marshall) meets a vivacious party girl named Mary (Norma Shearer). A whirlwind romance and marriage follows. After a few years settled into life on the Lord’s estate in England, Mary, perhaps weighted down by the differences in their background, begins to feel that she is not measuring up to her husband. When the Lord goes to America on a trip, Mary goes to Cannes for a release of her own. After some drunken, but mostly innocent, flirting with an old friend from New York, a playboy named Tommy Trent (Robert Montgomery), gets blown up into a scandal by some reporters, the Lord has trouble believing Mary’s explanation of innocence. He becomes cold and distant, setting the marriage on a course, perhaps inexorably, toward divorce.

Okay-done melodrama, but weak script relies too much on the mixed/crossed signals plot device. This is the kind of film where someone goes to confess something bad to another person, but that person cuts them off and says ‘wait, don’t say a word, let me say what I have to say first’, thus making the initial confession even more wrenching. The three leads are all decent, Shearer is at her best, even affecting, when desperately trying to convince her husband of her fidelity (this was her comeback role after 18 months following her husband Irving Thalberg’s illness--he produced the film). The script has some pre-code fun; allusions to Mary’s ‘history’ are suggested, but obvious, and there is clear adultery. Skeets Gallagher plays Tommy’s gay roommate, Erskine, for a few naughty laughs (Erskine to Man: “You have no romance.” Man: “No…Come.” Erskine (enthusiastically): “I’d love to.”). Legendary British stage actress, Mrs. Patrick Campbell (the original ‘Eliza Doolittle’), stands out as Lord Rexford’s dotty Aunt Hetty. Walter Brennan of all people plays a chauffeur in an early scene. Weird opening scene--when Lord Rexford and Mary first meet, they are dressed in bizarre insect costumes for a ‘World of the Future’ costume party he is taking her to. Shearer is oddly enticing (I believe I have just invented a fetish--women dressed as giant bugs). Lazy ending resolves the story in about 30 seconds.

out of 4
------------------------------------
EDMUND GOULDING – “Lightly Likable”
Riptide (1934)




John Nesbitt’s Passing Parade: The Immortal Blacksmith (1944) (short) Dir: Sammy Lee
Production: MGM

Tells the story of Tom Davenport (Chill Wills), a blacksmith in Vermont, circa 1833. An absent-minded but decent fellow, Tom is one day sent by his wife to travel into town and buy food, but instead he comes back with one of the few electro-magnets in existence. Tom starts tinkering with the magnet and invents a crude electric motor. At first the invention is lauded, but that glow soon fades away without any practical use for the motor and Tom dies, penniless and forgotten. But at least he got this short dedicated to him!

out of 4




Sweepings (1933) Dir: John Cromwell
Production: RKO Radio Pictures

A department store mogul hopes to interest his disappointing children in succeeding him. Daniel Pardway (Lionel Barrymore), along with his wife, Abigail (Ninetta Sunderland), steps off a train in fire-ravaged Chicago of 1871 and sees opportunity. He opens a small dry goods store called The Bazaar and it becomes a minor success. As the Pardway family grows, Daniel adds a wing to his store for each child. Soon The Bazaar, with the help of Daniel’s dedicated general manager, Abe Ullman (Gregory Ratoff), becomes the biggest business in Chicago. With his four children now grown, and his wife dead, Daniel tells them he expects them to carry on the business when he’s gone. To leave something substantial and have his children be people of substance, is all Daniel wants. But as each successive son reveals themselves as less than up to the task, Daniel’s dream seems less likely to come to fruition.

Sprawling and briskly paced (covering about 50 years in 80 minutes). One of the more convincing aspects of the production is the incredible make-up job in the aging of Barrymore and Ratoff. To compare Barrymore at the beginning of the film (when he’s supposed to be 25) and at the end is a small wonder. He was ill during shooting, appeared in the film against doctor’s orders, and was revealed to have had a high fever during many scenes. The performance is, of course, terrific. The kids are played by Eric Linden, William Gargan, George Meeker and Gloria Stuart. In one of the more amusing turns, as the sons are, one after the other, disappointing Daniel--one is a drunk and womanizer, another is involved in a shooting at a brothel--the third son’s deficiency is that he prefers to work on window dressing rather than running the store. The implication is hard to miss. Allan Dinehart plays Daniel’s brother, Thane, and his vocation, obviously shady, is referred to so vaguely I still don’t know what he did. Like another Cromwell film from the same year, DOUBLE HARNESS, SWEEPINGS has some impressive camera movement for the time.

out of 4
----------------------------------
JOHN CROMWELL – “Lightly Likable”
Sweepings (1933) , Double Harness (1933) , Little Lord Fauntleroy (1936) , Abe Lincoln in Illinois (1940) , The Company She Keeps (1951)




06/13/09

A Crime Does Not Pay Subject No. 41: Easy Life (1944) (short) Dir: Walter Hart
Production: MGM

Frank Davis is your typical high school boy. In fact he could be you or me. But he wants things, cars, clothes, and he wants them now. So he starts stealing things and selling them for spending money. Soon he gets a reputation for being able to handle himself, which attracts some big shots. Next thing you know, Frank finds himself in on a big time heist job, with the promise of a big payout. It comes off, but all is not as great as Frank thought it would be.

The sly link of consumerism as leading to a life of crime for otherwise normal young men lends some interest. Frank’s impossible naiveté is used to build up sympathy. “You mean I can’t talk to ordinary, decent people anymore?” a shocked, disillusioned Frank asks as the gang lays low. No, pal, you can’t, it defeats the purpose of ‘hiding out’. Of course, that’s the point--‘crime does not pay’ and these short subjects wear their schematization on their sleeve. Right up there in the title specifically. The lesson is, it always ends in a hail of bullets.

out of 4




Five Star Final (1931) Dir: Mervyn LeRoy
Production: Warner Bros. (First National)

A cynical newspaper editor accedes to his bosses' demands to increase circulation via sensationalism, then comes to regret it. New York Evening Gazette (inspired by a real paper, the New York Graphic) managing editor Joseph Randall (Edward G. Robinson) has committed a cardinal sin in the tabloid newspaper business--he’s too high-minded, filling the paper with “politics and tariff stuff” (referring to the Hawley-Smoot Act, presumably) and the circulation is suffering for it. The paper’s publisher, Bernard Hinchecliffe (Oscar Apfel), gives Randall a directive to start playing up the ‘human interest’ angles, something that will hook the stenographers. The paper decides to dig up an old murder case and plan a serial around it. The case involves a murderess, Nancy Voorhees (Frances Starr), who shot and killed her unfaithful husband but was acquitted, the story goes, because she had a baby. Randall sends his operatives (Ona Munson and Boris Karloff) to get the dirt on Voorhees, now married and her past well buried, with a daughter, Jenny (Marian Marsh), who is about to get married herself. For the story to break now, after all these years, could be devastating.

First off, nice opening credit sequence. No music, no fanfare, just the background noise of a printing press running and cries of ‘Extra, Extra!’ Then to show what a bloodsport the newspaper game is, we see a couple of goons trash a newsstand for not displaying their paper prominently enough. Edward G. is quite good, much less of a cartoon than in LITTLE CAESAR (not that Rico isn’t wildly entertaining). Randall is a bit of a riddle, he willingly throws himself back into the slime game, yet we frequently see him washing his hands, literally, a sort of physical manifestation of his ambivalence. Karloff is a highlight as T. Vernon Isopod, a hatchet man with no conscience who worked with Randall in the past and whose talents are needed once again. His best scene is a slithery inquisition of an unsuspecting Nancy Voorhees--now Mrs. Townsend--and her husband Michael (H.B. Warner) while in the guise of a clergyman. Aline MacMahon is Randall’s long suffering secretary, secretly in love with him, who acts as his conscience. Marian Marsh has a good breakdown scene near the end, a bit showoff-y for sure, but at least there is some intensity to it. The newspaper stuff has an enjoyable energy to it, the rest can be overly melodramatic at times and spotted with the kind of theatrical acting often found in early sound productions (particularly Ms. Starr). At a pivotal late moment, there is a visually interesting shot with the screen split into a triptych; Nancy Voorhees is in the middle panel trying to get someone at The Gazette on the phone, and the outer panels are filled alternately with the people she is being bounced around to--no one will take her call. Finally, when she is disconnected, the outer panels go black. The last shot of the film, a copy of that evening’s Gazette in a gutter being swept away with the rest of the trash, makes certain you get the point. Yes, even in 1931 Hollywood had a specious superiority complex over other media.

out of 4
--------------------------------
MERVYN LEROY – “Lightly Likable”
Five Star Final (1931) , The House I Live In (1945) (short) , Latin Lovers (1953)




06/14/09

A Pete Smith Specialty: Weather Wizards (1939) (short) Dir: Fred Zinnemann
Production: MGM

This short manages to make exciting the story of a cold front moving in to the citrus orchards of California. The action centers on the Morgan family and their small orange grove which must be protected at all costs from the frost. This means staying up around the clock and tending orchard heaters powered by fuel. To show just how much of a disaster it was for temps to hit freezing, something akin to an air raid siren goes off in the community to let the growers know that the heaters must be lit. But the longer the front hangs around, the more the danger of fuel running out becomes real. To make matters worse, a whole community of burning fuel creates huge black clouds of smoke that virtually stops traffic, and fuel reserves, from coming in. This leads to a shot of the younger Morgan hesitating and then feverishly hacking away at his go-kart in order to throw the wood on a fire.

out of 4
----------------------------------------------
FRED ZINNEMANN – “Less Than Meets The Eye”
A Pete Smith Specialty: Weather Wizards (1939) (short) , The Old South (1940) (short) , The Search (1948)




A Crime Does Not Pay Subject No. 28: Jack Pot (1940) (short) Dir: Roy Rowland
Production: MGM

Examines the menace of the ‘harmless’ slot machine racket, made possible by YOU, the apathetic public, who fill it with the nearly $1 billion annually that funds all the syndicate’s crime operations. Tom Neal, who knew a little about crime not paying, plays one of the upright citizens, a man who runs his own cleaners. When he’s approached by one of the 'representatives' from the ‘Cleaners & Dyers Improvement Association’ and informed he needs protection, he tells the guy to stick it. Bad things happen as a result. The point is that doing nothing in the face of criminal intimidation may be easier, but it makes you complicit, you cowards!

out of 4




Hide-Out (1934) Dir: W.S. Van Dyke
Production: MGM

A wanted gangster, shot and wounded, flees to the country and holes up with an unsuspecting family. ‘Broadway playboy’ Lucky Wilson (Robert Montgomery) does most of the legwork for mobster Tony Berrelli’s racket. Contracts for protection, that sort of thing. When one of Lucky’s ‘business partners’ finally squeals to the cops, a warrant is issued. Berrelli is tipped off that two of Lucky’s longtime nemeses, Lieutenant MacCarthy (Edward Arnold) and his partner, Britt (Edward Brophy), are coming to arrest Lucky. While trying to escape, shots are fired and Lucky takes one in the wing but manages to drive out of town. He eventually passes out on the side of a road somewhere in Connecticut and is taken in by the Miller family to recuperate at their farm. Lucky is desperate to get back to the city until he meets the Miller’s daughter, Pauline (Maureen O’Sullivan), who suddenly has him altering his plans.

Often charming, mostly thanks to the leads, but entirely predictable. Lucky works his way through a string of blondes at the beginning, hilariously establishing his character--this might have been an even better film if it just stayed with this likable scoundrel as he strolls through New York nightlife. Once we see Maureen O’Sullivan we know Lucky is going to fall for her (who wouldn’t, she’s adorable here). We know that love is going to redeem him. We know there’s going to be plenty of humor from the ‘fish out of water’ scenario (Lucky has trouble feeding the chickens, milking the cow, etc., never more than mildly amusing). We know Lucky is going to be struck by how kind and unprepossessing the Millers are and it’s going to help him develop a conscience. Despite that, it mostly works as entertainment. Montgomery and O’Sullivan are perfectly cast, they have great chemistry together. The other Millers are also well cast, particularly Elizabeth Patterson as ‘Ma’. Mickey Rooney plays the son, Willie. Good ending scene with MacCarthy and Britt going to the Miller farm to arrest Lucky while Lucky still tries to keep his identity secret from the Millers. Couple of songs by Freed and Brown, including an early use of ‘All I Do Is Dream of You’ better known from SINGIN’ IN THE RAIN.

out of 4
-----------------------------
W.S. VAN DYKE – “Miscellany”
The Prizefighter and the Lady (1933) , Hide-Out (1934) , Journey for Margaret (1942)




James A. FitzPatrick’s Traveltalks: Glimpses of New Brunswick (1938) (short)
Production: MGM

Opens with a panoramic view of Saint John, “one of the Eastern gateways to Canada”, a city founded by English loyalists after the Revolutionary War. Saint John, apparently, had a reputation as one of the “healthiest cities in Canada”, although by the opening shot it looks like Allentown or some other dreary city. But finally we get to why we’re visiting Saint John--we see the school a young Louis B. Mayer attended. Ah ha! Suddenly I feel like I’m watching the news and some random story comes on about a movie, and you find out the movie is from Universal or Disney and the whole thing was just a commercial ordered by the network to cross-promote. Other attractions include the Hartland Bridge over the Saint John River, the longest covered bridge in the world, a resort in Bathurst, and a look at the sardine industry. Meh. There are better choices in Canada for Traveltalks to visit.

out of 4
Export to Wiki
#880
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Woohoo, made a big dent in my stack of movies this weekend.

Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid - Oh joy, another Peckinpah film for me to be completely indifferent towards. My big problem here is that it's all quite artificial. The dialogue sounds written, the sets look like sets, the costumes look like costumes, Bob Dylan looks stoned out of his gourd, and the blood is bright red. You have to be retarded to think blood looks like that. Yeah, that's right, I just called Sam Peckinpah retarded. I'm sure some badass with a big gun and a mouthful of witty one-liners will be kicking down my door any minute now, very casual about killing and about dying just like all those Real Men from Wild West. So, anyway, I found it impossible to get immersed, but I wasn't that interested anyway. Pretty typical stuff about the death of the old West, blah blah blah. I liked James Coburn's performance, but Kristofferson was far too smug. The Dylan songs are mostly good, although sometimes inappropriate (especially the two occasions when they play "Knockin' on Heaven's Door"... in both instances when a minor character we barely know gets killed). Rating: 5


Synecdoche, New York - I'll admit: I didn't want to like this movie. I thought, "Oh, Charlie Kaufman... here you are again, trying SO HARD to be clever." And trying SO HARD to be profound, and trying SO HARD to be moving. And that is annoying, the transparency of it is annoying. But the thing is, he often does manage to be clever, profound, and moving. The film is a unfocused mess, but there is some "brutal truth" lurking in several corners of it. I'm not a huge Philip Seymour Hoffman fan, but he does okay, and I really like the rest of the cast (ever since What Happened Was, I've loved Tom Noonan). Rating: 8


Diner - It seems like this kind of "group of buddies" movie that started with American Graffiti, gained popularity in the 80's, and then fizzled out. The Big Chill, Fandango, Stand By Me... there must be others that I can't think of the moment. This one was watchable, but rarely rises above mediocrity. It features Steve Guttenberg of all people mocking The Seventh Seal, which is (as Brook points out) actually a funnier movie than this one. I didn't think much of the casting either. I've always liked Mickey Rourke, but here he's just wrong. And he looks like he's wearing makeup, which is very distracting. Kevin Bacon just comes off like a tool. Daniel Stern is good, though, and Paul Reiser surprisingly didn't annoy me. The only other Barry Levinson films I've seen are Rain Man and Good Morning, Vietnam. This was better than either of those, but that's not saying much. Rating: 6


Night Moves - A neo-noir that seems to be riding the coattails of Chinatown, about a private detective in over his head. Penn's film isn't as satisfying as Polanski's, but it has a couple of interesting nuances. It doesn't really come together until the end. And a little too heavy on the sexual liberation angle, perhaps. But Gene Hackman is always a pleasure to watch, I ought to track down more of his work that I haven't seen yet. Rating: 7


Duel in the Sun - Fun in a campy way, kind of an over-the-top Western take on Gone With the Wind (complete with Butterfly McQueen playing yet another subservient halfwit). There's an awful lot of scenery-chewing, especially by Jennifer Jones but Lionel Barrymore and Lillian Gish are guilty as well. And Gregory Peck... the more I see him, the more I think he's a shitty actor. At least he's trying something different. Most of the time he's some combination of noble, concerned, and confused. Here he takes on the scumbag role. He's lousy at it, but he gets points for trying. The standout is Joseph Cotten, just because Cotten is always awesome. This is in many ways a pretty "bad" movie, but it is enjoyable and the Technicolor looks purty. Rating: 7


Que Viva Mexico! - I feel guilty criticizing an unfinished film, but it's all I have to work with. Eisenstein's photography is top-notch, of course. Plenty of iconic images to behold here. The prologue and the epilogue are both very fine as well; the former kind of an ethnographic pastiche of all things Mexican, and the latter an exciting look at the "Day of the Dead" celebration (always a fascinating subject). But the main parts of the film aren't that hot. It's split into two stories. The first is about a matador and includes a bullfighting sequence. It's not bad, but it eventually wears out its welcome. Not nearly as much as the other story, however, about a loving couple and their cruel landlord. It's a revenge tale that captures the rebellious spirit that Eisenstein would have expanded upon had he been able to finish the project, but it goes on waaaaaaaaay too long and rarely succeeded in holding my interest. The storytelling technique is like that of a silent film, with just a bare minimum of voiceover serving as the intertitles. I'm not sure whether or not Eisenstein would have wanted it that way. Still, like Welles' Don Quixote, it's better to have a flawed look at what might have been rather than nothing at all. Rating: 6


The Party - One of those unbearable "comedies" which are based on one horribly awkward situation after another. If I'm saying "fucking hell, just get your goddamn shoe already" to the television, I'm not having a good time. It becomes even worse when the party gets WILD AND CRAZY. Oh haha the servant is getting drunk and woo there's an elephant and hoo boy there's foam everywhere! Such a WILD PARTY that it actually drove that stuffy old lady INSANE!!! The little I've seen by Blake Edwards has been pretty bad (Breakfast at Tiffany's is one of Audrey Hepburn's worst movies) but this reaches new depths of awfulness. Rating: 2


Vicky Cristina Barcelona - Woody Allen's best film in quite a while, at least since Small Time Crooks. Although not a comedy, it has a breeziness to it that reminds me of Truffaut and Jules and Jim. Taking Scarlett Johannson under his wing is starting to really pay off, and the other principals (Bardem, Hall and Cruz) are all very good here as well. I still think Allen's best years are far behind him, and the narration would have been much better if he had done it himself, but I was pleasantly surprised that this was as fulfilling as it was, with worthwhile insights. As a sidenote, ever since seeing Teshigahara's documentary, I'm starting to notice Gaudi popping up EVERYWHERE. Seeing his architecture makes me want to revisit the film. Rating: 8
Export to Wiki
#881
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Teller
Woohoo, made a big dent in my stack of movies this weekend.

Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid


I've held off watching this thing for so long even though I'm a die-hard Dylan fan. I'm not sure which version I'll watch when I do get around to it but it's doubtful the film will be half as entertaining as some of the stories I've heard Dylan tell about meeting the director and various issues with him throughout the shoot. They've made me laugh so hard I fear watching the movie will remind me of these stories and really take me out of the film.



Monumental Utah (1944) No Director Credited

The title alone should tell you that we've got another entry in MGM's TravelTalks series with James A. FitzPatrick. This time we visit Utah where we get to visit various sites including Mormon Tabernacle Choir as well as some mountains, which Indians once believed held demons. FitzPatrick said that up until recent years no one was able to reach this site other than Indians and early settlers. As a whole this is another decent episode but I was somewhat shocked to see that there really wasn't too many places visited. The narration is also cut back and instead we just get long tracking shots of the locations that we're looking at, which actually wasn't a bad thing. The mountain range we visit is pretty much a couple minute drive down the road with the film just letting our eyes see everything there is.

Glimpses of New Brunswick (1938) No Director Credited

Decent entry in James A FitzPatrick's TravelTalks series from MGM. This time out we go to the Canadian city where we see the school where Louis B. Mayer attended, the Hartland Bridge and perhaps the best part is a visit to a sardine work station. Once again, if you've seen one of these then you know what to expect and this one here is pretty much even with most of the others. It's really no better or worse but the one thing that did jump out at me was the perfect picture quality and how the rolling hills really jumped off the screen with the Technicolor greens. I also enjoyed the sardine section because I had never seen how something like this was done. Seeing how the river would flood and then the men would pretty much shovel the fish into boats was fairly interesting but then again, perhaps I'm easily entertained.

Weather Wizards (1939) Fred Zinnemann

One of Bob Dylan's most famous lines is "you don't need a weather man to know which way the wind blows" but I'm sure the family in this Pete Smith short would be happy to have that weather man. This short from the future director of FROM HERE TO ETERNITY talks about what happens when a cold front hits an orchard and farmers must fight to protect their crops from the frost. We see how the family works their magic as scientist and weather men try to determine how long the cold will be with them. Here's a perfect example of why I love shorts so much and why I feel they are so important and sadly not shown that often anymore. Here is a subject that I certainly wouldn't want to spend days reading a book on but for a nine-minute short it made for some great entertainment. Zinnemann handles the subject matter just right but the real credit goes to Smith and his perfect narration, which really adds some nice, tense moments.

Let's Go to the Movies (1949) No Director Credited

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences produced this 10-minute short, which tells us the history of movies starting with the early days of Edison, up to THE GREAT TRAIN ROBBERY, THE BIRTH OF A NATION, THE JAZZ SINGER and more current films. We get to learn how movies were born, when sound came along and even deeper stuff like how the actual film is made. If you're a fan of film then I'm sure you'll get a real kick out of this short, which is full of wonderful information as well as clips from some famous movies. I'm a die-hard fan of Griffith and have seen over one-hundred of his films and that includes watching different versions of his THE BIRTH OF A NATION. The clip show in this film is without question the cleanest and sharpest print I've ever seen and it was rather sad only being able to see such a short amount of footage in such condition. The stuff dealing with the cotton and silver used to make the film was an interesting segment as was seeing theaters from various parts of the world.

Morris Engel: The Independent (2007) Mary Engel

Morris Engel's name isn't too well known today but many would credit him with starting Independent films in America and also helping kick start the French New Wave. In 1953 he made a low-budget film called LITTLE FUGITIVE and it's this film that would take him to some brief fame but his main love was photography. Engel's daughter, Mary, director, wrote, produced and edited this 28-minute documentary that takes a look at her father's work as well as life. He was married to Ruth Orkin, another photographer, who helped him on LITTLE FUGITVE as well as LOVERS AND LOLLIPOPS. The two would eventually go their separate ways but not before leaving their mark on the independent scene. This is a pretty good documentary that gives us some great looks at Engel's photography work but also some commentary on why his visual style was so important to foreign filmmakers as well as American ones like D.A. Pennebaker and Albert Maysles. The film doesn't ever go into too much detail but perhaps that was good as the film doesn't have too much ground to follow since Engel's career was rather short. After watching this film it was somewhat shocking to notice he never got more credit and isn't better known today.

Shark Kill (1976) William A. Graham

Average made-for-TV movie is clearly trying to cash in on Spielberg's JAWS, which was released the previous year. In this film a Great White shark is taking a bite out of people in a coastal town so a couple men rent a boat and go out to kill it for the $20,000 bounty. The quality of this film is pretty much what you would expect from a made-for-TV movie from the 1970's. While it was clearly influenced by JAWS it isn't that bad of a rip off and overall it fits nicely into the decades "man vs. nature" movies. The ending has our two heroes fall into the water and their boat being destroyed. As soon as this happened I couldn't help but think of OPEN WATER so one does get curious to know if the makers of that film had seen this one as children. The movie features a lot of stock footage of the shark, which is good and bad. It's good because the footage is actually great looking with wonderful close ups of the shark. It's bad because it just doesn't mix in too well with the rest of the film and especially during the attacks, which you aren't ever able to see. The ending of the film was pretty much a letdown and I'm still suffering from a "WTF" moment as it still hasn't really made much sense to me. The performances are decent, the direction average and the story is about as simple as you can get and that pretty much sums up the entire film. If you're a fan of this type of film then check it out but others beware.

Maneaters Are Loose! (1978) Timothy Galfas

Extremely bad made-for-TV movie has a crazy farmer letting loose a couple maneating tigers, which soon start stalking a California town. Many people turn a blind eye to the matter at hand but a detective (Tom Skerritt) knows something isn't adding up as more people go missing. I enjoy a good made-for-TV movie as much as the next person but this one here is just pure boredom. I could never get involved in the story because of the rather poor writing and it appears none of the cast members were too thrilled with their characters because most sleepwalk through the film. I've always enjoyed Skerritt but you can just look at his face and see that he's incredibly bored here. I'm not sure if he had any habits at the time he made this movie but he just really seems to be wishing he's in another movie or perhaps there's something else wrong. Stave Forrest and Dabney Coleman have supporting roles but don't add much to the movie. The biggest problem is that there's a lot of dialogue scenes but none of them are interesting. I believe it was meant to deliver some character development but that never happens and in the end you can't help but wish the tigers would finish everyone off so that the movie would be over.

Invisible Agent (1942) Edwin L. Marin

Strange mixture of sci-fi, WW2 propaganda and comedy has Universal trying to hit several genres at once but failing all around. Jon Hall plays Frank Raymond, the grandson of the scientist from the original James Whale film, who is asked by the American government to use his invisible potion to sneak behind German lines and spy on the enemy. Despite the attractive cast this here is pretty bland from start to finish. The biggest problem is the B-movie script, which is just too silly to be all that entertaining. The film's screenplay is also all over the place because it doesn't know what type of movie it wants to be. One minute it tries being all serious but then the next we get slapstick scenes like the one early on where the invisible man spills food all over a German man. The humor didn't work that well but neither does the drama because it's just so poorly written. I remember enjoying this film more as a child and perhaps this is due to me not really knowing everything I now know about the war. The "drama" the film tries to get by talking about a suicide mission attacking New York City is something I'm sure freaked people out back in the day but today it just seems rather tasteless. Hall is pretty good in the role, although he's certainly no match for Raines or Price. Ilona Massey is wasted in her non-believable role as is Peter Lorre. Sir Cedric Hardwicke delivers a fine performance as does J. Edward Bromberg. Those two almost save the film but they're not enough to make this one here a winner.

Lady Vanishes, The (1938) Alfred Hitchcock

When an elderly woman (Dame May Whitty) goes missing only a young woman (Margaret Lockwood) seems to have seen her. With the assistance of a man (Michael Redgrave) and doctor (Paul Lukas) she tries to piece together what happened or perhaps the old woman never existed at all. Whenever the director's great movies are discussed this one here never gets mentioned even though wherever you look it gets four-stars. It says a lot for a director when a film is considered one of the best of its kind yet it doesn't even get mentioned when the man's filmmography is discussed. This is without question the best of Hitchcock's early films due in large part to a great script, great acting and some terrific direction. What works best in the film is how simple the actual story is. That's not to say there aren't any twists and turns but for the most part the title says it all as we have a woman who vanishes and there's a rather simple reason behind it even though the viewer won't catch on until late in the film. What works extremely well is the humor that is spread throughout with the best example coming from the fight sequence in the baggage cart. The way the fight is handled was masterfully done and Redgrave's comic timing is wonderful. Redgrave, to me anyways, steals the film with his charm and laid back comic approach. Lockwood, Witty and Lukas are all very good as well as is the rest of the supporting cast including Naunton Wayne and Basil Radford. In the end this film will probably never get the full credit that it deserves but more and more people are becoming aware of it, which is never a bad thing. There were many, many British thrillers throughout the decade but this one here is clearly the best of the best.

39 Steps, The (1935) Alfred Hitchcock

Early Hitchcock classic as Robert Donat accused of murdering a woman and having to go on the run to try and prove his innocence. Along the way Donat pretty much kidnaps a woman (Madeleine Carroll) and the two try to prove that a group of spies are behind the murder and perhaps much more. This type of story is one that Hitchcock would revisit throughout his career with NORTH BY NORTHWEST being the most popular example. This film really gives the director his first extremely good film even though there are a few flaws here including how easy it is for our hero to constantly escape. He's got spies and cops after him yet he seems to escape with way too much ease. That's a minor nitpick but the rest of the movie is incredibly fun and manages to be entertaining from start to finish. What really carries the film is the IT HAPPENED ONE NIGHT-type of romance and road trip that goes on between Donat and Carroll. With lesser actors this romantic side plot would have killed the film as well as the drama but the two actors are so great together that you can't help but want to see them go through all the flirtatious stuff. Donat really steals the film with his laid back style of acting, which manages to make his quite calm and collective even during the more suspenseful scenes. Carroll is quite cute and makes you enjoy her character even though she turns out hero in early in the film. The film has a very fast pace to it and you can see countless great touches from the master including a great scene early on in the train involving looking over a newspaper.

Young and Innocent (1937) Alfred Hitchcock

Nice thriller from Hitchcock has an actress being murdered by her jealous husband because of her affairs with young men. The next day one of those young men (Derrick DeMarney) finds her body on the beach and is arrested for her murder. He eventually escapes and takes a young woman (Nova Pilbeam) with him so that they can try and prove his innocence. This film has a very similar story to that of THE 39 STEPS but that doesn't take away from any of the charm or drama here. The movie works very well as a thriller and as usual, Hitch manages to throw in some nice dark humor. The best case of this is early one when the man is trying to claim his innocence but Hitch shows the reaction of the crowd, none of whom believe him. The look on their faces is priceless and this dark scenes comes off very funny. Another good running gag is the girl's dog who keeps getting in the way or in some cases getting left behind to where the duo must stop what they're doing and wait on him. Some of the humor doesn't work and most of this deals with the cops being made to look like idiots and one scene where the cops have to ride with some pigs. The writing is quite good from start to finish and the master does a very good job making it into his own. There are countless good scenes including the wonderful ending. I didn't care for how the killer gave himself away but everything leading up to it was very well done. Pilbeam is terrific in her role as is DeMarney and both have wonderful chemistry. By the end of the film you can't help but believe and enjoy the romance they've worked up throughout their adventure.
IMDB Reviews
Export to Wiki
#882
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Hello folks, it's The Invisble Man again!

Goddamn...I wouldn't have thought that finding the time (and the energy) after office hours to discuss what you people have been watching was going to be so tough! The irony is that the usual suspects - Michael Elliott, Martin Teller and Pete York - have posted comments on lots of good stuff lately which, under normal (or previous) circumstances, I would have jumped at the chance to discuss in detail over here.

Still, I can't very well let a couple of them pass by without reacting to them:


NIGHT OF THE DEMON (1957) - I'm surprised that it took Michael so long to catch up with this one which, for my money, is arguably the greatest British horror film ever. Whenever the latter are discussed, the ones getting the most milage would generally be (not without reason, of course) DEAD OF NIGHT (1945), DRACULA (1958), PEEPING TOM (1960), DON'T LOOK NOW (1973) and THE WICKER MAN (1973). Don't get me wrong - I love all 5 of them but I'd argue that Jacques Tourneur's superlative adaptation of the M. R. James story, "Casting The Runes" (which I also own in book form) has got that little extra edge above the others. I don't know if I'd attribute that to its relative obscurity or comparative modesty but, whatever the reason, to my mind the film has very few peers. I had written exhaustively about the film in my HTF review of October 2007 so I won't go over the same territory again but I'll only say that even though it is alleged that Dana Andrews drank a lot on the set of this film, I see no evidence of his lack of sobriety (and enthusiasm) in his performance. I really ought to spring for the "Speaking Of The Devil" book on the making of this film (which, in itself, is a token of how beloved NIGHT OF THE DEMON is to those who are familiar with it) - not to mention the 1981 TV adaptation issued on R2 DVD by Network - in order to elucidate the matter further and to learn more about Tourneur's craftsmanship. Another thing I should mention is that, while in any other movie, the gratuitous shock moment of a hand entering from nowhere into the frame to rest on a staircase would have been ludicrously tacky, it works wonders here - so thick is the atmosphere of dread the film is able to generate throughout. The great performance of Nial MacGinnis as Julian Karswell is always (and deservedly so) set out for praise but, while the animation of the demon is definitely imperfect, I cannot now imagine the film without it!

THEOREM (1968) - again, Pasolini is best-known for 2 movies in particular - THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MATTHEW (1964) and SALO` (1975) - but I'd argue that his most interesting and rewarding films were the ones he made in the latter half of the 1960s. Admittedly, I acknowledge Pasolini's importance in Italian film history over his talents as a film-maker, but there's no denying the worthiness of movies as HAWKS AND SPARROWS (1966), OEDIPUS REX (1967), THEOREM and PIGSTY (1969) which, at once, seem to be so different and yet similar in both tone and themes. I still don't know if Pasolini's defection to medieval settings was a blessing or a curse for him but it must be said that he adapted his 20th Century preoccupations to seemingly archaic worlds with remarkable conviction. As for THEOREM itself, it's been years since I saw it and I still need to pick up the BFI's SE DVD on R2 of it; while being perhaps his most pretentious film, I like how Pasolini had sexual gratification manifest itself so diversely through the various family members, particularly that nicely Surrealist touch of having Laura Betti levitate. I regret to say that I don't recall Ennio Morricone's score at all so I can't comment on it now!

PAT GARRETT AND BILLY THE KID (1973) - While I disliked the original 106 minute theatrical version which I watched on local TV in the Summer of 1991, my opinion was reversed when I caught up (twice) with the 1989 "Director's Cut" that ran for 122 minutes. Incredibly enough, I have yet to pick up that "Sam Peckinpah Westerns Collection" from Warners so I have yet to see the newer 115-minute Reconstruction but I've read very mixed comments on that one. The film itself I find to be one of its director's finest achievements and, at the same time, oddly unsatisfying: James Coburn is excellent but Kris Kristofferson much less so (albeit ideally cast); the same goes for Bob Dylan's score and performance respectively. I don't see how it's bad that "Knockin' On Heaven's Door" is played over the death scenes of minor characters - it's not like the song was an instant classic (although still the most recognizable song from the soundtrack)...even if I have a personal fondness for the song (whose title I don't know) playing in the sequence where Billy The Kid surrenders spreadeagled to Pat Garrett in a majestic overhead shot.


By the way, I've jettisoned my plans to watch those WWI-related movies and instead will be watching half-a-dozen more tributes: 2 dedicated to Joseph Losey - THE PROWLER (1951) and M (1951) - and 4 in honor of Peter Lorre - CRIME AND PUNISHMENT (1935), ISLAND OF DOOMED MEN (1940), THE FACE BEHIND THE MASK (1941) and THE LOST ONE (1951). Now I need to get those Directors' Polls back on track...
IMDB Reviews
Export to Wiki
#883
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Chûshingura - My 4th adaptation of the "Loyal 47 Ronin" story (out of at least 80 that exist), this time by Kunio Watanabe. It's not as intense as Inagaki's, not as beautiful as Mizoguchi's, and not as avant-garde as Ichikawa's. It's a little cheap-looking and kind of soapy. But what it does better than the others is convey the ronins' level of sacrifice and loyalty. The whole Bushido code thing seems a little ridiculous by today's standards (a problem that Mizoguchi's version especially suffers from) but here you really get a sense of why it's so important to these guys. It's also a pretty fun flick. It sports a slew of all-star familiar Japanese faces, including Takashi Shimizu, Machiko Kyo, Shintaro Katsu, and in the lead, Kazuo Hasegawa from my beloved An Actor's Revenge (and about half the rest of the cast from that film as well). Rating: 7


The Furies - My first Anthony Mann western, and it's a pretty great one. The term "Hitchcockian" gets thrown around a little too freely, but I think it applies here. Not because the film is suspenseful (although it is, at a few points) but because of the way it handles psychological issues. Barbara Stanwyck is terrific as a woman with a hell of an Electra complex, and the movie hints strongly at incestuous undertones with her father (a lesser but still fine performance by Walter Huston). There's a lot of darkness to the story, although it backs away from that at the end which makes the conclusion just a bit unsatisfying. Still an excellent movie, though. Rating: 8
Export to Wiki
#884
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Hey, a Mario sighting...



Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
...
Weather Wizards (1939) Fred Zinnemann

One of Bob Dylan's most famous lines is "you don't need a weather man to know which way the wind blows" but I'm sure the family in this Pete Smith short would be happy to have that weather man. This short from the future director of FROM HERE TO ETERNITY talks about what happens when a cold front hits an orchard and farmers must fight to protect their crops from the frost. We see how the family works their magic as scientist and weather men try to determine how long the cold will be with them. Here's a perfect example of why I love shorts so much and why I feel they are so important and sadly not shown that often anymore. Here is a subject that I certainly wouldn't want to spend days reading a book on but for a nine-minute short it made for some great entertainment. Zinnemann handles the subject matter just right but the real credit goes to Smith and his perfect narration, which really adds some nice, tense moments.
...

I'll throw this out to you, Michael, maybe you know the answer. Do you recall the scene in this short where the mother is taking down the curtains and Smith says something like "and Mom takes down the curtains. Why? We'll explain that later"? What was the explanation? Either I missed it or they never explained it!
Export to Wiki
#885
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
NIGHT OF THE DEMON (1957) - I'm surprised that it took Michael so long to catch up with this one which, for my money, is arguably the greatest British horror film ever. Whenever the latter are discussed, the ones getting the most milage would generally be (not without reason, of course) DEAD OF NIGHT (1945), DRACULA (1958), PEEPING TOM (1960), DON'T LOOK NOW (1973) and THE WICKER MAN (1973).

Great list. I would add Quatermass and the Pit and Witchfinder General.
Export to Wiki
#886
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Out of

Brainwaves 1/2
Boogeyman 1/2
Early Ulli Lommel efforts (before he degenerated into DTV crap) are hokey but enjoyable (especially the latter which shockingly gets 3 stars from Maltin's guide). I never realized that Suzanna Love (leading lady in both and Lommels' wife at the time) was a Dupont heiress. Maybe that explains the financing of his films.

Bedlam 1/2
My least favorite in the Lewton boxset really has few horror elements but the story, characters and visuals are still interesting.

Curse of the Cat People 1/2
Fascinating Lewton mood piece is an atypical sequel but offers insight into childhood innocence and fantasy.

Bloodlust 1/2
Lame Most Dangerous Game ripoff.

Gold Rush (restored silent version) 1/2
Very funny. I think this was the first time I have seen the silent version which is better than the "sound" version with Chaplin's annoying narration.

Funhouse 1/2
Eaten Alive
Personally I think that Tobe Hooper is up for reappraisal. While his contemporary Wes Craven is highly respected among most horror fans, Hooper is generally thought of as a "one-hit wonder" but many of his other films have something to offer. Funhouse is probably his second best film. It has a nasty carny atmosphere (helped by some garish photography) and has some strange family undercurrents. Michael nailed Eaten Alive a little earlier - it needs better croc attacks - but I still like it. It's a solid follow-up to TCM with some of the same atmosphere.

From Within 1/2
This After Dark Horrorfest offering is a little different to the usual fare but is still not that good. A rash of suicides in a small town may have something to do with a clash between the church and some Wiccans. The story is totally predictable and is actually given away in the first third of the movie but some may enjoy this. Very surprising ending.

Once 1/2
Totally disarming and enjoyable - one of my favorite movies of the last few years. Musical highlights are the heartfelt song played at the couple's first meeting, the piano scene and the first song in the studio.

My Night at Maud's 1/2
I have enjoyed some of the other Rohmer movies I have seen but am struggling through the Moral Tales. I don't mind talky movies but I just did not find the talk that interesting and that's coming from a mathematician. If you have the DVD please watch the Telecinema episode from the 1970s for a fascinating time capsule.
Export to Wiki
#887
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandro
Great list. I would add Quatermass and the Pit and Witchfinder General.


Christ...I can't believe I left WITCHFINDER GENERAL (1968) off of that potential all-time top British horror films list! It must have been its American connections (Vincent Price and AIP) that threw me off...

As for QUATERMASS AND THE PIT (1968), that and Joseph Losey's THE DAMNED (1963) are arguably Britain's finest generic sci-fi offerings on film - although I'd also put in a good word for more obscure stuff like UNEARTHLY STRANGER (1963) and INVASION (1965).
IMDB Reviews
Export to Wiki
#888
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario Gauci
Hello folks, it's The Invisble Man again!


NIGHT OF THE DEMON (1957) - I'm surprised that it took Michael so long to catch up with this one which, for my money, is arguably the greatest British horror film ever. Whenever the latter are discussed, the ones getting the most milage would generally be (not without reason, of course) DEAD OF NIGHT (1945), DRACULA (1958), PEEPING TOM (1960), DON'T LOOK NOW (1973) and THE WICKER MAN (1973). Don't get me wrong - I love all 5 of them but I'd argue that Jacques Tourneur's superlative adaptation of the M. R. James story, "Casting The Runes" (which I also own in book form) has got that little extra edge above the others. I don't know if I'd attribute that to its relative obscurity or comparative modesty but, whatever the reason, to my mind the film has very few peers. I had written exhaustively about the film in my HTF review of October 2007 so I won't go over the same territory again but I'll only say that even though it is alleged that Dana Andrews drank a lot on the set of this film, I see no evidence of his lack of sobriety (and enthusiasm) in his performance. I really ought to spring for the "Speaking Of The Devil" book on the making of this film (which, in itself, is a token of how beloved NIGHT OF THE DEMON is to those who are familiar with it) - not to mention the 1981 TV adaptation issued on R2 DVD by Network - in order to elucidate the matter further and to learn more about Tourneur's craftsmanship. Another thing I should mention is that, while in any other movie, the gratuitous shock moment of a hand entering from nowhere into the frame to rest on a staircase would have been ludicrously tacky, it works wonders here - so thick is the atmosphere of dread the film is able to generate throughout. The great performance of Nial MacGinnis as Julian Karswell is always (and deservedly so) set out for praise but, while the animation of the demon is definitely imperfect, I cannot now imagine the film without it!

Like a complete idiot, I actually debated whether or not to consider this a "new" viewing or not. I had seen the first thirty-minutes or so as a kid and I remember turning it off. I honestly couldn't remember if I ever started it again and while I was watching the movie, at a point, everything seemed new so I went on and counted it as a first viewing. I'm really not that high on British horror and I actually think the reason I enjoyed this one so much is because it looks and feels more like a Lewton movie instead of another British talk festival. The first view of the demon is certainly a shocker but I think the look of it works better in the long shots. The close ups are rather weak so I would have left them out but I did read the director was forced to add them so that it was more of a "monster" movie.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete York
I'll throw this out to you, Michael, maybe you know the answer. Do you recall the scene in this short where the mother is taking down the curtains and Smith says something like "and Mom takes down the curtains. Why? We'll explain that later"? What was the explanation? Either I missed it or they never explained it!

I'm not 100% certain but I took it as they were later thrown into the fire with the various other things. I don't think this was ever shown though so that might have been on the editing room floor. It is good to see someone other than me checking these things out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandro
Brainwaves 1/2
Boogeyman 1/2
Early Ulli Lommel efforts (before he degenerated into DTV crap) are hokey but enjoyable (especially the latter which shockingly gets 3 stars from Maltin's guide). I never realized that Suzanna Love (leading lady in both and Lommels' wife at the time) was a Dupont heiress. Maybe that explains the financing of his films.

Netflix was suppose to have sent me BRAINWAVES as well as Lommel's OLIVIA, also with Love. I had heard she was pretty much rich and was the main reason he was able to get those film's produced. I also read that sometime later she bought the rights to these movies, which is the reason he can "edit" them into many of his current films. I always enjoyed THE BOOGEYMAN as it at least shows he has talent. I'm not sure if you've seen the sequel but it's incredibly awful and 90% of it is footage from the first movie. The DVD features an alternate cut of it with 60% of the movie cut out and replaces the footage with stuff shot in 2002!!! It's a completely different movie all together but the DVD packages it as we original BM2. RETURN OF THE BOOGEYMAN is even worse. I've seen all but two of his recent DTV junk and it's really shocking to see how far he has fallen but he's making more money now than ever before. Someone told me at LionsGate that those DTV titles are among their best selling "non mainstream" titles, which is just shocking to me.
IMDB Reviews
Export to Wiki
#889
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Michael, I have the DVD with "Return of the Boogeyman" but did not bother after reading the comments on IMDb about it. Same reason I have not bothered with his DTV output. I actually am interested in seeing the Boogeyman II sequel and his earlier films particularly Tenderness of the Wolves. Have you seen that one?
Export to Wiki
#890
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott
I'm not 100% certain but I took it as they were later thrown into the fire with the various other things. I don't think this was ever shown though so that might have been on the editing room floor. It is good to see someone other than me checking these things out.

I suppose that's the only logical explanation, but at the time I was hoping for some kind of brilliant, unimaginable reason to be revealed for taking down the curtains as a cold front approaches. By the way, if you ever wanted to take credit for something it was your 'advocacy' for the short subjects that prompted me to sample a few. And then I have to admit the more I saw, from Traveltalks, Passing Parade, Pete Smith, Crime Does Not Pay, etc., the more I began to appreciate them on their own. Benchley is the only one I haven't been blown away by, he always seems funnier than he actually is.




06/15/09

Smilin’ Through (1932) Dir: Sidney Franklin
Production: MGM

The surviving member of a tragic love triangle bitterly endeavors, 50 years later, to keep the in-love descendants of the other two from getting married. In England circa 1900, John Carteret (Leslie Howard) still mourns the death of his love, Moonyean Clare, who died on the day they were to be married in 1868. Moonyean’s sister has just died, leaving a 5-year-old daughter, Kathleen, who John agrees to raise, sensing something familiar about her. Flash forward 15 years and Kathleen (now grown into Norma Shearer) is the very image of Moonyean. One afternoon Kathleen gets caught in the rain and runs for shelter in a deserted old mansion, where she meets its owner, an American named Kenneth Wayne (Frederic March) who has come to England to fight in the war. They soon fall in love. But when John finds out, to Kathleen’s surprise, he forbids her from seeing Kenneth. John tells Kathleen his story, and it turns out that it is Kenneth’s father, Jeremy, who John blames for his life of unhappiness. One way or another he will make sure Kathleen is not similarly wronged by a Wayne.

Period romance with the sort of polite elegance of character mixed in with overwrought tragedy that, frankly, bores me, unless it’s completely delirious (WUTHERING HEIGHTS, JANE EYRE). Which this isn’t. Norma Shearer suffers extensively in her dual role as Moonyean/Kathleen (March also plays the elder and younger Wayne). This lends a fantasy element to the film, as Kathleen is supposed to represent a re-incarnation of Moonyean for John (that and there’s also Moonyean’s ‘spirit’ hanging around waiting for John). Actually, it’s not much of a character for Shearer, Kathleen is either very high or very low, in tears or giddy in love. It’s annoying. Frederic March is mostly forgettable, he’s your basic romantic archetype, bland, handsome. Something bad is probably going to happen to him (which you know from the moment you hear the word ‘war’). Leslie Howard goes through the most interesting arc, but his pulse never really rises, either. Standard pulchritudinous MGM production design and nicely shot by Lee Garmes but unless you appreciate the ‘women’s picture’ or ‘weepy’ of the HIGHEST order, avoid.

out of 4
--------------------------------------------------
SIDNEY FRANKLIN – “Subjects For Further Research”
Smilin’ Through (1932)




06/16/09

The Story of Three Loves (1953) Dir: Gottfried Reinhardt, Vincente Minnelli
Production: MGM

Episodic film tells three tales of ‘love’ from three unrelated passengers on an ocean liner. In ‘The Jealous Lover’, the head of a ballet company reflects on the events that lead up to the company’s one and only performance of a ballet. While sitting through a generally uninspiring audition, ballet impresario Charles Coudray (James Mason) is suddenly struck by the brilliant dancing of a ballerina, Paula Woodward (Moira Shearer). But in the middle of her routine, Paula collapses in exhaustion and Coudray moves on to the next girl. Paula, who lives to dance, is diagnosed with a heart condition--the strain of dancing will kill her--and she retires. Some time later, after the smashing debut of the latest Coudray ballet, Paula, who was in the audience that night, takes the stage in an empty house and dances like she used to. In the darkness off-stage Coudray observes. Once again struck by her genius, Coudray asks Paula to come to his studio and dance for him and she agrees, fully aware of what might happen. A little too reminiscent of THE RED SHOES, down to Mason playing the Anton Walbrook role. The draw is Shearer, in her only American film, dancing in a couple of routines, although it’s wasted on a philistine like me.

Next is ‘Mademoiselle’, the episode directed by Minnelli. Back on deck, Leslie Caron overhears a governess speaking to the children in her care and reflects back on her own experience as ‘Mademoiselle’. Ricky Nelson plays her young charge, Tommy Campbell. Fed up with his French lessons and after a massive row with Mademoiselle, Tommy runs off one night and meets another boy, Terry, in the park. Goaded by Terry, the boys try to sneak a glimpse at Mrs. Pennicott (Ethel Barrymore), an old lady living in the hotel annex who Terry claims is a witch. Tommy sits and talks with Mrs. Pennicott and the two bond over their dislike of governesses. As they part, she gives Tommy a special incantation that will make him a grown-up for a few hours. Sure enough he turns into Farley Granger, and he finds out what it’s like to be a grown man (it involves, among other things, having a hungry looking Zsa Zsa Gabor come after you). When his grown-up self runs into an upset Mademoiselle, their ensuing brief romance teaches them both about the fleeting nature of youth and the importance of enjoying it while you can. Ricky Nelson is mildly annoying but the story has traces of the marvelous perception into childhood that Minnelli showed in MEET ME IN ST. LOUIS.

The last episode is ‘Equilibrium’ which begins with a passenger, Pierre Narval (Kirk Douglas), looking out over the railing of the ship, thinking about his past. We see Pierre save a young woman named Nina (Pier Angeli) from drowning after she jumps off a bridge. Later he visits her in the hospital. Pierre sees something in Nina that arouses his passion for taking risks in life. Pierre had once been a top trapeze artist, but his penchant for taking risks was said to be the cause of an accident that killed his partner, the woman he loved. Pierre thinks Nina can be the perfect partner, she has already faced death (how much so he would find out) and they have no romantic entanglement. They begin to train and soon a try-out is arranged for a big circus agent. Before the audition though, Nina is visited by a man from her dark past and is sent into a depression. Pierre sits with her the whole night and Nina slowly comes out of it and reveals her past to him. She is a changed person now, are they in love? A fellow acrobat notices Nina’s timing is off. With the audition on and the ominous sounding move called the ‘death dive’ needing to be performed for the agent and Nina’s focus in question, history seems to be repeating for Pierre. This last scene is tense and very good. Douglas’ intensity boils over at times, but that’s Douglas. Angeli is quite beautiful, but doesn’t exhibit a ton of range.

This may be as close as the studio era came to producing an art film, in as much as it deals with some relatively unusual themes in a rather poetic fashion. Not a masterpiece by any means but a curious anomaly, let’s say.

out of 4
-------------------------------------------
VINCENTE MINNELLI – “Far Side Of Paradise”
Yolanda and the Thief (1945) , The Pirate (1948) , The Story of Three Loves (1953) (segment ‘Mademoiselle’)




06/17/09

Something Wild (1961) Dir: Jack Garfein
Production: Prometheus Enterprises/United Artists

A young girl walking home one night from school is brutally raped. She makes it home, but tells no one. Her name is Mary Ann (Carroll Baker, then married to Garfein). She destroys her clothes and scrubs herself clean with laundry soap. The next morning, she goes to school as if nothing happened, but everyday things start to make her ill; kissing her mother goodbye, the crush of people on a subway. Mary Ann tries to run away, literally and figuratively; she leaves her home, rents a shabby room in a flop house and gets a job at a 5-and-10. She slowly goes to pieces and eventually tries to jump off a bridge when she is saved at the last second by Mike (Ralph Meeker), who takes the obviously exhausted Mary Ann back to his dingy apartment to rest. At first, Mike’s gentle attention is a tonic to Mary Ann and she hangs around, but when his own loneliness makes him drunkenly act out, the relationship takes a very wrong turn and she becomes his captive.

Strange movie, and whatever it’s trying to do, it doesn’t work. Ostensibly it’s about these two desperate, damaged people finding each other and in some weird way being good for each other. But it can’t possibly be meant to be life affirming or uplifting (although it dares to be) because there is so much wrong with Mike and Mary Ann. These people need serious professional help. They fall in love, but it’s not real, it’s based on psychosis. The first shot in the movie of Mary Ann shows her getting off a subway and lingering on the platform--she enviously watches a couple as the train pulls out. That’s all we know about her, she’s longing for companionship. So we are left to assume she stays with Mike because he needs her so badly, and that’s what the film bizarrely suggests cures her trauma. As for Mike, he’s played as simpleminded, but that doesn’t alter the reality that he is a dangerous psychopath. He’s not out of touch with reality, but he’s seriously irresponsible without any feeling for consequences. The first half of the film promised a serious look at what the sexual assault does to Mary Ann, but once Ralph Meeker enters the picture that goes off the rails. Otherwise, there is some gritty New York location work, an atypical Aaron Copland score (not folky, kinda sordid-jazzy) and a nice opening credit sequence with Saul Bass designs. Jean Stapleton as a prostitute and Doris Roberts as a bitchy co-worker add colorful support.

out of 4
----------------------------
JACK GARFEIN – “Miscellany”
Something Wild (1961)
Export to Wiki
#891
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Blood Work
I felt like a good suspense/thriller... when I spotted this one in my list I knew it had to be the one to watch since the only thing I remember about it is that I enjoyed it the first time I seen it. I watched it once when I got the DVD back in 2003. It was one of the movies I got for $5.00 when the video store I worked for at the time closed down. I am glad I decided to watch it again. It is a very good movie. I thought Clint Eastwood was great in it. Jeff Daniels was pretty good as well. But what I really liked about this one is the story itself.
Movies Watched in 2009
Export to Wiki
#892
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

The Graduate (rewatch, Blu-Ray) - A few thoughts while watching this for the umpteenth time. First, I wondered what I would think if it was my first time. I've been so stingy with the 9's and 10's lately, would I be just as harsh with this? Would I think it was funny, would I criticize it for playing "Scarborough Fair" 5 times in a row? But it's impossible to put yourself in those shoes... I suppose that ONE of the things I love about it is its familiarity, but certainly that's not the only thing. Next, it's nice to have a 60's counterculture film without any filthy longhairs, tie-dye, paisley, flower power, "make love not war", pot smoking or any other hippie trappings. Maybe a few months too early for all that, but it's still refreshing. And lastly, a word about the cast. Obviously you have the three principals, and those memorable small roles like Norman Fell, Buck Henry and the "plastics" guy. But I want to give props to William Daniels, Elizabeth Wilson, and Murray Hamilton (Mr. & Mrs. Braddock and Mr. Robinson). Three wonderfully comic performances that illustrate the life Benjamin is wary of, without descending too far into buffoonery. Rating: 10

Dr. Strangelove (rewatch, Blu-Ray) - Don't really have anything new to say here. I could regurgitate all the little bits of trivia, but I think everyone who cares already knows them all. I previously referred to this as "second tier" Kubrick, but it's more like 1.5-tier. Just a hair below my favorites (Shining/2001/Paths of Glory). It makes me laugh heartily. Rating: 9


Sulanga Enu Pinisa (The Forsaken Land) - Very beautiful Sri Lankan film (it won the Camera d'Or) with meditative rhythms reminiscent of Tarkovsky. Nearly silent, it explores the aftereffects of a long civil war on a small group of people in a desolate area. While it's not entirely clear what points the director is trying to make, the series of events (and non-events) does lead to a disturbing climax. Perhaps more style than substance, but an interesting piece of work. Rating: 7
Export to Wiki
#893
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Last Action Hero
This is a movie I find to be very under-rated. This is just a fun pop-corn movie. Sure almost the whole movie is so over-the-top it is ridiculous. But that is what makes this movie so fun. I really get a kick out of all the fun it makes of action movies... even movies in general.
Movies Watched in 2009
Export to Wiki
#894
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandro
Michael, I have the DVD with "Return of the Boogeyman" but did not bother after reading the comments on IMDb about it. Same reason I have not bothered with his DTV output. I actually am interested in seeing the Boogeyman II sequel and his earlier films particularly Tenderness of the Wolves. Have you seen that one?

I haven't seen WOLVES yet and Netflix doesn't have it available. I could probably rent it at this store in Louisville and might do so at some point. Netflix did just send me another one of the DTV features that I'll torture myself with this weekend. Lommel did just release a theatrical (overseas at least) film that is getting great reviews so hopefully he can get back to that.

Quote:
I suppose that's the only logical explanation, but at the time I was hoping for some kind of brilliant, unimaginable reason to be revealed for taking down the curtains as a cold front approaches. By the way, if you ever wanted to take credit for something it was your 'advocacy' for the short subjects that prompted me to sample a few. And then I have to admit the more I saw, from Traveltalks, Passing Parade, Pete Smith, Crime Does Not Pay, etc., the more I began to appreciate them on their own. Benchley is the only one I haven't been blown away by, he always seems funnier than he actually is.

I'm glad I'm not the only one. I usually get around 7-10 e-mails a week over at IMDB and the majority of them are people asking various questions about shorts. Whenever I go to the movies today and have to sit through ten-minutes worth of shampoo commercials is when I always think to myself about one of these shorts playing instead.


For anyone in the Louisville area, the Louisville Palace just announced their "Summer Classic Movies Series" and my wish was answered because they're showing the Universal Monsters FINALLY. You can get full info here:

Welcome to THE LOUISVILLE PALACE THEATRE

THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA, DRACULA, FRANKENSTEIN, THE MUMMY, THE BLACK CAT, THE RAVEN, THE BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN, THE WOLF MAN and CREATURE FROM THE BLACK LAGOON.

It's a 90-minute drive from where I live now but I'll be there each Saturday. A couple years ago I watched both screenings of A&C MEET FRANKENSTEIN and I might do that with a few of these since it's doubtful I'll ever get the chance to see them on the big screen again. This year the series is running three weeks shorter than before but I won't complain.
IMDB Reviews
Export to Wiki
#895
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Sportsman's Memories (1944)

Mixed bag from Pete Smith shows a janitor going into his room where we see various "sportman trophies" from Smith's various hunts. We then see footage from various strange hunts including shooting coyotes from a plane, capturing bears with ropes and fishing for marlin from a blimp. There's no doubt that we get some pretty amazing hunting footage here but the downside is that there are some pretty brutal things captured that really aren't that entertaining to watch. The stuff with the bear has a group of dog chasing it up a tree where two men then lasso the neck and legs before letting it down on the ground where they tie it up. In this footage the bear starts going crazy as one would expect and ends up getting ahold of one of the dogs, which screams out in pain. In the coyote segment we see a couple get shot and killed as does a large stingray. The footage is rather amazing but then again, it's hard to be entertained off of these things getting killed on screen.

Mills Blue Rhythm Band (1934) Roy Mack

Vitaphone musical has a group of people seeing various dance and musical acts at a nightclub and then they travel to a party where they see even more. This short from Warner is pretty special for a couple reasons. For one it features an all-black cast, which certainly wasn't the norm back in 1934. It was rather refreshing seeing something that didn't feature blacks in a supporting role or being played by white actors in blackface. Another reason why this short is so special is that we get some great musical numbers including songs by Blues McAllister and Sally Gooding. The dance numbers are very good and come from what we would call swing and jazz. The musical numbers are very well done and you can tell that director Mack put a lot of effort into them.

Hamlet (1997) Joe D'Amato

If you happen to accidentally rent this expecting Olivier it won't take long for you to hit the eject button. This "version" of the classic Shakespeare play is actually just another set up for yet another hardcore movie by D'Amato. Here, the question is "to screw or not to screw", which is haunting the young Hamlet who gets advice from his naughty mother as well as the ghost of his dead father who was known for his sexual acts. OK, obviously only fans of D'Amato are going to view this film so they're going to know what they're getting into. The actual "story" here is fairly funny as a spoof as D'Amato keeps the dialogue changing and while it's childish, in a sexual way, it still manages to be funny. The sex scenes really aren't all that sexy although I assume they're done well enough to where fans of porn wouldn't mind watching this. The cinematography, also by D'Amato, is the best thing which is often the case with his later day venture into these porn movies.

Murder! (1930) Alfred Hitchcock

Very entertaining crime-thriller has an actress (Norah Baring) convicted of murder on another actress but one juror (Herbert Marshall), a former actor, isn't convinced that she's guilty so he sets off to try and investigate the case better. Of all of Hitchcock's pre-1934 films this one here is clearly his best as it features some very good acting mixed in with a very strong story that makes for a great mystery. After watching this film you can't help but wish the director had stayed making movies like this one instead of wasting times on films like JUNO AND THE PAYCOCK. There are four brilliant sequences in this film starting with the jury room. One has to wonder if Lumet had seen this film prior to making 12 ANGRY MEN because the two films share quite a bit in common. The acting in this scene is masterfully done by all twelve people and it really helps drive the drama home. Another terrific scene involves on where the murder in reenacted to try and prove who the killer is. The way this scene is director is even better, in terms of drama, than had we seen the actual murder played out. This leads to the ending at the circus, which contains even more suspense and ends up packing one hell of a punch. The fourth sequence is when Marshall and Baring have a discussion behind prison walls where she talks about her fears of being locked up for life and the horrors she has already faced in just a week. Hitchcock handles all of this stuff with a masterful touch and really makes the viewer feel the drama from start to finish. The performances are all very well done especially Marshall in a very demanding role. In the end this is a first class thriller that has enough going for it that it really does deserve more attention than its ever received. This is without question Hitchcock's best film up until THE 39 STEPS when he started to really take form.

Schoolgirls in Chains (1973) Donald M. Jones

Two brothers, one a good-looking, seemingly normal man (Gary Kent) and the other a retarded, child-like man (John Stoglin) are sent by their mother to kidnap women and keep them chained up in their basement. Mommy does all of this so that her retarded son will have someone to "play" with. This film certainly fits into the exploitation genre but it isn't as wild or as sexual as the title would make you believe. During an interview on the DVD the director lets it be known that this title was just thrown on by the producer so that it would draw people in. Overall the film isn't too bad but it contains a "twist" in the story, which is so obvious that it really slows the film down because we have to wait eighty-minutes for the characters in the film to pick up on it. If I named the movie or director that this is ripping off then it would be a dead giveaway but I'd be shocked if anyone didn't have it figured out by at least the thirty-minute mark. I picked up on it right when the first clue happens and I'm sure many others will as well. Other than that the film actually delivers some decent performances and direction. The most interesting scene is one that seems to have been copied later in HALLOWEEN. There's a scene where the retarded brother is stalking a future victim and he walks from the front of the house to a side window to look in on a couple making out on a couch. This whole sequence is very close to what we see at the start of HALLOWEEN so it was interesting to see it being done here five years before the Carpenter movie. The low budget actually helps the film because it creates a nice atmosphere and really makes the movie seem all the more realistic. Kent gives the best performance in the film and Stoglin is good too even though his performance is more off the wall during certain times. The nudity in the film is rather low, although the retarded brother does like to play "doctor" with his female victims. There's really nothing too special here but there is enough where fans of drive-in exploitation will want to check it out.

Boss Ni**er (1975) Jack Arnold

Boss (Fred Williamson) and Amos (D'Urville Martin) are bounty hunters who travel to a small town being ran by a corrupt Mayor. Boss is waiting on a bad guy to show up and in the mean time decides to make himself Sheriff, which doesn't sit well with the racist white locals but they're going to learn that there's one way to do things and that's up to the Boss. In case you didn't read the title, this here is blaxploitation 101 and without question the best I've seen from the genre. Director Arnold is best known for CREATURE FROM THE BLACK LAGOON but he handles this material perfectly and not only delivers the perfect blaxploitation movies but also a pretty good Western. What works best here is Williamson's screenplay, which clearly shows that he knows how to write dialogue but it also shows he's just as brave as the characters he plays because there are all sorts of rules broken here and this helps keep the viewer on high alert because you never know what's going to happen. Every racist remake ever made towards a black person are present here and played for laughs in how over the top they are but they then lead to some hard hitting action as Williamson really does lay down the Hammer. The racial slurs are downright hilarious especially one scene where a dumb redneck tells Williamson to "shine his shoes" and the Hammer goes up to him acting like a shoe shiner. The way Williamson plays this and eventually pays it off is just downright brilliant and is clearly a highlight of the genre. Some get shot while others are forced to keep handing money over in fines but the Hammer deals with them all. What I respect most about the film and its screenplay is that Williamson isn't afraid to not play by the rules and the reason I say this is because certain people are killed throughout and these are the type of people that never get killed in films like this. The action scenes are great as are the stunts and Arnold knows how to use the slow motion oh so well. In some ways this film spoofs BLAZING SADDLES, which is pretty funny considering that film was a spoof to begin with. The sensitive should probably stay clear but if you want brave and fun filmmaking than this here is the top of the blaxploitation genre.

Cash and Carry (1937) Del Lord

The Three Stooges find a crippled boy and his sister living in their junk yard so they go to deposit their money in the bank so that nothing happens to it. The boys end up trading the money away for a "buried treasure", which two con men tell them is in a house, which they soon destroy trying to look for the goods. This here is a pretty good short for the boys, which features a similar plot to the one that would be used in LARCENY, INC. (and later SMALL TIME CROOKS). The movie features plenty of nice laughs from start to finish even though there aren't any real loud ones. My favorite sequence is towards the end when all three men are down in this giant hole they dug when they realize they don't have any place to throw the new dirt so they decide to dig another hole just to put the new dirt in. Moe ends up getting beat up pretty bad by the other two who keep swinging their shovels. The opening stuff dealing with the junk car and its bad tires is pretty funny as well but the ending is where the film really works.

Playing the Ponies (1937) Charles Lamont

The Stooges are running a junky restaurant where no client leaves happy or willing to tell their friends to visit. The boys overhear a couple con men talking about a horse and end up trading their restaurant for him. It turns out the horse is a total bust until Curly ends up feeding him some hot peppers. This here is certainly middle ground as far as the Stooges go but there are a few nice laugh scattered throughout the film. This certainly isn't a short I'd be going back to watch over and over again but there's enough here for at least one viewing. I found the first half with the restaurant to be the best as we get Curly doing several nice gags including the fishing bit as well as him constantly eating the salted peanuts. The customers in the film also get to deliver some nice lines as all of them leave the restaurant very unhappy about their "mud like" coffee and various other issues. The scene with the horse and feeding it hot peppers really didn't make me laugh even though it was mildly cute.

Sitter Downers, The (1937) Del Lord

The Three Stooges want to marry their loved ones but their father refuses because, well, because they're the Stooges. The boys refuse to leave his house until he gives permission, which eventually makes the national news and soon letters from across the country are coming to them. The father finally gives his okay and the group decide to take one of the letter's offer of a new house. The only catch is that they have to build it themselves. This was an extremely bland short for the trio because of some rather lazy writing, which constantly goes for the routine joke instead of trying anything new or original. The first half of the short works the best as we get a few minor laughs mainly with the girl's father who at one point accidentally gets beat up by the boys. The second half is just rather bland as we get the boys trying to build the house but end up fighting amongst each other more. The reaction to girls have to their fighting is boring and things really don't pick up until the very end when the house is done.

Termites of 1938 (1938) Del Lord

A woman needs a date so she decides to call an escort service but she accidentally dials a termite company being led by Moe, Larry and Curly. The boys end up going to this lavished party and all hell breaks loose of course. This is one of the very few Stooges short where I found nothing to be funny. I really don't recall laughing once, which is saying quite a bit but I found this thing to be rather boring from start to finish. The first half deals with the boys trying to catch a mouse by rigging a trap to fire off a canon but of course things go wrong. The second half deals with the party where we get some unfunny gags including one where the rich people start copying the way the Stooges are eating their mashed potatoes. I noticed that Charley Chase was credited with Associate Producer but you can't notice any of his touch here.

Gore Gore Girls, The (1972) Herschell Gordon Lewis

A polished detective (Frank Kress) and snappy reporter (Amy Farrell) are investigating the strange cases where strippers are being found mutilated with their heads bashed in. This would be the last film Lewis would direct until his comeback nearly thirty-years later with BLOOD FEAST 2 and it was a pretty good way to go out. The times were certainly catching up with the director because what we see here, the type of shock and awe gore that worked so well in the early 60's, seems rather old fashioned when compared to other films out around this time. With that said, fans of gore will certainly find a lot of that here and overall I had a pretty good time with the movie. As is to be expected, the screenplay is simply built around all the gore sequences, which there are plenty of. The entire story is pretty much just various strippers going back to their homes where they are met with extremely violent deaths. The director has always been involved with gore and violence but most of the time it was just innocent fun but that's not the case here because what we have here is rather mean spirited and extremely graphic and over the top. The violence basically just shows up the (fake) heads getting bashed in with eyes, brains and various other items being ripped out. We get some extremely outrageous scenes including one where a woman's face is melted with a hot iron and another where a woman has her face cooked with french fries in some grease. We get some extremely disgusting scenes including a woman getting her nipples cut off only to have milk start shooting out!! An even crazier scene is one where a woman has her panties pulled down so that she can be spanked to death only to have the killer then pour salt on her. Most of these effects are very fake looking but Lewis edits them in a way to make them quite uneasy to watch. Everything else from the acting to the production values are pretty low quality and that includes a cameo by the legendary Benny Youngman. It's funny but apparently Youngman would live the rest of his life denying he was in the movie even though it's on film and he really couldn't lie his way out of it. All in all this clearly isn't the director's best film but fans of gore will certainly want to check it out for all the crazy death scenes.

Wizard of Gore, The (1970) Herschell Gordon Lewis

A news personality gets drawn to a magic show where Montag The Magnificent act out various forms of torture. The magician will make it appear that he is brutally slaughtering women on the stage but the women eventually walk off but hours later they are found really slaughtered. The newswoman's boyfriend starts to get suspicious so he starts to investigate. Clocking in at a torturous 96-minutes, this here is clearly the worst of Lewis' gore films. I normally enjoy all of his gore films but this one here was just torture to sit through and I found it deadly boring before the first murder had even taken place. Most of his gore films have very little plot but at least they have something in them. This film has absolutely nothing and it's no wonder this thing sat on a shelf for nearly two years before finally getting released. The first murder sequence is downright boring and sadly they don't get any better but in fact they continue to get worse. The explanation behind what the magician is doing and how he's doing it is just downright stupid and you can't help but roll your eyes throughout the film. Even worse are the gore effects, which have to be the worst of the director's career because of how fake they look. Countless times you see the women breathing even though they're suppose to be dead and there's one scene where the knife being used starts leaking blood before the actual murder. This movie is a complete disaster from start to finish and all the blame must go towards the director. Each scene is done is such a slow, drown out pace that I was just sitting there wondering what the heck Lewis was thinking by doing this. I'm certainly not trying to suggest that his other movies were masterpieces of cinema but at least they were entertaining. This one here just worthless.
IMDB Reviews
Export to Wiki
#896
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

King Kong (2005)
Let me start out by saying this is my first taste of any King Kong movie. So I can not compare it to any of the previous movies. The first thing that popped in my mind when I pulled this from the shelf is "Damn!... this movie is Long!"... it clocks in just over 3hrs! But ok... I can accept that as long as it is an interesting movie. I was prepared for it being set back in the past... and that part of it was good... think it works better then having it placed in the present. But what I wasn't expecting was the dinosaurs that were also on the island. Not that it was a bad thing... because it wasn't... just an unexpected thing. I have to admit I did enjoy where he was fighting off the 3 Tyrannosauruses. Though I do think the giant insects were a bit much for my taste. Of course the scenes where he was brought to civilization were good. Seeing Kong let loose in New York City was definitely a lot of fun. I thought King Kong himself was well done. He looked good on the screen... though I do think I was expecting him to be a little bit bigger. But that was just going by what I heard since I never seen a King Kong movie before. Over all a movie I really enjoyed. I bought this one used... and the only downfall of it for me is no real extras and it is the Full Screen version. So it is one I will consider replacing some day.
Movies Watched in 2009
Export to Wiki
#897
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete York
01/20/09: Gabriel Over the White House (1933) Dir: Gregory La Cava
01/20/09: Swing High, Swing Low (1937) Dir: Mitchell Leisen
01/22/09: The Prizefighter and the Lady (1933) Dir: W.S. Van Dyke
01/23/09: Stanley and Livingstone (1939) Dir: Henry King
01/24/09: The Late George Apley (1947) Dir: Joseph L. Mankiewicz
01/26/09: Tales of Manhattan (1942) Dir: Julien Duvivier
01/28/09: The Company She Keeps (1951) Dir: John Cromwell
02/03/09: I See a Dark Stranger (1946) Dir: Frank Laudner
02/05/09: No Greater Glory (1934) Dir: Frank Borzage
05/08/09: Broken Lullaby (1932) Dir: Ernst Lubitsch
05/26/09: Chad Hanna (1940) Dir: Henry King
05/27/09: Ramrod (1947) Dir: André de Toth
06/15/09: Smilin' Through (1932) Dir: Sidney Franklin


Trip...er, Pete,


This may come as no surprise to you but in the last few months I've acquired all of the above movies that you've seen this year but, unlike you, I've yet to see any of them! I was also considering SOMETHING WILD (1961) but have passed on it for now. Another one I discared was Bob Dylan's RENALDO AND CLARA (1978)...after re-reading our resident Dylanologist Michael Elliott's damning review on HTF!

I've also acquired a few others from your list that I'm already familiar with, like THE STORY OF LOUIS PASTEUR (1935), THE SEARCH (1948), etc.
IMDB Reviews
Export to Wiki
#898
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mario Gauci
Trip...er, Pete,

This may come as no surprise to you but in the last few months I've acquired all of the above movies that you've seen this year but, unlike you, I've yet to see any of them! I was also considering SOMETHING WILD (1961) but have passed on it for now. Another one I discared was Bob Dylan's RENALDO AND CLARA (1978)...after re-reading our resident Dylanologist Michael Elliott's damning review on HTF!

I've also acquired a few others from your list that I'm already familiar with, like THE STORY OF LOUIS PASTEUR (1935), THE SEARCH (1948), etc.

Ha! That is an odd coincidence, isn't it? I boldly predict future overlapping, but I await your musings nonetheless. I sympathize with the sometime sisyphean notion of reducing the 'to watch' pile, but in your case with your broad tastes it must be something like herding cats!
Export to Wiki
#899
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

King Kong (1976)
After watching the 2005 version yesterday I was in the mood for more King Kong. I wish I had the 1933 version to finally watch... but I don't so I had to settle for the 1976 version. A movie I heard sucked. The first thing I did was watch the trailer that was on the disc with it. This did not raise my hopes any. But what really got me was the trailer actually had the nerve to call this movie original!?!? This movie is rather boring from the start. I got one look at Jessica Lange and thought well there is one reason to watch the movie... she was a beautiful woman. Then she started talking and I realized just how annoying of a character she portrayed. It started to get slightly more interesting once they got to the island. But not enough of an improvement that it wasn't still work trying to watch this movie. King Kong didn't look too bad... but wasn't great either. One thing I did like is Kong fighting the giant snake... but it was over so quickly it is hardly worth mentioning. Once they got him back to civilization it didn't get any better. I think part of where they went wrong in this one... that they did right in the 2005 version... is that they actually tried to modernize it instead of having it take place in the past. This is one I just wasn't able to get into much. Had 1 or 2 scene that were half way decent... but not much beyond that.
Movies Watched in 2009
Export to Wiki
#900
Rating: 0

Re: Track the Films You Watch (2009)

06/18/09

Flight (1929) Dir: Frank Capra
Production: Columbia Pictures

A Marine tries to prove his mettle while he and his buddy fight over a girl. When Lefty Phelps (Ralph Graves) pulls a ‘Wrong Way’ Reigels and blows the big football game, he becomes the disgrace of the sporting world and butt of every joke. But when he overhears someone wondering how much he must have been paid to blow the game, Lefty gets fed up and confronts the guy. The guy Lefty attacks is Panama Williams (Jack Holt), a Marine Corps flight instructor. Panama’s impressed with Lefty’s gumption and tells him if he’s ever near the base to come check him out. Lefty does, as a recruit. After some training, the day comes for Lefty’s solo flight. His nerves are compounded by some ribbing from the other guys and Lefty ends up flipping the plane on the takeoff. A disaster, he’s booted from flight school. On top of that, Lefty is seriously injured and ends up in the hospital where he falls in love with his nurse, Elinor (Lila Lee). When the Marines are sent down to Nicaragua, Panama takes Lefty down with him as a mechanic. There, Lefty learns that Panama is also in love with Elinor. But it’s Lefty that Elinor loves. As the two men come to blows over her, the company is called into action. Lefty, who goes up as a gunner for another pilot, will soon get his chance to make good.

Some nice gags (Lefty, after a particularly rough training flight has to hold in his urge to hurl while a flag ceremony finishes up; after rescuing some nurses from a jeep stranded in water, a love-struck Lefty picks up a fellow grunt by accident) and moments (Panama snaps a despondent Lefty out of a funk with some horse play, like little kids might do). And if there’s one thing they could do 80 years ago, it was film exciting aerial sequences, including real shots of the actors in the planes (which almost backfired when a plane with Holt aboard crashed--the actor suffered only minor injuries), although some of the model shots stick out in a bad way. The smaller moments tend to drag (the film is just short of 2 hours). The acting isn’t terrible, Holt and Graves are to varying degrees likable or stiff, but Lee (THE UNHOLY THREE), cute in a kewpie doll way, isn’t even that successful. The bigger problem is that the typical stilted dialogue and delivery of the early sound period overpowers the proceedings at times. Altogether though, holds up quite nicely as entertainment, particularly in the context of when it was made.

out of 4
-------------------------------------
FRANK CAPRA – “Far Side Of Paradise”
Flight (1929)




A Letter from a Soldier (1951) (short) Dir: Don Weis
Production: MGM

An excerpt from the film IT’S A BIG COUNTRY, for the purpose of a “public service presentation in cooperation with the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith”. Keefe Brasselle plays Maxi Klein, a soldier just back from Korea paying a visit to the mother of his buddy, Jack, who was killed in action. At first Mrs. Wrenley (Marjorie Main) is happy to see a friend of her sons, but her demeanor takes a drastic turn south when Maxi tells her his name. Maxi picks up on the cold shoulder, but he has come with Jack’s last letter and he reads it to her. Of course the letter is a remarkably composed exposition, in the ‘everyman vernacular’, of why he was in Korea. When Maxi is done, Mrs. Wrenley miraculously is no longer an anti-Semite. Standard propaganda.

out of 4
------------------------
DON WEIS – “Miscellany”
A Letter from a Soldier (1951) (short) , Bannerline (1951)




John Nesbitt’s Passing Parade No. 72: City of Children (1949) (short)
Production: MGM

In the final entry in the Passing Parade series, we look at the city of Mooseheart, 35 miles from Chicago, which is for and run by kids. They are the farmers, bankers, grocers, carpenters, journalists and artists and they are all orphans. The city, which by the time of this short was built on and of property worth about $40million, was built solely on donations. It sounds like a fascinating experiment, and indeed the kids were used for long-term psychiatric evaluation which makes it a little less cuddly. The whole thing is soft soaped as some kind of idyllic existence, there’s advanced medical care, the kids are given career training, all the facilities are modern, but who knows what the reality was. That’s probably just me being cynical, it does look pretty sweet. Would love to know the ensuing history. EDIT: It's still around and it's still awesome.

out of 4




06/19/09

Mission to Moscow (1943) Dir: Michael Curtiz
Production: Warner Bros.

“Mr. Stalin, I believe history will record you as a great builder for the benefit of mankind.”

Or not. Biopic about Joseph E. Davies, former United States ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1936-38, and based on his book of the same title which told of his experiences. Davies (Walter Huston) is plucked from a vacation with his family (Ann Harding, Eleanor Parker) by his old pal FDR to be ambassador to the Soviet Union. Upon his arrival, he finds the Soviets to be a peace loving people that are being pushed into war by provocative moves from Germany and Japan. Davies also learns that it is the Western democracies’ isolationist policies that will be most responsible should a war arise.

Begins with a dreadful, prolonged foreword delivered by the actual Davies, who had final say on the content of the film (after the movie was finished he wanted to change Walter Huston for an actor that looked more like himself). This prologue was obviously stuffed in by his decree. The film is somewhat notorious for its patently ridiculous take on ‘history’ (the Stalin purge in the show trials of 1936-38 was done to weed out Nazi and Japanese saboteurs, the non-aggression pact was signed by Stalin in order to allow for time to build up the Soviet army, the Soviet Union invaded Finland to ‘protect’ it from Germany, etc.), but then history has always been a malleable notion in Hollywood. And to take a different angle, this probably WAS history as Davies believed it to be. As American ambassador he saw what his Soviet hosts wanted him to see. The main problem is that the film as drama fails. It’s two hours of diplomacy; Davies taking meetings with people over and over again, with FDR, with a German banker, with the chairman of the All-Union Central Executive Committee, factory workers, diplomats, Churchill, Stalin, etc. The propaganda at no time ever takes a back seat to entertaining filmmaking. The scene of the Moscow trials is boring, it goes on too long to make its preposterous point. The best stuff is the integrated newsreel montages, either the mesmerizing, TRIUMPH OF THE WILL-like Nazi footage, or what was likely most folks’ first look at Russia. Walter Huston’s main role in the picture is to pose questions that can be reassuringly answered for the audience by various Soviet characters throughout the film, until the end when, properly educated, he can start answering them himself. Ann Harding as Davies’ wife, Marjorie (formerly Marjorie Post, of Post cereal fame), is there mostly to be flattered and impressed by her Soviet hosts. And a beautiful Eleanor Parker is the Davies’ daughter, Emlen, whose main job is to enjoy Russia (ice skating, going to the ballet, dancing) and therefore show anybody in the audience under 25 that the Soviet Union is just as cool as the United States. The likes of Oscar Homolka, Gene Lockhart, Victor Francen and Roman Bohnen make up the Soviets. Manart Kippen plays Stalin as if he based him on Frank Morgan. To paraphrase Manny Farber, this film is firmly in the tradition of Hollywood politics--once Red-baiting, here Red-praising--usually insulting. Or to look at it another way, as proffered by Jack Warner when the film became an easy target for HUAC, the picture was made when Russia was an ally and “made only to help a desperate war effort and not for posterity”. Fair enough. Still stinks.

out of 4
----------------------------------
MICHAEL CURTIZ – “Lightly Likable”
Mission to Moscow (1943)
Export to Wiki