Re: How do Blu-Rays treat 4:3 DVDs?
Although what Nicholas says is technically/theoretically true, some early players were flawed in that they did indeed stretch 1.33 content to 16x9 regardless of player settings. My first gen Tosh HD-D1 HD DVD player did it, as did my Pan DMP-BD10A BD player.
Luckily however . . .
| I doubt that many (if any) BluRay players will provide the scaliing/zoom option of your Panny RP-91 for non-anamorphic letterbox DVD material . . . |
. . . I've recently discovered that my new Pan DMP-BD55 does indeed not only present non-anamorphic DVDs at the right aspect ratio via what I believe to be
scaling (as opposed to zooming; the aspect ratio is right *and* human forms look properly composed) but I'm also getting the pq benefits of the upconversion via HDMI.
This is grand for me because, like Glenn, my vintage Tosh widescreen set prohibits aspect ratio control when fed anything of higher rez than 480p. Finally I can watch the embarrasing number of (mainly Disney) non-anamo titles (
The Horse Whisperer,
He Got Game, even the Crit
Armageddon,
Quiz Show,
Like Water For Chocolate and
Scream, plus some Fox discs like
True Lies and
Raising Arizona) and have them be properly composed *and* upconverted.
| . . . if I'm watching a letterbox movie that is non-anamorphic, will it have both pillarbox and letterbox -- with no stretch? |
This is what my HD-XA2 HD DVD player does: you get a properly-composed but small and unsatisfying swath of a rectangular image in the ceter of the screen with black on all sides. The BD55 is the first high def player I've owned of either flavor (and there are four so far) that addresses both of your concerns.