- Joined: September 2005
- Post Count: 1,330
Re: Newbie Question - Why Not PS3?
There are a few reasons you might go with something else;
*Some people want analogue outputs because their receivers don't support HDMI
*Some want a cheaper player
*Some are concerned about the PS3's incompatibility with universal remotes.
*Game machine bigotry. Sadly this is probably the most common reason.
"Because he's the hero that Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now... and so we'll hunt him... because he can take it... because he's not a hero... he's a silent guardian, a watchful protector... a DARK KNIGHT."
-
Toddwrtr
- Todd Erwin
-
- offline
- Joined: April 2008
- Location: Newport Beach, CA
- Post Count: 432
Re: Newbie Question - Why Not PS3?
Currently, the PS3 is the only Blu-ray player with wireless networking built-in that I am aware of. I've had my PS3 for over a year and a half now, and have been quite pleased with it. I use it to store my music and photos, play Blu-ray and DVDs, play games, and surf the internet (although the browser still needs some work). I'm not sure how Greg is using his PS3 for on-demand, unless he is renting downloads form the Playstation store and/or watching online content from sites like HULU and YouTube.
The only other option I can think of, for what you want, is the LG player that already has Netflix On-Demand compatibility. However, LG is not always on top of getting firmware updates released in a timely manner, compared to Sony or Panasonic.
Sadly, I think one area where the Blu-ray player manufacturers really need to work on is an easy solution to connecting the player to the internet for BD-Live. Even wireless can be tricky for the average consumer, so I'd like to see Sony, Panasonic, Samsung, or LG team up with a company like Linksys or Netgear, or even Slingbox, and come up with a co-branded powerline ethernet bridge that can be sold along side the BD players, and stocked in the entertainment hardware department rather than computer networking at retail locations. DirecTv came up with this same type of solution for their subscribers that do not have ethernet in their living rooms to enable them to access their On-Demand service on their DVR receivers. They also made it somewhat affordable and easy to install.
If you are still set on the PS3, and you are not looking at the 160gb model for the game bundle, then I would recommend saving $100 and getting the 80gb model. You can upgrade the hard drive to something larger in the future. Notebook SATA hard drives keep getting larger and cheaper, and I have not even come close to maxing out the 60gb hard drive that came with my console.
BD-Live Tip: To save on storage space, always delete the BD-Live data for any Blu-ray rentals after you return them.
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 4,195
Re: Newbie Question - Why Not PS3?
As a rule of thumb, if you're fully HDMI there's no reason not to go with the PS3; it's clearly the best BD player.
But if you're stuck with an older receiver or TV or both, then a standalone that accommodates analog connections may be more appropriate.
- Joined: August 2001
- Location: New York City Area
- Post Count: 3,532
Re: Newbie Question - Why Not PS3?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Toddwrtr
If you are still set on the PS3, and you are not looking at the 160gb model for the game bundle, then I would recommend saving $100 and getting the 80gb model. You can upgrade the hard drive to something larger in the future. Notebook SATA hard drives keep getting larger and cheaper, and I have not even come close to maxing out the 60gb hard drive that came with my console.
|
Agreed. HDD prices are constantly coming down (and the drives keep getting better for the most part). There's not much point in committing extra $ upfront to the bigger storage model unless you know you'll need it right away -- and even then, you might still be better off buying another drive (maybe even a huge external USB drive instead). For instance, if Sony is still using the old series of Seagate Modesto(?) drives (but just larger in capacity), you can do better by upgrading to a Western Digital Scorpio series which consumes less power and runs very noticeably cooler (as a result).
_Man_
Just another amateur learning to paint w/ "the light of the world".
-
Toddwrtr
- Todd Erwin
-
- offline
- Joined: April 2008
- Location: Newport Beach, CA
- Post Count: 432
Re: Newbie Question - Why Not PS3?
There is a problem with external USB hard drives on the PS3. For one, they must be reformatted in FAT32 on a PC. Secondly, the PS3 prefers to use the external drive for back-up, rather than additional disk space.
I have an 80gb portable external hard drive that is used for backups and transferring files from my PC to the PS3.
BD-Live Tip: To save on storage space, always delete the BD-Live data for any Blu-ray rentals after you return them.
- Joined: March 2000
- Post Count: 584
Re: Newbie Question - Why Not PS3?
For me it is the lack of a front display. I have a PS3 and it drove me nuts never being able to just glance at the player and see the time remaining display so I picked up an S550 and much prefer it to the PS3.
Every child has many wishes. Some include a wallet, two chicks, and a cigar, but that's another story.
- Joined: August 2001
- Location: Tulsa, OK
- Post Count: 492
Re: Newbie Question - Why Not PS3?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Doug_H
For me it is the lack of a front display. I have a PS3 and it drove me nuts never being able to just glance at the player and see the time remaining display so I picked up an S550 and much prefer it to the PS3.
|
The PS3 can display the running time using the remote. That's the one thing I like to have as well since I try to squeeze a movie in before the wife comes home.
The one thing I wish the PS3 would do (and please correct me if I'm wrong) is when watching a non-anamorphic movie, you can't zoom in to make it look normal. My last cheapo dvd player made it look pretty good but the PS3 does not do it the best that I can tell.
Don't make me hungry. You wouldn't like me when I'm hungry.
