-
Tim Tucker
- Tim Tucker
-
- offline
- Joined: June 2006
- Location: Huntsville, AL
- Post Count: 903
Re: The Bride Of Frankenstein
"One of these days" should be its 75th anniversary in 2010.
BARBARA WRIGHT: You're from Earth?
MORTON DILL: No... no, ma'am, I... I'm from Alabama.
Doctor Who: Flight Through Eternity
-
Patrick McCart
- Patrick J. McCart
-
- offline
- Joined: May 2001
- Location: Georgia, USA
- Post Count: 7,216
Re: The Bride Of Frankenstein
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi
Actually, I've always been disappointed that the Universal releases always seem to have that "slight grain" appearance. I much prefer the "smooth as glass" approach. I know this is considered blasphemy by many, as they insist to me that "Grain Is Good!" but I don't like it. They also claim that the details are removed if too much grain is removed, but I've never seen MORE detail than ever before with these smooth, grainless transfers of old b&w films from other studios.
|
Universal is one of the best when it comes to leaving B&W titles "as-is" in terms of inherent grain and other built-in issues. Take a look at the W.C. Fields box sets for gorgeous film grain and B&W contrast.
Tell The Weinstein Company to release Richard Williams' animated masterpiece
The Thief and the Cobbler on DVD in Panavision widescreen and uncut! See and hear what you're missing from their
Bitsy Award winner of Worst Standard Edition DVD of 2006 on
YouTube!
- Joined: June 2002
- Post Count: 266
Re: The Bride Of Frankenstein
greatest sequel ever
"My Hovercraft is Full of Eels"
- Joined: April 2000
- Post Count: 4,388
Re: The Bride Of Frankenstein
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi
Grain is a Pain.
|
Does tape hiss on musical recordings drive you nuts, too?
I have no problem with a little grain. I agree with those who'd rather have the movie look the way it did when it was shot rather than have it tidied up with artifical techniques. I don't want to see excessive grain due to a bad print or whatever, but if it was there when the film was originally processed, then it's okay with me...
-
Corey3rd
- Joe Corey
-
- online
- Joined: February 2007
- Post Count: 1,383
Re: The Bride Of Frankenstein
respect the grain. Without it, there would be no image on the film.
-
Robert Crawford
- Crawdaddy
-
- offline
- Joined: December 1998
- Location: Michigan
- Post Count: 17,142
Re: The Bride Of Frankenstein
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bugmenot
I agree, but I would want it in Blu Ray. I cant watch a regular movie anymore..haha i am a blu ray snob now.
|
I would love it on Blu-ray, but I can watch SD DVD all day long because I'm in love with movies.
Crawdaddy
G.W. McLintock: Camille, you're on your own.
-
Corey3rd
- Joe Corey
-
- online
- Joined: February 2007
- Post Count: 1,383
Re: The Bride Of Frankenstein
I want the fine grain 35mm source for a DVD transfer. I don't want a 16mm bathtub dupe.
At this point, I hold people who complain about grain on the same level as folks who claim that all black and white films would be better colorized. It's on par with saying "I want to watch it like it was shot on video!" Sorry if the cinematic process hurts your delicate eyeballs, but I don't want to see a film that's ultimately a computer's reinterpretation of a movie.
-
Patrick McCart
- Patrick J. McCart
-
- offline
- Joined: May 2001
- Location: Georgia, USA
- Post Count: 7,216
Re: The Bride Of Frankenstein
The transfer on the Legacy collection doesn't look that grainy outside of the opticals and effect shots.
I think some people have unrealistic expectations. I'll take thicker film grain over it being filtered out. Take a look at the mess that was Universal's original transfer for The Invisible Man.
Tell The Weinstein Company to release Richard Williams' animated masterpiece
The Thief and the Cobbler on DVD in Panavision widescreen and uncut! See and hear what you're missing from their
Bitsy Award winner of Worst Standard Edition DVD of 2006 on
YouTube!