Re: Your 1st DVD player vs. 1st Blu-ray player: How much and when did you buy?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nathan Eddy
You guys are definitely not the norm. You can congratulate yourselves on your anecdotal evidence justifying what you already want to believe . . . but it's just that: anecdotal. You've got to take into account lots of factors being ignored. The economy was a lot better 10 years ago. Sure, we're all making more money, but there are currently people who are at exactly the same point in their careers where you were 10 years ago.
|
It is true a poor economy may constrain a persons purchasing power (essentials become non-essentials), However a $250 Sony DVD player from 99 and a $250 Sony Blu-ray player from 08 when both have a similar feature set (using comparable technological specs of each players time) has a strong correlative value for making comparisons of price changes and points across time.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nathan Eddy
It may be true that BR is dropping faster than DVD did, but it seems there ought to be objective, industry-wide information on that. Can't someone just find that and post it?
|
In most cases if such information is linked to it has been my experience that it is usually derided as being corporate shilling or as misrepresentation/manipulation of facts to make it seem like Bu-ray is cheaper when they know (just know) in their hearts that it must be more expensive despite well presented evidence given by sources that prior to giving this information were deemed as reputable. The point of this thread was to give people an opportunity to tell their experiences of purchasing DVD and Blu-ray players, for lack of a better word, in the "real world". It is very easy to say all Blu-ray players should be $99.99 two years after the formats inception but when compared to the prices of its predecessor two years after inception statements like that begin (especially from what I have seen here from the posts) to border on the ridiculous. Here is a link to another site with an article about prices (
Blu-ray Pessimist or Optimist?) It is very informative.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nathan Eddy
Anyway, there is a HUGE difference which even this alleged faster dropping must be measured against: when DVD came out, there wasn't a dirt cheap digital format to compete against. It's *all* relative. BR *has* to drop in price much faster, simply because the competition with the current dominant format is so much more demanding. And, of course, DVD didn't require new receivers, TVs, etc. in order to enjoy, either.
|
You are absolutely right that all things are relative but your statements seems to draw the conclusion that DVD had an easy ride to mainstream acceptance. DVD was an unproven new technology that had no previous track record. VCD's had existed before DVD but not in North America at that time. Most of the people I told about DVD back in 97 were very skeptical about movies on on a CD it sounded cool but then again it just sounded like a small laserdisc. Most of the major rental companies were not in favour of DVD's (Blockbuster, Hollywood Video etc.) as the sell through model eroded rentals. If you think the installed base of DVD's is big you should see the size of the installed base of VCR's that DVD had to overcome to gain acceptance as an alternate video format. There was also the confusion between open DVD and DIVX that turned off consumers. It wasn't until 2000 that DVD started to take off (
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/articl...dvdsales.html). I had to buy a new receiver and TV in order to enjoy all the DVD format had to offer (5.1 Surround, 16:9 Anamorphic video) just like you have to have an HDTV and an HDMI 1.3 Reciever to get the full benefits of Blu-ray (you can use 5.1 analog on some players for sound, too). But you can hook up your blu-ray player to a 14" 4:3 TV and 2 channel receiver and it will work but you will not get the full benefits of the format just like it was with DVD (even VCR's had pro logic and most people just hooked them up and used their TV speakers not even taking full advantage of that format).
Out of the 30+ posts in this thread the consensus seem to be that Blu-ray players are comparatively priced in accordance with their DVD players during the same period in the formats growth. If myself and the people who posted are considered to be atypical in that our purchases of DVD players and Blu-ray players fall within the same price parameters, I guess we must just be lucky. In my opinion I believe we will see $100-$150 dollar Blu-ray players but probably not for another two years (perhaps around the same time they started to appear for DVD players). But that's another thread.