Home Theater Forum  ›  Forums  ›  Hi-Definition  ›  HT Software - High Definition  ›  Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far
Forum Nav More Forums | All New Posts | New Thread

Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

#61
Rating: 0
11/10/08 at 5:24pm
  • Joined: October 1999
  • Post Count: 1,175

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Very poor decision to forego the Director's Cut; hell, Paramount has been working on the new TREK movie for awhile now and then they delayed its release half a year, so this Blu-ray release window sure as hell didn't just sneak up on Paramount. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I wish they'd just do individual releases of I-VI now; after seeing the DC of TMP, I can't see myself ever going back to the theatrical cut...
Ernest Hemingway once wrote, \"The world is a fine place and worth fighting for.\" I agree with the second part...
--Det. William Somerset, SE7EN

http://www.dvdanthology.com/Filmmaker-movielist.html), http://LDDb.com/collection.php?actio...user=Filmmaker
Export to Wiki
#62
Rating: 0
11/10/08 at 7:06pm
  • Joined: September 2005
  • Post Count: 1,331

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Sounds great to me. I-- like most-- prefer the Directors Cut of TMP but the theatrical version was never even released on DVD so this is the first time it will have been made available in years. I'll hope for the Director's Cut down the line, and gladly get both.

In a way it almost gives me a little hope. If all Paramount did was re-render the DC scenes at 1080p then they may as have gone ahead and done it, it would be very quick, easy, and cheap to do given what Darren Dochterman as said on the subject. The problem with that is that some of the material they produced simply wasn't up to HD quality regardless of its resolution. The CGI model of the Enterprise for example simply won't hold up to that kind of scrutiny IMO.

And some of the new shots stick out like a sore thumb. Even simple things like the new credits and the digital matte paintings of starfleet headquarters look a bit cheap. I think if you're going to add new effects to a major motion picture, they should be motion picture quality. I hope if/when the directors cut comes to Blu they'll take to time to go back and make a few improvements , it's been nearly 10 years since they made it and they could easily do better today.

P.S., I'm also really looking forward to the Batmans. I can't believe Warner didn't get those out in December.

"Because he's the hero that Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now... and so we'll hunt him... because he can take it... because he's not a hero... he's a silent guardian, a watchful protector... a DARK KNIGHT."

Export to Wiki
#63
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 12:57am
  • Joined: July 2005
  • Post Count: 93

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

I agree. For the new cgi shots to integrate well with those original miniature shots in hd they gotta look REALLY REALLY good. Please take as long as necessary to do that right. And for now I'll be glad to have the original version for posterity too.
Export to Wiki
#64
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 5:33am
  • Joined: April 2000
  • Post Count: 9,138

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

I'm so used to the DC of The Motion Picture now I don't know how I'll react to the theatrical cut anymore. The last time I'd seen it was probably 20 years ago on cable and the last time I'd seen it in it's OAR was in '79

Anyway disappointment over the lack of the DC aside it's great we're getting all the original crew films.

Now CBS needs to get all 3 seasons of the original series out on Blu-ray NOW! Both the original and the HD redo f/x versions w/ seamless branching! Do it right this time CBS!
The Movie Library
Export to Wiki
#65
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 5:41am
  • Joined: June 2001
  • Post Count: 1,175

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson Au
Trekmovie.com reports and clarifies the blu-ray news. All 6 Star Trek movies will be out in a box set in time for the JJ Abrams film. New masters for video and sound. Of course, this is still not officially confirmed, but sounds pretty likely.

Still no word which cut of Star Trek 6 will be remastered, theatrical or the home video version, or the last Directors Cut.

There's no word either on the second film - theatrical or the longer version.

Thank you Paramount for not rushing the Director's Cut for The Motion Picture (which I have no problems with double dipping later) and for including the theatrical. I hope the theatrical cuts for Star Trek II and VI will be included too.

Disney/Buena Vista/Miramax: Please put Beautiful Girls on Blu-ray with bonus features and the original theatrical trailer in 1080p, and an anamorphic re-release with bonus features and the original theatrical trailer day-and-date on DVD. Thanks!

www.myspace.com/macphoen

Export to Wiki
#66
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 9:19am
  • Joined: March 1999
  • Location: Silicon Valley
  • Post Count: 4,087

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Zack, what specifically was so bad about the new CGI Enterprise? I thought the new effects looked quite good. There's probably only 2 or three long shots, one where the V'Ger energy bolts stop short of hitting the ship. The other shot was inside V'Ger heading towards the Voyager island and then the outside shot where Kirk and company walk on the saucer out to the V'Ger bridge.

Regarding the matte painting of Starfleet, I thought that was pretty good too. I'll pop the DVD in and look specifically at the Starfleet shots where Kirk's shuttle is flying towards it. The new Golden Gate Bridge looks quite good. The angle it was shot at, is very close to the view from an observation point near the bridge on the northern side of the bridge and I've been up there to look down on it. Pretty awesome sight!

JimK, I actually have the theatrical cut, plus the 12 minutes of added footage on the laserdisc for a total run time of 143 mins. This must be the first laserdisc of TMP. I bought it around 1989 for $39.95! It's code is LV 8858-2A.

Plus I have the widescreen laserdisc from 1991, as I'm sure many of you have. It was also in a box set called the Space Dock. The specs show it at 132 mins. So I bet this new blu-ray disc is based on that cut. Maybe even the mastering is from the same source. The audio was Dolby Pro Logic. I remember how cool it was to hear the sounds of V'Ger, when Kirk and crew discover the Voyager 6 craft, cracking in the rears.
Export to Wiki
#67
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 9:43am
  • Joined: January 2003
  • Post Count: 410

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

I'm not happy about this. Top me the Director's Cut is a vastly superior film. The improvement was palpable.

Paramount is so damned cheap. Trek has made them oodles of money. Sorry, but this sucks.

And I am not EVER buying a box set because I despise Trek V with every fiber of my being. I really only want I, II and III.

Death to PG-13! And now death to DVNR too!!

Export to Wiki
#68
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 9:47am
  • Joined: May 2001
  • Location: Waterford, MI
  • Post Count: 2,126

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

I really fail to see why everyone is so pissed off. It's not as if Paramount has said the DE will NOT be on BD at some point. They're deciding to lead with the ORIGINAL HISTORICAL THEATRICAL CUT. The same thing has been done for countless movies on DVD: put the theatrical out first and then the remaster/extended cut. It just happened to Waterworld for heaven sake.

If Bill had said Paramount is dead set against presenting the remastered version in high def, I'd be ready to hang them, too. But they're not pulling a Lucas and trying to bury anything. They are doing what should be done in the first place: preserving HISTORY with the ORIGINAL, UNALTERED cuts of the movie and then bringing out the new edition.
Export to Wiki
#69
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 9:53am
  • Joined: July 2005
  • Post Count: 93

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Exactly (although we really need the theatrical version of VI in there too!)

Does anyone know if there was anything more elaborate Robert Wise wanted to do for I in 2000 but wasn't able to at the time?
Export to Wiki
#70
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 9:55am
  • Joined: May 2001
  • Location: Waterford, MI
  • Post Count: 2,126

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Alex, I'd argue this set and the first releases should be the original theatricals of all the films. Then, around Christmas, release standalone discs featuring the extended cuts of I, II and VI like what Warner did with Superman II.
Export to Wiki
#71
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 10:29am
  • Joined: February 2000
  • Location: Boca Raton, FL
  • Post Count: 591

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

I wonder if they'll record a new commentary for the original theatrical version. If they use the commentary for the Director's Edition, they might have to edit some of Robert Wise's comments (which appear to have been scripted in advance) that pertain only to the DE.

IMHO, they should bring in Robert Meyer Burnett (documentarian and director of Free Enterprise) and film/music historian Jeff Bond (who has recorded commentaries for many Fox titles and wrote a book several years ago called The Music of Star Trek).
Export to Wiki
#72
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 11:51am
  • Joined: October 1999
  • Post Count: 1,175

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Sorry to take an alternate opinion from Jason V but there is absolutely no evidence that Paramount is "taking their time to do the Director's Edition properly" at all. We may never see the DE ever again, especially in light of Paramount's historical...ahem...thrifty nature...
Ernest Hemingway once wrote, \"The world is a fine place and worth fighting for.\" I agree with the second part...
--Det. William Somerset, SE7EN

http://www.dvdanthology.com/Filmmaker-movielist.html), http://LDDb.com/collection.php?actio...user=Filmmaker
Export to Wiki
#73
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 11:54am
  • Joined: May 2001
  • Location: Waterford, MI
  • Post Count: 2,126

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Travis, the world would be dull if we all agreed with one another.

I tend to look at things in a glass half full approach: there's no evidence Paramount spent all the money to redo the effects only to let it languish on the shelf now. Dozens of other movies are available in both their original and refurbished forms, many with a lower pedigree than TMP.

Besides, even if the DE is relegated to the dust bin, the existing DVD copies are still usable, right?
Export to Wiki
#74
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 12:01pm
  • Joined: September 2005
  • Post Count: 1,331

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

You'll see the DC again someday Travis. At the very least Paramount could spend pretty much nothing and just upscale the existing material into an HD print. That probably doesn't sound great to many but it's really not that big of a deal, I don't think there was more than a minute or so of new material, it's the editing of the film that mattered most.

"Because he's the hero that Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now... and so we'll hunt him... because he can take it... because he's not a hero... he's a silent guardian, a watchful protector... a DARK KNIGHT."

Export to Wiki
#75
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 12:27pm
  • Joined: February 2006
  • Location: Boston, MA
  • Post Count: 3,587

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

DC adjusted the pace/tempo of the theatrical cut. it is quite significant in changes of the cuts, not just extended new material itself.

i hope they release all of the films separately. i don't want to buy the crappy theatrical cut in a stupid box set =P. hopefully they do it like planet of the apes.,

to the edge of eternity and depth of infinity, stupidity knows no bound.

Export to Wiki
#76
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 1:39pm
  • Joined: October 2000
  • Location: Merseyside, England
  • Post Count: 1,047

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by JediFonger
DC adjusted the pace/tempo of the theatrical cut. it is quite significant in changes of the cuts, not just extended new material itself.

i hope they release all of the films separately. i don't want to buy the crappy theatrical cut in a stupid box set =P. hopefully they do it like planet of the apes.,

There are many things I prefer about the theatrical cut. The opening credits for starters (hate the modernised credits on the DC). It's also important to bear in mind that Goldsmith crafted his score around a movie that was mostly devoid of sound effects, particularly beeps and whistles etc on the bridge. When it's placed against the new mix everything seems a little too crowded.

The only thing that, for me, stands out as awe-inspiringly improved about the DC is the opening shots on Vulcan. But the original shot looked just fine for the 20 years that I lived with it.

I'd love the DC at some point too - and the TV version for that matter - but I'm plenty happy that the theatrical version is coming.
Export to Wiki
#77
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 2:53pm
  • Joined: November 2004
  • Location: The basement of the FBI building
  • Post Count: 12,740

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis Brashear
Sorry to take an alternate opinion from Jason V but there is absolutely no evidence that Paramount is "taking their time to do the Director's Edition properly" at all. We may never see the DE ever again, especially in light of Paramount's historical...ahem...thrifty nature...
Paramount endlessly re-releases Star Trek in all of its forms so I think that all but guarantees that the DC will come out at some point.
Export to Wiki
#78
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 4:02pm
  • Joined: August 2001
  • Location: New York City Area
  • Post Count: 3,536

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

I just want II and VI -- and *maybe* IV -- along w/ First Contact, but I'm not a hardcore fan though. Presumably, they will come on separate releases even if the initial release is just the box set. I'm ok w/ waiting for that eventuality since I can't afford to rebuy every title of interest (not just this franchise) on BD in one big mad rush anyway. In fact, I may even wait until they release both theatrical and DC on the same release via seamless branching before I buy unless there's some big sale/discount or something. OTOH, maybe Paramount will decide to offer upgrade rebates for these films like they did for the Godfather Trilogy and make waiting (for big discounts) unnecessary -- sure hope that's the case.

_Man_

Just another amateur learning to paint w/ "the light of the world".

Export to Wiki
#79
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 8:01pm
  • Joined: October 2002
  • Location: London, England
  • Post Count: 134

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

I hope someone from Paramount is reading this thread and taking notes as the Bluray fans are usually the hardcore fans like me who buy this stuff (I bought all the videos, Laserdiscs & DVD's). Trek has never been mainstream always cult so relies on the hardcore fans to triple dip etc etc.

Star Trek 5 needs fixing urgently. The FX on DVD right now played on a HDMI upscaling player look really poor so 1080P will look even worse. Can you not get the guys @ CBS Digital who worked on TOS-HD to do something about it please as the movie deserves some love.

STMP I did not think the DE helped it at all apart from a few new CGI shots the movie had the exact same tone as before and still felt tired & cold like it always has. So I will buy it as is or whatever not bothered either way. Not sure if you guys on here know but Lowry Digital confirmed they worked on ST 4 & 8 giving them a partial restoration & degrain.

But ST5 really needs attention otherwise you will not be selling many copies and a $300-400 bluray boxed set is not exactly going to get many mainstream buyers is it!
Export to Wiki
#80
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 8:45pm
  • Joined: July 2005
  • Post Count: 93

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

300-400? Yikes. I was picturing a simple 6 disc set, not much more expensive than the 4 disc Godfather trilogy.
Export to Wiki
#81
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 8:45pm
  • Joined: January 2002
  • Post Count: 3,128

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Well, if they are individual releases, I'll buy everything EXCEPT TMP. No interest in back-peddling to the theatrical cut. The DC is just so much better.

If it's a box set, I don't know that I'll do it. If I get the BD-TMP, and Paramount DOES do a DC later on.... that will constitute a quadruple-dip for me. Hey, I'm a HUGE Trek fan... but damn.
Export to Wiki
#82
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 9:02pm
  • Joined: September 2005
  • Post Count: 1,331

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex cosmo
300-400? Yikes. I was picturing a simple 6 disc set, not much more expensive than the 4 disc Godfather trilogy.

Yeah, even at a $25 per movie average that would only be $150...

"Because he's the hero that Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now... and so we'll hunt him... because he can take it... because he's not a hero... he's a silent guardian, a watchful protector... a DARK KNIGHT."

Export to Wiki
#83
Rating: 0
11/11/08 at 9:17pm
  • Joined: August 1999
  • Location: Baton Rouge, LA
  • Post Count: 502

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Count me in as one who prefers the Theatrical Cut for TMP.

The DC is okay, but to me, too many of the little changes bother me now. The added sound effect are okay, but the revised alert klaxon sucks. Kirk's missing "Oh my God" after the transporter accident (what was wrong with it ?... it was much more dramatic and appropriate than how it ended up in the DC). Kirk's missing second, stronger, "Viewer OFF!" makes the shock of what the crew just saw have less of an impact.

Also, the CGI animated hexagons that formed the V'ger bridge really bothers me. I know that Darren said they tried to mimic the look of traditional cel animation by doubling up each frame, but in a short sequence such as this, they would have spent the time to do a single frame animation. Even in real full animated movies, sometimes they do single frame shots on important scenes and only double up the minor character motion and speaking movements.

I'll get the DC when (and if) it comes out on BD, but I'm very happy the Theatrical Cut is coming out at all. My laserdisc is not going to last forever.

Joel

Export to Wiki
#84
Rating: 0
11/12/08 at 4:42pm
  • Joined: May 2001
  • Post Count: 3,319

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Nobody here that's posting they're upset too not get the DC of "ST: TM" because of SD FX, better not be posting anywhere that they are upset too get SD FX shots on "Firefly" on BD!

Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!

Export to Wiki
#85
Rating: 0
11/12/08 at 4:52pm
  • Joined: August 2001
  • Location: New York City Area
  • Post Count: 3,536

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed St. Clair
Nobody here that's posting they're upset too not get the DC of "ST: TM" because of SD FX, better not be posting anywhere that they are upset too get SD FX shots on "Firefly" on BD!

Wow! That's a whole lot of nested negatives. But I think I got what you mean.

Yeah, I was looking forward to renting this to see for the first time. Sounds like I might not want to buy it after the rental no matter how much I turn out to like the series itself (unless there's some *serious* price slashing for it).

_Man_

Just another amateur learning to paint w/ "the light of the world".

Export to Wiki
#86
Rating: 0
11/12/08 at 5:24pm
  • Joined: November 2002
  • Location: South Carolina
  • Post Count: 1,359

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

So what would happen if Lucas only released the Original Theatrical Version of Star Wars on Blu-ray? :X
Export to Wiki
#87
Rating: 0
11/12/08 at 6:38pm
  • Joined: August 2001
  • Location: Tulsa, OK
  • Post Count: 492

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrettGallman
So what would happen if Lucas only released the Original Theatrical Version of Star Wars on Blu-ray? :X

The Earth would crash into the sun and we would all burn alive. George keeping the OT hidden is all that saves us from certain doom!

Don't make me hungry. You wouldn't like me when I'm hungry.

Export to Wiki
#88
Rating: 0
11/12/08 at 8:04pm
  • Joined: May 2001
  • Location: Waterford, MI
  • Post Count: 2,126

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrettGallman
So what would happen if Lucas only released the Original Theatrical Version of Star Wars on Blu-ray? :X

For my money, I'd be upset, too. There's no reason not to include both/all versions. Heck, look what Blade Runner did.
Export to Wiki
#89
Rating: 0
11/12/08 at 8:33pm
  • Joined: February 2001
  • Post Count: 1,284

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

what is this about firefly? is there something wrong with the PQ on the Firefly BD?
Rolando Avendano

My Collection
Export to Wiki
#90
Rating: 0
11/12/08 at 8:44pm
  • Joined: September 2005
  • Post Count: 1,331

Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolando
what is this about firefly? is there something wrong with the PQ on the Firefly BD?

Firefly (and Enterprise for that matter) was produced in HD but the SFX work was rendered in SD, and so it will be softer when viewed on Bluray. A very similar approach could be taken with TMP's director' cut and I wouldn't mind all that much, though I would prefer them to go back and do things a little better.

"Because he's the hero that Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now... and so we'll hunt him... because he can take it... because he's not a hero... he's a silent guardian, a watchful protector... a DARK KNIGHT."

Export to Wiki
Forum Nav More Forums | All New Posts | New Thread