-
Jonathan Kaye
- Jonathan Kaye
-
- offline
- Joined: October 2000
- Post Count: 377
Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce
As to Wise not being familiar with the show, its just not true. By all accounts he was a fan of the show in its original airings and never missed an episode. In addition he screened some episodes on 16mm film before starting the project. If you listen to the commentary you'll find that he has in depth knowledge of the original episodes and amazing recall of names, dates, and places from the TMP shoot. I don't know that I would remember that kind of detail some 30 years later.
|
Not to question Wise's familiarity with the original Trek or his remembrance of the TMP shoot, but the only part of the TMP commentary I've listened to so far (first 10 mins or so) sounded like he was reading from a script, and I very much suspect not a script he'd written either. Hardly surprising given his age at the time, of course.
"There's no point in being grown-up if you can't be childish sometimes" - The Doctor.
-
Douglas Monce
- Douglas Monce
-
- offline
- Joined: November 2006
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
- Post Count: 3,817
Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far
I believe Wise had a stroke somewhere in between The Day The Earth Stood Still commentary and the TMP. While it didn't effect his memory, it did effect his speech.
I have listened to several of Wise's commentaries and he always seem to have the facts at his fingertips. He may very well make notes before he goes in to do the commentary. However I can tell you that I met Mr. Wise on 2 separate occasions. Once at a film festival in Phoenix, where we had a 15 min conversation, and once again about 5 years later in LA at a retrospective of his work. I was astonished when I walked up to shake his hand, that he remembered me with out my having a chance to say a word to him.
Doug
"I'm in great shape, for the shape I'm in."
Bob Hope in The Ghostbreakers
- Joined: July 2003
- Location: Lacombe, AB
- Post Count: 2,562
Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far
Sat down and watched the DE DVD this afternoon. Two things were immediately apparent:
(1) The print was somewhat dirty, but I can't tell if it was optically printed in, since most of it was in the special effects shots; and
(2) a lot of this film is very soft looking, particularly the bridge shots where a split diopter was being used due to the darkness of the bridge set.
This will be a very interesting experience in HD. I can just imagine the fanboy complaints already: "What's that fuzzy part in the middle of the shot?" "This is really grainy-looking." "The colour looks really washed out."
I know there are many who will understand the reasons, but there will be many more who will expect that 3D "pop" and won't get it consistently out of this film. Watching the effects shots, it's clear that they were either shot on 65mm or VistaVision (no elliptical distortion on lens flares, and Trumbull is known for preferring 65mm for effects shots), and they may exhibit the best possibilities for 3D "Pop".
\"My opinion is that (a) anyone who actually works in a video store and does not understand letterboxing has given up on life, and (b) any customer who prefers to have the sides of a movie hacked off should not be licensed to operate a video player.\"-- Roger Ebert
-
Douglas Monce
- Douglas Monce
-
- offline
- Joined: November 2006
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
- Post Count: 3,817
Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stephen_J_H
I know there are many who will understand the reasons, but there will be many more who will expect that 3D "pop" and won't get it consistently out of this film. Watching the effects shots, it's clear that they were either shot on 65mm or VistaVision (no elliptical distortion on lens flares, and Trumbull is known for preferring 65mm for effects shots), and they may exhibit the best possibilities for 3D "Pop".
|
Actually its both. Trumbull's effects shots were done in 65mm, and John Dykstra's shots were done in VistaVision.
One thing that I do think would help improve the effects shots in this film is if they were to go back to the original individual elements, and re-composite them digitally. The Klingon sequence in particular has HUGE matte lines.
Doug
"I'm in great shape, for the shape I'm in."
Bob Hope in The Ghostbreakers
- Joined: July 2003
- Location: Lacombe, AB
- Post Count: 2,562
Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TravisR
My understanding is that the matte line were 'erased' digitally (rather than recompositing the shots digitally).
|
My understanding was they
did recomposite the effects sequences in the Star Wars films, as matte lines were only one problem. Another was contrast issues in TESB, in both the Hoth battle (transparency of composited elements) and the asteroid chase scene ("white boxes" around the TIE fighters). They couldn't really solve those issues witout recompositing.
\"My opinion is that (a) anyone who actually works in a video store and does not understand letterboxing has given up on life, and (b) any customer who prefers to have the sides of a movie hacked off should not be licensed to operate a video player.\"-- Roger Ebert
-
Douglas Monce
- Douglas Monce
-
- offline
- Joined: November 2006
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
- Post Count: 3,817
Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far
In Star Wars, where they had shots of ships on black space with stars, matte lines were not a big issue. However as has been noted, the Hoth scenes had to be re-composited because the only way to do those shots originally and not see huge black matte lines was to not print the model elements to full density. Objects could be seen through the snow speeders.
Also in Star Wars, every explosion done in front of a bluescreen was re-comped because they the opacity of fire would be realized much better with digital compositing.
My understanding is that there was no elimination of matte lines in Star Wars with some kind of digital paint technique, it was all done by re-comping the original elements. Honestly re-comping the shots digitally would probably be easier and less costly than some kind of matte line removal process done frame by frame. This assumes of course that the original elements are available and in good shape, which may not be the case with film stock from the late 70s.
I'm not sure if Lowry has any process for the elimination of matte lines. I still feel the best option would be to go back to the original elements. This way much of the dirt and dust specs seen in those shots could be done away with before the comp process starts. Also the shots would likely end up being MUCH sharper with much finer grain.
Also the Kingon sequence has always had a big problem with density of the elements. The space plate behind everything isn't really black but rather a milky gray, which makes the matte lines stand out even on the star fields. This could be corrected with out effecting the other elements with a re-comp.
Doug
"I'm in great shape, for the shape I'm in."
Bob Hope in The Ghostbreakers
- Joined: February 2006
- Location: Boston, MA
- Post Count: 3,587
Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far

Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nelson Au
(And don't say it Jedifonger!  )
|
to the edge of eternity and depth of infinity, stupidity knows no bound.
- Joined: February 2006
- Location: Boston, MA
- Post Count: 3,587
Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far
what fuzzy lines r u guys referring to? the consoles in the enterprise ship or the visual fx through V'Ger?
to the edge of eternity and depth of infinity, stupidity knows no bound.
- Joined: February 2006
- Location: Boston, MA
- Post Count: 3,587
Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far
ah gotchya, i've always wondered about that and if it was done on purpose. thanks.
to the edge of eternity and depth of infinity, stupidity knows no bound.
-
Douglas Monce
- Douglas Monce
-
- offline
- Joined: November 2006
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
- Post Count: 3,817
Re: Star Trek films on Blu-Ray... what we know so far
The split diopter is both a necessity of the low lighting on the bridge, and just something that Wise liked to use. Another director might have just let the background go soft and use a rack focus rather than a diopter, but the diopter is very much a Robert Wise thing.
Remember he was the editor on Citizen Kane, which was praised for its deep focus. Most of Wise's pre-scope films also exhibit a deep focus look. Watch "The Day The Earth Stood Still" as an example. However once he got to using anamorphic lenses, the deep focus just wasn't possible, so he opted for the split diopter.
Doug
"I'm in great shape, for the shape I'm in."
Bob Hope in The Ghostbreakers