Re: HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition
You mean my two options are 1) Warners being out to get me; and 2) Warners not supporting me? Is there a door no. 3?
|
Originally Posted by Timothy E
You mean my two options are 1) Warners being out to get me; and 2) Warners not supporting me? Is there a door no. 3?
![]() |

Ken McAlinden
Livonia, MI USA
|
Originally Posted by Ken_McAlinden
I was thinking the same thing, but wanted to keep my head down until the shells stopped flying. Perhaps we could start one thread with the DVD paranoid conspiracy theorists pointing to the presence of an outstanding letterboxed presentation and the lack of smilebox as definitive proof that Warner is out to get them and a second thread for the Blu-Ray paranoid conspiracy theorists pointing out how Warner last week released 10 classic westerns in two box sets exclusive to SD DVD as definitive proof that Warner is not supporting them.
![]() Regards, |
When you have to shoot...shoot. Don't talk!
|
Originally Posted by Thomas T
But I do wish the blu-ray fanboys would stop turning every thread into a promotion for blu-ray. If I cry "Uncle!" will you guys stop or do you just enjoy torturing me?
|

|
Originally Posted by Edwin-S
Yeah, but the Blu-ray conspiracy is real while the DVD conspiracy is just paranoia. The men in the Black Helicopters said so.
![]() |

Ken McAlinden
Livonia, MI USA
| Criticizing this film for favoring spectacle over intimacy would be like criticizing a fish for favoring water over air. |
Jonathan
DVD Reviewer / News Editor
eyecravedvd.com
| I have to be honest, I don't quite understand this whole Smileboxing. Does it actually work on a large display? From the screenshots, it looks like it might be distracting. |
|
Originally Posted by Steve Christou
The best thing about How the West Was Won is Alfred Newman's magnificent music score, one of the most famous western themes ever.
Distracting and from the screenshots the movie looks even more distorted. I'm glad it's not included on the SD-DVD, to be honest it looks as gimmicky as the cinerama process. ![]() |
Roland Lataille
Cinerama web site:
http://cineramahistory.com
|
Originally Posted by RolandL
What Cinerama was trying to do with its three projectors and a 146 degree deeply curved screen was to give you the feeling of "being there". The smilebox processs tries to duplicate this by curving the letterboxed image to make it look like you are seeing it on a 146 degree Cinerama screen.
|
|
Originally Posted by Lord Dalek
Yeah but since the curve is 2-D, the process doesn't look right at all.
|
|
Originally Posted by Ken_McAlinden
I am not paranoid. You are just saying that because you hate me like everyone else.
![]() Regards, |

When you have to shoot...shoot. Don't talk!
|
Originally Posted by Edwin-S
![]() BTW, Nice review. I find it interesting that the traditionally letterboxed version has a lot more information showing on the sides than the Smilebox version. I suspect they may have cropped the Smilebox version so as not to lose too much resolution in the central portion of the image; although, that is just my uneducated guess. The traditionally letterboxed version looks like it may be the most accurate version in terms of AR; however, I'm no expert on this film so I will wait for confirmation from others who are more familiar with the in and outs of the film. |
|
Originally Posted by Edwin-S
![]() BTW, Nice review. I find it interesting that the traditionally letterboxed version has a lot more information showing on the sides than the Smilebox version. I suspect they may have cropped the Smilebox version so as not to lose too much resolution in the central portion of the image; although, that is just my uneducated guess. The traditionally letterboxed version looks like it may be the most accurate version in terms of AR; however, I'm no expert on this film so I will wait for confirmation from others who are more familiar with the in and outs of the film. |
Roland Lataille
Cinerama web site:
http://cineramahistory.com
|
Originally Posted by Lord Dalek
Yeah but since the curve is 2-D, the process doesn't look right at all.
|
Roland Lataille
Cinerama web site:
http://cineramahistory.com
|
Originally Posted by RolandL
If you want to see how it was shown at a Cinerama Theatre, the smilebox version is for you. You decide.
|
|
Originally Posted by RolandL
When How the West Was Won had its roadshow run, it was at Cinerama theatres only. You paid top dollars - (up to $3.50 a ticket!) to see it on a large deeply curved screen and seven channels of stereo sound. They had only two showings a day. It was reserved seats only and you got dressed up - (most men in suits and women in dresses). You were escorted to your seat by a uniformed usher.
After its run at Cinerama theatres (in London it played for three years at the Casino Cinerama Theatre), it was shown at your local theatre. It was on a flat screen, played continuously, you could dress as you like and your ticket was probably 70 cents. If you want to see it the way it was shown at the local flat screen 70 cents per ticket theatre then the flat letterboxed image is the way to go. If you want to see how it was shown at a Cinerama Theatre, the smilebox version is for you. You decide. |
|
Originally Posted by BillyFeldman
Unfortunately, we can't decide, those of us who have not gone Blu-Ray. Thanks to Warners apparently incredible business sense, they have precluded the majority of their customers from being able to decide. And I say hooey to that.
|
\"My opinion is that (a) anyone who actually works in a video store and does not understand letterboxing has given up on life, and (b) any customer who prefers to have the sides of a movie hacked off should not be licensed to operate a video player.\"-- Roger Ebert
|
Originally Posted by MarcoBiscotti
So how is it that Warners have managed to include EVERYTHING on the cheaper packaged standard UK release but on their blown out super deluxe R1 box set we are offered even less? Nobody can use the production cost excuse anymore. What a misfire...
|
Roland Lataille
Cinerama web site:
http://cineramahistory.com
|
Originally Posted by John Hodson
Thanks Roland; "...I feel the bigger screen the better it works..." - makes me want to dash out and plunk down the cash for a PJ, a HUMONGOUS screen and a BD player...
|
Roland Lataille
Cinerama web site:
http://cineramahistory.com
|
Originally Posted by Dave B Ferris
Quote:
From the Los Angeles Times SCREENING ROOM 'How the West Was Won' back in Cinerama at ArcLight Hollywood The Cinerama Dome will show the landmark 1963 epic in its recently restored original three-projector Cinerama format and seven-channel sound. By Susan King Los Angeles Times Staff Writer September 4, 2008 Big-screen films didn't get much bigger or wider than in Cinerama. And this Sunday, the Cinerama Dome at the ArcLight in Hollywood will show the landmark 1963 epic "How the West Was Won" in its recently restored original three-projector Cinerama format and seven-channel sound, just as it was presented at the Dome 45 years ago in its initial roadshow engagements. The Dome is one of only three theaters in the world left that is able to show Cinerama in all its widescreen glory. John Ford, Henry Hathaway and George Marshall directed the sprawling saga; Gregory Peck, Debbie Reynolds and James Stewart led the cast of thousands. Redirect to the right page |