Re: A few words about...™ Kill Bill: Volumes 1 & 2 -- in Blu-ray
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed St. Clair
"Dumbed Down"
&
"Format Looks Bad"
|
Accurate quotes, but a bit meaningless in that form and out of context.
My position has always been simple.
In the high definition arena of home theater we had HD and BD, with the latter rushed to market.
Both were essentially "holding systems," or buckets if you will.
One, BD, had the ability we were told, to eventually hold more stuff. And this became fact, giving it a HUGE advantage over its competitor.
Whatever the studios decided to pour into those buckets defined them, and set their attributes as recognized by the public.
Both formats came out of the gate stumbling.
Problematic masters from Sony; bad chipsets from Samsung; 1080i transfers from Warner.
With two systems available, the buying public... weren't.
Both overcame their initial problems.
When Warner ended the competition, and Toshiba withdrew, it was all up to those filling the Blu-ray buckets to position the system to make it a no-brainer purchase.
For about six months things progressed well, with an expanding consumer base. Then within 30 days three major releases arrived, which defied all logic, and flew in the face of one of the most basic points set forth by the Blu-ray concept -- near theatrical quality in the home.
As a fierce supporter of Blu-ray, my fear was that the public -- which should be able to purchase or pre-order Blu software simply because it has the Blu-ray logo on it, and KNOW that it would be a quality release -- might pull back, and seeing these releases might consider throwing the proverbial baby out with the bath water.
And yes, the problems absolutely needed to be reported, making the point that Blu-ray supporters were best to steer clear from three problematic Blu-ray pieces of software.
And, that the Blu-ray system itself was sound.
Someone had poured garbage into the bucket, and this was not a good thing.
There is a bond of trust between the consumer and those that publish via an electronic format that quality will not be an issue. The public wants simplicity.
Once it becomes an issue, that bond is broken.
That is my concern.
And it made Blu-ray as a format look "dumbed down," with releases that "looked bad."
If you do your research, you'll find that HD freedom fighters were quick to pick up on it, posting in not always obvious ways. But those posts are available to make potential Blu-ray consumers think twice about finally making the big purchase.
And THAT is what we don't need.
One of the studios that made what can be considered an error of judgment was Disney in releasing a technically crippled, old master on BD of Gangs of New York -- an important film.
The release of Kill Bill brings them back to the stellar heights that can be accomplished via the Blu-ray system.
That is where they and the other studios belong.
If Disney doesn't make the Gangs error again with Cold Mountain, which was created by the same post house, all should continue to be well.
RAH