It's a mad mad mad mad world
Re: It's a mad mad mad mad world
I read somewhere that you were hired to restore this masterpiece or researching if it was possible.Am I wrong and can you talk about it?
My Blu Rays
http://www.blu-ray.com/community/col...=Dj%20Matt%20B
Favorite films of all time in no order
1. Zodiac 2. Dawn of the Dead (1978) 3. The Good The Bad and The Ugly 4. Blade Runner 5. The Warriors 6. Dark Knight 7. The Godfather 8. Bullitt 9. Experiment in Terror 10. Raiders of the Lost...
Re: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World
I've been curious to ask about this restoration again acctually since FOX is involved in MGM home video now. Was wondering if this increased its chances at all. Still holdin on to that old laserdisc copy hopin to see this movie get saved properly.Re: It's a mad mad mad mad world
When the original article, thread and photographs were done with "Mad World" the need for restoration was critical. The question on my mind is that if not restored, can what elements that do survive be *conserved* for later restoration if a studio decides to do so? Are we at the "now or never" point?Best regards,
Paul Bigelow
Will there be a restoration?
Thanks for any info.
My Blu Rays
http://www.blu-ray.com/community/col...=Dj%20Matt%20B
Favorite films of all time in no order
1. Zodiac 2. Dawn of the Dead (1978) 3. The Good The Bad and The Ugly 4. Blade Runner 5. The Warriors 6. Dark Knight 7. The Godfather 8. Bullitt 9. Experiment in Terror 10. Raiders of the Lost...
Mark Evanier has an interesting teaser about some information he has obtained regarding the running time of Mad4 with the claim that everything you know is wrong:
http://www.newsfromme.com/archives/2009_09_30.html#017810
Stay tuned for what promises to be provocative stuff!
STOP THE MADNESS! STOP THE BUTCHERING AND ABANDONMENT OF TV SHOWS ON DVD!
My DVD List at DVD Aficionado, Now Featuring Blu-Ray

Mark Evanier has an interesting teaser about some information he has obtained regarding the running time of Mad4 with the claim that everything you know is wrong:
http://www.newsfromme.com/archives/2009_09_30.html#017810
Stay tuned for what promises to be provocative stuff!
Here is a review of the movie from the November 11, 1963 issue of Boxoffice magazine. 197 minutes plus the intermission.
http://cineramahistory.com/1963iammmmwreview.jpg
Roland Lataille
Cinerama web site:
http://cineramahistory.com
Robert Harris says 195 minutes in this interview - http://events.hometheaterforum.com/madworld/Robert_Harris_Q%26A.html . The Boxoffice review could be wrong. The movie program says 210 minutes but that included the intermission which would have been about 15 minutes.
Roland Lataille
Cinerama web site:
http://cineramahistory.com


