Home Theater Forum  ›  Forums  ›  Talk With The Insiders  ›  Robert Harris  ›  Nothing Sacred & A Star is Born (1937)
Forum Nav More Forums | All New Posts | New Thread

Nothing Sacred & A Star is Born (1937)

#1
Rating: 0
8/2/08 at 3:53pm
  • Joined: August 2002
  • Post Count: 147
I've read that both of these titles were restored some time back. They only circulate in poor quality, faded versions-even on TCM. Why aren't the restored versions available to viewers?
Export to Wiki
#2
Rating: 0
8/3/08 at 3:41pm
  • Joined: February 1999
  • Post Count: 2,866

Re: Nothing Sacred & A Star is Born (1937)

I believe both have been released on SD DVD, derived from 35mm prints.

Both are AFAIK in the public domain, and if released in high quality would only get grabbed the Chinese and the Koreans among others. That's assuming that they would bother copying something that wasn't copyrighted.

I would think that there's a chance of seeing SiB as an extra on the 1954 restored release when it arrives.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Vedowski
I've read that both of these titles were restored some time back. They only circulate in poor quality, faded versions-even on TCM. Why aren't the restored versions available to viewers?

"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did."  T.E. Lawrence

Export to Wiki
#3
Rating: 0
8/4/08 at 4:02am
  • Joined: February 2000
  • Post Count: 633

Re: Nothing Sacred & A Star is Born (1937)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Harris
Both are AFAIK in the public domain, and if released in high quality would only get grabbed the Chinese and the Koreans among others. That's assuming that they would bother copying something that wasn't copyrighted.

Is there a way to get movies back out of the public domain ?
Because if it isn't it seems to me that no company would invest the necessary time and money to bring such a title back into circulation in appropriate quality.
Export to Wiki
#4
Rating: 0
8/4/08 at 7:07am
  • Joined: October 2005
  • Location: New York, NY
  • Post Count: 68

Re: Nothing Sacred & A Star is Born (1937)

I could have sworn that I saw restored clips of Wellman's "A Star Is Born" that look infinitely superior to the print used on the Image disc (which is OK for what it is--certainly better than the "low-rent" broadcasts seen in the '70's & '80's); but perhaps I'm confusing this with clips I had seen of the restored "Becky Sharp."
Export to Wiki
#5
Rating: 0
8/4/08 at 11:07am
  • Joined: August 2002
  • Post Count: 147

Re: Nothing Sacred & A Star is Born (1937)

I've seen pristine clips used as well. That's what I don't get-I understand why the rights holders don't bother to release a DVD of these public domain titles but what's preventing them from being used for TV showings? TCM has access to the WB/MGM/RKO catalog and they own the 1937 "A Star is Born" (Ron Haver mentioned in his book that he came across excellent source material for the original in Jack Warners private film stash) but the version shown on TCM is pretty poor. The trailer for it is on the 1954 ASiB DVD and it looks great.
Here's a link to a story about the restoration of "Nothing Sacred":
Cinetech – News
Article says it was shown on TV in Europe and that a DVD was to be released in 2000 but I only find the usual poor quality DVDs and I've never seen a good print on TV. Oh, well.
Export to Wiki
#6
Rating: 0
8/4/08 at 8:39pm
  • Joined: February 1999
  • Post Count: 2,866

Re: Nothing Sacred & A Star is Born (1937)

Nothing Sacred would be owned by Disney.

"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did."  T.E. Lawrence

Export to Wiki
#7
Rating: 0
8/5/08 at 9:20am
  • Joined: August 2003
  • Location: Sunny California, USA
  • Post Count: 715

Re: Nothing Sacred & A Star is Born (1937)

UCLA was responsible for the recent 35mm restoration of the 1937 A STAR IS BORN. If I recall correctly, they utilized the three-strip camera negs or some early element and the results were outstanding.

That being said, UCLA doesn't have to answer to WB in terms of ownership unless they supplied the elements, seeing as the film is in the public domain, and the price they put on the film may not be what Warners wants to pay for something so non-exclusive. There may also have been donor restrictions on the materials used for the print if the materials did not come from WB.

-J. Theakston

Export to Wiki
#8
Rating: 0
8/5/08 at 4:26pm
  • Joined: February 1999
  • Post Count: 2,866

Re: Nothing Sacred & A Star is Born (1937)

I'm quite certain that the elements are the property of WB

"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did."  T.E. Lawrence

Export to Wiki
#9
Rating: 0
8/7/08 at 1:47pm
  • Joined: July 2003
  • Location: Lacombe, AB
  • Post Count: 2,562

Re: Nothing Sacred & A Star is Born (1937)

Quote:
Originally Posted by OliverK
Is there a way to get movies back out of the public domain ?
Because if it isn't it seems to me that no company would invest the necessary time and money to bring such a title back into circulation in appropriate quality.
Actually, MGM released Zulu awhile ago on DVD when many inferior non-anamorphic PD copies were floating around, so it's not necessarily the case that it's not worthwhile to release a PD title for which you own the original elements.
The only title that comes to mind as being "rescued" from PD is Metropolis.

\"My opinion is that (a) anyone who actually works in a video store and does not understand letterboxing has given up on life, and (b) any customer who prefers to have the sides of a movie hacked off should not be licensed to operate a video player.\"-- Roger Ebert

Export to Wiki
Forum Nav More Forums | All New Posts | New Thread