Re: Heaven's Gate Uncut Version
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Simon Howson
The film was 2 hours too long?
It looked the same as the DVD. Dirty, grainy, faded etc. Maybe that is simply how it is meant to look?
It was exactly the same as the Australian DVD I own. So there wasn't any footage additional or missing compared with what I had previously seen.
|
Well, regarding the part I bolded, that wasn't what I was asking, Simon. I was simply asking if your issues re: the "restoration" were regarding the
physical condition of the print you saw, or other issues. I also have the Australian DVD and while it certainly is quite dirty in many places (having been mastered from an actual 35mm print it seems), I don't see how it's "faded". Unless by "faded" you're referring to the lowering of contrast and color saturation caused by "flashing" the negative, which was was a pretty popular cinematographic process in the 1970s. If that's what you're referring to, then yeah, it would be related to the "intended" look of the film.
Given the apparent tone of your response to me (i.e., the "2 hours too long" line), I'm guessing you're misreading my posts to you. I'm not attacking your opinion of the film itself, I'm just trying to get to the bottom of your response to the
condition of the projected print you saw was, and how it might relate to the quality of the "restoration" that was done a couple years ago on a whole.
Vincent