- Joined: December 1998
- Location: Cham-Bana, IL
- Post Count: 2,832
Re: Ebert & Roeper Move On / New Hosts Announced
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DaveF
It's sad to see the final end to Siskel and Ebert's show. But I've not seen Ebert on air in five or more years. And when I was last watching, it was on at midnight! Aside from graduate students, who stays up that late for movie reviews?
I like Roeper. I was pretty dubious about his choice, and didn't understand why Ebert chose him as the new co-host at first. But they had a good dynamic, and I thought Roeper's practicality balanced Ebert's "oooh! shiny!" attitude towards thumbs-upping otherwise sucky movies.
Oh well. The show's relevancy plummeted years ago, when it was relegated to the late-late slots, if even aired.
|
I agree wholeheartedly. I used to watch this show every week, but must admit that I have only watched in occasionally in the last couple of years. I started to lose interest when Roger left the show, but really stopped watching when they had to give up the thumbs gestures.
Lawn Ranger Motto: You're only young once, but you can be always be immature.
- Joined: May 2001
- Location: Defending the Ark
- Post Count: 92
Re: Ebert & Roeper Move On / New Hosts Announced
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DaveF
It's sad to see the final end to Siskel and Ebert's show.
|
According to both
Ebert &
Roeper, the review show with thumbs will continue, it just won't be associated with Disney.
Here's the excerpts from them that confirm they plan on continuing the show.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Roger Ebert
We are discussing possibilities, and plan to continue the show's tradition.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Richard Roeper
I wish Disney the best of luck with their new show, whatever form it may take. In the meantime, it is my intention to proceed elsewhere with my ninth year as the co-host of a movie review show that honors the standards established by Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert more than 30 years ago. I will be free to share the details on that program in the near future.
|
XBOX Live Gamertag - Kenshiro 26
PSN Username - Kenshiro26
- Joined: November 1998
- Post Count: 2,010
Re: Ebert & Roeper Move On / New Hosts Announced
I lost a lot of interest in the show when Gene Siskel died. I lost more interest in the show when Ebert became ill (no slam on Roeper, but the show was Siskel and Ebert to me). No plans for Ebert (or even Roeper) to come back? I've 0 interest. I'll read Ebert's on-going reviews in the Chicago Sun-Times.
Studios, caption your internet streams.
- Joined: October 2001
- Post Count: 1,038
Re: Ebert & Roeper Move On / New Hosts Announced
Not that I've been able to find it for a while, but I haven't really searched at all since Roger became ill though I trace my roots back to the Late 70's Sneak Preview era when my college roomie and I used to watch it regularly. The show lost a lot without Gene and I have never regarded Roeper as anything more than awful. If Lyons is worse than RR then the show needs to be put out of its misery.
"I sit in my cube with my headphones on and try to let my competence hold back the tide for as long as possible, then move on when the flood of stupidity breaches the levee. I'm a refugee from Hurricane Stupid."
- Joined: January 1999
- Location: The Land of Oranges, Mickey Mouse, and foreclosures
- Post Count: 6,204
Re: Ebert & Roeper Move On / New Hosts Announced
I used to watch Siskel & Ebert religiously in the '70s and '80s. I grew up on it. However, I think it's been 7-8 years since the show's even been on the air where I live.
Sometimes I'll watch the online review clips. I get Ebert's email newsletter, too.
And I regretfully agree that Disney can't be blamed for not wanting to pay much for a guy who hasn't been on the show in two years and will likely never be able to appear with any regularity in the future.
"How wonderful it will be to have a leader unburdened by the twin horrors of knowledge and experience." -- Mr. Wick