Re: Batman Begins Part III
|
Originally Posted by MikeRS
How can the next film not be called...."The Dark Knight Returns"?
|
|
Originally Posted by MikeRS
How can the next film not be called...."The Dark Knight Returns"?
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuck Mayer
Because the Dark Knight hasn't gone anywhere. He's not returning. The title is perfect for that story, because it's literal. And I think it should be saved for when they actually do make that film. Which is almost inevitable at this point (in what form is unknown), with Watchmen hitting next year.
|
"Because he's the hero that Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now... and so we'll hunt him... because he can take it... because he's not a hero... he's a silent guardian, a watchful protector... a DARK KNIGHT."
|
Originally Posted by PatrickDA
Now, as for the third film, I think the "Clock King" would be a good fit for the world of Gotham City they've created in this series. He's a loner, sick of people walking over him, not respecting him, low level lawyer or bureaucrat in a corrupting environment. He feels more moral, ethical, and intelligent than the vast majority of Gotham City. In addition, Mr. Nolan has shown a great deal of interest in messing with time (i.e. Memento and even The Prestige). Johnny Depp would be perfect.
|
Don't make me hungry. You wouldn't like me when I'm hungry.
|
Originally Posted by Brad M
I posted this in the TDK discussion forum so why not put it here too?
With Batman on the run from the law, it would be an excellent opportunity to have Superman come over to Gotham to have a little talk with him. Could even be a springboard to a real Justice League movie. I know many want Batman to stay away from something like that but if DC wants to put the Justice League movie together this would generate interest. Anything is possible right now. |
|
Originally Posted by Pete-D
I don't think Nolan would go for that angle.
I'm sure the Warner suits would love that Justice League angle but the best thing the Warner suits can do right now is let Nolan do whatever he wants and stay the heck away from tampering with it. |
Bring back John Doe! Or at least resolve the cliff-hanger with a 2hr movie or as an extra on a dvd release.
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Dragon*Con 2009 | Heroes Con 2009
|
Originally Posted by Chuck Mayer
Because the Dark Knight hasn't gone anywhere. He's not returning. The title is perfect for that story, because it's literal. And I think it should be saved for when they actually do make that film. Which is almost inevitable at this point (in what form is unknown), with Watchmen hitting next year.
|

| Another civic minded Billionaire puts a bounty on Batman capture. Bruces conflict is then with this other Billionaire as well as the bounty hunters sent after him. |
|
Originally Posted by Lou Sytsma
Good as in narratively good. The themes have been explored. The Joker took everyone and everything to their limits. Any story after that will be a pale shadow. Then again if a straight action story is sufficient to satisfy there's plenty of those that can be rolled off the assembly line.
|
|
Originally Posted by Brandon Conway
One thing about the next film - it'll be nice to have Wayne Manor and the Batcave back.
|
|
Originally Posted by Cory S.
As far as villians are concerned, the Riddler could be done in a way that's very similar to Fincher's Zodiac, i.e. a serial killer on the loose with the "riddles". The obvious goal would be much bigger in terms of what it means to the citizens of Gotham. But, doing it this way would also bring in more of the detective Batman that The Dark Knight does more of. That's the only way I can see The Riddler fitting in to Nolan's universe.
|
|
Originally Posted by dana martin
at some point I want to see him walk the hall at Arkham Asylum and if only cameos, we need to see Crane. And possibly joker face in glass with a woman talking on other side.
|
| The problem with filming the whole film in IMAX is that that presents a much larger divide between the two formats' aspect ratios. I suppose they could make the regular release 1.85 to make it easier? |
|
Originally Posted by MikeRS
How can the next film not be called....
[Hunt the Dark Knight] |
|
Originally Posted by Brad M
With Batman on the run from the law, it would be an excellent opportunity to have Superman come over to Gotham to have a little talk with him. Could even be a springboard to a real Justice League movie.
|
It's the film after "The Dark Knight".
| My only problem with that is it's redundant. The beauty of the Bat symbol motif is they can call it anything and have it be instantly identifiable as a Batman movie. |

Never go out with anyone who thinks Fellini is a type of cheese
My Blu-Ray/DVD Collection
Government in action = Government inaction
|
Originally Posted by Chuck Mayer
...The title really doesn't matter anymore
It's the film after "The Dark Knight". |
"Because he's the hero that Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now... and so we'll hunt him... because he can take it... because he's not a hero... he's a silent guardian, a watchful protector... a DARK KNIGHT."
|
Originally Posted by Pete-D
I think Rhas Al Ghul will be brought back to bring the story full circle, as I suspect Nolan will want to end the trilogy.
. |
|
Originally Posted by DavidPla
I see a lot of talk about a return of Two-Face but forgive me if I missed something..
Warning Spoiler! Click to show Isn't he dead?
I'd love to see The Riddler or Catwoman. But what about The Mad Hatter? Never been done on the big screen yet and he could fit in as a minor villain (ala Scarecrow) |
Paul V
|
Originally Posted by Zack Gibbs
P.S., Expect 'Dark Knight spoilers ahead... |
|
Originally Posted by Brian Borst
Harley Quinn? I'd love to see her in a Batfilm. Then you'd have a small cameo from the Joker, and she would be picking it up from there.
|
" I think it's time we go to plan B". "What's plan B?" "That's the one where we don't do something stupid".
|
Originally Posted by MikeRS
Regarding Harvey's death.....
The whole end of the film is built on the fact Batman will take the rap for the crimes of the very dead Harvey Dent. If he's not dead, the end sequence makes not a lick of sense. Are people still doubting his death because it's a standard comic convention/cliche for characters to come back from the dead? |
"Because he's the hero that Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now... and so we'll hunt him... because he can take it... because he's not a hero... he's a silent guardian, a watchful protector... a DARK KNIGHT."