Home Theater Forum  ›  Forums  ›  Hi-Definition  ›  HT Software - High Definition  ›  High Def Disc Review Archives  ›  HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

#1
Rating: 0
ronsreviews_covers_1991617.jpg

In the Line of Fire





Studio: Sony/Columbia

Year: 1993

Rated: R

Program Length: 128 minutes

Aspect Ratio: 2.40:1 1080p

Languages: English Dolby TrueHD 5.1, French Dolby TrueHD 5.1, Portuguese Dolby TrueHD 5.1, Spanish Dolby Digital 5.1

Subtitles: English, English SDH, French, Portuguese, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese (simplified), Chinese (traditional), Dutch, Bahasa, Korean


The Program

Filmmakers have long been intrigued by the subject of political assassination. One of the earliest such films that I recall is Anthony Mann’s The Tall Target, a 1951 movie about an attempt to kill Abraham Lincoln in 1861. Then of course there is The Manchurian Candidate, filmed first in 1962 and remade in 2004. Several films have been made about the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy, and the 2006 film Bobby examines the murder of his brother in 1968. Other assassination-themed films include 1954’s Suddenly and 1974’s The Parallax View. The films which I have mentioned include only assassination attempts upon American politicians; there are many more films which focus upon assassinations in other countries.

One of the best assassination films is In the Line of Fire, directed by Wolfgang Petersen and starring Clint Eastwood. One thing which sets this movie apart from the others is its focus on the workings of the Secret Service, which among other things is charged with protecting the life of the President of the United States. Eastwood plays Frank Corrigan, an aging Secret Service agent who is now working on counterfeiting cases. It is 1992, and Corrigan is the only active Secret Service agent who was part of JFK’s protective detail in Dallas in 1963. Over the ensuing years Corrigan has been haunted by the belief that he might have been able to save JFK’s life if he had reacted more quickly to the sound of the first shot.

When Corrigan and his young partner, Al D’Andrea (Dylan McDermott) become aware of a man in the District of Columbia who is threatening the incumbent president, there is no unusual alarm because such threats are relatively commonplace. But then the potential assassin (John Malkovich, in a brilliant performance) reaches out to Corrigan, calling him at home, thereby setting the stage for an intriguing and suspenseful cat-and-mouse game. The would-be assassin calls himself “Booth” (he does not want to be called “Oswald” because John Wilkes Booth had “panache,” which Lee Harvey Oswald seriously lacked). He is aware of Corrigan's involvement in the JFK assassination and he taunts the agent with suggestions that he is not willing to put his life on the line for the president. Attempts to trace Booth’s phone calls either fail or are significantly delayed because of his use of sophisticated scrambling devices. It becomes increasingly apparent that his threats against the president are quite serious and real. Corrigan gets himself reassigned to the president’s protection detail, where he teams up with agent Lily Raines (Rene Russo). Corrigan clearly wants to redeem himself for what he sees as his failure in 1963, but there are concerns that his involvement is too personal and that his judgment has become suspect.

Throughout the film the target of the threats, the president, is by design kept at a distance from the viewer. All that we know about him is that it is an election year and that he is trailing in the polls with just a few weeks to go before Election Day. We do not know his name (he is referred to only by his Secret Service code name, “Traveler”) or his political party. Nor is his opponent ever mentioned by name. This approach allows the viewers to focus on the battle of wits between Corrigan and Booth without having to consider whether we would support or oppose the president. Live footage from actual campaign appearances during the 1992 presidential campaign is seamlessly integrated into the film to give it a very authentic look.

There are many suspenseful scenes and the film has a very thrilling climax. Eastwood is perfectly cast as an agent who has seen it all and is nearing retirement. Malkovich is positively chilling as the creepy assassin who kills people as easily as you or I would swat a fly. In the Line of Fire is a superb action film and is highly recommended.

The Video

Sony has done itself proud with another first-rate Blu-ray transfer. The picture is exceedingly sharp, allowing the viewer to examine every nook and cranny in Clint Eastwood’s weathered face. Color fidelity appears to be perfect. I observed very little grain, which presumably is how the movie was filmed because it does not appear that there has been excessive digital processing. The scenes which were filmed on location in Los Angeles and the District of Columbia are exquisite, and some of the shots of the nation’s capital are breathtaking.

Shadow detail in the many dark scenes is excellent and I never felt that I was missing anything.

The supplemental materials are in standard definition.

The Audio

The Dolby Digital TrueHD 5.1 audio is very satisfying and involving. There is considerable use of the surround channels in the action scenes and there is some noticeable punch in the lower ranges. The dialogue is clear and always comprehensible. There also is nice dimensionality to Ennio Morricone’s pulsating score.

Be aware that the film’s soundtrack is set lower than the sound level of the disc’s introductory materials. I had to raise my volume level about 20db when the feature started.

The Supplements

The extras on In the Line of Fire are identical to those found on the Special Edition DVD which was released in 2001.

There is a commentary track with director Wolfgang Petersen.

There are five deleted scenes, one of which involves Corrigan sitting at a piano in a bar. When a woman strikes up a conversation with him, he has her play two chords on the piano, but when she strikes the keys there is no sound. Apparently it was decided to delete that scene before the music was added.

A 22-minute documentary entitled “The Ultimate Sacrifice” talks about the Secret Service and how the agency cooperated in the making of the film.

A Showtime special called “Behind the Scenes with the Secret Service” appears to have been a promotional piece which aired on Showtime when the film was originally released. The special runs for 20 minutes and goes into some detail about how Secret Service agents are trained.

There is also a 5-minute featurette entitled “Catching the Counterfeiters” which describes how our currency has had to go high-tech to outsmart counterfeiters who use computers to make phony bills. Another 5-minute featurette called “How’d They Do That?” demonstrates how blue screen technology was used to insert images of Clint Eastwood and other actors into scenes of the 2002 presidential campaign and even into film of JFK's visit to Dallas in 1963.

The Packaging

The single disc comes in a standard Blu-ray keepcase.

The Final Analysis

In the Line of Fire is an outstanding thriller and Sony has given it a superb Blu-ray transfer. It boasts a tight script and it moves along swiftly. There is of course a romantic angle between Corrigan and Raines, but it is a minor diversion and does not distract from the film’s essential tension.

Equipment used for this review:

Panasonic DMP-BD10A DVD Player
Sharp LC-42D62U LCD display
Yamaha HTR-5890 THX Surround Receiver
BIC Acoustech speakers
Interconnects: Monster Cable

Release Date: July 1, 2008

Rich Gallagher

Export to Wiki
#2
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Great to read that this release is very good, my disc is on the way to me and I should be watching it this week.





Crawdaddy
G.W. McLintock: Camille, you're on your own.
Export to Wiki
#3
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Need to buy this straightaway. Off to Amazon.
Export to Wiki
#4
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Need to get this straightaway. Off to Amazon baby.
Export to Wiki
#5
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Sounds great! This is one of my fave Eastwood flicks and I can't wait to get it in my hands today.
Export to Wiki
#6
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

I've put this in my Netflix queue, as I have never seen it.

One question though, is Rene Russo supposed to look like a deranged psychopath on the cover:



*shiver*
Export to Wiki
#7
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

yeah, that's a pretty damn crappy photoshop cover
Export to Wiki
#8
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Also, what's up with the hollowness in Clint's eyes? It looks like he's had a run in with the 'ole alien virus from The X-Files...

Somehow I've managed to avoid this all these years, looks like I'm throwing it in the Netflix queue based on the recommendation.
Export to Wiki
#9
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Mine is in route from Amazon. Glad to hear the DVD is well done!

Cogito, Ergo Sum
My DVD Library / The BLOOD is the Life!
Pioneer Elite PRO PDP-111FD - 2/28/2009
Export to Wiki
#10
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

I love the artwork for the UK release:


Click here to view my DVD Collection
Export to Wiki
#11
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Agreed, the U.K. cover is much better!

Rich Gallagher

Export to Wiki
#12
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

And what Kubrick film did they get that shot of Rene Russo from?
Ernest Hemingway once wrote, \"The world is a fine place and worth fighting for.\" I agree with the second part...
--Det. William Somerset, SE7EN

http://www.dvdanthology.com/Filmmaker-movielist.html), http://LDDb.com/collection.php?actio...user=Filmmaker
Export to Wiki
#13
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Gallagher
Agreed, the U.K. cover is much better!
Coverart isn't a biggie with me, but I have to agree about the U.K. cover being better than the Region A. By the way, the U.K. coverart is the same as the 1997 SD DVD Region 1 release while this BR coverart is the same as the 2001 SD DVD Region 1 release.
G.W. McLintock: Camille, you're on your own.
Export to Wiki
#14
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Gallagher
Agreed, the U.K. cover is much better!

Yeah, that was the original DVD cover and it's miles better than the crappy image they used on the SE DVD and now the Blu-Ray.

"If you're good at something, never do it for free."

Export to Wiki
#15
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Gallagher
The Video

Sony has done itself proud with another first-rate Blu-ray transfer. The picture is exceedingly sharp, allowing the viewer to examine every nook and cranny in Clint Eastwood’s weathered face. Color fidelity appears to be perfect. I observed very little grain, which presumably is how the movie was filmed because it does not appear that there has been excessive digital processing. The scenes which were filmed on location in Los Angeles and the District of Columbia are exquisite, and some of the shots of the nation’s capital are breathtaking.

Shadow detail in the many dark scenes is excellent and I never felt that I was missing anything.

The supplemental materials are in standard definition.



Thanks Richard for your thoughts about the BD of "In the Line of Fire".

Please don't get me wrong -no personal insult- but I completely disagree with your review as concerns PQ:

It is a VERY ordinary transfer. The BD obviously derives from a dated HD master with fake sharpness created by a more than healthy amount of edge enhancement. The picture appears to be heavily grain-reduced and filtered, although not as pervertedly digitally processed as the FOX stinkers "Patton" and "The Longest Day".

Not a disaster, but no recommendation for purists and people who like the film-like look.

In addition to that, I noticed for the first time Sony using the paranoid BD-plus "non-feature" with minutes of loading time on my Sony S1.
Export to Wiki
#16
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johannes S
Thanks Richard for your thoughts about the BD of "In the Line of Fire".

Please don't get me wrong -no personal insult- but I completely disagree with your review as concerns PQ:

It is a VERY ordinary transfer. The BD obviously derives from a dated HD master with fake sharpness created by a more than healthy amount of edge enhancement. The picture appears to be heavily grain-reduced and filtered, although not as pervertedly digitally processed as the FOX stinkers "Patton" and "The Longest Day".

Not a disaster, but no recommendation for purists and people who like the film-like look.

In addition to that, I noticed for the first time Sony using the paranoid BD-plus "non-feature" with minutes of loading time on my Sony S1.
Something tells me that almost each BR release and review is going to be debated with disagreements about the PQ. Personally, I noticed the picture not having a lot of fine film grain, but it didn't affect my enjoyment of the disc. We have to strive for the best presentation on BR, but I have to wonder if purists will ever be really happy with most of these presentations?
G.W. McLintock: Camille, you're on your own.
Export to Wiki
#17
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Crawford
Something tells me that almost each BR release and review is going to be debated with disagreements about the PQ. Personally, I noticed the picture not having a lot of fine film grain, but it didn't affect my enjoyment of the disc. We have to strive for the best presentation on BR, but I have to wonder if purists will ever be really happy with most of these presentations?

Right, personally I will never ever be happy with THESE kinds of presentations...

But there were examples of the "perfect" high definition transfer in the early days of HD DVD and Blu-ray:

"Bullitt", "The Getaway", "Blazing Saddles", "That's Entertainment Box Set", "The Chronicles of Riddick", "The Searchers", "Forbidden Planet", "Serenity", "The Last Samurai".....


But these are "used-to-bees". The majority of transfers that we get right now are pure digitally manipulated shit. (pardon my language)

The incapable product managers of the major studios are going to kill the format Blu-ray for the serious film lovers and cineasts with their excessive grain-elimination,wax-figures presentations.
Export to Wiki
#18
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johannes S
Right, personally I will never ever be happy with THESE kinds of presentations...

But there were examples of the "perfect" high definition transfer in the early days of HD DVD and Blu-ray:

"Bullitt", "The Getaway", "Blazing Saddles", "That's Entertainment Box Set", "The Chronicles of Riddick", "The Searchers", "Forbidden Planet", "Serenity", "The Last Samurai".....


But these are "used-to-bees". The majority of transfers that we get right now are pure digitally manipulated shit. (pardon my language)

The incapable product managers of the major studios are going to kill the format Blu-ray for the serious film lovers and cineasts with their excessive grain-elimination,wax-figures presentations.
I think you're being a little melodramatic with your "used to bees" comment, but I understand your point.
G.W. McLintock: Camille, you're on your own.
Export to Wiki
#19
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale MA
I love the artwork for the UK release:


And that's the one I'll be getting.

The UK version of the film has been cut ever since the theatrical release, but Sony have apparently put the full version on the UK BD. Sweeeeeet.
Export to Wiki
#20
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johannes S
It is a VERY ordinary transfer. The BD obviously derives from a dated HD master with fake sharpness created by a more than healthy amount of edge enhancement. The picture appears to be heavily grain-reduced and filtered, although not as pervertedly digitally processed as the FOX stinkers "Patton" and "The Longest Day"

Johannes,

No offense taken! I did mention the lack of grain, but I had no other version (not even the LD) to compare it with, so it was not apparent to me whether any significant digital processing had been done. Usually with older films I have an earlier version to compare it with, but not in this case.

Rich Gallagher

Export to Wiki
#21
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

I watched this yesterday and after several stellar transfers from Sony that I watched before this was quite a letdown.

It looks dated and wanting in detail as well as grain structure.

I did not even notice the ringing that much and was more bothered by the fact that even in closeups faces never seemed to come into focus, let alone long and medium shots - the power of DNR and grain reduction applied to an older master I guess.
Export to Wiki
#22
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

If we're comparing this to other Sony transfers then yes, it is slightly lacking - however, if you compare it to the original DVD... then wow, there's no contest, the DVD transfer is horrible whilst this looks pretty damn good.
Click here to view my DVD Collection
Export to Wiki
#23
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

As Crawdaddy mentions, to each his own really in regards to what we think looks ok. We recently watched the BD of Dirty Harry. It was kind of inconsistent but mostly looked pretty good. The parts that were a tad noisy were fine as for me it, it reminded me I was watching a film made in 1971. And that made the experience more authentic.

So, the 'dated' look of films is really a good thing. We watched In The Line Of Fire last night and it's a good Blu-ray disc. I can't remember much from 1993 but nothing stuck out.

It's also a terrific film and the Blu-ray disc doesn't really call attention to itself and allowed us to soak up the screenplay. Isn't that the whole point?
Club Timobi Wan-Episode II
Export to Wiki
#24
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Tim,

I made a lengthy reply to your post and for some reason the forum software just did not post it so here I go again a little shorter: I wanted to say was that the transfer looked dated to me, not the movie itself. Faces are lacking in detail, foucs is lacking overall and colors look to be kind of muted, too.

I like the look of Dirty Harry much more as it really looks like Film and especially details in fine structures and faces are much more visible in that one, also actors faces do not only have that uniform "one shade fits all of the face" color as In the Line of Fire - very happy I am with Dirty Harry indeed

Oliver
Export to Wiki
#25
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Oliver, as a long-time fan of In the Line of Fire, who has seen every DVD version as well as the Blu-ray and the original film release (though I can't claim to recall the image in detail), let me say this:

The color scheme has always been muted. The special edition DVD tried to "push" the colors, with results that weren't very good (IMO). The Blu-ray presents a much better balance.

There appears to have been some amount of DNR, but it's minor. My visual tests for this are relatively simple:
  • Are the faces waxen, like the "mannequin" faces in Trading Places or The Untouchables? Here they aren't.
  • Does fast motion cause blurring (as in Face/Off)? I've only watched ItLoF once on BD, but the scene of chaos at the Bonaventure Hotel is one of the film's highlights, and it looked great on this disc.
I did not find focus to be lacking, but I was judging it by different shots: namely, the long shots of massive crowds at rallies, which have never had sufficient detail on standard DVDs to create the same effect as they did in the theater. On the BD, they finally do.

In close-ups on faces, I was struck by something different, and that was how completely invisible the makeup was on Malkovich's many disguises. This leads me to wonder whether the original photography wasn't somehow filtered to achieve that effect. There's no way to know without consulting the cinematographer. (I don't believe Petersen covers this in his commentary, but it's been years since I listened to it.)

Overall, while it's not a perfect disc, I think it's a very good one.

M.
Zoloft and Paxil and Buspar and Xanex, Depacon, Chronaphin, Ambien, Prozac,
Ativan calms me when I see the bills.
These are a few of my favorite pills.
(Next to Normal)              HTF Rules & Regs     My 2009 Film List
Win cool stuff: www.hometheaterforum.com/contest for details!
Export to Wiki
#26
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Michael,

I am also a fan of this movie and at least the Blu-Ray is the first version on prerecorded media that I consider watchable, so I am happy that I was able to rewatch it finally

I also saw In the Line of Fire in a movie theater and remember that at the time I thought that Eastwood was looking so old in this movie, it was almost painful in some scenes especially the romantic ones.

On this Blu-Ray he looks rather young as his face and neck look so uniform and smooth and this immediately struck me as odd and I am pretty sure this was not the intended look.

I have rewatched a few minutes today for demonstration purposes by the way and indeed smearing in motion is not prevalent with ILF, but then smearing is not as much of a problem with some newer DNR algorythms even when you want to go for the ultra clean look like in Patton. Add to that a high probability that the master used by Sony was too old to have true 1920 x 1080 resolution in the first place, and there was not as much detail/grain to get rid of anyway.

And while I do not agree with this being a very good transfer I do not consider it that bad either but still a disappointment given Sonys recent track record with one stellar transfer after another.

Oliver
Export to Wiki
#27
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by OliverK
I also saw In the Line of Fire in a movie theater and remember that at the time I thought that Eastwood was looking so old in this movie, it was almost painful in some scenes especially the romantic ones.

On this Blu-Ray he looks rather young as his face and neck look so uniform and smooth and this immediately struck me as odd and I am pretty sure this was not the intended look.
Of course he looks younger to us now -- we're fifteen years older. That does change one's perspective. And if you've watched Eastwood age in later films like Space Cowboys, Blood Work and Million Dollar Baby, then naturally he's going to look youthful by comparison in ItLoF.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OliverK
but then smearing is not as much of a problem with some newer DNR algorythms even when you want to go for the ultra clean look like in Patton. Add to that a high probability that the master used by Sony was too old to have true 1920 x 1080 resolution in the first place, and there was not as much detail/grain to get rid of anyway.
You can't have it both ways. If it's an old master, it's not going to get the benefit of newer DNR processing. The whole reason for using an old master is to save the trouble of doing new processing. You just ship the old master to the compressionist. (Otherwise we wouldn't have messes like Face/Off.) Also, the color values between this transfer and the previous DVD are so different that I find it unlikely that this is an old transfer.

Ultimately, though, we have no way of knowing the technical specifics without an inside source. Maybe one of our "connected" participants can help out.

M.
Zoloft and Paxil and Buspar and Xanex, Depacon, Chronaphin, Ambien, Prozac,
Ativan calms me when I see the bills.
These are a few of my favorite pills.
(Next to Normal)              HTF Rules & Regs     My 2009 Film List
Win cool stuff: www.hometheaterforum.com/contest for details!
Export to Wiki
#28
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben
Of course he looks younger to us now -- we're fifteen years older. That does change one's perspective. And if you've watched Eastwood age in later films like Space Cowboys, Blood Work and Million Dollar Baby, then naturally he's going to look youthful by comparison in ItLoF.

I mentioned specifically that he appears younger to me now than he did back then when I saw it in the cinema because I remember not that much how it looked but what I thought back then. To add to that the last two Eastwood movies that I watched before were Unforgiven and Dirty Harry - he was younger when doing those than he was when he did ILF. As I mostly watch his movies from the 60ies and 70ies (I prefer his westerns and he made only two from the 80ies on) it is clearly not a case of remembering him only from Space Cowboys, Blood Work and other movies where he was older.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben
You can't have it both ways. If it's an old master, it's not going to get the benefit of newer DNR processing. The whole reason for using an old master is to save the trouble of doing new processing. You just ship the old master to the compressionist. (Otherwise we wouldn't have messes like Face/Off.) Also, the color values between this transfer and the previous DVD are so different that I find it unlikely that this is an old transfer.

Your argument is flawed as it implies that with an old master nothing else is done before bringing it to Blu-Ray, but the compressionist alone can make or break a transfer. Ironically Face Off is a very good example of this - there are different versions out there from the same old master and the encoding alone makes the two look different. I would guess that this is due to DNR that can be applied to a varying degree during the creation of the transfer. Here is a comparison where you can see a nice amount of DNR that is added to the VC-1 version when compared to the AVC encoding:Face/Off | BD vs HD | Image 1 (200%)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben
Ultimately, though, we have no way of knowing the technical specifics without an inside source. Maybe one of our "connected" participants can help out.

100% agree.
After the conflicting information we got from Sony about The Fifth Element and Lawrence of Arabia I am not sure if we should expect too much useful information from them when it comes to suboptimal masters/transfers, but I would not mind to be pleasantly surprised in this case.

So until we hear more I suggest that we agree to disagree and if a better version of ILF is released at some point in the future we both won't be unhappy about that - even if it makes Clint Eastwood look older

Oliver
Export to Wiki
#29
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Quote:
Originally Posted by OliverK
Your argument is flawed as it implies that with an old master nothing else is done before bringing it to Blu-Ray, but the compressionist alone can make or break a transfer. Ironically Face Off is a very good example of this - there are different versions out there from the same old master and the encoding alone makes the two look different. I would guess that this is due to DNR that can be applied to a varying degree during the creation of the transfer. Here is a comparison where you can see a nice amount of DNR that is added to the VC-1 version when compared to the AVC encoding:Face/Off | BD vs HD | Image 1 (200%)
Sorry, I didn't mean to indicate that "nothing" is done. My point was that the whole reason for using an old transfer is to save money by doing as little as possible. As for the Face/Off comparison you've linked to, I'm already familiar with it, and if you read the linked thread at AVS, no one could agree on why the two looked different -- some people couldn't even see the difference, though I can -- but I'd say the weight of opinion tended toward the point I've bolded above: it's the encoding. The encoding is not DNR.

And to repeat a previous point: This BD has very different color values than the special edition DVD from 2001. So it's unlikely to be sourced from that transfer. If it's from an older transfer, it would have to be from the original DVD in 1997. I suppose that's possible, but it seems unlikely.

M.
Zoloft and Paxil and Buspar and Xanex, Depacon, Chronaphin, Ambien, Prozac,
Ativan calms me when I see the bills.
These are a few of my favorite pills.
(Next to Normal)              HTF Rules & Regs     My 2009 Film List
Win cool stuff: www.hometheaterforum.com/contest for details!
Export to Wiki
#30
Rating: 0

Re: HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: In the Line of Fire

Quote:
One question though, is Rene Russo supposed to look like a deranged psychopath on the cover
Yes, she is the assassin!
Export to Wiki