I have just read the news:Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
That's make me sick...
That's make me sick...
6/17/08 at 6:53pm
- Joined: December 2007
- Post Count: 42
Home Theater Forum
›
Forums
›
Other Diversions
›
After Hours Lounge
›
Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Recent Reviews
-
Toshiba enters the Blu ray world with their first player. Toshiba with universal had gone with HDDVD a few years back and lost. now they are here with the first blu ray player. I had a Toshiba HD-a2...
-
FUNNY PEOPLE 2-Disc Unrated Collector’s Edition Studio: Universal Studios Home Entertainment Year: 2009 Rated:R Film Length: 2 hours, 26 minutes (theatrical), 2 hours, 33 minutes...
-
There are continual jolts of electricity spread throughout Matteo Garrone’s Gomorrah. It’s akin to the shock-to-the-system kick one got when he was first exposed to Martin...
Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
6/17/08 at 7:16pm
- Joined: March 2002
- Post Count: 1,198
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Total money grab by these companies. As the person from Cisco said, “today’s ‘bandwidth hog’ is tomorrow’s average user.”....They're just prepping for the future to justify higher prices for all.Carl
6/17/08 at 8:15pm
- Joined: February 2001
- Location: Albany, NY
- Post Count: 9,370
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
You don't buy broadband to check your email and hit up a couple favorite websites. If you're paying for 2 MB download speeds, you should have a rightful expectation that you can use that bandwidth.
6/17/08 at 9:06pm
- Joined: January 2003
- Post Count: 4,492
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
I work for a telecom company, and yes, this is coming. They figure that there's 10% of customers that use 90% of the bandwidth. I guess for people who aren't heavy users, this is preferable to having rates go up across the board. I'm not a huge bandwidth user myself, (I don't think) but I would like to know more about what the limits will be. I personally don't want to have to worry if I am exceeding. I have a cell phone plan where I probably only use 10% of my available minutes a month, but I keep just for the peace of mind of knowing I will never go over my plan.STOP HIM! He's supposed to die!
6/17/08 at 9:42pm
- Joined: May 1999
- Post Count: 2,815
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
I guess it's hard to argue with it in principle. Everything else we consume is pretty much charged by the amount used...gas, electric, phone, water, etc. Why not bandwidth?
6/17/08 at 9:52pm
- Joined: April 1999
- Post Count: 2,951
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
> Why not bandwidth?Uh, because the price of bandwidth has been dropping like a rock, for one.
And of course we pay for cable TV by the hour.
6/18/08 at 4:23am
- Joined: June 2006
- Location: Burlington, MA
- Post Count: 678
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
When there is so much bandwidth that high bandwidth usage doesn't place any strain on the system, then perhaps that'll be a good argument against charging by the byte. Until then, I want fees unbundled: I want the service providers to charge the lowest possible base price, and then have everyone pay incrementally more based on how much they actually use the service. That way, I don't pay one penny more than I personally need to. Anything that costs them more to provide they should charge extra for, so I don't have to subsidize anyone else's special or excessive usage, and so I am only charged for what I personally use.
6/18/08 at 5:33am
- Joined: May 2002
- Location: Ajijic, Jalisco, Mexíco
- Post Count: 12,060
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Charging by the bit will kill off services such as online Netfilx and Apple TV and will certainly curb the use of graphics on sites such as this one. After all how many will pay for pretty pictures when they can just read the text?
¡Time is not my master!
6/18/08 at 5:47am
- Joined: February 2002
- Location: Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
- Post Count: 1,279
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
I'm a FIOS user and not only did I get a rate increase notice, but I also got a note saying that they were going to cut out all USENET groups that were not in the 'BIG 8'...comp.*,humanities.*,misc.*,news.*,rec.*,sci.*,soc. *,talk.*
That leaves out the alt.* stuff which is loaded with binary images and I assume uses a bunch of bandwidth.
Lew
My DVDs
6/18/08 at 6:59am
- Joined: April 2002
- Post Count: 2,346
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
I guess I dont' know how much I use. I download a few songs, play a few PS3 games online. No idea how much this "uses" or how much more it would cost me a month. I don't download HD movies online, or run Bit torrent full time. I think it's kind of silly personally. If you don't use a lot of bandwith, pay for DSL at 19 bucks a month. If you are spending $60 a month for cable, then they charge you when you use it? No thanks.
6/18/08 at 8:13am
- Joined: December 1998
- Post Count: 7,876
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
If this policy is implemented by only some providers, the ones that don't will pick up a lot of customers. Also, I'd ask if this means that the base price will be cut for "light" users.
6/18/08 at 8:40am
- Joined: June 1999
- Post Count: 1,754
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Quote:
| That leaves out the alt.* stuff which is loaded with binary images and I assume uses a bunch of bandwidth. |
They didn't shut it down because of bandwidth usage. The NY Atty General was threatening legal action because a survey of the alt.binaries groups found child porn in 8 of the alt newsgroups (only 8? seems low). Verizon and some others have just opted not to deal with the legal issues by turning off access through their service to the thousands of other alt groups (which generally have copyright issues of their own).
This will likely have zero effect on the targetted problem, since it's just as easy to post illegal content to a newsgroup with a different name or switch to a USENET server outside of your ISP - but at least some lawyers made money and wielded the power of attorney.
My bandwidth usage has gone up recently because I've been watching more video podcasts through my PC and through my TiVo. If I were to add a movie streaming service in the near future then that might put me into some heavy user category. I do wonder how Comcast would differentiate the bits for me downloading content from Amazon vs me downloading bits from Comcast On-Demand. Who am I kidding? They wouldn't care - mo money either way!
Brad
We apologise for the unnecessary truncation and lack of formatting control in the signature. Those responsible should be sacked.
Mynd you, møøse bites Kan be pretty nasti...
6/18/08 at 9:27am
- Joined: May 1999
- Post Count: 2,815
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
This could be the opportunity the content providers have been looking for to deter piracy. If one can find a song/movie to download for "free," he might think twice if it costs more in bandwidth charges.
6/18/08 at 9:49am
- Joined: June 2006
- Location: Burlington, MA
- Post Count: 678
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lew Crippen
Charging by the bit will kill off services such as online Netfilx and Apple TV
|
6/18/08 at 9:50am
- Joined: June 2006
- Location: Burlington, MA
- Post Count: 678
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LewB
I'm a FIOS user and not only did I get a rate increase notice, but I also got a note saying that they were going to cut out all USENET groups that were not in the 'BIG 8'...
comp.*,humanities.*,misc.*,news.*,rec.*,sci.*,soc. *,talk.* That leaves out the alt.* stuff which is loaded with binary images and I assume uses a bunch of bandwidth. |
6/18/08 at 9:52am
- Joined: June 2006
- Location: Burlington, MA
- Post Count: 678
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steve_Tk
I guess I dont' know how much I use. I download a few songs, play a few PS3 games online. No idea how much this "uses" or how much more it would cost me a month. I don't download HD movies online, or run Bit torrent full time.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steve_Tk
If you are spending $60 a month for cable, then they charge you when you use it?
|
6/18/08 at 10:27am
- Joined: April 2002
- Post Count: 2,346
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
I meant cable modem, forgot to include that.
6/18/08 at 10:33am
- Joined: February 2002
- Location: Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
- Post Count: 1,279
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brian^K
I read that some service providers have recently decided to do this because some of those other realms provide child pornography.
|
Lew
My DVDs
6/18/08 at 10:59am
- Joined: August 2000
- Location: BritCol. North of a Black Hole and West of The Centre of the...
- Post Count: 3,850
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
This is just the thin edge of the wedge. If this practice becomes common, the companies will start lowering the thresholds at which the extra charges take place. First the "bandwidth hogs" then eventually the "average user" will see their internet bills skyrocket with usage charges.I'll help free up telcom companies bandwidth by canceling my service if this practice becomes common. I've done it with my television service and I can do it with internet service. I'm getting sick and tired of these companies and their attitude that we serve them, instead of them serving us.
Internet service, like satellite and cable TV, is a luxury.....not a necessity. I can survive without any of these services. How long can Telcom and TV companies survive if people finally wake up and start canceling their subscriptions en mass?
When you have to shoot...shoot. Don't talk!
6/18/08 at 11:57am
- Joined: November 2004
- Location: The basement of the FBI building
- Post Count: 12,733
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RobertR
If this policy is implemented by only some providers, the ones that don't will pick up a lot of customers.
|
6/18/08 at 1:53pm
- Joined: December 2004
- Location: KY
- Post Count: 1,773
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
I think big brother Microsoft would also have something to say when XBox live memberships start dropping off.I would say that we in the "heavy" user group. My son lives on XBox, I have a weather web page that gets updates every 10 seconds, and my daughter loves the instant messaging. In all we have 5 computers hooked up.
6/18/08 at 1:58pm
- Joined: December 2001
- Location: Columbus, OH
- Post Count: 6,427
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by drobbins
I think big brother Microsoft would also have something to say when XBox live memberships start dropping off.
I would say that we in the "heavy" user group. My son lives on XBox, I have a weather web page that gets updates every 10 seconds, and my daughter loves the instant messaging. In all we have 5 computers hooked up. |
The man I loved - the man who vanished - he never came back at all. But maybe he's still out there, somewhere. Maybe some day, when Gotham no longer needs Batman, I'll see him again.
6/18/08 at 2:25pm
- Joined: February 2003
- Location: Ohio
- Post Count: 3,195
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Yeah, my son and I play a ton of Xbox Live. It would be interesting to see just how much bandwidth I actually use in a month.You think all those people with unsecure wireless home networks would eventually wise-up and secure them? If not, they could be in for some shocking monthly bills.
6/18/08 at 5:28pm
- Joined: December 2004
- Location: KY
- Post Count: 1,773
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
With the water and electric we have meters on the house so we can check usage and if the utility company's billing dept is honest. How can you meter byte usage at the house? It would have to be in between the router and the gateway.
6/18/08 at 6:26pm
- Joined: February 2007
- Location: west coast of florida
- Post Count: 897
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Even the XBox will be pretty low bandwidth-wise."Bobby is and idiot"
6/18/08 at 10:59pm
- Joined: May 2005
- Post Count: 109
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Yeah and the worst part is, not only are the charging us for going over bandwidth limits but they are still limiting our speeds with traffic shapping software.
6/19/08 at 6:29am
- Joined: May 1999
- Post Count: 959
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bobbyg2
Even the XBox will be pretty low bandwidth-wise.
|
Unless you download free demos/videos or use the Marketplace for movie rentals. The demo for NCAA Football 09 came out today. 1.44GB.
6/19/08 at 8:43am
- Joined: January 1999
- Post Count: 2,307
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by drobbins
I think big brother Microsoft would also have something to say when XBox live memberships start dropping off.
|
1. Microsoft
2. Apple
3. Amazon
4. Netflix
5. Google/Youtube
Today's "average user" can easily rack up 50GB+/month in transfers. If you download a couple of movies a week from any one of the services and watch a few things on Youtube, you're going to bump up against that.
I'm also a little dismayed that the bandwidth that exists today was largely paid for by investors who have ZERO to show for their investment, when all the Telecoms went belly up. These pipes were sold for pennies, if that, on the dollar, and now these same companies are looking to further bilk the end user- who may well have been investors also- on a by the minute basis.
Like Edwin, I may end up choosing the original alternative to Internet- nothing.
I love to singa, about the moon-a, and the june-a, and the springa...
-Owl Jolson
6/19/08 at 3:52pm
- Joined: June 2006
- Location: Burlington, MA
- Post Count: 678
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LewB
I've heard that too, but it sounds like a bunch of B.S. to me.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LewB
Kind of like treating a hang nail by amputating.
|
6/19/08 at 3:57pm
- Joined: June 2006
- Location: Burlington, MA
- Post Count: 678
Re: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Edwin-S
This is just the thin edge of the wedge. If this practice becomes common, the companies will start lowering the thresholds at which the extra charges take place.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Edwin-S
First the "bandwidth hogs" then eventually the "average user" will see their internet bills skyrocket with usage charges.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Edwin-S
I'm getting sick and tired of these companies and their attitude that we serve them, instead of them serving us.
|
