Re: Stalled series? There's Hope!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Andrew Radke
As for me, I'd LOVE to buy all the shows I'm interested in, but many of us are on extremely tight budgets, especially with today's economy.
|
No doubt, and studios HAVE to recognize that. But unfortunately the reaction may be to "make less, if noone can afford to buy them". That may be "less product, period", or that may be "less (and therefore cheaper) content per release"; i.e. more half-season sets...or even to break the seasons into smaller portions like thirds or quarters! I've been nervous that this kind of thing may happen...and nervous about it for quite a while now, especially with some of the older shows that run 30+ episodes for a single season. When we see that "Season 1, Volume 3" title tag, then all hell's gonna break loose.

Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RichieMagoo
Maybe that drop-off is a result of the studios taking so long to release subsequent seasons, though?
...The fact that bootleggers often offer the incomplete shows which the studios refuse to continue, speaks volumes as to their viability.
|
The latter is certainly a debatable: while it's easy to think "hey, bootleggers wouldn't be sellling those full-series sets if it wasn't profitable for them", there's also a very valid point that they have much less of an overhead, too. Hey, it's not like they're paying for licenses, royalties, remastering, or anything else that goes into a studio budge.
As for the former point, there's certainly something to be said for that. But as I indicated, sometimes a studio just doesn't have the data they need right away to make a decision. If you don't know how Season 1 sold yet, you may have to wait for that data to come in before you can decide on green-lighting Season 2, y'know?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bryan^H
But that's where I'm stumped. If season 1 of a show sells great, how can the second season do worse, and the third even less? Obviously if you buy the first season of a show your a fan and are going to want to continue the seasons. Do fans lose interest in the series and call it quits, or is it they just get back logged and need time to catch up?
|
Ah, but you're missing an entire category, and a pretty darn big one: the CASUAL FAN. The person who likes a show, gets it on DVD, then watches those episodes and realizes that this is enough for them. Perfect example here is the release of The Andy Griffith Show. I had three co-workers (back before TSoD became a full-time job for me) who loved, loved, LOVED that show, and always asked when the DVDs would come out. When it came out, two of them bought it, loved it, and purchased ever release on street date. The third guy bought Season 1, and enjoyed it, but realized "this is enough for me" and didn't feel the need to own further episodes. Even though his favorite episode wasn't in that season; it was a few later. He didn't care; what he had was good enough. If he had a hankerin' for some Andy, he could scratch that itch.
Other "fans" buy the first season, and realize that it doesn't hold up to their memories and isn't enjoyable any more, so they never buy more releases. Still others are picked up by non-fans, as a gift for a fan (say, a mom or dad, or a grandparent) who would never buy it for themselves. Well, having bought the first release for that person, the gift-giver isn't committed to buying the rest of the seasons for this fan...and whatever reasons (often financial) that prevented the fan from buying it themselves in the first place, persist and keep them from picking up more seasons.
Add that to the people who don't buy subsequent seasons because of dissatisfaction with prices or quality, or irritation at half-season sets or edits or music changes, or people who just haven't gotten around to buying the second season or maybe never got around to finishing watching the first season, or maybe never even got word that more seasons were coming out because they're not online all the time like we are, etc.; there are LOTS of reasons why further releases don't sell as well as the first release. I'm sure we could add tons more reasons to the list than I just stated here.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jab_B!
well, it doesn't make sense that the companies act like the initial sales are the only ones that matter.
|
If my post made it sound like that's the case, then I apologize. I don't think I said that, though. I've seen LOTS of examples of studios, including CBS/Par, Sony, Warner, Fox, and others, who will indicate to us many months, or even years!, after a title's release that they are still looking at sales figures for that title and waiting for it to get above a certain mark before making a decision on a further release. It's often "never too late" in some cases for a studio to un-stall a stalled show because the numbers finally made it. But how long it took will certainly factor into the decision, yes? And obviously it means a decision is made much later; the point I was trying to make had to do with why the studio looks at the earliest sales data to make the quickest decisions on whether to move forward with the next release.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Professor Echo
I think the future for TV shows on DVD will probably eventually go the boutique route along the lines of Time-Life, with complete series being released at once and in gift packaging.
|
I think that there's certainly room for this, and more of it...but that it will never take the place of people running down the street to Wal-Mart or Best Buy to pick up the latest and greatest.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steve...O
Dave, I'm assuming that you and Gord deal primarily with the marketing people as opposed to the operations/executive types. Since these individuals' job security revolves around proving their value as marketeers there may be some professional one-upsmanship going on from their standpoint. After all, if the business leaders decide that TVSonDVD.com or some other internet outlet can be as effective at getting the word out about a product at a lower cost then they may consider outsourcing the work to entities such as yourself. This is just a thought; I know you didn't want to drag the conversation out and I wouldn't blame you if didn't want to touch this comment with a 10 foot pole 
|
Okay, I'll dare to "touch it"!

Yes and no on the marketing people; let's just say "it depends on the studio". Mostly "yes", though. What I guess most people don't know is that Gord primarily talks to the studio folk, though I also do sometimes (especially at the independent companies; I leave the majors to Gordo). I more often talk to the "retailer friends," "anonymous sources" and "industry contacts"...you know, the "spies".

But yeah, we recognize that some of the people we deal with are worried about their jobs. However, I am also frankly worried about mine; I want TVGuide.com to renew my contract, so that means I need to bring da' funk.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TravisR
Very well said.
|
Agreed; Steve...O's second paragraph is dead-on.