Re: Paramount Makes Official Blu-Ray announcement! Read the press release here.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Michael Reuben
Man, I think you've missed my point.
|
I suspect not entirely though the finer details might've been skewed somewhat in different ways.

Quote:
I regard the format war as a trivial matter compared with an issue that existed long before anyone had heard of Blu-ray and that will continue long into the next format (whatever that may be): namely, the quality of film-to-video transfers in general. So while I'm as happy as the next person that Paramount is finally starting to announce Blu-ray titles, my enthusiasm is tempered by the recognition that a bad transfer is still bad, even if it's on Blu-ray. And that's very likely to be the case with Face/Off and several other Paramount titles.
M. |
I agree w/ that, and actually, I was just pointing out how "ideally" the studios (and CE companies) should in general have done what's right and get things done right from the get-go. Yes, in a sense, the format war was trivial to this specific matter, ie. if Paramount wanted to give us great quality titles, they could've regardless of the format war. But I do believe in practice the format war (or rather the approaches that the various parties took that led to and perpetuated the war) did in fact contribute somewhat to the problem anyhow. IMHO, there are various interrelated factors involved. And the format war being what it was did probably play a significant role in presenting an extra obstacle for certain studios in their delivery of quality titles to us.
For one thing, if they had done everything right, ideally, MPEG2 would not be a concern. Bandwidth and space limitations would also be less of a concern too, if/when those might play into the resulting quality. The lack of a format war would also have allowed certain studios (and CE companies) to commit more strongly and clearly (and quickly) toward max quality output. And those are just what's off the top of my head.

Yeah, stuff like the DNR issue is a bit different (and philosophical), but even there, one can argue that less DNR might be used in some cases if bandwidth/space limitations are of absolutely zero concern (thus leaving it purely to the rather philsophical debate about how/when DNR should be used, if at all). And if the transfer is bad, it costs $$$ (and time/effort) to redo it -- again, there can be interrelated factors there also, including the $$$/time commitment involved, if there's a format war to cloud things, not that Paramount has had a great track record (like you said) anyhow though they seem to eventually improve when all obstacles are removed, eg. it took them a while, but they eventually got to the point where they released pretty decent 16x9 DVDs at a decent pace vs doing very little and sticking w/ just non-16x9 (LD transfers) during the early days of DVD. And of course, the list can go on...
_Man_