Re: "Dark City: Director's Cut" coming to Blu-ray on July 29
Good post Cees.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cees Alons
I'm not referring here to the fact that the screencap may have been chosen to show the absolutely worst (or best) example of a frame containing what the poster wanted to argue.
|
Yes, one or two screencaps (I mean 1 frame of the 24 frames, where 24 frames is 1 second..) is hardly the "smoking gun" that should suddenly ruin the film. I personally want to see the film (and no, I don´t post in the forums during that..

) through. If I have to "freeze frame" the film to "see" some problem etc, it´s probably not a "problem" for me. Or it´s a "minor problem".
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cees Alons
Screencaps PROVE close to nothing about what you see when watching the running movie. But on the other hand, they're almost the only way to explain on a non-moving medium what you saw.
|
True, true. It has both sides for sure..
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cees Alons
IOne of my biggest irritation in this respect on the internet is people who didn't see the movie at all and post opinions based on such screencaps of others (that were accompanying an article about the movie as seen by the author) and apparently think they have a 'proof' in hand. ("Here, see?")
The other irritation I have in this respect is separated screencaps: those that are published anywhere, or repeated somewhere (even if it's done by the original author) without the original text they were meant to clarify.
|
Now we´re talking. We´ve now screencaps circulating from the various sources and many of them doesn´t have the original link/source included. They´re living their "own life" now. E.g. DVDbeaver didn´t post some of those screencaps to "show DNR or EE", I believe..
But like I said in some other thread, we´ll see these "I saw one screencap of this movie - it has DNR/EE/etc, no buy"-threads in the future, even when the person posting them haven´t see the disc him/herself.. IMO; It doesn´t work like that.
Give me the valid sources/links/knowledge/info (RAH, etc) WITH those screencaps and then we talk. If that´s not going to happen, forgettaboutit. One screencap means nothing alone. We need some proper "info" behind that (like it happened with "Patton", IMO)."This image is rather clean with no grain - it *must* have DNR"-type of threads is not the way to go, IMO. Too much speculation (since we all know, that the amount of grain varies quite a lot within the films - due the film stock, cinematography, style, post-production, restoration, etc).