Re: Advice on new LCD 1080 purchase
Quote:
| I have never been a big fan of Philips TVs. They are king in Europe but here there are many better choices. |
It would be fairer to say that they're
commonplace in Europe. They aren't necessarily universally critically admired, although some of their sets get good reviews (and justifiably, as far as I can see).
Bsmooth - I think there are two basic issues here. In spite of my love of LCD, I agree with the comments that a top of the range plasma is better. It's better provided you've got tons of cash to spend and can live with the thought that within a couple of years a TV with the same specs will be available at a quarter of the price. But at the sort of price most of us are prepared to pay for a TV set, you have a stark choice - lower resolution plasma or higher resolution LCD. I've yet to see a budget or even mid-range plasma that has the screen resolution of an LCD, one to one pixel mapping, 24 fps, etc. The blunt truth is - you won't find one. I think the only reason for automatically always preferring plasma is if motion blur really seriously bothers you.
The other issue is the question you first asked - Samsung or Sony? Why limit yourself to these two makes? If it's on what they look like in the store, then be very careful, my friend. Although some will say this is heresy, the truth is that in a TV showroom, all sets can be made to look pretty damn good, provided they have a decent picture source and have been reasonably tuned in. I may be preaching to the choir, here, but if you're basing your findings on what you've seen in a store, be very very careful. It could be just the way those specific sets were set up.
The issues I'd say matter are these:
(1) 1920 x 1080 and progressive is essential - if it ain't this, it ain't Full HD, and no matter what anyone says, any lower resolution screen reproducing 1080p is is in effect cutting corners and, well, 'lying'.
(2) one to one pixel matching is essential - again, without this, no matter what other virtues a set has, it ain't showing you truthfully what the source is producing
(3) good upgrading of SD signal is essential - SD is going to be with us for some time yet, and you have to live with it; there's no point in having a handful of great looking BD discs or high def broadcasts and the rest of your viewing looks like Albanian daytime TV circa 1980.
(4) 24 fps is useful but not as amazing as some folks claim
(5) separate picture memories for different inputs is very handy, but again, not perhaps essential
I'd personally say - choose the one you like with attributes 1-3 and if it has 4+5, that's a bonus.