- Joined: February 1999
- Post Count: 2,809
Re: Statement concerning THE LAST EMPEROR (Criterion Collection)
Was it Churchill that said "Never use a preposition to end a sentence with?"
"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence
- Joined: February 1999
- Post Count: 2,809
Re: Statement concerning THE LAST EMPEROR (Criterion Collection)
This gets stranger as more information comes out. If the 2:1 transfer is something controlled by the filmmakers, where did the UK transfer come from and how old is it?
"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence
- Joined: September 2002
- Post Count: 3,700
Re: Statement concerning THE LAST EMPEROR (Criterion Collection)
I think Criterion's standard is to do as the filmmakers' request if they are around to give their input. That's what I'd expect from them, even if those filmmakers' are off their rocker. One can't fault Criterion here if they were heeding the requests of Storaro and Bertolucci, IMO.
My DVD/BD CollectionCriterion DVD/BDs Owned: 55, Total DVDs Owned: 527, Blu-ray Discs Owned: 223
- Joined: April 2000
- Post Count: 4,387
Re: Statement concerning THE LAST EMPEROR (Criterion Collection)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mdnitoil
If I can go this long without African Queen, I can wait a few more years for them to get this film right.
|
That assumes there will eventually be a version with a 2.35:1 ratio, which is a big assumption given Storaro's bizarre obsession with cropping for 2.00:1. It took nine years for
Last Emp to get a decent - though cropped - transfer. You wanna wait another decade or so for a possible 2.35:1 transfer?
- Joined: October 2001
- Location: Rensselaer, NY
- Post Count: 17,543
Re: Statement concerning THE LAST EMPEROR (Criterion Collection)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Colin Jacobson
You wanna wait another decade or so for a possible 2.35:1 transfer?
|
Well we're gonna have to, Colin...at least. The real question...and one that's nagging the heck out of me...is should I go ahead and get this darn release because we may NEVER get anything better..other than a BD release...and THAT may be a decade or more away. Who really knows?
Even if Criterion moves forward in a year-or-two with BD releases...who knows when they will get around to TLE? And then it will likely be 2:1.
We may need to wait until after Storaro is out-of-the-picture before a 2.35:1 release will ever come...and that could be a VERY long time from now.
There's Jessie the yodeling cowgirl. Bullseye, he's Woody's horse. Pete the old prospector. And, Woody, the man himself. Of course, it's time for Woody's RoundUp. He's the very best! He's the rootinest, tootinest cowboy in the wild, wild west!
- Joined: October 2001
- Location: Rensselaer, NY
- Post Count: 17,543
Re: Statement concerning THE LAST EMPEROR (Criterion Collection)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lord Dalek
however as you can see in the theatrical cut on the second set of captions the frame has been shifted a little bit to the right where, albeit curiously, the TV version sticks with having it in the middle.
|
I was going to post something funny (read snotty) about how Storaro was probably thinking about different compositions for both the potential 2:1 televised presentation and the 2:1 theatrical presentation. And about how Da Vinci probably was always re-composing his work, too, for different audiences. I could see him inventing an elaborate system of mattes and curtains to display his prominent works in different states depending upon who his audience was.
But I suppose it's not fair since we're talking about screen captures and someone else's thought process, etc. It's not fair.
But why wouldn't this be a lesson to any artist NOT to screw around with his work after it has been seen, appreciated and honored by the public and his peers. It is only going to create this sort of controversy and complaint. Unless, of course, THAT
IS the motivation--to create said controversy. But if one is already an acclaimed artist with tangible work to prove it...why screw with it?
There's Jessie the yodeling cowgirl. Bullseye, he's Woody's horse. Pete the old prospector. And, Woody, the man himself. Of course, it's time for Woody's RoundUp. He's the very best! He's the rootinest, tootinest cowboy in the wild, wild west!
- Joined: October 2001
- Location: Rensselaer, NY
- Post Count: 17,543
Re: Statement concerning THE LAST EMPEROR (Criterion Collection)
I was on the periphery during the AN debate...and while I remember it being waged...it wasn't until TLE (which is a film in which the images especially moved me) that it became 'personal" for me.
There's Jessie the yodeling cowgirl. Bullseye, he's Woody's horse. Pete the old prospector. And, Woody, the man himself. Of course, it's time for Woody's RoundUp. He's the very best! He's the rootinest, tootinest cowboy in the wild, wild west!
- Joined: August 2001
- Location: New York City Area
- Post Count: 3,476
Re: Statement concerning THE LAST EMPEROR (Criterion Collection)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lord Dalek
Well it appears from the Beaver comparison that in most cases the frame is dead center (which adds some slight credence to Storarro's statement that he did compose the film to 2.00:1 since the viewer's object of interest is directed to the middle), however as you can see in the theatrical cut on the second set of captions the frame has been shifted a little bit to the right where, albeit curiously, the TV version sticks with having it in the middle.
|
I don't think so. If anything it seems like plenty of shots might be slightly off center, including ones shown in the Beaver comparison, even when it looks like they should *not* be.
And I've already noted some panning and scanning going on between a few scenes I bothered to check (because they were called to attention by others for something
other than suspected panning and scanning).
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/htf/...ml#post3324046
And as I stated in the review thread wrt the new Criterion blog response, I just don't buy it that TLE was originally composed for 2:1 as Storaro claimed unless someone can provide better, more conclusive evidence to support that claim. I would've been more inclined to accept his claim if it looks like the entire movie has been center cropped (w/out any notably bad effects), but the evidence (and his potential motive/agenda) just don't add up...
_Man_
Just another amateur learning to paint w/ "the light of the world".