- Joined: July 2005
- Post Count: 1,294
Re: Why is digital old 4:3 fullscreen narrower than analog 4:# fullscreen on TV broadcast
It's more like getting rid of overscan. Overscan is what you were describing when you can see there's more image to be had. Television manufacturers used to decide how much overscan you have to live with. Now it can be adjusted or eliminated all together. I would say the digital version is giving you the entire 4:3 image. That may also have a slight size difference between the two. However, in respect to OAR, I'd rather have the entire intended image smaller in size vs. overscaning to fill the screen....and then some.
" I think it's time we go to plan B". "What's plan B?" "That's the one where we don't do something stupid".
- Joined: August 2001
- Location: New York City Area
- Post Count: 3,541
Re: Why is digital old 4:3 fullscreen narrower than analog 4:# fullscreen on TV broadcast
With a PAL DVD, you may also need to adjust the PAL-to-NTSC conversion for proper OAR display, assuming that's what you're doing. That's why some folks try to shop for a DVD player that can do the conversion correctly (vs just doing any old conversion) or at least allow you to manually adjust it.
_Man_
Just another amateur learning to paint w/ "the light of the world".
- Joined: March 2001
- Post Count: 3,971
Re: Why is digital old 4:3 fullscreen narrower than analog 4:# fullscreen on TV broadcast
Normal PAL has an aspect ratio of 5:4, not 4:3 like NTSC in the US. Different chips make different decisions about how to deal with this.
"Scientists are saying the future is going to be far more futuristic than they originally predicted." -Krysta Now