Re: BREAKING NEWS!! Warner Brothers is now Blu-ray Exclusive
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Edwin-S
OK. And you extrapolate all that based on one post from AVS, that you admit is anecdotal. Your scenario could end up occurring, but I doubt it. The enormous amounts of money being tossed out by these companies has to be recouped. They still have major competition in the form of DVD. If they start pushing up the prices then they stand to lose a lot of money because there will be no incentive for the average consumer to switch.
If they want to have any chance of getting back some of the money they are burning then they have to mainstream HD. The only way they are going to do that is to make it competitive with SD DVD. As I see it, prices are going to have to come down, not go up, if they want to have any chance of getting people to switch. I still think there will be a concerted push to bring down the cost of HD displays even faster than they have been presently dropping. I also think that there will be a lot more package deals being made available to encourage a faster absorption of HD sets. Of course, my extrapolations are based on no more evidence than yours. Either scenario could occur. Everybody is talking like HD being a "niche" would be a bad thing, and in some respects it is since it media prices would likely remain high and breadth of film releases would be thinner; however, other aspects of niche status wouldn't be so bad. For one thing they would have to cater to a consumer block that wouldn't take kindly to poor audio and video transfers. The releases would have to cater more to the tastes of film collectors than casual viewers. If being niche means that I won't have to look at any car commercials on my discs then bring it on. ![]() |
Actually it wasn't based on the post from AVS, I had been thinking about this for a few days. The AVS post was just my first indication that it might actually be true.
The format war was gift handed to the early adopter and most of them have no idea. If it weren't for the format war we would still be paying $1000 or more for players, and I would bet that movies would be over $30, probably pushing $40.
As you said the powers that be have to make back a lot of money, particularly if blu-ray really did pay Warner to the tune of $250 million or more. They can't make that money back by giving discounts. It's likely that every blu-ray player under $500 is losing money. They won't stay under $500 for long if they don't have to.
Doug



Becuase it "makes me feel better"...? My feelings do not play into why I choose to believe these sources.