Re: BREAKING NEWS!! Warner Brothers is now Blu-ray Exclusive
I don't own either format, and haven't followed the "war" as closely as many here. I can't afford to be an early adopter and am currently quite satisfied with the quality of SD-DVD so I haven't looked at either format in detail (I guess that makes me format neutral?). But after reading this thread, there are a couple things that stuck out for me (and I may be more representative of the "mass" adopter rather than many of the "early" adopters found at HTF):
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ronald Epstein
My first love was HD-DVD. That format had a perfect launch.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chuck Mayer
But Ron is correct. HD's launch was better, and for quite some time their product was better.
|
I'm confused as to how if the HD-DVD launch was so perfect, and the BRD launch was handled poorly, that BR software sales always seemed to out-pace those of HD-DVD? Given the "perfect" launch of the format and more affordable price, HD-DVD should have kicked BR to the curb from Day 1. But apparently that didn't happen?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Greg Kettell
I really wish that Warner had made this decision two months ago, though. Turning newly opened Christmas presents into door stops isn't very classy.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jim_K
But while I've always preferred BD I am a bit sad that my less than a year old $500 XA2 may very soon turn into a Betamax player, but that's the choice I made and the risk that I took.
|
As Jim and others have noted, if you buy into a technology with competing formats you are always taking a chance that your choice may be wrong in the long run. Anyone shopping for these players should have been aware of the competing formats. Racks of both HD-DVD and BR software were found in most every retail store over Christmas, so even casual shoppers should have had an inkling that there were two competing formats (just as with Beta/VHS 25 years ago) and that one would be going away sooner or later. In this case, it just appears that it is sooner.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ensign Eddie
However, I believe that the majority of people at large have held off because they just don't care about it (yet..hopefully).
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Man-Fai Wong
This will probably not be a popular view, but unfortunately, often times, the (average) consumers are just not capable of (or don't really care about) making that decision w/in a feasible window of opportunity.
|
I probably fall closer to this "don't care" group than many here. I currently have SD-DVD via a non-HD projector which is beautiful to my eyes, and often elicits compliments about the sharpness and clarity from anyone invited over to watch a film. I've seen HD pictures on the many displays in the electronics store and while I do see quite a difference, I almost think the increased resolution looks "unnatural." Combined with the fact that I don't anticipate being able to afford to upgrade any kind of HD display in the immediate future, I'm really quite content to stick with SD for the time being. I have no doubt I'll upgrade eventually, but I see no reason to do so anytime soon and likely won't consider it again until prices come down much closer to SD levels.
Also, if this war were to be truly decided by the consumer, all the studios would have to be supporting both formats so that the consumer could choose. No exclusives to one side or the other. And if that were the case, the consumer will always choose the most affordable option which likely would have meant HD-DVD victory in the long run. But with all the exclusive contracts and money changing hands behind the scenes, the consumer was never a legitimate part of this battle.
Perhaps HD-DVD should have issued full-screen discs. That would have been one way to win over the mass public and swing the war in their favor.