Re: Do today's kids remember a time before the internet?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alex-C
Those children, now adults entering the job market, are used to/accostomed to/can't imagine a world without...instant access to information and people.
Most college grads we hire, cannot imagine turning their cell phones off and not using the internet while they are expected to work from 8-5 !
|
I spent the last five-six years working for local government, supervising high school and college student seasonal hires. We never had the internet, because the money wasn't there to network the database. The early years were alot of fun because there was nothing to do during the slow periods but sit around and chat. I knew it was time to move on this last summer when we had a crop of hires as young as fourteen. The room was silent except for me turing pages of a book and the click-clack of their thumbs on cellphone numberpads. Even in the real world, life is apparently better virtualized now...
That said, what desk jobs don't require regular internet use at this point? Even the office I managed would have been much more efficient if we could have network our database to the tax rolls. (Since so much of the work was redundant data collection of information already held by the tax department in a different building.)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Greg_S_H
I'm talking about even knowing what was in print. I had a Rolling Stone Rock Encyclopedia (still have it, though it's in several pieces), and it would list a band's discography. Before something like 1990 or 1991, there was no Queen on CD, so I could call all the record stores and say, "Do you have Queen's Sheer Heart Attack," and they'd know they didn't but that wouldn't tell me that no one had it.
|
Interesting point. Most of the CD stores I frequented had a chalkboard that listed upcoming new releases. I'm not really sure what I did for catalog stuff; I was probably to young to care about music older than the present.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by andrew markworthy
I'm a university professor and the internet has revolutionised my working life. E.g. a case in point. This afternoon I started to write a book chapter and I needed a couple of references to journal articles. Twenty years ago I'd have had to haul my ass to the library and spend the better part of a day tracking them down using printed citation indices, or book (expensive) time with a computer archivist to track them down using one of the two or three machines that could do a very primitive journal search.
|
My degree is in print journalism. I find it incredibly frustrating that reporting has less context than ever before when, thanks to tools like LexisNexis, the past is more accessible than ever before. I think the databases might actually be part of the problem. Before everything was easily available at one's fingers, publications valued staff well-versed in general knowledge. Thanks to technology, knowledgable and well-informed people can be (and have been) replaced with cheaper people who can merely find information. We're quickly learning that they're not the same thing.
Quote:
I can remember more than one occasion during winter months when I went to the library when it was dark, went down to the old stock section in the (windowless) basement and came back up in the evening when it was dark. I once didn't see daylight for a week. It's a miracle I didn't get rickets.  |
I enrolled as a Freshman in (ironically) Computer Science. I would spend days in a computer lab arriving before dawn and leaving after midnight, breaking only for class (in the same building) or a trip the vending machine. The lights in the labs were on a motion sensor that would turn the lights off if no motion was detected for a half-hour. I can remember being in a lab full of people and having the lights turn themselves off because no one had moved anything but their hands in that time. Part of why I picked journalism is it was the farthest thing from Computer Science I can find.

Sunlight is important...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Francois Caron
I still dabble in old technologies such as vinyl records, double-8 and super-8 movie film and cameras, and even old Polaroid Land film technologies. I even filmed and spliced together a couple of my summer vacation trips on 8mm film. It's impressive how the super-8 film's resolution is comparable to high definition video material. Many of my antiques will continue to work reliably for many years as long as I can find the appropriate material that makes them useful such as film stock and records.
|
This is the biggest problem I have with our commodized culture. It used to be a person'd send $200 for a VCR (for instance) and $20-30 to take it somewhere for repair. Now we buy a $60 VCR, and when something goes wrong we throw it out and buy another $60 VCR. There's something incredibly wasteful about that trend.
Quote:
| On the flip side, it's sad that today's technology doesn't age as well as the old antiques I like to collect. |
I remember when I had my 95 Cirrus. After pulling into work one day, the receptionist who'd followed me into the lot commented that my break lights weren't working. I checked the bulbs, but they were fine. Turns out there was a circuit board in the tail lights that had malfunctioned. I pulled out the wires for the break lights and the turn signals, bypassed the circuit board and soldered them directly to the wires the bulbs plugged into. Had someone hit the breaks and test the blinkers while I watched from behind. Problem solved. Sometimes technology adds an unnecessary level of complexity.