Re: Journeyman - season 1 thread
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Greg_S_H
They operated it. The kid knew it could play back video.
|
Right. There's no way the kid could have known it was also a video camera because is had "digital picture and video" printed on the body.

Quote:
| I don't think grabbing it and running would have been such a bad strategy. |
Again - grab it and run
where? They were in a building full of people with no easy exits and security on the way.
Quote:
| Basically, what Dan did when the stakes were higher. |
And it was after hours and
the building was empty. It is a lot easier to elude 3 people long enough to
destroy the camera than when you're trying to elude dozens of people and possibly the police when your goal is to secure the camera and escape with it. How does Dan grabbing the camera running at that point prove that he
should have grabbed it earlier when every possible circumstance was completely different? If I drive my car with the wipers going and my headlights on during a rainy night, does that prove I should have done the same thing hours earlier when it was sunny and dry?
Quote:
| ...when the stakes were higher. He should have known they were high enough when the kids were obviously fully intending to do what they can to decipher the technology |
He wanted the camera back regardless of what they were planning to do with it. That they would
try to reverse engineer the technology probably didn't mean a hell of a lot to Dan, who isn't exactly a techie, and was irrelelvant to him at that point anyway. The stakes, as you pointed out, weren't very high yet. And he assumed he'd have more chances to get the camera back. The kid still had it, it hadn't been turned over to the company, and the mother still seemed sympathetic. There was no reason to steal it out of the kid's hands in front of twenty witnesses and risk arrest and leaving a record when he could just try again later.
Quote:
| Lie low with the camera, and you'll leap out soon enough. |
Right. Because Dan always knows when he's going to leap.

***************************88
I liked the episode a lot, and for most of the reasons mentioned. The moment with Katie was especially nice. But I couldn't help thinking, "Dr. Samuel Beckett never returned" after Dan leaped out, though.

Evan certainly presented a case study in the dangers of trying to manipulate your own history. His death raises some interesting questions though. Did someone have to die so that
Evan could start travelling? If so, who? Was he Dan's age? Did they both come in with the comet? Evan seemed to be like Dan, travelling into his own past and living a constant "present". Is that why Langely thinks Dan is the last of the Travellers, and doesn't seem to know about Livia? Is she an anomally, leaping into the future and connecting with another Traveller?
If she and Dan had a child would it inherit whatever ability the comet gave them?
I think Dan's instincts were right in not giving Langley any clues about Livia. And if Langley is always being watched, you have to wonder what the ramifications of Jack's little performance at the lecture might have been.
I
really hope we get a novel or a TV movie or a detailed text treatment of some of the rest of the story on the DVD set if the show does not return.
Regards,
Joe