Re: Close Encounters of the Third Kind - November 13th
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TravisR
Is that a rhetorical question? 
|
Even Jerry Goldsmith sounds better via HD!

Seriously speaking, at this point it´s probably true that *some* people seek that "great PQ/SQ" over the films itself (however, this doesn´t mean that they don´t care about the film at all, or something). It´s true that many Hollywood blockbusters "look better" than some 1970s-1980s titles, if we seek that "reference material" and exploding audio (recent films are all mixed in 5.1. 6.1 etc to begin with, when that´s not the case with many "older" films). While it´s great that these "demo-films" like PotC, Matrix, etc are being released, I have to agree that eventually they´re not nearly enough for me. I want titles like "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", Blade Runner, Kubrick, etc - generally more "classics". I also want "smaller films", horror etc. It seems that the tide is (slowly) turning at the moment and studios have a wider view on their HD release schedule (not only "big blockbusters", "catalogue titles", "comedy" and "CG animation").
Thanks to the Kubrick-titles, Blade Runner etc, there are many "SD DVD only"-fans out there, that seriously have to consider of getting that Blu-ray or HD DVD-player. More and more these type of titles = many more HD fans. IMO, "blockbusters" are doing a great job of showing the strengths of HD (both PQ/SQ) and many of them are solid entertainment, but we need those genuine classics if HD wants to go that "extra mile".