Re: Harry Potter & The Half-Blood Prince discussion...
I'm about two-thirds of the way through re-reading it now. One thing that strikes me about it is that while OOTP is almost always meloncholy on page as well as screen, HBP (colossal downer of an ending aside) is actually a remarkable cheerful book for being set in the middle of a war. Harry's come out the other side, and is ready to reconnect and accept his mantle.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by todd s
Just curious. I know muggle interaction is discouraged. Although, the British PM knows about the magic community. Is it ever discussed what Voldemort's thoughts are on muggles? I know disdain. But, does he want to take over or destroy the muggles?
|
Clearly, he hates muggles due to the situation with his father. That said, I'd imagine he'd treat the muggle community with distainful indifference. He doesn't care when his people murder and torture muggles, but I think he considers them so far beneath him they're not even worth bothering with.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brian Sheffield
While I do like Half Blood Prince, I'm not sure it will turn into an exciting movie.
It an exposition heavy book. Voldemort's background is interesting, but not much really happens until the last few chapters.
Half blood Prince is just a big buildup for Deathly Hallows; consequently, it is not a very satisfying read on its own.
|
There's LOADS of character development, though. I think all of the stuff between Harry/Dean/Ginny & Ron/Lavender/Hermione is a scream. And the exposition is handled in a screen friendly way. Unlike the conclusion to OOTP, which is pages and pages of sheer dialogue, we SEE Voldemort's development.
And if they start the film with Spinner's End, like in the book, you have THAT dangling over your head the whole time.
It's not an action-heavy book, except the end, but the drama is much more external than in OOTP, where most of the conflict is inside Harry's head.