\"My opinion is that (a) anyone who actually works in a video store and does not understand letterboxing has given up on life, and (b) any customer who prefers to have the sides of a movie hacked off should not be licensed to operate a video player.\"-- Roger Ebert
STOP THE MADNESS! STOP THE BUTCHERING AND ABANDONMENT OF TV SHOWS ON DVD!
My DVD List at DVD Aficionado, Now Featuring Blu-Ray
\"My opinion is that (a) anyone who actually works in a video store and does not understand letterboxing has given up on life, and (b) any customer who prefers to have the sides of a movie hacked off should not be licensed to operate a video player.\"-- Roger Ebert
Roland Lataille
Cinerama web site:
http://cineramahistory.com
Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!
|
Originally Posted by Brent Avery
I decided to watch the one of the extras - Grand Canyon - have to say, it looks fantastic in 1080 ( 2:35 ) - should sound pretty good too in DTS HD - although in my case I am only getting the basic DTS core as I am running optical out. Nice little gem!
|
|
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce
I would think that most of the cells probably no longer exist, and those that do are probably in the hands of private collectors.
Its common practice to destroy or sell animation art work after the film is completed. Doug |
|
Originally Posted by Rachel Bowman
Believe it or not, cels were given away as promotional tools at Disneyland in the 50's. For free. Usually for things created for the Disneyland TV show, but I suppose its conceivable the same occurred for larger budget endeavours.
|
Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
Another cat? Perhaps. For love there is also a season; its seeds must be resown. But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that...
|
Originally Posted by BrettB
That's the *new* dvd.
|
|
Originally Posted by Mike Frezon
|
Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!
Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!
|
Originally Posted by Jesse Blacklow
Someone at AVS pointed out that Gary doesn't use the right colorspace when capturing Blu-ray, so that's likely the reason for the difference.
|
Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!
|
Originally Posted by that1guypictures
I only noticed a few shots here or there that exhibited a lack of focus/detail during the procession at the beginning of the film, and these were INCREDIBLY MINOR.
|
\"My opinion is that (a) anyone who actually works in a video store and does not understand letterboxing has given up on life, and (b) any customer who prefers to have the sides of a movie hacked off should not be licensed to operate a video player.\"-- Roger Ebert
Movies are: "The Greatest Artform".
HD should be for EVERYONE!
|
Originally Posted by Paul Hillenbrand
What would cause "lack of focus/detail" on "a few shots" "during the procession at the beginning of the film" when the transfer was apparently done "straight from the Original Negative"?
Example of lack of focus in "during the procession": ImageShack - Hosting :: 20283382ny7.jpg |
"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence
|
Originally Posted by Robert Harris
This is precisely why some frame grabs less than useful. From memory, and without the disc in front of me, this would seem to be atmospheric background, ie. something else in the foreground WAS in focus, and is now out of frame.
RAH |
