So where is the next Season? Anybody know?
Thanks
|
Originally Posted by if200
Where is Mary Tyler Moore Season 5?
|
|
Originally Posted by mickeyTOR
To Fox, I say - Lets get a move on and get those sets out - PRONTO!
|
"Movies should be like amusement parks. People should go to them to have fun." - Billy Wilder
"Subtitles good. Hollywood bad." - Tarzan, Sight & Sound 2012 voter.
"My films are not slices of life, they are pieces of cake." - Alfred Hitchcock"My great humility is just one of the many reasons that I...
STOP THE MADNESS! STOP THE BUTCHERING AND ABANDONMENT OF TV SHOWS ON DVD!
My DVD List at DVD Aficionado, Now Featuring Blu-Ray
STOP THE MADNESS! STOP THE BUTCHERING AND ABANDONMENT OF TV SHOWS ON DVD!
My DVD List at DVD Aficionado, Now Featuring Blu-Ray
|
Originally Posted by MatthewA
Nope, they were written in the 1950s.
|
I\'m a classic TV fan. Widescreen? What\'s that?
|
Originally Posted by Carlos Garcia
I don't think that has anything to do with whether a song is in the public domain or not. I think once a copyright expires, if the original owner of the rights renews the copyright, it'll once again be owned.
|
I\'m a classic TV fan. Widescreen? What\'s that?
| "Happy Birthday" is the classic example. It was written by two school teacher sisters, Mildred and Patty Hill, in the late 1800s. But it wasn't copyrighted until 1935. |


|
Originally Posted by Andrew!A
A song is a song... is a song ;-)
The format for which is was written (play, movie, tv show, album/cd) doesn't affect its copyright. |
|
Originally Posted by Mike*SC
A song is a song is a song, yes. But when that song is performed, other rights can come into effect. Let's take the example of "Steam Heat." If a character is shown singing that song in the shower, or at a microphone, or the like, the song is simply the song. But if you want to perform that song in a manner and context similar to its performance in the show/movie "The Pajama Game," then what you need is "grand rights." That is, you're not simply performing the song, you're recreating a copyrighted performance of it in some way.
I'm no legal expert, and where exactly grand rights begin and end is definitely fuzzy. They can include (but are not limited to) choreography, wardrobe, context, style of performance, etc. And that is an extra wrinkle that goes beyond a song being simply a song. |
I\'m a classic TV fan. Widescreen? What\'s that?
|
Originally Posted by Carlos Garcia
Also, let's not forget that even though most of the song was edited out, they DID use several seconds of "White Christmas" on the DVD version of the 1st season Christmas episode. Enough was used so that I could tell what song it was, yet I'm sure the amount used was small enough so Fox didn't have to pay any amount to the Irving Berlin estate.
|
|
Originally Posted by Mike*SC
A song is a song is a song, yes. But when that song is performed, other rights can come into effect.
I'm no legal expert, and where exactly grand rights begin and end is definitely fuzzy. They can include (but are not limited to) choreography, wardrobe, context, style of performance, etc. |
| Agreed. I thought you were stating that the format in which the song was ORIGINALLY used would affect its value when used elsewhere. |
) So it seemed at least possible to me this might make a difference, hence my wondering aloud about it.| Originally Posted by Carlos Garcia Also, let's not forget that even though most of the song was edited out, they DID use several seconds of "White Christmas" on the DVD version of the 1st season Christmas episode. Enough was used so that I could tell what song it was, yet I'm sure the amount used was small enough so Fox didn't have to pay any amount to the Irving Berlin estate. |
| I know it's not what you're implying, but your post made me think of the oft-repeated statement that if you use fewer than "x" number of notes of a song, you don't have to pay royalties. |

|
Originally Posted by Joseph DeMartino
Actually it seems to me that that is exactly what Carlos was not so much implying as flat-out saying. Or am I missing something here?
![]() Joe |
| LOL! I think I must worry too much about people thinking I'm flaming them! Instead I end up doing the opposite - kissing a**. ;-) |

|
Originally Posted by Joseph DeMartino
Quote:
Actually it seems to me that that is exactly what Carlos was not so much implying as flat-out saying. Or am I missing something here? ![]() Joe |
I\'m a classic TV fan. Widescreen? What\'s that?
|
Originally Posted by Ollie
TV Shows On DVD is now posting upcoming releases as far out as March 2007....no sign of MTM S5 amidst the announcements. Back to the original question posed in this thread, does ANYONE have any word, gossip, rumors....(I'll take what I can get at this point) about the status of future MTM releases? I hope and pray we're not in for another 3 year lapse between releases
|
