-
Kevin M
- Kevin Ray
-
- offline
- Joined: February 2000
- Location: Somewhere west of St. Louis MO
- Post Count: 5,064
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Any word on who is doing the commentary? Also, I wonder where they got the stems for the 5.1 track?
-Kevin M.
See You Next Wednesday
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
| The stereo tracks on the old laserdisc sounded FANTASTIC. |
Agreed. This is one of the few cases where I thought the sound on a DVD was
grossly inferior to a laserdisc stereo track. Presumably the 5.1 track is being derived from the original 3- or 4-track master, but I wish they'd simply do an exact replica of the highest fidelity track from among the original theatrical mixes and not necessarily try to "upgrade" every film. Or at least make the original track an option.
I also wonder if this is a strictly video "restoration" or if the original film elements were worked on. If so, I'd certainly love to see this film in a real theater for the first time. This is the kind of thing that deserves an IMAX roadshow release. Is somebody still planning that ill-advised remake? I'll bet they could piggy-back on the release publicity for that by putting the original into limited release on some really big screens.
Regards,
Joe
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Billy Fogerty
Would love to see a remake,but I just don't think it will have the same class as the original. Just as War of the Worlds just didn't compare to the George Pal original. Great idea if it were done right.
|
Some films should simply never be remade. No one would think of rewriting
War and Peace to make it more "modern" and acceptable. But try stopping them from remaking
Casablanca (as if any other version could ever compare to that perfect match of script, stars, directors and bit players.) How many versions of
Miracle on 34th Street have there been? How many can hold a Christmas candle to the original? Would anyone be mad enough to go Welles one better with
Citizen Kane, this time in color and with a computer-generated Xanadu?
Sometimes Hollywood should just leave well enough alone.

Regards,
Joe
- Joined: March 2005
- Post Count: 72
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Not sure how many times I've seen Forbidden Planet; growing up in the 1970's, it was a staple at Saturday afternoon "kiddie" matinees (The Day the Earth Stood Still and Cat Ballou are two others titles that were shown many times), and I never grew tired of seeing it. I'm sure Warners will do this title justice with the deluxe release.
Favorite Classics Not on DVD: One Hour With You, She Done Him Wrong, These Three, A Women's Face, The Magnificent Ambersons, The Hard Way ('43), The Human Comedy, The Picture of Dorian Gray, Cluny Brown, Margie, The Search, Beyond the Forest, Flamingo Road, Intruder in the Dust, The African Queen,...
- Joined: December 2002
- Location: nr London, England.
- Post Count: 129
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Exactly the same here, being scared by the invisible monster when small in FP, along with War of the Worlds and that metallic unscrewing of the top of the meteor/spaceship.......
Never forgotten either of them......
Metal Damage, Brain Damage...Are you listening Bronze? I am the Nightrider. I'm a Fuel Injected Suicide Machine......
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
| ...it was a staple at Saturday afternoon "kiddie" matinees (The Day the Earth Stood Still and Cat Ballou are two others that come to mind)... |
They showed
Cat Ballou at the "kiddie" matinee? Don't they know she's mean and evil through and through?

Quote:
| A $75,000 Robby was there to take pictures with... |
Gee, these days you can pick one up for a mere fifty grand at
Hammacher Schlemmer.

Regards,
Joe
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
| An earlier poster mentioned the extras on the Criterion laserdisc, there were quite a few there, but a few of the extras on this new UE sound different. |
The problem with Criterion extras is that they are owned by Criterion, which created the original content that goes into them. In the past some studios have been unwilling to license them from The Criterion Collection - or Criterion has refused to license them and/or asked too high a price (and the studios decided it would be cheaper to just produce their own documentaries, etc.)
In the early days of DVD, when laserdisc was still competing with the new format, Criterion often flat-out refused to license its content. Then for a time it used its extras as leverage for getting the studios to allow them to release certain films under license. I'm not sure where they stand on the issue now, or if many (or any) studio releases include extras originally produced by Criterion.
Since laserdisc is dead and the studios prefer to release their own Criterion-style special editions in the broader DVD market, it seems to me that half a loaf would be better than none for Criterion, but I don't run the place.
Regards,
Joe
-
Kevin M
- Kevin Ray
-
- offline
- Joined: February 2000
- Location: Somewhere west of St. Louis MO
- Post Count: 5,064
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
| I'm not sure where they stand on the issue now... |
I
assume from things I have read that Criterion sometimes barters with studios for getting films from their back catalog in exchange (along with the fee of course) for leasing out their supplemental material.....as I say, I assume that is the way it works at least some of the time with Criterion.....but I could be totally off base with this.
-Kevin M.
See You Next Wednesday
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
| The question I would have though is where did Criterion get their materials for the Forbidden Planet laserdisc, or the other film projects for that matter. |
Certainly any footage from the film, out-takes, studio-produced publicity materials, trailer, etc. would be the property of the studio. But any commentary tracks recorded (and paid for) by Criterion, any original interviews they produced or documentary footage they shot would belong to them. In fact, a Criterion-produced "making of" documentary would belong to them, not the studio. Any footage from the original film would have been licensed for that use. But the original footage, narration, any original music would all be the property of Criterion. If WB tried to do a shot-for-shot copy of a Criterion documentary with substantially simllar narration they would be violating Criterion's copyright even if every frame in both pieces was from a Warner-controlled film. Once they licensed the footage and assembled it in a unique form, Criterion would have created a new work, separate from the raw footage, and would own that work.
Regards,
Joe
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
| As far as I'm aware, Criterion's supplementary section consisted mostly of a huge illustrated text essay... |
I've never seen the Criterion
Forbidden Planet, and so addressing the broader question of what kind of content Criterion might own and be able to withhold from the studios. I agree that from your description it sounds like this isn't much that couldn't be recreated by WB. (If the illustrated essay wasn't created expressly for Criterion, but was adapted from a published source, even that might be available to WB.)
Regards,
Joe
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
| Have seen the HD version I know that it can look MUCH better than the DVD we have now. |

Gee, I knew that from seeing the laserdisc version. But what's this you say? An HD version? And you've seen it? Why didn't you say something before? You really shouldn't hold out on us like that...

(Just having a bit of fun.

)
Regards,
Joe