-
Chris S
- Chris Sierra
-
- offline
- Joined: April 2000
- Location: Dallas TX
- Post Count: 2,482
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shane Martin
At this point this is wishful thinking until it actually is announced.
|
Warner has stated in the past that they plan to support both formats equally. According to WHV, no film will be exclusive to either format. Its just a matter of time.
DVD & Blu-ray - It's all about the movies!
- Joined: September 1999
- Post Count: 762
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PaulP
I went through most of the content on this set today. Really amazing stuff. Never seen the film before, and really loved it, as well as the great supplements. Now I have a yearning for other classic sci-fi. What're some recommendations? I have several DVDs, like 2001 and The Day the Earth Stood Still, but I'm looking for other gems.
|
Them
Earth vs The Flying Saucers
20 Million Miles to Earth
Monster That Challenged World
The Thing
H.G. Wells' First Men in the Moon
The Time Machine
It Came From Outer Space
The War of the Worlds
When Worlds Collide
Creature from the Black Lagoon
The Black Scorpion
This Island Earth
The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms
The Angry Red Planet
among many. Most of those are cheezy but I love em.
Daryl L
MacBook Pro 2.4GHz C2D
2GB Ram, 160GB HDD
15" LED Glossy Widescreen
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT 256MB GDDR3 Vram
- Joined: December 1998
- Location: Little Rock, AR
- Post Count: 2,069
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Daryl L
Them
Earth vs The Flying Saucers
20 Million Miles to Earth
Monster That Challenged World
The Thing
H.G. Wells' First Men in the Moon
The Time Machine
It Came From Outer Space
The War of the Worlds
When Worlds Collide
Creature from the Black Lagoon
The Black Scorpion
This Island Earth
The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms
The Angry Red Planet
among many. Most of those are cheezy but I love em. 
|
There's only two on your list that IMHO qualify as cheesy, Monster that Challenged the World and The Angry Red Planet. The latter of the two is a far more entertaining movie. Ok, Black Scorpion is a little cheesy too, but not excessively so.
Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
Another cat? Perhaps. For love there is also a season; its seeds must be resown. But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that...
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
A Journey to the Center of the Earth and
20,000 Leagues Under the Sea surely deserve a place on this list. So does the silent
Metropolis, inspiration for everything from the Superman comic book to C3-PO. I would personally add the somewhat corny, but quirky and surprising
Rocket Ship XM and a personal favorite,
The Blob - the original with Steve McQueen - a triumph of cast and story over a non-existent budget.

On the TV side, consider
The Outer Limits which was more SF than its rival
The Twilight Zone, and adapted some of the classics of the genre. (What other TV series would have done a version of Harlan Ellison's "Demon with a Glass Hand"?)
Regards,
Joe
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Not “big bug/monter” movies
This
ffice:smarttags" />Island Earth
H.G. Wells' First Men in the Moon
The Time Machine
When Worlds Collide
The War of the Worlds (The Martians are not played as mere monsters)
Rocketship XM
Have Bugs/Monsters, but played straight, and take themselves seriously as films for grown ups.
Them
The Thing
Good, Solid B movies with good effects
Earth vs The Flying Saucers (Saucermen not really treated as monsters)
20 Million Miles to Earth
The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms
Creature from the Black Lagoon
It Came From Outer Space
Goofy Fun
The Angry Red Planet
The Blob (Original)
Never saw ‘em, can’t comment
Monster That Challenged World
The Black Scorpion
Can't believe nobody mentioned
The Incredible Shrinking Man
Regards,
Joe
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
| As far as 50s si-fi, Forbidden Planet was a one and only for the 50s. |
Really? What about the other film that Paul mentioned in the part of his post you quoted?
The Day the Earth Stood Still was
also a 50s film. And there were far more seious, adult SF films in both the 50s and the 60s than
FP and
2001. Several of the 50s films are mentioned above. I'd add the original
Invasion of the Body Snatchers to the 50s list, along with the post-nuclear holocaust
On the Beach and merely mention
Planet of the Apes and
Fantastic Voyage as two other serious, big budget, SF films from the 60s.
Regards,
Joe
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
| I agree, all the films you mention are great, and i love them all. But also most take place on earth in the present, well, the 50s present. |
The post I was responding to mentioned SF films, not specifically films set in the future. It doesn't have to be in outer space or in the future to be science fiction.
Quote:
| Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Day the Earth Stood Still, and even Planet of the Apes, to some degree, were not big budget movies. Just think of what could have been made with a Ben Hur or Cleopatra budget in the day! |
Day the Earth Stood Still and
Planet of the Apes were definitley "major" studios releases with budgets comparable to other "A" pictures or equivalents, if not huge roadshow "event" movies. And I'm not sure I'd use
Cleopatra as an example of much of anything. I damned near sank the studio.

If you ever visit Century City in Los Angeles, just remember that it is sitting on what used to be the Fox back lot - which they had to sell off to cover the cost overruns on
Cleo.

Regards,
Joe
- Joined: December 1998
- Location: Little Rock, AR
- Post Count: 2,069
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Joseph DeMartino
Really? What about the other film that Paul mentioned in the part of his post you quoted? The Day the Earth Stood Still was also a 50s film. And there were far more seious, adult SF films in both the 50s and the 60s than FP and 2001. Several of the 50s films are mentioned above. I'd add the original Invasion of the Body Snatchers to the 50s list, along with the post-nuclear holocaust On the Beach and merely mention Planet of the Apes and Fantastic Voyage as two other serious, big budget, SF films from the 60s.
|
Is On The Beach sci-fi? If memory serves, it postulated a world after a nuclear war, something all too possible. It was a what-if about the then present-day that required no scientific advancements. To me it was more social-fiction than sci-fi.
I have to humbly disagree with you when classifying Fantastic Voyage as a serious sci-fi movie. Beyond that fact that I was always wondering, where is all the light coming from, the effects were very cheesy along with the acting.
Invasion of the Body Snatchers and FV occupy different universes when it comes to quality. True, IOTBS didn't require much in the way of effects, but it is a B movie only in audience attitude towards the genre. It's an A-list movie for me and FV is a C-list movie. Now if they had put Raquel in a bikini for her diving scenes.
Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
Another cat? Perhaps. For love there is also a season; its seeds must be resown. But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that...
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
| Is On The Beach sci-fi? If memory serves, it postulated a world after a nuclear war, something all too possible. |
Does it have to be
impossible to be sci-fi?

Are
The Andromeda Strain and
The Terminal Man SF? I'm not sure. Both were contemporary novels that involved perfectly possible scenarios and at most postulated slight and entirely reasonable developments of current technology. And yet I'm tempted to say "Yes" to both, especially if we understand SF to mean both "science fiction" and "speculative fiction". In part it is the affinity for science that puts them across the goal line for me. It is specifically how they deal with the consequences of scientific inquiry and application that make them seem like SF.
I think
On the Beach qualifies because it presents a genuinely changed world, an alternate universe to the one we live in - one where the bomb really was dropped and a civilization collapsed. I think that's qualitatively different than an ordinary piece of mainstream fiction that asks a single "what if" question like what if a woman were elected president or what if a the U.S. had a chance to capture a Soviet nulcear sub - or even "what if a terrorist exploded a nuclear bomb in the U.S." because those scenarios change one thing about our present and let us imagine how they would play out in the world we know. Also they key element that is changed, and to which we are reacting
isn't really connected to science and its consequences in quite the same way. A stolen nuke used by terrorist is somehow a very different thing psychologically than a world-wide holocaust brought about by the civilization that developed the technology.
On the Beach and similar tales ask us to step across a divide into a completely different world and ask ourselves how we'd cope with having to live there.
Of course, defining what is and what isn't SF is one of the great intellectual parlor games, and there are never any "right" answers.

Joe
- Joined: December 1998
- Location: Little Rock, AR
- Post Count: 2,069
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Joseph DeMartino
Of course, defining what is and what isn't SF is one of the great intellectual parlor games, and there are never any "right" answers. 
|
I can agree with that.
Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
Another cat? Perhaps. For love there is also a season; its seeds must be resown. But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that...
- Joined: December 2002
- Location: nr London, England.
- Post Count: 129
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
DVD Times has just posted a excellent review of the Film & DVD
http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=63585
Metal Damage, Brain Damage...Are you listening Bronze? I am the Nightrider. I'm a Fuel Injected Suicide Machine......
- Joined: December 1998
- Location: Little Rock, AR
- Post Count: 2,069
Re: Warner announces Forbidden Planet for November
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shawn DuHast
|
Reading this review and the comments on the Krell technology has brought someting to mind. For me at least, the weakest part of the special effects of the film are when we are being shown the immense Krell underground. Whenever I see this, all I see are miniatures. I don't buy into the vastness of the Krell technology that was intended. Am I alone in this?
Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
Another cat? Perhaps. For love there is also a season; its seeds must be resown. But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that...