Re: Comics: The Weekly Rundown (was Heroes Con 2006)
Originally posted by Brett Gallman in the Superman Returns Discussion Thread:
At least DC tries to rectify/explain their continuity issues with their various crises. Marvel just sort of rolls along, constantly ret-conning stuff, especially here lately. (Lately meaning the last few years). Just to stay on topic: I pretty much grew up on the Byrne version of Superman, but I revisited it this summer, and I have to say I prefer the Birthright origin now
Hey Brett,
I like Superman: Birthright, it is a very well done story by Mark Waid and Lenil F. Yu, as a matter of fact, I waited until I had all twelve issues before I sat down and read the whole story. I know Birthright is newer and shinier

, and as I previously stated it is a well done story, but once I finished reading it, all I could think was this story was an unnecessary retread of everything Byrne did, but Byrne did it in half the amount of issues.
As far retconning goes, Superman: Birthright is extremely guilty. According to that story, Lex Luthor actually spent some time in Smallville and was friends with Clark Kent. Of course, this totally goes against what was established in Byrne's Man of Steel and the subsequent Superman mytho's. Furthermore Brett, I don't know if you remember a one shot format that DC put out called Lex Luthor: The Unauthorized Biography by Edaurdo Barretto. Simply put it is Luthor's equivalent to the Killing Joke and it is an very underated gem of a book.
Lex Luthor: The Unauthorized Biography explores Lex's origin and firmly establishes why he is who he is, and the book never makes any references of him being in Smallville. Personally, I think Superman: Birthright was created to cash in on the success of the Smallville t.v. series. Another thing that bothers me with DC is that it hadn't even been twenty years before they went back and re-did Superman's origin, again. I also felt that Birthright somewhat treaded on territory already covered by Superman: For All Seasons.
From what I know, the only time Marvel has done something to the effect of what DC has done with Superman is when they had John Byrne re-do the Spider-Man origin and I think it is safe to assume that Marvel would like to sweep that under the carpet along with the Spider-Man Clone Saga fiasco. But Brett, I guess it goes back to what you were stating, Marvel accepts their errors and just keeps rolling along, where as DC seems to go back retell and origins. I guess it's just a matter of preference, to me these various crises every ten years or so just seems to confuse readers as they don't know which origin to stick to.
Personally, I was really excited about Infinite Crisis, but after having read the entire story, I found it to be a very unfocused mess. And now I find out that DC is going to issue another version that will clarify the story. I think perhaps Geoff Johns (the writer of Infinite Crisis) maybe spreading himself too thin, besides the various DC titles he was also involved in the writing for the Blade television series.
Anyway Brett, I got a bit long winded, but I found your post very interesting. I do like Superman: Birthright, but at the end of the day, I feel Byrne's Man of Steel said everything that needed to be said as far as a modern day Superman origin goes