Home Theater Forum  ›  Forums  ›  Entertainment and Media  ›  Movies (Theatrical)  ›  Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

#1
Rating: 0
Marvel has at least tried over the past few years [with varying levels of success] to bring other of their characters to the big screen. A few that I can think of:

Spider-Man
The Hulk
Daredevil
Elektra
The Punisher

DC/Warner seems intent on just rehashing old territory over and over again. You'd think they'd at least try to bring some of the other classics to the big screen. (I don't count Constantine because that was just a total mess) How about The Flash? Green Lantern? A Green Arrow movie could be great if done right.

Any thoughts?
Export to Wiki
#2
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Joss Whedon is working on Wonder Woman
I wouldn't mind:
Green Lantern
Flash
Aquaman
Green Arrow
Sandman
Jonah Hex
How about Batman Beyond?
2009 Film List | 2009 Complete List | 2008 Film List | 2007 Film List | 2006 Film List | 2005 Film List | 2004 Film List
My Blog
Export to Wiki
#3
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

I think Green Lantern if it was cast and scripted right, full space opera an all could have the largest degree of success.
Fighting for truth, justice, and to help save Superman from the evil clutches of Bryan Singer.
Export to Wiki
#4
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Green Lantern, for sure. Flash would be awesome too.
Export to Wiki
#5
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

David Goyer (Batman Begins) is working on the Flash.

I agree, many characters could make for interesting movies if done right. The technology exists to do most of them justice now fairly economically. Its whats on the page that counts most though. I'm cautiously optimistic that Whedon will turn out at least an interesting Wonder Woman...even if it is not what many of us will be expecting/hoping for.
Export to Wiki
#6
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

James Cameron's Aquaman just recently broke box office records

Live Free or DIE!!!!!

Export to Wiki
#7
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

I forgot to mention this earlier, but a Captain Marvel (or Shazam) movie is in the works. I think this could be good if they don't make it really campy.
Export to Wiki
#8
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Shazam was always cool and underrated. Not as good as Superman, but not hokey either.

Green Lantern? Not enough wide appeal.

Flash? Maybe. The TV show was good for a while before it tanked. I'd see it.
Export to Wiki
#9
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Also the great thing about DC's movies are they are all done by Warner Bros - so there is a possibility that if they get a few movie franchises going they could do crossovers (how cool would a World's Finest movie be!).

With Marvel there are so many companies involved in their movies that crossovers are pretty much out of the question which is why Ben Urich in Daredevil no longer writes for the Daily Bugle because Sony had the rights to the Bugle name! And it's also why Kingpin can't appear in a Spider-Man movie!

Also I think after Wonder Woman that Green Lantern has huge potential as a movie franchise - a huge space opera with an almost limitless choice of supporting characters (with the miriad of GL Corps members)... with the right creative team it could be really good.
Export to Wiki
#10
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

That's a hell of a billboard of a sig, Paul...

Man, an hour wasted on this sig! Thanks, Toshiba! :p
Export to Wiki
#11
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

If Wonder Woman a character not top tier like Superman & Batman can pull good numbers I expect stuff like Green Lanturn and Flash to come.
My DVD Collection
Export to Wiki
#12
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

J. Michael Straczynski wrote a Green Lantern screenplay treatment -- perhaps his favorite comics character outside of Superman -- for Warner Brothers back in the '90s, but it never went into production, coming as it did during a largely fallow era in the DC Comics/WB Pictures motion picture-development relationship.

Instead, that regime gave us Batman Forever and Batman & Robin.

(Would like to read that thing sometime.)
Export to Wiki
#13
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Wasn't there a rumour of Jack Black playing the Green Lantern?
Export to Wiki
#14
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric F
Marvel has at least tried over the past few years [with varying levels of success] to bring other of their characters to the big screen. A few that I can think of:

Spider-Man
The Hulk
Daredevil
Elektra
The Punisher

DC/Warner seems intent on just rehashing old territory over and over again. You'd think they'd at least try to bring some of the other classics to the big screen. (I don't count Constantine because that was just a total mess) How about The Flash? Green Lantern? A Green Arrow movie could be great if done right.

Any thoughts?

DC popped out V for Vendetta and Constantine. And Constantine was a hell of a lot better put together than Daredevil, Elektra, and the Punisher.

Outside of Spidey and X-Men, I don't see Marvel having a lot of success. FF did OK business. I wouldn't scream to my shareholders about it.
Hey buddy...did you just see a real bright light?
Export to Wiki
#15
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

i think goyer needs a partner to 'edit' him. his work on blade trinity and the tv series really sucked. blade 1&2 worked cause the directors' visions were really strong. batman begins worked because of nolan. i hope goyer doesn't work on flash all by himself! =).

flash would make an interesting movie, the themes about time, speed and what it means for a person's life in relation to others. very interesting themes.

but the problem with DC comics is... the name itself... DC=detective comics. have you noticed that nearly all of the superheroes of DC are basically detectives? superman/clark kent centers around a mystery that he solves. same with batman/bruce wayne. that's why batman the animated series works brilliantly. look at each of the best episodes, there's a mystery that he must solve. and it also illustrates how smart he really is as a dectective. that's his REAL superpower. in fact, that is THE best superpower most of the DC superheroes have, is the smarts to solve a mystery. anytime a medium that is trying to recreate a dc hero away from the detective element... they loose it.

in another words, all these "mythologies" and other story/theme elements should be developed as a RESULT of the detective element. it's like in batman the animated series. it's in the mystery of trying to solve Commishioner Gordon's frameup that Batgirl is born. the story isn't about Batgirl's birth, the story is about the mystery but it causes the other elements to gel together.

hopefully, whomever works on the next DC property realizes this =).

to the edge of eternity and depth of infinity, stupidity knows no bound.

Export to Wiki
#16
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Hey, I was going to mention V for Vendetta but it doesn't apply, sort of the way of the way Moore's other earlier works like Watchmen don't apply either.

Ooh, let us not forget that total crap-fest Swamp Thing 1 (and 2) as well.

Green Lantern could make a very good movie (Hal Jordon, not Kyle), GL Corps and all.

I do like the idea of Green Arrow, basically because he could be played as almost as dark as Batman (and I know most of you just want to see the boxing glove arrow, at least once).
Export to Wiki
#17
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Isn't Captain America A DC hero? Or am I just revealing my vast ignorance of which hero belongs to which company? Captain America seems like he'd make for a great cinematic hero.

\"Life began in mystery, and it will end in mystery, but what a savage and beautiful country lies in between.\" - Diane Ackerman

Export to Wiki
#18
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael:M
Isn't Captain America A DC hero? Or am I just revealing my vast ignorance of which hero belongs to which company? Captain America seems like he'd make for a great cinematic hero.

Nope he's a Marvel character, but I agree a good film could be made with him. I also think that Neil McDonough would be a good Cap.
2009 Film List | 2009 Complete List | 2008 Film List | 2007 Film List | 2006 Film List | 2005 Film List | 2004 Film List
My Blog
Export to Wiki
#19
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

No, Captain America belong to Marvel. He was one of their first heroes along with Sub Mariner back in 1940s when they were still Timely Comics, IIRC.

Quote:
Outside of Spidey and X-Men, I don't see Marvel having a lot of success. FF did OK business. I wouldn't scream to my shareholders about it.

FF did well enough to be the 13th highest-grossing film of 2005, with receipts in excess of $150 million. Besides the films you have mentioned, other successful Marvel films include Blade & Daredevil. Blade continues to profit for Marvel with the successful launch of the TV series which had the highest ratings ever for Spike and beat the number of viewers watching a rerun on Lost.

Vertigo characters such as V & Constantine shouldn't really count towards DC since they come from a sister line that doesn't maintain a lot of continuity with the DC universe.
"Only two things are infinite––the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not so sure about the universe." ––Albert Einstein
Export to Wiki
#20
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

I'm definitely looking forward to Wonder Woman but I'd really like to see another Supergirl movie.

Live Free or DIE!!!!!

Export to Wiki
#21
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

I don't see any chance of Captain America being made anytime soon.

The writers of Superman changed the iconic line, not just to court international viewers, but to "make a point" and not step on toes. How would a Captain America movie fare? He's probably Marvel's second best character (behind Spidey), and their best for great storylines, but Hollywood doesn't have that skill. Too much external baggage around.
Hey buddy...did you just see a real bright light?
Export to Wiki
#22
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

I actually think Daredevil could have been just as good as Spidey if done right, which it obviously wasn't.

But this is a DC thread, so let's try to keep it that way.

Thinking of the lesser known DC characters, how about The Atom (Ray Palmer)?
Export to Wiki
#23
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

ain't moore's material released under Vertigo... which is related to dc/spinoff? somn like that. very vague.

PS V4V&Watchmen both have mystery/detective elements as well =).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric F
Hey, I was going to mention V for Vendetta but it doesn't apply, sort of the way of the way Moore's other earlier works like Watchmen don't apply either.

Ooh, let us not forget that total crap-fest Swamp Thing 1 (and 2) as well.

Green Lantern could make a very good movie (Hal Jordon, not Kyle), GL Corps and all.

I do like the idea of Green Arrow, basically because he could be played as almost as dark as Batman (and I know most of you just want to see the boxing glove arrow, at least once).

to the edge of eternity and depth of infinity, stupidity knows no bound.

Export to Wiki
#24
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

As far as DC-owned characters go, I'd personally like to see Warner release a well-done PLASTIC MAN movie, provided it was done in the wild, cartoony spirit of the character's creator, Jack Cole, and set in the 1940s. If it were done as a live-action film, it'd be perfect material for either Sam Raimi or the Coen Bros to have fun with. If done as an animated film, Brad Bird's the man for the job.
My Current Damage at DVD Aficionado

Top 5 most-wanted films on R1 DVD wish list:

SANDS OF THE KALAHARI (1965) / MURDER, HE SAYS (1945) / UNEARTHLY STRANGER (1963) / CRACK IN THE WORLD (1965) / ISLAND OF LOST SOULS (1933)
Export to Wiki
#25
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidPla
Wasn't there a rumour of Jack Black playing the Green Lantern?

Well it is great to see that the WB already has potential future plans to ruin the first Green Lantern movie.

Honestly, I think Samuel L. Jackson would make a great John Stewart. I am not sure who they could find to play Hal Jordan, but I hope it would be an actor who has had previous acting experience.

For once, I wish they could find someone who really has a passion to bring a good quick action pack 90 minute super hero movie to the screen, with little to no romantic sub-plot that bogs the movie down.
Fighting for truth, justice, and to help save Superman from the evil clutches of Bryan Singer.
Export to Wiki
#26
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Aqauman seems like a no-brainer.

Government in action = Government inaction

Export to Wiki
#27
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

.
Export to Wiki
#28
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

.
Export to Wiki
#29
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Maybe the producers of Superman returns figured that the original, authentic, classic, pre 1942, slogan would serve them better in the international market (where most films actually stand to make a profit.
Export to Wiki
#30
Rating: 0

Re: Doesn't DC have any "Movie" quality heroes than just Batman & Superman?

Quote:
Because Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman were just about the only super-heroes whose comics weren't cancelled in the late-40s to mid-50s, their secret identies of Clark Kent, Bruce Wayne and Diana Prince live on to today.

I read the recent Wonder Woman #1--probably the only Wonder Woman I've ever read--and it's Diana's sister in the role now. It was purposely unclear if this would be the status quo for the book, or if Diana would take up the mantle again.

Quote:
Personally, I only like the Golden Age originals from the '40s but I doubt there'll be a Mercury-helmeted Flash running around like some hyped-up version the FTD Florists icon any time soon.

Another new book I read was Flash #1, and it actually featured Jay Garrick with a little silver helmet. I could make no sense of the issue--a problem I've always had with DC, which seems very unfriendly to new readers--but it also was up in the air whether he would be the focal Flash, or if it would be some kid named Bart.

Quote:
Maybe the producers of Superman returns figured that the original, authentic, classic, pre 1942, slogan would serve them better in the international market (where most films actually stand to make a profit.

I won't say too much, as it's not the point of this thread, but they really should have just left the line out completely. As it is, it plays like an intentional slap. Totally unnecessary.
Export to Wiki