Re: AFI 100 Years Series Discussion & Challenges, vol. 2
I've updated
my main post with the Cheers list.
I'll also just throw in a short comment about
Philadelphia, which I saw a couple of weeks ago - and which I see is in the Cheers list.
It's a good, solid, well-made etertaining film that I enjoyed. And Street of Philadelphia is a good song. But I thought its presence on the Heroes list was interesting. Why?
The film is on the Heroes list is for the Tom Hanks character, Andrew Beckett. He plays a gay lawyer who is fired on spurious grounds after catching AIDS, and who takes his former company to court to vindicate his reputation.
The thing is, I personally thought the bigger hero in the film was not Andrew Beckett, but the Denzel Washington character, Joe Miller. Theis character is a homophobic lawyer to initially turns down Beckett's case, but then changes his mind and becomes a strong advocate for Beckett.
Why did I find Miller to be the hero? Beckett's crusade was essentially about himself. He was fighting for his personal rights, his personal reputation. They had infringed his rights, and he was going to do all he could to defend himself. It's an admirable thing, don't get me wrong, and his persistence and force are certainly exceptional, carrying on where others would have given up, but essentially it's because it is personal for him.
But Miller? He's strongly homophobic. And while he does soften over the course of the film, it's evident he's still not at all comfortable with the issue - see the scene where he is hit on, for instance. He's not fighting because it's a personal issue for him. He's fighting because he realises it is the right thing to do. And that to me is more heroic, to fight for something just on the principle of the matter, even if you disagree with it.
Trying to think about this issue, I noted a famous quote about free speech that articulates my point.
* One person says "I'm fighting for my right to have free speech so you can hear what I think". That's good, that's admirable.
* But more admirable is the person who says "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I will fight for your right to say it".
Does that make sense?