Up to 85% at RottenTomatoes.com. Looks like this is going to finally be the Batman film a lot of us were waiting for.
6/11/05 at 10:12am
- Joined: May 1999
- Post Count: 1,665
Home Theater Forum
›
Forums
›
Entertainment and Media
›
Movies (Theatrical)
›
*** Official BATMAN BEGINS Discussion Thread
Recent Reviews
-
Toshiba enters the Blu ray world with their first player. Toshiba with universal had gone with HDDVD a few years back and lost. now they are here with the first blu ray player. I had a Toshiba HD-a2...
-
FUNNY PEOPLE 2-Disc Unrated Collector’s Edition Studio: Universal Studios Home Entertainment Year: 2009 Rated:R Film Length: 2 hours, 26 minutes (theatrical), 2 hours, 33 minutes...
-
There are continual jolts of electricity spread throughout Matteo Garrone’s Gomorrah. It’s akin to the shock-to-the-system kick one got when he was first exposed to Martin...
*** Official BATMAN BEGINS Discussion Thread
6/12/05 at 2:49pm
- Joined: December 1998
- Post Count: 7,277
Saw HBOs making of today. Looks great.
6/13/05 at 12:51am
- Joined: February 2001
- Location: Albany, NY
- Post Count: 9,365
Quote:
| Just read on Dark Horizons that Bale and Oldman are the only ones signed for future films. Nolan isn't signed. |
6/13/05 at 1:01am
- Joined: January 2000
- Post Count: 186
Michael Cane and Katie Holmes both said they would be interested in doing a sequel.
6/13/05 at 1:56am
- Joined: September 2002
- Post Count: 3,742
Quote:
| The only other one who needs to come back is Michael Caine, now, cast wise. |
Well, and
Warning Spoiler! Click to show
Morgan Freeman
though I admit they could do it without this individual, though I wouldn't like it.
6/13/05 at 6:01am
- Joined: November 2000
- Post Count: 1,129
I love that they have such a stellar cast for the film, but I am worried about continuity for secondary characters such as Falcone and Fox.
Seeing it Wednesday night - going to be a long 60 hours....
EDIT: By "continuity," I just meant having the same actors play the roles in any sequels. Wasn't sure if that was clear in my original text.
Seeing it Wednesday night - going to be a long 60 hours....
EDIT: By "continuity," I just meant having the same actors play the roles in any sequels. Wasn't sure if that was clear in my original text.
\"You know, God has some really weird kids, and I find it hard to be in their company most of the time.\"
--Paul \"Bono\" Hewson
6/13/05 at 9:30am
- Joined: July 2002
- Post Count: 6,078
if the sequel didn't bring back Freeman and Oldman, i would get the impression they were skating on goodwill from the first film, and not really interested in maintaining that films integrity.
both have fairly substantial relationships (of sorts) with this Batman/Bruce Wayne.
both have fairly substantial relationships (of sorts) with this Batman/Bruce Wayne.
6/13/05 at 9:39am
- Joined: May 2001
- Post Count: 439
Quote:
| By "continuity," I just meant having the same actors play the roles in any sequels. Wasn't sure if that was clear in my original text. |
You mean, like what happened to Harvey Dent? I was kind of bummed when Tommy Lee Jones showed up for the role in Batman Forever. Although kind of dull in Batman, It would have been interesting to see what Billy Dee Williams would do with the role...
8^B
6/13/05 at 10:58am
- Joined: November 2000
- Post Count: 1,129
Quote:
| You mean, like what happened to Harvey Dent? |
Yes, and, well, what they did with the title character.
But, yes, I was thinking more about the roles of Gordon, Fox, and Falcone. I know that Oldman is signed for a sequel, and I suppose they could easily replace Fox's character with an underling with a minimum of fuss.But Wilkerson's a great actor, and from the clip on Yahoo, brings a weight to the role I'd like to see reprised. Same for Freeman. I understand that there are many, many factors that can impact an actor's willingness and availability, but I am hoping for as much continuity as possible.
\"You know, God has some really weird kids, and I find it hard to be in their company most of the time.\"
--Paul \"Bono\" Hewson
6/13/05 at 3:34pm
- Joined: June 2003
- Post Count: 543
Quote:
| You mean, like what happened to Harvey Dent? I was kind of bummed when Tommy Lee Jones showed up for the role in Batman Forever. |
What? I didn't even know about this.
I was annoyed that Batman changed face twice!
6/13/05 at 3:58pm
- Joined: June 2003
- Post Count: 543
Quote:
| BTW, supposedly Bale confirmed that WB still plans on doing Batman vs Superman, but only after each character has had 3 standalone films. |
If that's true, I don't think I'll be alive to see such a movie with the rate at which they are produced
.
6/13/05 at 10:19pm
- Joined: January 2000
- Location: Catasauqua, PA
- Post Count: 1,104
Four stars from Ebert.
I haven't read the review, but it's obviously a glowing one.
I'm not really anti-spoiler in regards to this film, but as I haven't kept up with any of the plot details thus far (only caught the trailer before ROTS), I figure I can hold out a little while longer until it comes out.
Evan
I haven't read the review, but it's obviously a glowing one.
I'm not really anti-spoiler in regards to this film, but as I haven't kept up with any of the plot details thus far (only caught the trailer before ROTS), I figure I can hold out a little while longer until it comes out.
Evan
" " - Buster Keaton
S&S (1992 & 2002), The 1930s : Finished! S&S Club : 307 seen (Most Recent: Jeanne Dielman)
AFI Challenge Stars: 44 left, Songs: 11 left, Passions: 6 left, Cheers: 5 left, Quotes: 3 left, Heroes/Villains: 1 left, Top Tens: 1 left; Laughs, Thrills, Movie...
6/14/05 at 5:03am
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 761
I skipped around in the review to remain spoiler free as well. Here's Ebert's last comment:
Can't wait til 6:50 tomorrow. I think I am anticipating this more than I was Revenge of the Sith.
Quote:
| I said this is the Batman movie I've been waiting for; more correctly, this is the movie I did not realize I was waiting for, because I didn't realize that more emphasis on story and character and less emphasis on high-tech action was just what was needed. The movie works dramatically in addition to being an entertainment. There's something to it. |
Can't wait til 6:50 tomorrow. I think I am anticipating this more than I was Revenge of the Sith.
Xbox Gamertag: badlieut
6/14/05 at 5:19am
- Joined: August 2001
- Post Count: 7,528
I can't say I'm waiting for it MORE. But I am more excited about it. SW always draws a Pavlovian response from me. An urge, even if I didn't like the last one.
Batman Begins actually reminds me of my feelings about TTT and ROTK. Patient and excited.
I was considering a midnight movie...I'm not certain. If not, I'll see it tomorrow afternoon. Either way, I am VERY excited.
Take care,
Chuck
Batman Begins actually reminds me of my feelings about TTT and ROTK. Patient and excited.
I was considering a midnight movie...I'm not certain. If not, I'll see it tomorrow afternoon. Either way, I am VERY excited.
Take care,
Chuck
Hey buddy...did you just see a real bright light?
6/14/05 at 6:41am
- Joined: May 2002
- Post Count: 3,854
Man, I know NOTHING about this movie (thanks to the ROTS build-up) and I am just now able to get excited about it. The early reviews look good; I have no doubt I will enjoy this one quite a bit.
6/14/05 at 9:27am
- Joined: November 2003
- Post Count: 1,286
Same here, spoiler free and ready for tomorrow.
6/14/05 at 12:27pm
- Joined: November 2000
- Post Count: 1,129
Have my tickets: 7:30 PM Eastern time tomorrow. Like Chuck, I considered the midnight showing, but I've missed a lot of sleep lately, so decided instead to see it a "normal" hour.
\"You know, God has some really weird kids, and I find it hard to be in their company most of the time.\"
--Paul \"Bono\" Hewson
6/14/05 at 2:06pm
- Joined: June 2000
- Post Count: 2,795
I used to be a spoiler hound for Batman films, but ROTS took all of my spoiler enthusiasm this time around. So I'm actually going to see a Batman film without knowing every detail, and that's a great feeling. I have my tickets for 4:30 tomorrow afternoon. I can't wait!
6/14/05 at 2:06pm
- Joined: August 2001
- Location: Tulsa, OK
- Post Count: 492
I got to see it last night at the IMAX here in Tulsa. A few random comments: First off, bring on the sequel. I love how it was set up. Liam Neeson was outstanding in his role. Caine, Freeman and Bale also did a very good job. Some of the action seemed to be too zoomed in. You'll love Bruce Wayne. The costume was great. The audience stood and cheered when the movie was over. This was a good test since a local comic book store passed out the tickets. The fans enjoyed it. By the way, the IMAX version is widescreen. It's still big but not reframed. So there are my random thoughts. I look forward to reading comments as more and more people go and see it. Bring on the DVD!!
Don't make me hungry. You wouldn't like me when I'm hungry.
6/14/05 at 3:28pm
- Joined: February 2001
- Location: Albany, NY
- Post Count: 9,365
Still debating whether to hit up the midnight showing tonight. Don't have to go into work until 3:30 tomorrow, so sleeping in isn't a problem. Main concern now is whether I'd sleep through the film. Dark theater, late at night...
6/14/05 at 6:59pm
- Joined: December 1998
- Post Count: 7,277
James Bs review...
http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/mo...an_begins.html
http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/mo...an_begins.html
6/14/05 at 10:25pm
- Joined: May 2000
- Post Count: 4,099
Washington Post review is up:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...061401661.html
Basically likes it, but thought it was too "joyless" and "somber". Well, this is Batman we are talking about here...
Jason
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...061401661.html
Basically likes it, but thought it was too "joyless" and "somber". Well, this is Batman we are talking about here...
Jason
6/15/05 at 12:29am
- Joined: May 2001
- Post Count: 86
Quote:
| I got to see it last night at the IMAX here in Tulsa. By the way, the IMAX version is widescreen. It's still big but not reframed. |
For those with an interest, I'd like to mention that over at the FromScriptToDVD.com website we have a list of the IMAX locations showing "Batman Begins."
http://www.fromscripttodvd.com/batma...ngagements.htm
6/15/05 at 12:44am
- Joined: November 2004
- Post Count: 432
Is Rutger Hauer any good?
6/15/05 at 2:41am
- Joined: April 2000
- Post Count: 319
I just listened to the score of the film without watching the movie. Zimmer and Howard did a fantastic job. The score is so different than Elfman's score that it's hard to compare the two. It makes me more hyped for the movie =)
Paul V
6/15/05 at 4:34am
This thread is now designated the Official Discussion Thread for "Batman Begins" please, post all comments, links to outside reviews, film and box office discussion items to this thread.
All HTF member film reviews of "Batman Begins" should be posted to the Official Review Thread.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Crawdaddy
All HTF member film reviews of "Batman Begins" should be posted to the Official Review Thread.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Crawdaddy
G.W. McLintock: Camille, you're on your own.
6/15/05 at 5:24am
- Joined: November 2000
- Post Count: 1,129
Quote:
| I just listened to the score of the film without watching the movie. Zimmer and Howard did a fantastic job. The score is so different than Elfman's score that it's hard to compare the two. |
Bought the score yesterday. Reminds me a bit of a more organic (less synthesized) Blade score: much more about setting tone and atmosphere than about creating recurring themes.
There are unmistakeable Zimmer and Howard moments, but they fit and are not overwhelming. The two composers really put themselves in service to the story.
It's what I would call good "background" music - good to have on as you're doing something else, but it's not meant to be what you focus on alone.
11 hours!
\"You know, God has some really weird kids, and I find it hard to be in their company most of the time.\"
--Paul \"Bono\" Hewson
6/15/05 at 6:01am
Bassheads are going to love the DVD because the Batmobile can rumble with the best of them.
The audience, at the midnight showing I attended, cheered when the criminal asked "who are you?" and Bale utters "I'm Batman."
This Batman is simply ferocious when he has to be, and plays on fear to get the answers he needs.
This is a loud film, the gunshots sounded unlike any gunshots I've heard in film or on TV.
The audience, at the midnight showing I attended, cheered when the criminal asked "who are you?" and Bale utters "I'm Batman."
This Batman is simply ferocious when he has to be, and plays on fear to get the answers he needs.
This is a loud film, the gunshots sounded unlike any gunshots I've heard in film or on TV.
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Dragon*Con 2009 | Heroes Con 2009
6/15/05 at 8:04am
- Joined: January 2002
- Post Count: 1,049
It appears that the producers of Batman Begins have not only bothered to carefully study the original comics featuring Batman from the 1930's, but probably studied why Frank Miller's Batman: Year One was so good. 
I am definitely going to see this film in the next few days.
I am definitely going to see this film in the next few days.
Raymond in Sacramento, CA USA
6/15/05 at 8:48am
- Joined: June 1999
- Post Count: 16,605
Ray's comments move me to comment thusly: Despite all the popular revisionism about this character, Bob Kane's original Batman from the 1930s was hardly a "dark creature of the night." Really, this "dark knight" obsession did not take off until that Frank Miller graphic novel. But the comic books from 1938 on through the 1960s? Very little of the darkness that has come to be attached to the character.
Based on all the reviews (especially Ebert's), this looks like the first Batman-related movie I could get into.
Based on all the reviews (especially Ebert's), this looks like the first Batman-related movie I could get into.
