- Joined: July 1999
- Location: At work, stuck in front of my computer.
- Post Count: 735
I noticed that there is a new "re-imagining" of Darrin McGavin's classic
Night Stalker series coming up from one of the producers of
The X-Files. At first I was excited about it, but now that I've heard more I must admit that I am apprehensive about this series now.
For one thing, they've teamed Kolchak up with a hot, female reporter. What's with this!?! An
X-Files producer can't put together a scary show without the Mulder/Scully dynamic!?!
Also, they've cast Stuart Townsend as Kolchak! Kolchak is supposed to be badly dressed, slightly obnoxious, and a real character. Not Mr. Cool in dark clothing (check out the photo on ABC's site,
http://abc.go.com/primetime/schedule...htstalker.html).
Supposedly the producer (whose name escapes me for the moment) was a big fan of the original series...so why is he turning it into a hip, cool
X-Files clone?
Movies I would purchase instantly if they were available in their correct aspect ratio:
Death Trap, Innocent Blood, The Shadow, and Remo Williams
- Joined: January 2002
- Post Count: 2,233
I saw the ad for this during the finale for LOST and I thought it looked terrible! I give it 6 episodes. If you wanted some hip, young supernatural show, call it something else and not The Night Stalker! And what's with all the supernatural shows coming out next season?! Someone wrote that it's due to LOST, but that show was never an all out supernatural program...
And you believe, at heart, everyone's a killer...
- Joined: December 1969
- Post Count: 7,219
And the die-hard Star Trek fans said TNG wouldn't last - you couldn't do a show without the original cast, etc., etc., etc. Then the Battlestar Galactica people did their sackcloth and ashes number. These shows don't get remade or have sequels generated in order to tap into the nostalgia of the old fans. They get done because somebody thinks a basic premise that was worth trying 20 or 30 years ago might work for a new audience - and if the audience is going to be big enough to sustain the new series then by definition it is going to have to attract people who never even heard of the original show.
You know how this usually breaks down? A small percentage of the old fans refuse to even watch the new show. A slightly larger proportion checks it out, decides it's garbage and dennounces it as heresy. An even bigger group decides the new show is just fine, as good as the old one, maybe better. And the biggest group of all is new fans who either never watched or didn't like the original show, but just love the new one. If there are enough of them altogether, the new show survives, if not, not. In both cases the fans of the old show have little or nothing to do with the success of the new one.
I thought TNG was OK, but still have a soft spot for the original. (I found DS9 boring, Voyager embarassing and Enterprise unwatchable.) I thought the original BSG sucked, despite cool effects, cute women and a fun character in Starbuck. I think the remake is much better.
I'll give the new Night Stalker a chance. I loved the first TV movie and thought Darren McGavin's Kolchack was one of the all-time great TV characters, but I recognized the inherent weakness of the "monster-of-the-week" format the series used and wasn't surprised or all that saddended when the original was cancelled. So I don't see this as descerating a classic, regardless of what happens. And the originals will all still be there, it isn't like they're going to erase the master tapes to record the new version over them. Just as TOS and the original BSG are still there for those who prefer them, or who like them just as much as the remakes.
Regards,
Joe
- Joined: January 2002
- Post Count: 2,233
Well, the one difference is the old Kolchak series isn't on DVD. I probably wouldn't even bother to complain a bit if those episodes were available. I love the opening credits/title section, where he comes in whistling and the music is light and airy, and then the music grows dark... And I always seem to miss it when it's played on the Sci-Fi Channel.
And you believe, at heart, everyone's a killer...
- Joined: December 1998
- Post Count: 497
Yep...if all the new show does is get the original Night Stalker series released on DVD then I'm a happy man. You just can't 'remake' McGavin's Kolchak.
- Joined: July 1999
- Location: At work, stuck in front of my computer.
- Post Count: 735
I didn't mean to imply that I felt that something sacred was being tampered with. I'm just saying that from what I've seen I'm not as happy with the idea as I once was. And I very much do not like what they are doing with the Kolchak character.
I will definitely tune in, but the point of my comments was simply that I'm not happy so far...
Movies I would purchase instantly if they were available in their correct aspect ratio:
Death Trap, Innocent Blood, The Shadow, and Remo Williams
- Joined: July 1999
- Location: At work, stuck in front of my computer.
- Post Count: 735
Quote:
| My question is: who will play "Vicenzo"? That's the key. If they try for the seriousness of The X-Files, they're dead. |
Vincenzo is being played by Cotter Smith.
Movies I would purchase instantly if they were available in their correct aspect ratio:
Death Trap, Innocent Blood, The Shadow, and Remo Williams
- Joined: November 1998
- Post Count: 4,490
Quote:
| Now all we need is a remake of "The Norliss Tapes" |
Ah yes, that one scared the crap out of me as a kid as well. I remember the reel to reel tape recorder with the full tape reel spinning at the end.
Every man is my superior, in that I may learn from him.
- Joined: July 1999
- Location: At work, stuck in front of my computer.
- Post Count: 735
I see that this premieres next Thursday, September 29th, so I thought I'd resurrect this thread in preparation.
While I don't hold a lot of faith in this series, I do admit a keen interest in the premiere. We shall see...
Movies I would purchase instantly if they were available in their correct aspect ratio:
Death Trap, Innocent Blood, The Shadow, and Remo Williams
- Joined: July 1999
- Location: At work, stuck in front of my computer.
- Post Count: 735
Just a reminder that this program premieres tomorrow night (Thursday, September 29th).
Movies I would purchase instantly if they were available in their correct aspect ratio:
Death Trap, Innocent Blood, The Shadow, and Remo Williams
- Joined: July 1999
- Location: At work, stuck in front of my computer.
- Post Count: 735
Tonight's the night. 9:00 pm (PST) on ABC.
Hopefully this program will turn out to be real surprise. Galactica was...
Movies I would purchase instantly if they were available in their correct aspect ratio:
Death Trap, Innocent Blood, The Shadow, and Remo Williams
- Joined: January 2002
- Post Count: 2,233
The media reviews posted over at AICN tear Night Stalker apart and don't bother to put it back together, and given it's timeslot, don't expect it to last. Hell, ABC didn't give Miracles the shot it deserved...and I already have my monster-of-the-week fix with Supernatural anyway.
And you believe, at heart, everyone's a killer...
- Joined: December 2001
- Location: Toronto, Ontario
- Post Count: 2,468
I just finished watching The X-Files .....I mean The Night Stalker. You might as well call the characters Mulder & Scully and rename the show as such. Heh....they might as well give the FBI guy hounding Kolchak a cigarette while they're at it. Can't say that I'm really impressed so far and don't like it's chances as it has that 'been there, done that' feel to it.
Recently watched- BSG: Season 4.0[BD], Starship Troopers 3: Marauder[BD], The Happening[BD], Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen (IMAX)[BD], An American Werewolf In London[BD]
Currently watching- Heroes: Season 1[BD], Michael Palin: Pole To Pole, Battlestar Galactica[BD], Magnum P.I.: Season 7
- Joined: February 2002
- Post Count: 10,068
NIGHT STALKER discussion
Anyone check out the new "Night Stalker"? Semi-promising start, but I hope the production values were just cheap because it was a pilot. They never did really show the creature, and when I slowed it down to try and get a look, it seemed like basically a hand puppet (especially in the shower attack scene).
Also lots of blathering on about connections and "the mark," but nothing really about what these creatures were, or why they were attacking. There was some mention that the women were pregnant, but that was never really followed up.
And why did the creatures carry the girl back to the caves rather than just killing her?
Seemed like there were lots of plot threads that were never really tied together. But I'll give it a couple more episodes.
Uncle Joe: I'll never marry you, Selma Plout! You may as well take off that wedding dress and put it back in your Hopeless Chest!
--Petticoat Junction--