-
David Williams
- David Williams
-
- offline
- Joined: March 2001
- Location: ...certain reaches of John Adams' mind...
- Post Count: 2,290
Quote:
| There's never been any concrete way to convert stardates into real time. They're mentioned various times that they frequently just make them up at they go along to give the impression of the passage of time. |
Which is true, except for everything I said. In the modern Trek era, 1000 units = 1 year and 1 season = 1 year. Whether or not time flows in a orderly manner inside that span is a different matter altogether.
From the Star Trek Chronology:
"Gene Roddenberry made
Next Generation stardates five-digit numbers, apparently to underscore the years that theoretically elapsed since the first
Star Trek series. He arbitrarily chose 4 as the first digit (supposedly because the show is set in the 24th century), and designated the second digit as the number of the show's current season. The last three digits increase unevenly from 000 at the beginning of a season, to 999 at the end. This means a stardate of 43999 would be the last day of the third season of
Star Trek: The Next Generation."
This system was carried on through DS9 and VGR, except that they didn't restart with a 41--- number, they picked up in the 'year' that they started. So DS9 stardates range from 46--- to 52--- and VGR stardates begin in 48--- and end in 54---. DS9 started in the middle of TNG's 6th season and VGR started in the middle of DS9's 3rd season.
"Only two things are infinite––the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not so sure about the universe." ––Albert Einstein
- Joined: November 1998
- Post Count: 2,011
A year is the amount of time it takes the Earth (strange name for a planet) to revolve around our Sun (strange name for a star). I think it is interesting that the whole universe uses our calendar year and day.
VGR? I always thought Voyager was VOY.
Say what you will about Voyager crew, but the Doctor was cool. I liked Tes as well. B'elanna Torres had her moments, too.
Studios, caption your internet streams.
- Joined: August 2001
- Post Count: 1,827
Re: Star Trek Voyager - A Thread for Fans
Well since there has been a lot of bashing of Voyager lately, I thought I would bring this topic back up...
I liked the show and felt it added to the overall Star Trek World. Sure it had some bad episodes, but so did all the other series.
-----
Scott
View My DVD Collection
Stop the on-screen Bugs!!!!!!
- Joined: October 1999
- Post Count: 1,175
Re: Star Trek Voyager - A Thread for Fans
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scott-S
Sure it had some bad episodes, but so did all the other series.
|
But none of the others matched VOYAGER's a) quantitative high ratio of bad to good and b) qualitative high ratio of extreme bad to mid-line good. I still find much to enjoy in VOYAGER, so I'm not out to just bash it willy-nilly, but it was so aggravating to have to go through 5, 7, 10 poor episodes to get to a great one (and even 75% of the great ones had some disappointing element to them, usually the climax/resolution).
Ernest Hemingway once wrote, \"The world is a fine place and worth fighting for.\" I agree with the second part...--Det. William Somerset, SE7EN
http://www.dvdanthology.com/Filmmaker-movielist.html),
http://LDDb.com/collection.php?actio...user=Filmmaker
- Joined: February 2006
- Location: Boston, MA
- Post Count: 3,587
i'm skipping all of the comments in fear of spoilers... but this is probably the most appropriate thread for my input.
i'm a long time trekkie. i've seen all of TOS, TAS, TNG, ENT, the movies, but missed both DS9&VOY.
recently, i caught up on a # of VOY season1 episodes. @first i thought i saw most of season1 sporadically over the years during syndicated UPN... but after watching, now, the first 11 episodes... i realized i've only seen the very first episode the Caretaker! i didn't watch any of the season1 while it was on the air! lol.
one thing i noticed is Janeway is very hawt. i luv the way she takes command of the ship >P. her performance gives the cast a "gravitas" much like TNG's stewart and DS9's avery did and even ENT's Bakula. i never really seen mulgrew's talents until i took a look at her performance. for many, many years i've read about how many trekkies dumped on VOY. & i kind of bought into it without really watching VOY myself closely... until now! boy are they wrong! i luv the skip and a hop taht janeway gives despite being 70k light years away. i also love that they really do miss home on a # of this first eps. janeway is really the emotional core/center of the series... very much UNLIKE the other male captains. u tend to feel more when u have a female lead vs. male lead.
barring, that i also loved the rest of the cast and how their relationships have evolved. harry&paris's friendship, the ma'quis trails and 'tribulation' if u will on being integrated into the ship. there's just so much more continuity than TNG/TOS era. i also loved the Doctor's rising humanity. just watched that beowulf ep. recently. very cool stuff =).
anyways, will be chiming in as soon as i start finishing episodes and seasons and so on =D.
to the edge of eternity and depth of infinity, stupidity knows no bound.
- Joined: July 1999
- Post Count: 6,450
I know this is an appreciation thread. And my comment is more from disappointment than dislike. I felt the producers/writers missed a great opportunity with the ending of the show. The show was about the crew trying to get home. You spend 7 seasons with them hoping they do it. Yet, the big payoff is just seeing them arrive in orbit around Earth. I really felt they should have arrived home with at least 2-4 episodes left. Then used those episodes to show the impact of their 7 yr absence. While it wouldn't have been big action. It could have been great storytelling.
Bring back John Doe! Or at least resolve the cliff-hanger with a 2hr movie or as an extra on a dvd release.