Quote:
| It's unnatural. I don't care if a set costs too much, at least it's intact!!!!!!!! |
Chris, the first mistake your making is to assume that this will become standard proceedure for all TV shows to hit DVD.
I will grant you that if they split up Happy Days in to 2 sets for season 1 that would not make sense, because it was only what 16 episodes?
However, a number of the shows being split like that are shows like Transformers and all its various incarnations. Some of these shows had seasons that ran for 50 or 60 episodes in a season. Even if you pay the same for 2 sets as you would've for one one, you don't really. Paying 100 dollars for a set now, is not the same as paying 50 now and 50 six months from now.
Besides, aside from those cartoons with large seasons, the only shows that are seeing this treatment are hour long shows, I can't think of one sitcom that has been talked about for splitting up this way. Sex and the City and the Osbournes, aired with a gap between them so that's ok if they're released accordingly, but I haven't heard anything about Simpsons season 5 Volume 1, or King of the Hill season 3.5.
As for Sex and the City, my problem with that is not that it was split up in to 2 volumes, my problem is that HBO felt compelled to charge the same amount of money for season 5 (8 episodes) that they did for season 4 (18 episodes) even though there was no difference in the types of supliments or anything else that would've justified me to pay practically the same for either of them. That's why I didn't buy season 5, why I didn't by season 6.1 or whatever they want to call it, I won't buy the next release, and it actually contributed to me selling off the 4 seasons I already had.
On to the original topic of this thread, I guess I'll wait for Lionsgates' official sanitized answer, but if what Michael says is true and in fact Fusco himself is not pleased, that does give me some measure of satisfactioneven if I would have a hard time explaining why it might.