- Joined: March 2003
- Location: New Zealand
- Post Count: 3,013
Quote:
| I just whoever does eventually replace him does not demand a three year wait in between movies. That is the one and only thing I hate about Pierce. |
A three-year wait is fine, provided they spend the time developing a good movie. Unfortunately, they haven't been doing that.
AFI Top 100 lists:100 Movies,
100 Thrills - Completed
100 Laughs - 24 to go - last seen:
The Freshman100 Passions - 39 to go - last seen:
Breakfast At Tiffany's100 Heroes & Villains - 10 to go - last seen: Tom Powers in
The Public Enemy100 Songs - 44 to go - last seen: "When You Wish upon a Star"...
- Joined: March 2003
- Location: New Zealand
- Post Count: 3,013
Quote:
| Thank Goodness that MGM has come out with the denial as this rumor seemed to have some teeth to it! |
Phew - Have they denied this. That's a relief.
AFI Top 100 lists:100 Movies,
100 Thrills - Completed
100 Laughs - 24 to go - last seen:
The Freshman100 Passions - 39 to go - last seen:
Breakfast At Tiffany's100 Heroes & Villains - 10 to go - last seen: Tom Powers in
The Public Enemy100 Songs - 44 to go - last seen: "When You Wish upon a Star"...
- Joined: July 2002
- Location: Vienna, VA
- Post Count: 2,840
Disappointing. Every time the rumour comes up, I hope it's true, and then, alas, no new life injected into Bond.
So sad.
Though everyone has their own preferences, I found it interesting in the special features of my Bond DVD's that the filmmakers admitted that Lazenby and Moore played Bond much closer to the way he was written in the books.
Oh, and I think my left butt cheek is sexier than Pierce Brosnan. :b Wonder how much the Bond producers had to payoff People to make him "Sexiest Man Alive" to help promote his next Bond outing. Still can't take him seriously in any of the womanizing scenes.
My midis bring all the Force to the yard; my midis are better than yours!
- Joined: July 2002
- Location: Vienna, VA
- Post Count: 2,840
At least it gives the franchise more time to find a suitable, less wimpy replacement.
Wimpy Batmen, wimpy Bond, wimpy Spider-Man; what a generation we're in!!
Just to clarify, I was very happy with the casting of the NEW Batman, Christian Bale. I did become a little worried recently though, when I read he had lost 60 lbs for a recent role to look like he was starving. Considering the guy didn't have any fat on him I'm really worried about him getting 60lbs of muscle back for Batman now. From what I've seen of SM 2, Toby didn't have any time to get much back after Seabiscuit. (not that he had much in SM1) Alas, we may have another wimp if Bale can't bulk up. Prove me wrong, Christian!!
My midis bring all the Force to the yard; my midis are better than yours!
- Joined: August 2001
- Post Count: 7,528
Grant,
You've seen Christian ripped before, I assume. The Machinist simply proved that Bale knows physical appearance is critical to a role. I'm certain he'll do what is required to gain the physique for Bruce. He's had it before (Equilibrium, American Psycho).
As for Pierce, my wife loves him, and has since Remington Steele. She also loves Sean Bean, so Goldeneye is easily her favorite Bond. Hopefully, they'll put a worthy film (and Bond girl) around Brosnan for his last outing. Based on the BO for DaD, I am not hopeful.
Take care,
Chuck
Hey buddy...did you just see a real bright light?
- Joined: December 2001
- Location: Columbus, OH
- Post Count: 6,427
Liev Schreiber? NO. WAY. He was born in San Francisco, not the UK.
The man I loved - the man who vanished - he never came back at all. But maybe he's still out there, somewhere. Maybe some day, when Gotham no longer needs Batman, I'll see him again.
- Joined: June 1999
- Post Count: 33,005
Liev can't do 'debonair' all that well, he's a little more on the rough side.
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Dragon*Con 2009 | Heroes Con 2009
- Joined: May 2000
- Post Count: 655
Quote:
| I just whoever does eventually replace him does not demand a three year wait in between movies. That is the one and only thing I hate about Pierce. |
???
1995 - Goldeneye
1997 - Tomorrow Never Dies
1999 - The World is Not Enough
2002 - Die Another Day
That's only one 3-year wait, between movies 3 and 4. Besides, I'd rather wait 3 years for a good movie than have a mediocre one cranked out every 2.
And then there's Maude!
Whenever the laws of any state are broken, a duly authorized organization swings into action. It may be the called the State Police, State Troopers, Militia, the Rangers, or the Highway Patrol THE CITIZENS AUXILIARY POLICE!!! These are the stories of the men whose training, skill, and courage,...
- Joined: July 1997
- Post Count: 6,788
While fans would hate it, I would love it if they would break form and go with someone like, oh, Avery Brooks

(then again, I think Lazby is easily the best bond)
My Current DVD-Profiler"I've been Ostrafied!" - Christopher, Sopranos 5/6/07
- Joined: November 2002
- Post Count: 139
Sean Connery can still do it. More charisma than the rest put together and he's getting better. Just make the setting realistic -- don't pair him up with jailbait. There are plenty of nice-looking middle aged ladies who could act up a *storm* around him, retain sexiness, and the picture can still have action.
The action picture genre has been trying to one-up itself for so long that the "incredible stunt of the month" is no big deal any longer (IMH0).
Don't know about anyone else but I'm finding that the "quaint" action movies of yesteryear are much more *interesting*.
Best regards,
Paul Bigelow
- Joined: April 2000
- Post Count: 4,388
Quote:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
how about Jason Statham?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shurely not. No way he'd ever be suave enough to carry off Bond. And he's not tall enough.
Plus, although he's Brit, his accent is working class, not public schoolboy as Bond should be -- although this admittedly could be fixed with a good coach.
But I just don't see it.
|
Isn't he also follically challenged? Seems like he lacks the hairline for Bond, IIRC...
- Joined: July 2002
- Location: Vienna, VA
- Post Count: 2,840
How about Rupert Everett?
Still think Cary Elwes would be good. He's a great under-used actor. Hell, he was reduced to X-Files: The Sucky Years for a while wasn't he? Don't think I ever got to see an entire episode he was in.
My midis bring all the Force to the yard; my midis are better than yours!
- Joined: November 2002
- Post Count: 139
The point of being a spy is to come and go and, hopefully, no one ever knew you ever there. A saboteur leaves wreckage. Find some top writers and get Bond back to being a suspense thriller.
I'm kind of tired of the "stunt" casting with the "babe-0-licious hottie of the month". Pair Connery with Kim Cattrall.
The producers ought to take a hard look at "From Russia with Love" and see from where to proceed.
Best regards,
Paul Bigelow
- Joined: April 2000
- Post Count: 4,388
Quote:
| How about Rupert Everett? |
Sign I'm a) getting old, and b) not a very observant reader: when I saw this, I thought it was a joke, because I thought it referred to KENNY Everett!
- Joined: January 2002
- Location: Toronto
- Post Count: 1,300
sigh.
howabout gary coleman?
fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt