Home Theater Forum  ›  Forums  ›  Archives  ›  Software Archive  ›  2004 Foreign, Alternative and Independent Films
This thread is locked! Posting is not allowed!

2004 Foreign, Alternative and Independent Films

#151
Rating: 0
Yes.


The man I loved - the man who vanished - he never came back at all. But maybe he's still out there, somewhere. Maybe some day, when Gotham no longer needs Batman, I'll see him again.
Export to Wiki
#152
Rating: 0
Me too, i'm not as articulate as most of you guys with the reviews so i'm content with just reading what you guys have to say.

Top 10 Film Lists: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004
Film Lists: 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005
Export to Wiki
#153
Rating: 0
And I'm not as articulate as Nick, so I'll just say "What he said..."
Films Watched in 2008 , 2007 , 2006 , 2005
S&S List , HTF Top 20 Films
My Blog , My DVDs (horribly out of date)
Export to Wiki
#154
Rating: 0
what the other guys said...

i do appreciate your comments though guys. you often give me ideas to put into my netflix queue.

i've posted a few times in the 'expanding horizons' thread though...does that count?

 

Export to Wiki
#155
Rating: 0
Agreed Michael, I was disappointed too and agree with much of what you said. Coming off Casa de Los Babys I'd hoped for better, but this will make 2 Sayles films in a row I won't be buying on DVD.

I'm going to make an effort to be more active and post some reviews in the next couple of days. I just finished two work projects so hopefully I'll get a bit of a break. Besides, after all the hype and talk, a review of The Brown Bunny is pretty much an obligation.

2002 Sight & Sound Challenge: 318  Last Watched: Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles

Last 7 Films Watched: Sugar - B+ / Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone - B / The Lower Depths - B / Downhill Racer - B+ / Whatever Works - B / The Legend of Jimmy the Greek - B

Export to Wiki
#156
Rating: 0
After all the controversy surrounding The Brown Bunny i'm actually glad to see some positive reactions on the forum. I belong to that small group here that love Gallo's Buffalo '66. I look forward to a review Brook.

Top 10 Film Lists: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004
Film Lists: 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005
Export to Wiki
#157
Rating: 0
Quote:
I belong to that small group here that love Gallo's Buffalo '66.

Me too. My wife and I still talk about our plans to span the years together.

I'll be interested in your thoughts on Brown Bunny, Brook. We all have other demands on our attention; during the early summer, I barely posted here at all (three guesses what I was doing instead). But I happened to look at some of the threads from prior years, and I was startled to see how many more participants this thread used to have.

M.
Zoloft and Paxil and Buspar and Xanex, Depacon, Chronaphin, Ambien, Prozac,
Ativan calms me when I see the bills.
These are a few of my favorite pills.
(Next to Normal)              HTF Rules & Regs     My 2009 Film List
Win cool stuff: www.hometheaterforum.com/contest for details!
Export to Wiki
#158
Rating: 0
The thread is definitely being read based on the daily changes in the view count. As to the posting activity, you are right, Michael. I would like to see more activity on that side, as well. But the 2004 Film list thread has performed in the same fashion. There were a lot of posts in prior years but this year, it has trickled, as well.

~Edwin

DVD Unwind: Paradise Now (Coming) • King Kong - - • KeaneThe Squid And The WhaleA History Of ViolenceHarry Potter and the Goblet of FireThe Best Of Youth (Italy) • Good Night And Good LuckHowl\'s Moving CastleWalk The Line - - • ZathuraNorth Country

Export to Wiki
#159
Rating: 0
Yes, I'm reading -- I posted (relatively) recently, but it was about Before Sunset and it had it's own thread, so I posted there. BTW: Best American film of 2004 -- run, don't walk to see it!

Ted
Hold on tightly, let go lightly.
My Twitter page
Export to Wiki
#160
Rating: 0
Quote:
P.S. Is anyone besides Edwin, Jason and me still reading this thread?

Put me down as another reader and non-poster. My excuse is that I’ve not had quite as much chance to see some of these movies when the first appeared as I did last year, and consequently I have avoided writing something like, I agree with Edwin—or Michael—or Jason.

Also this year (for some reason) a lot of the smaller films seem to have developed their own threads—which is, I think a good thing.

But to show that I am not a complete slacker, I’ll post some comments on a film my wife and I saw this last weekend.
¡Time is not my master!
Export to Wiki
#161
Rating: 0
Quote:
Also this year (for some reason) a lot of the smaller films seem to have developed their own threads—which is, I think a good thing.

Yes and no. Those separate threads often show very little activity and quickly sink from view. The advantage of this annual thread is that it manages to stay in active view, even if just a few people post to it regularly.

I've gone back and forth on the approach but have finally decided that, if it's a limited-release film, I'm posting my comments here. One can always post links.

M.
Zoloft and Paxil and Buspar and Xanex, Depacon, Chronaphin, Ambien, Prozac,
Ativan calms me when I see the bills.
These are a few of my favorite pills.
(Next to Normal)              HTF Rules & Regs     My 2009 Film List
Win cool stuff: www.hometheaterforum.com/contest for details!
Export to Wiki
#162
Rating: 0
It is my job to keep smut out of England—and this is smut.



Says a customs official to Adam Symes the protagonist of Bright Young Things director and screenwriter Stephen Fry’s adaptation of the Evelyn Waugh novel, Vile Bodies. This scene, as the one copy of Symes’ novel for which he has already received an advance is confiscated servers as both a contrast to the never-ending party of the English upper classes between the wars and as a device to disallow Symes’ to marry his girlfriend, as he has not money nor his book.

The plot then follows the fortunes of Adam Symes as chance gives him money and he carelessly throws it away and as his romance ebbs and flows. All set in the frenetic social whirl, that he both chronicles and (with great humore0 embellishes and invents for the readers of a society gossip column that he is forced to write to make ends meet.

All the while he attends one party after another, each a bit more decadent than the one before—and each where a bit more champagne and cocaine consumed than the day before.

Along the way there is an incredible amount of humor as each scene and party is a bit funnier than the one before. Early on for example, the partier par excellance, Agatha (Fenella Woolgar) becomes inadvertently responsible for the forced resignation of the Prime Minister. She is also one of the many causalities of the lifestyle led but remains, to the end dedicated to good times as she manages to have a party even in an asylum.

Fry, in his first directorial effort manages the laughs very well indeed. But this would not be enough by itself to recommend the film. As one would expect from the source (Waugh), there is an edge and a price to be paid.

Both Waugh and Fry have great sympathy for their flawed characters—and the coming war allows at least two to redeem themselves.

Highly recommended for those who like period pieces. Or for those who want sorrow wrapped in a gaudy package.
¡Time is not my master!
Export to Wiki
#163
Rating: 0
Quote:
Coming off Casa de Los Babys I'd hoped for better

Not sure if I understood this in the proper context...Does this mean that you expected Silver City to be better because Casa De Los Babys was so good? Or because it wasn't and you were hoping to see Sayles rebound? I'm curious as Casa has been on my "to see" list for some time now...

Quote:
I belong to that small group here that love Gallo's Buffalo '66

As do I. I didn't think that group was actually that small. Not a widely seen movie, but well liked by those who saw from what I've heard. I mean, how can you fault a movie for using "Heart Of The Sunrise" by Yes?

Quote:
There were a lot of posts in prior years but this year, it has trickled, as well.

Speaking only for myself, I'd have to say it's because I just don't seem to make it to the first run showings of movies that much in theatres. Partially because I'm busier these days, but also because I'm willing to wait for most things to come out on DVD (except for films like Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind which I saw twice in the theatre...). I'm also ploughing through lots of older stuff having rediscovered the joys of renting (not to mention the Expanding Horizons and the S&S Greatest Films threads).

Regarding Before Sunset:

Quote:
Best American film of 2004 -- run, don't walk to see it!

Though I'd rank Eternal Sunshine slightly higher, that was a fabulous film. It almost never fails when I visit my local rental place that someone asks one of the staff (fortunately, a pretty knowledgeable staff) about "um, that movie they made a sequel of recently? The one where Ethan Hawke meets that European woman?". I swear Before Sunrise must be one of their most popular rentals.
Films Watched in 2008 , 2007 , 2006 , 2005
S&S List , HTF Top 20 Films
My Blog , My DVDs (horribly out of date)
Export to Wiki
#164
Rating: 0
I saw Silver City last week at a preview and thought it was a hit-and-miss, but ultimately effective parable about the dangers of corporate interests trumping political intergrity.

The movie could not have come at a more important time. The parallels to current events is obvious to anyone who has followed political news over the last several years.

I think the movie could have been better with some tighter editing but is still recommended for the curious.
My DVD Profiler Collection
Export to Wiki
#165
Rating: 0
The rebound thing. Casa has some nice character moments but the socio-political message is heavy-handed and seems to contradict itself. I never saw a trailer for Silver City, I just read the synopsis and it sounded in the Lone Star vein. I'll continue to see his films but it is disappointing to me that two of my favorite American filmmakers, Sayles and The Coen Bros., seem to be in creative tailspins.

I loved Buffalo '66 too. Not sure why I never bought it, I'd really like to see it again, especially after Brown Bunny.

2002 Sight & Sound Challenge: 318  Last Watched: Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles

Last 7 Films Watched: Sugar - B+ / Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone - B / The Lower Depths - B / Downhill Racer - B+ / Whatever Works - B / The Legend of Jimmy the Greek - B

Export to Wiki
#166
Rating: 0
The Five Obstructions

A cinema game conceived by Lars Von Trier. He issues a challenge to another Danish director, Jorgen Leth, to remake an 11 minute short film he had directed in 1967, The Perfect Human, 5 times. Each time Von Trier will give him "obstructions", or rules he must follow in remaking the film. We see how Leth reimagines his film to meet Von Trier's requirements and see Von Trier's reactions as he screens the films in this documentary cum trip to the psychologists couch.

The viewer is treated to a special experience inside the mind of an artist. The Five Obstructions shines brightest when we see Von Trier issue his instructions, experience Leth's often incredulous reactions to them, and then see Leth roll up his sleeves and get to work. Each challenge would seem to present enormous difficulties to a filmmaker (Obstructions include no shot longer than 10 frames and making an animated film when the director declares that he's never seen a cartoon that he liked) but Leth rises to meet them, cleverly creating new films and demonstrating to us that Von Trier's respect for this director is not misplaced.

A secondary source of entertainment is Von Trier's reaction to these films. He is alternately impressed, flustered, and angry that Leth is doing his best to circumvent Von Trier's wishes. What we find out about his intentions surely informs us more about Von Trier's psyche than it does Leth. Von Trier's wish is to bring out Leth's "Inner LVT" in a manner of speaking. He feels Leth's films are too clincal and Von Trier wants him to reveal the emotional fire burning within.

But this is part of the one problem I had with the film - we never learn very much about Jorgen Leth. We get almost no background information on his career or life. Of course this may be because it was a Danish TV project for an audience more familiar with Leth and may not have been originally conceived for worldwide distribution. Less excusable though, is that we never really find out why Leth consented to participate.

However, what will really drive one's reaction to the film is their feelings for Von Trier and the short films that make up much of the running time. Since I think Von Trier is the most challenging director working today and also thought that 4 of the 5 shorts plus the original were often amazing, I have very positive feelings about the film. But I could just as easily see someone not liking it for the same reasons. The original The Perfect Human short is resolutely late-60's art house and definitely not for a wide audience, but then neither is this film.

Still I give it a firm recommendation for its insight into the mind of one artist and for showcasing the talent of another who I had never heard of until this film. A-

2002 Sight & Sound Challenge: 318  Last Watched: Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles

Last 7 Films Watched: Sugar - B+ / Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone - B / The Lower Depths - B / Downhill Racer - B+ / Whatever Works - B / The Legend of Jimmy the Greek - B

Export to Wiki
#167
Rating: 0
Great review Brook—even though I have not seen The Five Obstructions. But now I want to.
¡Time is not my master!
Export to Wiki
#168
Rating: 0
Someone (I can't remember whether it was a critic or an HTF poster!) described The Five Obstructions as a Von Trier film for people who don't like Von Trier films. I like that description. (And, for the record, I like Von Trier films.)

Brook, do you think some of your desire to know more about Leth could have been satisfied if they'd shown the original Perfect Human in its entirety? I experienced a similar frustration, but it was focused on the film being remade. I think you're probably right that The Five Obstructions was made for an audience assumed to be at least somewhat familiar with Jorgen Leth. At the same time, I thought it was interesting how much of himself he revealed during the film.

One moment that particularly stuck with me is when he's making the 10-frame-per-shot version and declares, with a certain satisfaction, that the limitation is a "paper tiger" (I think that's how the subtitle read). Another is the bemused look on Leth's face when he returns from India and Von Trier accuses him of failing to honor the obstructions. The contrast between Leth's approach to filmmaking (and life) and Von Trier's is beautifully highlighted by such moments, which lead into the Oedipal drama that, for me, was the film's true subject.

M.
Zoloft and Paxil and Buspar and Xanex, Depacon, Chronaphin, Ambien, Prozac,
Ativan calms me when I see the bills.
These are a few of my favorite pills.
(Next to Normal)              HTF Rules & Regs     My 2009 Film List
Win cool stuff: www.hometheaterforum.com/contest for details!
Export to Wiki
#169
Rating: 0
Quote:
P.S. Is anyone besides Edwin, Jason and me still reading this thread?

For my part, I'm dealing with my girlfriend's recent move to the area, and her work schedule isn't conducive to moviegoing. I think Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow is the only film I (er, we) have seen theatrically in the last six weeks.

It doesn't help that Garden State and De-Lovely have enjoyed abnormally long runs at the local art theatres, one of which only has three screens.

He obviously misinterpreted what it means to "be bullish."
Export to Wiki
#170
Rating: 0
No, Michael, I don't think that it would have satisfied me simply by showing the entire original short (though I do hope that it is included on the DVD). While I would have liked to know a bit more about Leth's career, what I really wanted to know was why Leth agreed to put himself through Von Trier's game and what was the nature of their relationship. Reviews and articles on the film describe him as a "mentor" to Von Trier, but that isn't mentioned in the film. From the film all we get is that Lars has watched The Perfect Human over and over and that he is an "expert" on Jorgen Leth.

Perhaps Leth's reasons can be inferred from the film, but I would have liked to hear him speak for himself.

Yes Michael, when he used the "paper tiger" line, I knew he wasn't going to have much of a problem with anything Von Trier was going to throw at him. Seeing how these Obstructions really serve as sparks for his creativity is the most thrilling aspect of the film for me.

2002 Sight & Sound Challenge: 318  Last Watched: Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles

Last 7 Films Watched: Sugar - B+ / Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone - B / The Lower Depths - B / Downhill Racer - B+ / Whatever Works - B / The Legend of Jimmy the Greek - B

Export to Wiki
#171
Rating: 0
Inconsistent reader of the thread here. Just wanted to show my appreciation for the reviews. Maria Full of Grace might be my next one.
Export to Wiki
#172
Rating: 0
Time to catch up a little. Boutique stuff from this weekend:

Bright Young Things -

Sadly, Stephen Fry is in his mid-forties, and probably both too old to play a Bright Young Thing and too vital to play a character like Jim Broadbent's Drunken Major. Fortunatley, he's available to make his feature writing and directing debut.

In America, the "Gilded Age" is said to be roughly from 1890 to World War I; it seems like an appropriate description for the 1930s London depicted in the film. The title characters are attractive, titled if not actually monied, and at least speak well. Underneath, though, things aren't so pretty. Nina (Emily Mortimer) won't marry Adam (Stephen Campbell Moore) until he's solvent, but his first novel has been detained at customs. Like the rest, their existence seems to be a steady stream of travel, parties, drinking, cocaine (I do like the euphamism "naughty salt"), and not taking anything seriously. The only ones who appear to be gainfully employed are the ones who write gossip columns about the others for the entertainment of the masses.

What's really quite remarkable is the amount of affection Fry (working from the novel Vile Bodies by Evelyn Waugh) manages to get us to feel for these characters. They're shallow and near-complete libertines, but they're self-aware and capable of pathos when the real world finally catches up with them. The downside of this is that Fry never really goes in for the kill with the satire; even the song he penned for a visiting religious group ("Ain't No Flies on the Lamb of God") isn't as vicioulsy funny as it perhaps could be.

The plot is rather thin - it's got the form of a romantic comedy, as Adam tries to make secure his position with Nina, whose fickleness is one part shallowness and one part practicality, but the movie happily takes regular side trips. The end is a bit forced, both in terms of jumping forward in time and somewhat ham-fistedly using WWII as a means to make the characters take stock (although I gather the book did that too, quite a neat trick what with it being written in 1930 and all). Makes for a fine and fitting final scene, though.

I'm a fan of Fry - when I heard Bright Young Things was playing the Boston Film Festival, I joked that if I wangled an interview, it would quickly devolve into something like "The Chris Farley Show". He's extremely talented, as a comic actor and a writer in just about every medium he's tried (television, stage, print, radio, and film), and here shows potential as a screenwriter and director. His directorial debut is solid, and well worth a look.



Jesus, You Know - ¾

Ulrich Seidl's Jesus, Du Weisst isn't a very good movie. Its static cinematography and odd framing are off-putting, and for a documentary it certainly feels staged, if not outright rehearsed. It doesn't have a strong voice, and even at 87 minutes seems like a long sit. Even bad documentaries, however, are useful in terms of provoking discussion.

Jesus, Du Weisst sets up cameras in the churches of six devout Austrian Catholics and films them as they pray aloud. The aesthetics of this are peculiar; you mostly wind up seeing these people along in a large cathedral, looking directly into the camera, as if they were praying to the audience. Perhaps even more creepy are the cutaways to the worshippers' actual lives, which are silent and on occasion quite peculiar.

I wondered if perhaps Seidl's point was that people who spend a lot of time talking to God don't talk to each other; it's especially telling with a young couple who pray seperately, telling Jesus about the problems in their relationship, but are mute in their scenes together. As they play ping-pong in the church's rec room, there's a huge crucifix between them.

Other subjects are somewhat disturbing, such as a teenager who is considered strange by his family for attending Mass every evening and who seems to have channeled so much of his energy into his faith that he's completely unable to handle the new emotions puberty is injecting into his mind. Others are just sad, such as the middle-aged church caretaker who worries for her husband, a Pakistani Muslim who recently suffered a stroke.

There is potentially interesting subject matter here - though an introduction suggests that the film was conceived to illustrate how prayer strengthens people, the picture that emerges is one of isolation and sometimes greater despair. I can't imagine that the churches would have given Seidl as much access as they did if that was his original plan, and he may not have been prepared to deal with that.

The counter-argument to that, though, is that this is a deadly dull film to watch. The camera never moves, and the composition is both very static and odd. Ever church and worshipper is shot the same way with the differences being how far off-center they are, with what seems like a lot of space at the top of the frame emphasizing the emptiness of the church behind them. On top of that, the movie looks artificial; the subjects seem to be wearing the same clothes each time they come in to pray, and there's something off about staging. One person in the discussion group noted that though the couple stood at a ping-pong table and hit the ball back and forth, they didn't seem to be playing, in terms of trying to get the ball past the other player. Similarly, some of the shots of people walking into the church looked subtly wrong, as if the person was more worried about getting every step right than they would be without a camera there.

I enjoyed the discussion with the other Brattle/Clotrudis members afterward, far more than the movie itself; I freely admit that a fair amount of what's written above would have been absent without it. But if you're not going to talk it over with somebody afterward, I can't see any reason to watch this.
Jay's Movie Blog - A movie-viewing diary.
Transplanted Life: Sci-fi soap opera about a man placed in a new body, updated two or three times a week.
Trading Post Inn - Another gender-bending soap, with different collaborators writing different points of view.

"What? Since when was this an energy ball...
Export to Wiki
#173
Rating: 0
First weekend of the Boston Film Festival:

Primer - ¾

Usually, I'm annoyed by comments that you need to watch a movie more than once to really get it. There are other movies to see, and if it's only playing one night of a film festival, well... Still, there's irony to using that claim to describe Primer as it moves from geek infighting to the science-fictional.

It's low-budget science fiction, without anything in the way of special effects, but compensates by paying a little more attention to science and story. As the movie opens, Aaron and Abe are sharing a garage lab with two other techies, trying to supplant their income by making tools for hackers and trying to build the revolutionary, patentable technology that will free them from their boring, unrewarding jobs. Writer/director/star Shane Carruth has a math and science background, and the tech-speak is authentic. Rest assured, though, that when the breakthrough finally comes, it is explained in meticulous detail.

This lends a certain reality to the procedings. Most movies that screw with spacetime use a certain amount of handwaving; the detail Carruth supplies puts clear limits on what the magic tech can do. Also, the characters' less than ambitious use of their new invention fits the characterization; they're too paranoid to use their newfound power to try and rule the world!

You've got to like your sci-fi a lot to get into this, though. No flashy visual effects, lots of jargon, spoken by first-time actors. The film itself is shot an Super-16 and blown up to 35mm, and mostly looks OK, although some scenes (especially night scenes) are extremely grainy. In a couple places it's probably deliberate, but it's often distracting. In his after-film Q&A, Carruth gave the usual responses about how it's the conflict of the characters that's really important, and he does pretty well there. The characters don't change all that much, but they've got a good, creepy paranoia to work with.

This is very much a niche film, and art-house sci-fi is a pretty small niche. If it's one you're into, then Primer has something to offer.



The Almost Guys -

Writer/director/star Eric Fleming admitted that this isn't necessarily the sort of film one associates with a film festival. It's a deliberate throwback to the 1970s, the sort of laid-back road caper that Burt Reynolds was once known for. The result, like its main character, is scruffy but likable.

Rick (Fleming) is a repo man, behind on his child support, prone to getting beat up and parntered with "The Colonel", a 73-year-old repo vet played by Robert Culp. Rick's already been smacked around twice, once by a tough called "The Monk" (Tae-joon Lee) and once by his ex-wife's new boyfriend, when he and The Colonel find something extra in the latest car they repo - big-league pitcher Jim Anderson (James Edson) tied up in the trunk, whom the car's owners intended to ransom in the days leading up to the World Series.

So, they should be heroes, right? Well, the pitcher was in on it, or was until his partners changed the plan, and the kidnappers are making threats, so Rick collects his son Buddy (Oliver Davis) and heads out with Buddy, the Colonel, and the pitcher to try to stay out of trouble and maybe see if they can't make the plan work for them. They wind up joined by Jim's first ex-wife, "Bigger" (Shawnee Smith).

The charm of this movie is that while Rick and The Colonel basically steal things for a living, they're actually not very good at crime. Jim gets beat up, the Colonel suffers the indignities of age (including a small bladder, the tendency to nap, and hands that really shake too much to hold a gun), and even the Italian kidnappers are a little outraged at how too many Americans carry guns. Bigger and Buddy tend to be the smartest and most level-headed of the group, and considering that Buddy is nine and Bigger's friendly with the blonde stereotypes even if she doesn't embrace them... Well, things go amusingly wrong.

Fleming does a good job with his feature debut - he's mostly worked at developing television since getting buzz with a 1997 short. He's got a good cast to work with (and said during the Q&A that he was quite frankly amazed at the people who expressed interest in Robert Culp's part), and finds humor in just about every corner, from slapstick to dialogue to subtitles. He actively avoids coolness, making his characters believable people who screw up in believable ways, but also grow to like each other.

It's a fun little movie, worth a look if it gets distribution.



Easy - ¾

Marguerite Moreau is kind of adorable in Easy, even as her character blunders along in her love life, leaping to conclusions about the men in her life that make her feel foolish even when she's correct. I liked her Jamie Harris, even as I was occasionally aggravated by the situations writer/director Jane Weinstock put her in.

Part of the problem is that this movie takes what Roger Ebert calls the Law of Conservation of Characters to an extreme. Jamie appears to know approximately seven or eight people (including family) in this movie, and once the movie is past its midpoint, the only way a new person is going to be introduced is if another character gives birth. So when Jamie's life takes on the characteristics of a soap opera, it's among a group of characters so tight-knit that it almost feels incestuous. I was shocked that D.B. Woodside's character (a chiropractor who lives next door to Jamie) didn't get sucked in. I mean, it would have made more sense than some of the other inevitable pairings. Maybe they could have done something with him and the woman whose suicide Jamie prevents early on, as she disappears soon afterward.

The group is so constrained that I really noticed that Jamie has one of those jobs - a "namer" - that exists in real life but whose function in the movie seems to be that it lets her work from home and somewhat insulate herself from the world at large, which may contain practical people. Note that her first boyfriend, played by Naveen Andrews, also has one of those jobs, being a "poet". It also means that Jamie can wind up in more awkward situations than is really credible.

Which is too bad; I like Jamie and some of her supporting cast. I know she's meant to be something of a screw-up, but she seems to be the one his is dumped on more often than not, and aside from being pretty, she's big-hearted and funny. Of course, I sometimes had to remind myself that Moreau is playing an adult rather than the teenager that actresses with her looks often play, but that's on Hollywood, not her. I liked her sister, played by Emily Deschanel, although I thought potential boyfriend #2 (Brian F. O'Byrne) did seem a little bland for someone who was supposed to be a professional funnyman.

It's too bad that one pretty damn good performance can only take a movie so far. Ms. Moreau makes Easy worth watching, and her worth watching out for, but can't raise the movie as a whole out of mediocrity.
Jay's Movie Blog - A movie-viewing diary.
Transplanted Life: Sci-fi soap opera about a man placed in a new body, updated two or three times a week.
Trading Post Inn - Another gender-bending soap, with different collaborators writing different points of view.

"What? Since when was this an energy ball...
Export to Wiki
#174
Rating: 0
Second weekend of the Boston Film Festival, Part I:

Dead & Breakfast - ½

Dead & Breakfast takes the form of a horror movie but is not actually scary at any point. It's a comedy that involves evil spirits and attacking corpses, and manages a few good gags, but co-writer/director Matthew Leutwyler hews too closely to the horror handbook and the end result is a movie that doesn't cross genre lines but instead straddles them uncomfortably.

The movie starts out with our six young folks getting lost on their way somewhere, in this case a wedding. The characters don't really need names, since their types are so familiar. Among the girls, Sara (Ever Carradine) is The Tomboy, identifiable by her jeans, sneakers, and ingenuity when the violence starts; Kate (Bianca Lawson) is The Bitch, notable for her nice shoes, angry look, and tendency to make snippy remarks to her boyfriend mid-crisis; and Melody (Gina Philips) is The Screamer, the sweet, girly vegan who has a hard time with hurting anything, even zombies. Meanwhile, among the guys, David (Erik Palladino) is the Meathead who gets gung-ho about killin' some zombies (and would be obnoxious except that he's The Bitch's boyfriend and has to deal with her); Christian (Jeremy Sisto) is The Wiseass who is somewhat detached (heh) from all that's going on; and Johnny (Oz Perkins) is The Weirdo, who in a more postmodern movie would be a walking encyclopedia of horror clichés but here just acts a little squirrelly.

Because Johnny is a weirdo, they get lost, and wind up staying at a bed and breakfast in Nowhere, Texas. The proprieter is David Carradine, and there's a weird French chef named Henri (Diedrich Bader) there, too. And, soon, a couple of dead bodies that prevent anybody from leaving town while the Sheriff (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) completes his investigation, focusing mainly on a drifter (Brent David Fraser).

So, there's the horror set-up. It's not going to work as a horror movie, though, because Leutwyler is so matter-of-fact about it. He and his co-writers don't seem to realize that dead bodies with blood all over the place are familiar sights in slasher movies, but not to the characters in slasher movies. So when you've got them acting like it's some sort of minor inconvenience, you lose credibility. This movie tries to fill the space with comedy, including frequently funny musical interludes, and does an okay job with it, although only a few moments achieve "that's sick and I'm laughing anyway". The evil spirits are also a sort of generic evil; they're coming to kill the living, but only because the structure of the movie demands it.

This is a pretty nice cast, though. Gina Philips and Ever Carradine are likable heroines who deserve shots at higher-profile gigs, and Erik Palladino makes a character who is more than a bit of a jackass into someone who's fun to watch just from his enthusiasm and belligerance toward the undead. The real standout, though, is Oz Perkins, son of Anthony Perkins but struck me more as a young Jeffrey Combs. That lineage probably gives you an idea of who the crazy head zombie is, but he works it, eating large chunks of scenery and giving the only performance that really transcends the movie making little sense.

Leutwyler gives an obvious shout-out to Sam Raimi's Evil Dead movies at one point, but he's no Sam Raimi; he doesn't have the knack for moving the audience from one mood to another smoothly and he never chooses one mood and sticks with it. He's also got no skill wit blood & guts other than to say "hey, look - blood & guts!" That makes for a movie with good parts, but not much else.



Man Dancin' - ½

The Glasgow of Man Dancin' is a depressing place; as Jimmy Kerrigan (Alex Ferns) returns there after a nine year prison term in Northern Ireland, the city seems rotted, hollow, and dirty. There are large industrial structures with no sign of activity, and when he walks into a tavern, even the blind guy recognizes him immediately. Nothing, one gets the sense, has changed, and it's no wonder Jimmy wants to serve out his parole and then maybe emigrate to a warmer, more prosperous place.

The interesting thing about this story is that while Jimmy found God in prison, it's initially a private faith. Jimmy just wants to look after his brother (who has become a junkie in the ensuing decade), visit his bedridden mother in the nursing home, find work and save some money. However, the priest (Tom Georgeson) who was supposed to be placing Jimmy in an anger management class notices that Jimmy did drama in prison (it was that or basket-weaving) and instead elects to cast the ex-con in the church's passion play. All well and good, except that Jimmy's mother always asks him to read to her, and this one day there's naught but a bible, and Jimmy gets a rather different impression of Jesus than the one being portrayed in the play.

In the Q&A afterward, director Norman Stone made no bones about the debt this movie owes to Jesus of Montreal; though I haven't seen that film, the premises are basically the same - people putting on a passion play find their lives paralleling the last days of Christ's. Some may find it to be a bit of a stretch to offer a former gunrunner as a Christ figure, but I think that oversimplifies Jimmy. His message isn't primarily religious, but more down to earth - he connects with the rabble-rousing Jesus, the one who had scorn for tax collectors and tyrants, and his oratory focuses more on taking control of one's life than putting one's faith in God, which doesn't go over so well with the gangsters Jimmy used to work for.

I liked it, though. Though the structure of this film comes from a religious source, the story isn't limited to any particular faith. It is, basically, about a guy who wants to make the world, or at least his corner of it, a better place, inspires others to do so, and collides with the forces who profit from misery. Jimmy's not perfect, but he does his best.

A big part of why we like Jimmy is the actor playing him, Alex Ferns. Not (yet) well-known in the United States, Alex spent a couple years as a popular villain on the long-running soap EastEnders, and makes use of his boxer's physique well here. Even if he has put his past behind him, he still looks like a thug, and one wonders if his newfound passion will fly out of control.

Ferns is ably supported by the rest of the cast, including Cas Harkins as Jimmy's brother Terry, Tam White as "Johnny Bus-Stop", a one-time pop star now old, blind, and playing on corners for beer money, and Kenneth Cranham as the corrupt detective on the payroll of gangster Donnie McGlone (James Cosmo). Making the cop and the gangster physically similar is a clever (if intentional) move. The Mary Magdalene surrogate is played by Jenny Foulds with pretty-but-grimy attitude.

While talking with the festival audience, the director made some unnecessary apologies for how Scottish folks talk and his worries that Americans wouldn't understand the dialogue, referencing the annoying subtitles on Ken Loach's Sweet Sixteen, and the remnants of a subplot that had a great deal removed in the editing stage involving the dead sister of one of Jimmy's old mates. Mr. Stone implied that he may just excise it altogether by the time the movie is released on DVD in the US. I hope that's not the case; it makes sense if you're paying attention and gives depth to a supporting character. I can see where those might be a problem for those who sort of half-watch

So far, I do't know if Man Dancin' has a US distributor, and it likely won't see a theatrical release anyway - Stone claimed it would just be a vanity release and he feels an obligation to the folks who funded the movie. It's worth a look when it arrives on video, if you happen to spot a copy squeezed between bigger releases.



King of the Corner - ½

I hate to bag on Peter Riegart and his film, since unlike many festival guests, he introduced and did Q&A for all four screenings and even seemed somewhat familiar with the area, discussing which theaters his film might get a chance to play in. But let's face it; movies like this are among the main reasons people say they hate independant film.

I'm all for building a movie primarily based on characters, but I've also got a preference for stories that aren't quite so grounded in everyday experience that I stand a good chance of hearing a version with different names by simply asking my next-door neighbors what was going on with their lives. I can get that for free, any time.

What makes it more irritating is that the protagonist (Riegert) is a complete ingrate. The problems his Leo Spivak has probably sound pretty appealling to the audience. Like his obnoxious father Sol (Eli Wallach) in an Arizona retirement community; sure, it's far away, but it's where papa chose to be and, hey, you can afford to fly cross-country from New York and visit him every other weekend. Or his "out of control" only child Elena (Ashley Johnson), who is pretty, unpiereced, doing homework practically every time we see her and on the one time she and her boyfriend are out past curfew, suggests grounding her for two weeks as a reasonable response. Oh, and he's married to Isabella Rosselini. Any woes he may have, he brings upon himself, generally in ways that really defy logical explanation.

And I realize that that's sort of the point, that like most of the audience for this film, Leo has a pretty good life but allows his daily aggravations to skew his perspective, and it takes blah blah blah. What it takes is ninety minutes of watching Leo bitch and moan and generally act like a jerk, and then there's the anecdote from which the title is drawn, and then I guess we're supposed to mist up.

Most descriptions I've seen for this movie involve the word "comedy" somewhere, and I can see where it makes an earnest attempt or two, but it just doesn't happen. Characters who are supposed to be idiosyncratic just come off as strange. There's also one intensely annoying scene in the nursing home about two-thirds of the way through the movie, which I think is going for "darkly comic" but fails in part because the back-and-forth banter mores at too slow a pace and in part because I have real trouble imagining the scene the two characters describe visually. I'm not sure how much of this falls on writer/director/star Riegert and how much comes from the source material (a collection of short stories by Gerald Shapiro), but does it matter?

Pretty much every minute of King of the Corner feels banal or unlikely, and the "unlikely" is seldom entertainingly unlikely.
Jay's Movie Blog - A movie-viewing diary.
Transplanted Life: Sci-fi soap opera about a man placed in a new body, updated two or three times a week.
Trading Post Inn - Another gender-bending soap, with different collaborators writing different points of view.

"What? Since when was this an energy ball...
Export to Wiki
#175
Rating: 0
Second Week of the Boston Film Festival, Part II:

The Boys From County Clare - ¾

The Boys From County Clare is kind of a topsy-turvy movie, with the familiar character actors in the lead and the good-looking romantic pairing in supporting roles. If Miramax picks up the rights, you can almost guarantee a cover that focuses on Andrea Corr and Shaun Evans with Bernard Hill and Colm Meaney nowhere in sight.

Hill and Meaney play brothers, John Joe and Jim, who learned to play the fiddle at their father's knee and now, forty years later, have only their passion for traditional Irish Ceili music in common. John Joe (Hill) is a lifelong bachelor, still working their father's old farm in County Clare; his band has won the top prize at Ireland's largest folk festival two years running. He and Jim (Meaney) haven't talked for twenty-four years, during which time Jim has married five times while becoming a millionaire builder in Liverpool, but now he's put together a ceili band of his own and aims to win the trophy himself. John Joe's band includes Anne, a supremely talented (and beautiful) fiddler played by musician Andrea Corr; Jim's includes Teddy, a shy fellow played by newcomer Shaun Evans.

Anne's mother Maisie (Charlotte Bradley) is also in John Joe's band, and this fact should allow even folks who have never seen a movie before to figure out how this one goes; the family feud isn't just about who has possession of their father's fiddle. The conclusion, especially, is telegraphed early and often. Still, the screenplay works around its difficulty in deciding just what it wants to be (I nearly shamed myself by using the sniglet "dramedy" to describe this movie, but that's a rant for another day), and director John Irvin keeps the melodrama around Anne and Maisie seldom clashes jarringly with the occasionally-cartoonish parts of the brothers' musical rivalry and Jim's band of oddballs.

I should probably say something about the music, but beyond knowing that Andrea Corr does this stuff for a living (as part of The Corrs), I know pretty much nothing about Irish music. In particular, all the ceili numbers sounded alike to me, although there's enough dialogue about the finer details and scenes the focus on performance almost exclusively to suggest that writer Nicholas Adams knows his stuff. Of course, John Joe and Jim might have been selecting identical songs as a way to show that they're still connected no matter how much they don't get along.

The cast is good, individually, and plays well off each other, although I question casting Hill and Meaney as brothers. They really don't look a bit alike, their accents don't match, and the apparent age difference between the characters in the "present" (circa 1968) belies how close in age they are in the flashback to 1926 that opens the movie. Hill gets the more reserved, affable part, while Meaney's blustering, obnoxious Jim is more likely to stick in the audience's memory (he gets the last word, with gusto). Corr and Evans likably play likable young people; Evans gets and "Introducing" credit while Ms. Corr gets billed before the title along with Meaney & Hill, so I gather someone sees them as being movie stars, though it's tough to tell from these supporting roles.

The Boys From County Clare is a good little movie. I went because I couldn't remember ever seeing Colm Meaney in a lead role before (though he's probably had more character roles than all the other supporting actors on every Star Trek series combined) and found myself at least enjoying the funny bits, even if two vomit-related gags is at least one too many. The serious bits are a bit iffier, especially around the Anne/Teddy/Maisie resolution, but not enough to seriously detract from the film.



Kontroll - ½

My first impression of Kontroll was that it was the work of a sort of Hungarian Danny Boyle, although the specific movie it reminds me of most is Doug Liman's Go. That's pretty good company to be in; Nimród Antal's movie is a fast-paced, occasionally dark comedy with a driving soundtrack, populated by young characters living on the fringes.

The film centers around a group of ticket inspectors in the Budapast subway; apparently, instead of having turnstiles, passengers just walk right in, and it's up to the inspectors to make sure that the people on the train have actually paid. It is not, as one may imagine, a job which confers much respect or pay, and attracts the peculiar.

The group that the audience follows is nominally led by "The Professor", a sad-faced middle-aged man resigned to this as his lot in life; it also includes Tibi the new guy, Lescó the narcoleptic, Muki the belligerant guy, and Bulscú (Sándor Csányi). Bulscú never actually leaves the Metro, sleeping in the stations during his off-hours and making friends with one of the drivers, Béla.

As humdrum as the inspectors' jobs sound, it's frequently peculiar or downright surreal. There's a stupid workplace rivalry with one Gonzó (who is favored by the bosses) and his group that leads to a potentially fatal rail running race. There are weird customers, such as the one who brings his unmuzzled dog on the train, or the pimp and his "clients" who tries to pay via barter. One passenger who captivates Bulscú is a pretty girl (Eszter Balla) riding the subway dressed in a big teddy-bear costume. There's a vandal called "Bootsie" whose ass, the team feels, desperately needs kicking. On a more disturbing note, the number of suicides committed by people jumping into that path of an oncoming train is on the rise, and the audience can see that they're not suicides at all.

Kontroll has a lot of balls in the air, but Antal has the knack for moving quickly and for prioritizing. It's clear early on that the movie is Bulscú's story, and while the other characters are entertaining and undoubtably have stories of their own, the movie never becomes an ensemble piece. There's only one or two scenes that seem to go on too long, and not by much, and the director knows that a little obvious foreshadowing can go a long way. There are also a few exciting (and funny) chase scenes, full of pushing and shoving in crowded tunnels. When violence happens, it happens with shocking suddenness.

Full disclosure - I didn't immediately "get" one of the more surreal sequences; one of the disadvantages of the festival experience is that by the fourth movie of the day, your mind might not be totally sharp, especially if you're shuttling between two theaters and subsisting on a popcorn diet. I get pretty literal-minded at that point, although the metaphor of the tunnel to the hidden part of the subway system (Bulscú's entire world) should be fairly obvious to most.

Hungary doesn't seem to produce a lot of movies, or at least not a lot that make it to the United States, and don't know what sort of thriving film industry the country has. I'm guessing a somewhat conservative one from the disclaimer at the front, making sure we understand that Kontroll doesn't accurately reflect the employees of the Budapest Metro but that they chose to allow filming anyway to support the filmmaker's art (which struck me as simultaneously progressive and quaint). So a film like Kontroll is a pleasant surprise, filled with actors free of baggage from previous roles and feeling rather polished despite its grimy setting.



Duane Incarnate - ¼

As I started watching Hal Salwen's Duane Incarnate, I got a little worried. The narrated montage that opens the movie seemed rather mean-spirited, as narrator Gwen (Caroleen Feeney) described her three best friends, Fran (Kristen Johnston), Connie (Cynthia Watros), and Wanda (Crystal Bock). Gwen, Fran, and Connie are all beautiful, successful women with great boyfriends, while Wanda... Well, she falls short in every category. Fortunately, while the movie is mean-spirited, it sets its targets on the right people.

Because, see, the pretty girls can't cope when Wanda gets a new boyfriend, Duane (Peter Hermann), who is apparently everything a girl could want. He's handsome, sensitive, incredibly intelligent, gregarious, a good dancer, has a great job, and is skilled and considerate in bed. He can, it seems, do a lot better than Wanda, and he makes the other girls' boyfriends look bad.

Understand - even as the audience feels vaguely disgusted by how Gwen and company patronize Wanda, they understand it. Wanda is plain-looking, out of work, and even if she is smart, she doesn't articulate herself well; she also has a sort of annoying voice. There is a sort of cruelty to her relationship with the others, as if they keep her around in order to feel better about themselves, while she puts up with their patronizing comments and actions because, hey, at least she's hanging with the cool crowd. Very high school, when you think about it.

Of course, I might also sort of looking down at these characters because we don't really get to see grown women as comic leads that often and aren't used to it. Mean Girls and the slapstick comedies on Nickelodeon or the Disney Channel show teenage girls acting silly, but once they're old enough to vote, it seems women in comedies are either objects of men's desires, the sane wife/girlfriend who reels the stupid man in, or a comic character with little screen time. Duane Incarnate is somewhat unusual in that it gives the women almost all of the jokes.

The movie's world reminded me a bit of Just A Kiss, in that it seemed to recognizably be our world, although the characters sort of push the envelope of believable behavior. The characters are aware of that, though, as they see the events of the story as an anomoly, nay, a danger to an orderly and comprehensible universe. Writer/director Salwen is good at convincing the audience to go along with it, though, especially with the introduction of Sheena (Amber Cather), a potential rival to Wanda who seems as unlikely a creation as Duane himself.

The movie's most recognizable cast members, Johnston and Watros, have a sitcom background, while most of the rest are (I assume) New York stage actors. Given the off-kilter style of the movie, though, this acting style actually works better than I think the usual (for film) naturalistic approach; it heightens the unreality of the situation. The movie looks good, and appears to use the independent "we'll use what locations we can get" situation to its advantage ("a bowling alley will let us shoot there if we thank them in the credits? Well, heck, this is an opportunity to show that Wanda's not good at anything").

Duane Incarnate is a quirky, off-kilter thing. I like this brand of comedy when it's done well, which isn't that often: It's hard to create a sort of exaggerated environment without going too far and leaving the audience without context. This movie is occasionally shaky, but mostly manages the trick.
Jay's Movie Blog - A movie-viewing diary.
Transplanted Life: Sci-fi soap opera about a man placed in a new body, updated two or three times a week.
Trading Post Inn - Another gender-bending soap, with different collaborators writing different points of view.

"What? Since when was this an energy ball...
Export to Wiki
#176
Rating: 0
The Brown Bunny

The Brown Bunny is the story of Bud Clay, a motorcycle racer with a damaged soul. After his latest race he has to drive across country to the next race in Los Angeles. But he remains haunted by the memory of his love, Daisy, who he has not seen in sometime. Terribly lonely, he reaches out to other women, but he ultimately can't connect with them. Bud continues his journey as places and things wash over him. This may be a wound that time alone cannot heal. We must reach the end of the line with Bud, to find out what is inside of him.

Vincent Gallo gives a completely open, soul-baring performance that left me stunned. While it may seem gross exaggeration, I am serious when I say that The Brown Bunny could be this generation's Last Tango In Paris. Gallo gives us Bud Clay as a sexual and emotional open book. A man crippled by his own inadequacies and fear. He has been emasculated; his feelings and love so twisted and betrayed, not only by his lover, but by his own failure that, to paraphrase Travis Bickle, "All the kings men can not put Bud back together again".

In placing this character within the road movie genre, the characters loneliness is reinforced. He is isolated within a private world while life carries on outside the doors of his van. Alone with himself, he is forced into the sort of self-examination he desperately is seeking to avoid. The way the journey is filmed, it forces the audience into contemplation as well, something many audience members obviously found trying, but is of critical essence in getting us to understand and empathize with Bud's state of mind.

We are stuck with Bud in his circle of Hell. Whether it be the unbroken rings of the motorcycle track or his struggling effort to find some comfort from Daisy's family, who doesn't even remember him in a tragicomic scene that would be laugh-out-loud hilarious if it wasn't so sad. Bud's trip to the Salt Flats, where he gets on his bike and rides until he disappears from our view, evokes the same sort of personality disintegration that Ingmar Bergman explored in his "Island" trilogy.

What to make of the now infamous blowjob scene? Heartless exploitation by an egocentric director? Hardly, for the scene is integral to our understanding of Bud. Carrying the Last Tango analogy further, this is the "get the butter scene. The sexual aspects at the core of Bud's damaged personality provide us with incredibly revealing insight to the nature of his character and his attraction to and relationship with Daisy.

This is the kind of searing character portrait that made the early 70's such a thrilling time in American film, but which we see all too little of these days. Like Gallo's previous work Buffalo 66, this too is one of the best films of the year.

2002 Sight & Sound Challenge: 318  Last Watched: Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles

Last 7 Films Watched: Sugar - B+ / Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone - B / The Lower Depths - B / Downhill Racer - B+ / Whatever Works - B / The Legend of Jimmy the Greek - B

Export to Wiki
#177
Rating: 0
I share most of Jason's thoughts on Code 46. Shots are carefully and craftfully composed, and the soundtrack (with the exception of the dubious Coldplay track and reference to the track to close the film) creates a wonderful ambience.

The world that has been created for the film is fascinating; the story of William and Maria that unfolds before our eyes in that world isn't. I can't do better than "icky" to describe my feelings about them as the film progresses. The second sex scene, in particular, is uncomfortable for a number of reasons.

It really is a shame that such an aesthetically pleasing film with such promise in the details is saddled with such a clunky main storyline. I'm willing to take the good with the bad when it comes to Code 46, however, and I think it balances out.

He obviously misinterpreted what it means to "be bullish."
Export to Wiki
#178
Rating: 0
Looks like the NY/LA people have a chance to see my favorite film from last year, The Yes Men this week(actually it opened last weekend). Doesn't look like they have a wider released planned, so most everyone will have to wait/hope for the DVD. Anywho, if you are in the mood for a very funny documentary about some pranksters on a crusade to draw awareness towards the danger(in their minds anyway) of Globalization, please check it out. The filmmakers are the same team that brought us American Movie: The Making of Northwestern, and once again they find subjects ambitious and driven enough to make some progress, and crazy enough to be immensely entertaining.

My:Hardware LDs DVDs

Export to Wiki
#179
Rating: 0
I've been reading the thread, off and on, all year (as I have the S&S and 30's threads). My work chedule and computer woes have kept me from contributing, but I've enjoyed reading the comments and commend y'all for keeping foreign/independents active. I confess I get a bit weary of all the threads on the current blcckbusters - the typical cineplex fodder doesn't usually do much for me.

I'm happy to see affection expressed for Bright Young Things, a film I enjoyed very much. I hope Frye continues to write and direct, although I'm quite fond of his on-screen performances.

I liked Code 46 quite a bit - apparently a lot more than Jason or David. I thought Robbins & Morton generated real chemistry and found the sexual obsession quite believable. If I get time, I'll have more to say on Code 46.

It's off to Mean Creek tomorrow. Tonight I'm playing with my new Criterion Ozu/Floating Weeds set.
Export to Wiki
#180
Rating: 0
Count me as another non-posting reader of this terrific thread. With my current professional and personal committments, making it to a theater is (sadly) an extraordinarily rare event.

I fully expect to be writing about these films in the "Expanding Horizons" thread 6-12 months from now.
Export to Wiki